The Truth Is Out There

Archive for April, 2013

Aside

Take a stand


People Take A Stand

Across this nation, gun stores are virtually empty. There is simply no ammunition to be had. Backorders are running into the late fall or next year, or maybe never. Gun sales are higher than at any time in history: more than one million in one month. And first-time gun buyers are exercising their right to keep and bear arms in unprecedented numbers.

All of this adds up to a massive civil rights protest the likes of which America has not seen before.

It is political spontaneous combustion. And I guarantee what we are seeing at the cash box will be repeated at the ballot box in 2014 if Congress votes for any gun control.

In all.my years, I have never seen a mass protest of this magnitude. As Americans learn more about the threat to their rights and freedom, it will continue to grow.

Politicians had better wake up to what it means for them in every corner of the nation. The men and women exercising freedom in this consumer-driven protest cross every personal political boundary and represent every walk of life.

And, yes, they are motivated by a palpable and very well-founded fear of what President Barack Obama’s government and the likes of New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein and self-appointed gun-ban nanny, New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, have in store for free, peaceable Americans.

Feinstein has introduced a presumptive ban on virtually all semi-auto rifles and shotguns with detachable magazines.

The New York law passed and pushed by Gov. Cuomo is worse. The news media called Cuomo’s massive ban “a good first step.” That’s what they will say about his next step. “Confiscation is not off the table,” he bragged.

Bloomberg is bankrolling huge propaganda efforts to convince American^ that he loves the Second Amendment while disarming law-abiding Citizens across the nation. Even Bloomberg admits none of these laws would have prevented the massacre at Sandy Hook because, “there are too many guns.” He says he doesn’t want guns in schools carried by cops or trained guards. He doesn’t even want NYPD police to take their guns home.

And Barack Obama is the worst. His administration promised “revenge” and he is delivering it—for starters in the form of 23 “executive” sneak attacks on our freedom-actions he claims have the force of laws. Orders so bad, they would never clear any Congress.

This is what is driving the consumer civil rights protest.

But it’s not just consumers who are voting economics. Every year in Harrisburg, Pa., more than 200,000 people attend the Eastern Sports and Outdoor Show. This year, the event organizer (owned by a British company) announced it would ban semi-auto rifles, saying the presence of such products “would distract from the theme of hunting and fishing, disrupting the broader experience of our guests.”

That statement is straight out of the gun-ban playbook-you know the lie; these guns have nothing to do with “legitimate sportsmen.”

As a result of the exhibition ban, following the. lead of giant retailer Cabela’s, a diverse group of vendors began pulling out by the hundreds and the show was shut down. The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette called it “an act of pro-gun solidarity…. The ban triggered a revolt among the show’s gun exhibitors that grew to a boycott by vendors and sponsors, including hundreds of companies, many of which do not sell guns.”

Nothing like this has ever happened before. These companies are putting their financial future on the line. They lost millions—and they did it for the principle of the Second Amendment.

The next time you hear someone in the media say “sportsmen” don’t care about semi-autos, tell them about Harrisburg. Every politician in America ought to understand what happened and contrary to media reports, it was not led by the NRA.

It was a spontaneous combustion reaction to Barack Obama’s obsession with erasing our very culture of peaceable gun ownership.

The NRA didn’t empty the gun stores. The NRA  didn’t close down the sports show gun-banners. You did it. Your friends and neighbors did it. In a time of harsh economic hardship, millions of ordinary Americans are speaking with their pocketbooks. And they are hammering the Congress as never before.

A member of Congress recently implored Mr. LaPierre of the NRA to “turn it off.”   Mr. LaPierre responded by telling him that the, “NRA didn’t turn it on. Barack Obama turned it on.” His “revenge” turned it on.

Mr. LaPierre then told him, “Only you have the power to turn it off and you do that by simply saying and voting ‘No’ to any gun control scheme.”

We have the greatest solidarity in the history of the defense of the Second Amendment. Each of us needs to do our part. We need to let Congress know, repeatedly, that our freedom, and their tenure, is on the line.

The Save One Life LIE


The Administration’s “Save One Life” Lie

A favorite saying of both President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden is that more gun control laws must be instituted because “even if just one life was saved, it would be worth it.”
 

This statement is not only, disingenuous (Biden has even said he knows such laws won’t stop mass slayings or reduce crime), but also dangerous—to you, to me, to our children and to our grandchildren.

When it comes to “saving one life,” what about those lives saved by legal firearm ownership? Shouldn’t those lives, which you seldom hear about in the so-called “mainstream” media, also be important to those in charge in Washington, d.C.?

Each month, MANY law-abiding Americans saving lives with firearms. And, trust me, if I had the space, I could list many, many of them.

Wasn’t the young mother from Georgia, who saved herself and her 9-year-old twins by shooting a home intruder, a life worth saving? And what about the lives of the twins?

Apparently Obama and Biden could care less about the lives of law-abiding American citizens saved by the use of firearms.

What about Bryan Lee, the pharmacy owner from Madera, Calif., who saved both himself and his mother by shooting an armed gunman who came in, guns blazing?

Or Rafael Lantigua of Lawrence, Mass., who ran off armed robbers with his own gun without ever firing a shot; Clint Lowery of Port Angeles, Wash., who used a gun to save himself and his 2-year-old daughter from a home intruder, again without even firing a shot; or Roger Mundell of Amherst, Mass., who used a gun to save himself and his nephew from a rabid bobcat that had already wounded them both?

If just one life was saved by not further infringing on our Second Amendment rights, shouldn’t we immediately stop even considering these measures that do nothing but harm innocent, law-abiding gun owners?

Apparently Obama and Biden could care less about the lives of law-abiding American citizens saved by the use of firearms. Neither has ever acknowledged that lives are saved thousands of times a year by good people using privately owned firearms.

I believe they simply do not care. Besides, if they acknowledged the lives saved by the use of firearms, their gun-ban agenda would completely derail. Each instance of them ignoring an example of defensive gun use is further proof they 11 do anything within their power to ban guns, even if it costs you, me or any other law-abiding American his or her life.

So it is asked of President Obama and Vice President Biden this question: Since more than “one life” will be saved by not implementing further gun control measures, shouldn’t you immediately stop promoting such bans?