The Truth Is Out There

Archive for February, 2022

Yet Another Suicide While in Custody in the Epstein Saga – Who’s Next?


Ever since the charges against Jeffrey Epstein came down, people associated with him have been dropping off. Some just from the public eye, others completely from their life in general. With the first trial of Ghislaine Maxwell completed, many are left with questions. Most commonly asked is about her lists of his clients, friends, and associates who visited Epstein’s famed Little St. James private island.

Considering the lack of media access to the trial, the number of high profile people who stepped down from their posts in the wake of her conviction, and the number of career politicians who have remained largely silent about the case, there is a lot left to investigate. Somehow, this keeps being brushed under the rug by the mainstream media. It’s as if there is nothing to gain and everything to lose in their minds by being transparent. Yet, for the young girls who were victimized at the hands of Maxwell and Epstein, time is of the essence.

So when another of the big players drops dead while in custody, there is a lot of things to be concerned about. Jean-Luc Brunel was a former modeling agent who was also referred to as Epstein’s pimp. He had hung himself in his cell by his bedsheets. As a report in Daily Mail stated “His death in an alleged hanging will fuel conspiracy theories around the Epstein affair after the financier also died in prison while awaiting trial in what authorities concluded was a hanging.”

The problem is, this isn’t so much of a conspiracy when people start dropping like flies by suicide. Considering Brunel had been indicted on rape charges in December 2020 as well as September 2021, his victims now get no justice, and his victims through Epstein lose their justice as well. With the number of big names connected to two notorious pedophiles, no trial because they committed suicide… in jail with guards and a security system that mysteriously “malfunctioned” people know something is up.

When someone dies in prison, there is always an investigation. In the Epstein case, there was little to no investigation because, miraculously, nobody saw anything. Naturally of course, so far the Brunel suicide investigation is yielding the same results, with no expectation of improvement. At least one anonymous source spoke up about this death to The Daily Mail.

The source claimed “There is an investigation going on to confirm all this, but at the moment it looks like he killed himself alone, and it was a routine patrol that found his body hanging. There were no obvious fears for the prisoner’s health, and he was not on a suicide watch, having already been in prison for many months.” The source went on to allege that he was being kept in a part of the jail with no cameras, but that is contradictory to initial official reports.

No matter his location at the time of his death and the cameras, the lack of answers, in this case, is troublesome as it is. When they aren’t ensuring they stay alive long enough to face the music and testify about other people who could have been a part of the problem, it’s a big issue. With the allegations against people like Bill Clinton, Bill Gates, Prince Andrew, and former President Donald Trump, the American people, and the globe as a whole, deserves answers.

Until the prisons and the legal teams responsible for securing convictions begin to take their jobs more seriously and they keep the prisoners safe, we will have a total lack of answers to what happened here. The victims deserve justice, the pedophiles deserve prison, and given the status of many of the attackers, the American people deserve to see them taken to a proper trial. With any luck, the Maxwell case will be naming names in the coming weeks. Unless she has a camera slip, too, that is.

Image

EXIT & ENTRANCE


The REAL aggressors attacking humanity are the vaccine pushers, covid propagandists and governments that terrorize their own citizens


The financial sanctions Biden has announced against Putin are nothing compared to the Canadian government’s own financial terrorism that it has unleashed against its own peaceful citizens. Donate just $20 to the freedom convoy and all your bank funds can be stolen without notice, completely outside of due process. But we’re told that Putin is the worst villain on the planet. Yet Putin hasn’t stolen anyone’s bank accounts in the USA or Canada (for starters).

For the record, I don’t see Putin demanding Americans and Canadians be injected with spike protein bioweapons that have already killed nearly one million Americans right here at home, either. Those demands came from our own corrupt governments, media propagandists, fraudulent science institutions and pharma-infiltrated Big Tech giants.

Similarly, when the fake Biden president decries Putin’s violation of Ukraine’s “sovereign borders,” the corporate media is utterly silent about America’s invasions, attacks and military violence committed against Yemen, Libya, Iraq, Somalia, Afghanistan, Syria and dozens of other countries. Over the years, the media cheered those attacks, never once caring about how many innocent people would be “displaced” in those countries.

When America attacks innocent nations, it’s never described by the western media as a “brutal onslaught that’s killing innocents.” It’s always described as an effort to “defend freedom.”

Funny, isn’t it, how America’s violence is dressed up as “peace,” but when anybody else does it around the world, suddenly it’s a “brutal onslaught.”

The corporate media is so dishonest in its coverage of conflict that if Ukraine were being invaded by Black Lives Matter with the exact same weapons as the Russian military, we would all be told the incursion was “mostly peaceful” with only “rare” episodes of bombs or missiles.

The lying media has been complicit in the vaccine holocaust that has already killed millions around the globe

Missiles and bombs aren’t the only forms of violence that kill people. Vaccine violence is another concept that’s become crystal clear these days as literally millions of people are now dead from the covid vaccines that were pushed onto innocent people by pharma-controlled governments and complicit corporate media giants over the last 18 months or so.

Thanks to a bombshell “smoking gun” analysis of the covid-19 spike protein, it turns out that Moderna actually patented a particular genetic sequence three years before the covid outbreak… and that sequence is found in the covid-19 spike protein. This is proof that Moderna helped synthesize the virus that got released onto the world, which in turns generated tens of billions of dollars in revenues for Moderna.

In other words, the entire covid outbreak and all its damage — lives lost, economies destroyed, liberties demolished — was done on purpose and was engineered by powerful corporations and governments (NIH, Fauci) in order to deliberately harm humanity. In the world of pure evil, Putin doesn’t even hold a candle to Fauci.

That crime against humanity dwarfs the current events in Ukraine, as devastating as they are. While Putin has launched missiles at targets in Ukraine, global governments and pharma corporations launched a deadly biological weapon against the entire planet, causing untold death, suffering and destruction on a scale that has never been witnessed in the history of human civilization.

Big Media, Big Tech, Big Science, Big Government and Big Pharma all went along with it. They pushed the false narrative that “vaccines are safe and effective” while deliberately conspiring to destroy the reputation of ivermectin and other interventions that could save lives. In a world where Joe Biden claims Russia is “attacking the people of Ukraine,” it was actually Biden’s own government (and Trump’s before) that attacked the people of America with a biological weapon and a fraudulent “vaccine.”

So to anyone that’s going to scream about Putin and Russia, get your crisis hierarchy sorted out correctly so that you at least recognize that Putin’s attack of Ukraine pales in comparison to the USA / CCP attack on the entire world via biological weapons and deadly jabs that transform the bodies of innocent people into spike protein weapons factories. And NOT to back Putin, because the guy IS a thug, but he’s a smart thug unlike brain-dead Biden. He’s an accomplished pianist, which means he’s a mathematician, martial artist and champion chess player and right now he’s playing chess with the idiot lamebrain here. It’s all about geography. Ukraine has always followed Russian ways. Russia has always maintained fleets off the island close to Ukraine having the Port of Sevastopolof because geographically, it is the only location on earth that Russia can keep vessels in warmer waters because the remaining Russian coastlines harbor Icelandic frozen waters. Again, I’m not backing or protecting Putin, but his approach to Ukraine is not what the U.S. media is making it to be. It’s just not. Chalk that up to the second-raters in the W.H. now guiding geopolitical affairs.

For the record, we are opposed to all forms of violence against innocent people. That includes kinetic violence, of course, but it must also consider vaccine violence, medical violence, hospital homicide and gain-of-function biological weapons development. Yes, war is bad. Kinetic war is horrible. But so is biological warfare, economic warfare, censorship, government propaganda, journo-terrorism and everything else we’ve all been subjected to under the fraudulent covid narrative.

Putin didn’t make our children wear masks and lock our elderly in nursing homes and hospital beds where you’re not even allowed to visit them. America’s own medical tyrants did that. And they tried to force deadly spike protein shots on everyone, all in the effort to achieve global depopulation and extermination of the human race.

Remember that when you’re watching the propaganda media whine about Russia. CNN has killed far more Americans than Putin has Ukrainians, just from the network’s vaccine propaganda alone.

Image

The so-called ‘fact checkers’ have now resorted to ‘fact’ checking hypothetical opinions of dead people


And…and…and… the results are…


As has been reported a week or two ago, the vaccine passport systems in various American cities

Since that time, the system in Boston has also been removed. That holds special significance for those people as I’m sure they could not bear to see their city placed under those useless, cruel, and unscientific orders.

Here’s a chart you can try to stump your friends with.

These are two neighboring counties in California: Los Angeles County, which has a widespread vaccine passport system, and Orange County, which has no passport system at all.

These people live right next to each other. It’s a perfect test.

We are told that the shots are supposed to reduce hospitalizations. So let’s have a look.

Hospitalizations in Los Angeles County vs. hospitalizations in Orange County.

There had better be a huge difference in Los Angeles County’s favor to justify all this.

And yet….

And yet.

Here is the chart, generated from covidactnow.org
I haven’t labeled the counties. Can you tell them apart?

Can your friends?

Shouldn’t they be able to?

The answer almost doesn’t matter, since the curves for the two places are essentially indistinguishable. But if you’re really curious, I’ll tell you that the blue line, which is slightly worse, is Los Angeles County, the place with county-mandated vaccine requirements to participate in normal life, and the orange line, which is slightly better, is Orange County, which has no such requirements.

They’ve destroyed businesses, torn families apart, turned people’s lives upside down — and it’s all for nothing.

Nothing at all.

I know there are those who will say that this has never been about a virus.

If you’ve doubted that, doubt no longer.

It is about compliance and control. The chart speaks for itself.

The same goes for the rest of the alleged mitigation measures. There’s no evidence masking children (or anyone) does anything, and yet they’re going to die on the hill of keeping masks on kids.

What are masks doing to little children who are still learning language and human communication in general?

We know it’s much easier to learn a new language from birth than it is to try to learn it later. So instead of building on that principle, our overlords are putting masks on everyone’s faces.

Not much more if anything needs stating I’d say.

Watch Dad Torch School Board


Image

Can ANYONE identify the consistency of all of these ‘PARENTS’ magazine covers?  Anyone? Bueller? Bueller?


Image

With or Against?


Image

TRANSLATION: NWO and we’re all SCREWED. DIRECT from the HORSE’S mouth. PERIOD!


Image

Disguised Dystopia


What Trudeau’s move against the truckers means


You have probably heard that Justin Trudeau, prime minister of Canada, just invoked something called the Emergencies Act in response to the trucker protest.

I want to share with you a Twitter thread on the subject by Ezra Levant, who publishes the heroic Rebel News, one of the very rare Canadian sources that isn’t official state propaganda.

Here goes:

1. Trudeau has no legal justification for invoking the Emergencies Act.

It has never been invoked before — not even on 9/11, or the 2014 terrorist attack on Parliament.

Trudeau called the truckers “terrorists,” but everyone can see that’s a lie.

2. Tonight Trudeau called the truckers, and the countless citizens cheering them on, “dangerous” and “not peaceful.” But in fact there has not been a single act of violence committed by any of them in two weeks.

3. The Emergencies Act is to made to defend against a genuine threat to the security of the nation. The definition of “threat” in outlined in the CSIS Act. It has an extraordinarily high bar: https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/PDF/C-23.pdf

4. There is no espionage threat; no foreign clandestine coup plot; no “serious violence”; no covert act “intended ultimately to lead to the destruction or overthrow by violence.” 

And the act specifically excludes “lawful advocacy, protest or dissent.”

5. This is a coup — from within government. A desperate, flailing politician who bungled the pandemic, antagonized millions of Canadians and sits at just 16% in the polls [source: Maru Public Opinion Survey, February 9-10 — TW]. Three of his own MPs have broken ranks. This is a panicky power grab.

6. There was loud honking in Ottawa. A judge ordered truckers to stop and they complied. The Ambassador Bridge was cleared without incident by local cops.

None of that needed emergency powers. 

But Trudeau wants to rule, like his father figure, Castro.

So he made his move.

7. Trudeau’s obsession with vaccine mandates exceeds any public health rationale. He wants the biomedical security state — the database, the power to control, the power to surveil. 

8. $20 million has been raised for the truckers. The first $10M was through GoFundMe. Trudeau pressured them to cancel the campaign. The next $10M was through GiveSendGo. An Ontario court — in an ex parte (secret) hearing — ordered the money frozen. And then GSG was hacked.

9. About a million dollars was disbursed to a Canadian bank for the truckers, but that was seized, too.

Not a dime has actually gone to the truckers. But Freeland claims that those funds are tantamount to financing terrorism.

10. This is the Canadian version of Biden’s disgraceful memo instructing the FBI to investigate parents who show up to complain at school board meetings. Trudeau and Freeland have criminalized grassroots, peaceful political activism.

11. Freeland announc[ed] that anyone who donated to the trucker crowdfunds is a terrorist financier, and can have their bank accounts seized without a court order. Freeland will “share relevant information” about her enemies list with the banks.

12. There’s more; the bizarre notion of not only commandeering tow trucks, but also “directing” tow truck drivers themselves to work for the government. (What — at the point of a gun? On pain of jail?)

13. It’s hard at first to understand the idea of a coup by someone who is already in office. But recall, Trudeau only won the election with 32% (he lost the popular vote). He’s been increasingly erratic and enraged. Even his former admirers are shocked.

14. He was losing support from his own MPs. The polls were tanking. The truckers were winning — not just in the court of public opinion, but actually convincing provincial premiers to hurry up and end their lockdowns. The public were laughing at him. And he can’t stand that.

15. By shocking the country with a form of martial law, and the suspension of due process and civil liberties, and granting himself the power to unilaterally seize the bank accounts of his enemies, Trudeau consolidates power, thrills the media and silences critics within his party.

16. I mean, it’s “war time” and there are “terrorists” afoot — you must rally behind the prime minister. It stops the dissent in his own party. But more importantly, it criminalizes the Conservative opposition party.

17. Most political fundraising is done online now through crowdfunding. Most of the donors to the trucker convoy are opponents of Trudeau. Trudeau will now use the State of Emergency to build a “terrorist” database of all of the people who donated to support the peaceful protest.

18. Trudeau says this will be the law for “just” 30 days. But he also said we’d be out of lockdowns in two weeks. The Castro model is the permanent emergency and a permanent revolution against the enemies of the movement. Trudeau’s twist is using banks to make his enemies list.

19. And in the background — Trudeau’s new bill to regulate the Internet. That’s the final piece of the puzzle, isn’t it?


Inicidentally, I just sent a donation to Rebel News out of appreciation for their excellent convoy coverage.

Now let me add one more thing: even though it’s February, there’s never a wrong time to pull your children out of a bad educational situation.

Justin Trudeau campaigned on diversity and rainbows, and is forcing his crazy views on everyone with an iron fist.

The same goes for your kids’ teachers. It’s all diversity and rainbows, until it isn’t.

Latest Durham revelations put Biden’s national security adviser in uneasy light


Special Counsel John Durham’s investigation isn’t just imposing accountability for Hillary Clinton’s 2016 political trick to dirty up Donald Trump with the FBI; it’s also encroaching on the credibility of President Biden’s current chief foreign policy adviser and point man for the current Russia-Ukraine crisis.

National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan was a senior adviser to Clinton’s 2016 campaign and, by his own admission, spread the word to reporters back then that Democrats believed Trump was colluding with Vladimir Putin to hijack the election and had a secret computer channel to the Kremlin. Neither proved true.

But long before that Russia collusion narrative crumbled like a stale Starbucks muffin, Sullivan gave sworn testimony to the House Intelligence Committee disputing that anything the Clinton campaign spread around Washington was misinformation.

“Are you aware of any collusion, coordination, or conspiracy by yourself or by any other members of the campaign that you were working with to procure fake Russian information to harm Donald Trump?” Sullivan was asked in December 2017.

Sullivan responded without ambiguity. “I mean, you will forgive me if I want to say more than just an emphatic ‘No’ to that answer, because I find that totally absurd,” he answered.

But Durham’s court filings in two cases last fall — one against Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann and the other against the primary source for the discredited Christopher Steele dossier — call into question that assertion. Both defendants are charged with lying to the FBI.

Sullivan is not accused of wrongdoing. But court filings in those cases state that Sullivan — identified in the Sussmann indictment only as a Clinton “foreign policy advisor” — engaged in email traffic with other Clinton campaign officials and lawyers about a story leaked to the news media suggesting Trump had a secret communications system with Russia via a computer server at the Moscow-based Alfa Bank.

“On or about September 15, 2016 Campaign Lawyer-1 exchanged emails with the Clinton campaign’s campaign manager, communications director, and foreign policy advisor concerning the Russian Bank-1 allegations that Sussmann had recently shared with Reporter 1,” the Sussmann indictment stated.

“Campaign Lawyer-1 billed his time for this correspondence to the Clinton campaign with the billing entry ’email correspondence with [name of foreign policy advisor], [name of campaign manager], [name of communications director] re: Russian Bank -1 article.'”

That revelation places Sullivan squarely in the loop of conversations designed to spread a story that the FBI, former Russia Special Counsel Robert Mueller, and Durham’s team all have deemed false.

A month after those email conversations — with the Trump-Clinton presidential race coming down to the wire — the story containing the Alfa Bank allegations surfaced in the mainstream news media in late October 2016.

And it was Sullivan who jumped into action, issuing a statement adding legitimacy to the article’s claim. “This could be the most direct link yet between Donald Trump and Moscow,” Sullivan said in the statement. “Computer scientists have uncovered a covert server linking the Trump Organization to a Russian-based bank.”

His statement also gave his boss, Hillary Clinton, the opportunity to retweet it.

“Computer scientists have apparently uncovered a covert server linking the Trump Organization to a Russian-based bank,” Clinton crowed in an effort to get the media to cover the allegations.

By the time Sullivan issued the statement, there was already substantial reason to doubt the article. The FBI was already telling this reporter and the New York Times that it had ruled out the secret communications channel and that the pings the computer researchers allegedly found could be explained by basic marketing communications.

Durham’s recent court filings reveal that some of the very computer executives who were advising the Clinton campaign and its lawyer on the allegation strongly doubted the conclusions themselves.

Durham refers to emails between the various players who assisted the research that said they were looking simply for “an inference” or a “very useful narrative” that could make it look like Trump was in bed with Russia.

But the tech company executive who led the effort himself wrote an email two months before the stories were published casting doubt on the evidence.

“Tech Executive-I expressed his own belief that the ‘trump-email.com’ domain (referring to the subject of the allegations that SUSSMANN conveyed to the FBI) was not a secret communications channel with Russian Bank-1, but ‘a red herring,'” Durham wrote in the Sussman indictment.

Other participants in the research expressed similar doubt. “How do we plan to defend against the criticism that this is not spoofed traffic,” one wrote in an Aug. 22, 2016 email.

So Durham court fillings not only establish the story was proven false, they also show there was reason to doubt it even before Sullivan lent his name and foreign policy credentials to it.

The court filings so far provide no evidence Sullivan was told directly about the concerns, but experts told Just the News that as the senior national security adviser to the Clinton campaign he had an obligation to check it out before spreading it to the media.

“If you’re the national security adviser, or you’re the foreign policy advisor for presidential candidate Secretary Hillary Clinton, you got to be able to look at the information and vet it before you make a conclusion,” said Daniel Hoffman, a respected CIA officer who was the agency’s station chief in Moscow.

“He never challenged his own assumption, and he never challenged the information he was receiving,” he added.

Former House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) said he has concerns about the accuracy of Sullivan’s testimony back in 2017 and the fact that today he serves as Biden’s national security adviser. Nunes recently retired to become head of Trump’s new tech and social media company.

“Well, it sure doesn’t look like it,” Nunes said when asked about whether Sullivan’s testimony was accurate. “Because he was one of the propagandists that was out there all through the 2016 election that was promoting this, promoting this in great detail.

“Look, that seems like everybody who was involved in the Russia hoax was actually promoted. So if you were in the Obama White House, and you participated in this hoax, you got a major promotion, you got a new job.”

Rep. Lee Zeldin (R-N.Y.), another lawmaker who played a role in exposing falsehoods in the Russia collusion narrative, said Sullivan should face investigation to determine what he knows.

“Just because you’re getting paid by Hillary Clinton, just because you are Hillary Clinton, or you’re associated with Hillary Clinton, you don’t get some free pass from the justice system,” Zeldin told Just the News.

Brian Stekloff, the attorney who represented Sullivan at the 2017 deposition, did not immediately return a call Monday seeking comment.

In his 2017 testimony, Sullivan argued he was justified in pushing the Trump narrative because the Clinton campaign felt under attack by Russia after allegations of hacked emails surfaced in the summer of 2016.

“We feared that we were under attack, not just by the Russians, but by a coordinated, with the Trump campaign as well,” he said at the time.

In the end, every investigation that looked at the collusion allegations concluded there was none between Trump and Russia, although U.S. officials believe Moscow on its own did engage in hacking and leaking of Clinton-related emails.

Beyond the legal implications, experts said Sullivan’s role in spreading a now-disproven allegation against a campaign rival could undercut his credibility with U.S. allies in his current role as Biden’s national security adviser, especially during the current Russia-Ukraine crisis.

“I can’t say what the leadership in Ukraine is thinking about this White House and the various characters who populate it, as well as the State and Defense Department. But I’m sure based on what you’ve just said, they have a lot of questions about pronouncements coming out from those very people about intelligence that relates to their life and death,” former State Department adviser Kiron Skinner told Just the News on Monday. “I think that that would absolutely be the case.”