Uvalde massacre was a PLANNED STAND DOWN operation – law enforcement saved their own children while parents were pepper-sprayed and handcuffed
https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-05-27-uvalde-massacre-was-a-planned-stand-down-operation.html
STATE FARM INSURANCE AND YOUR 5 AND UP YEAR OLDS IN SCHOOL
Intriguing confirmations about Twitter. Elon estimating the bot activity is 20% or higher, and his $44 billion bid was assuming that the bot activity was at the 5% or lower Twitter formally reported.
He is forcing them to prove their actual bot activity, causing them to expose themselves. While pissing off all of their advertisers and shareholders in the process, for falsifying numbers and therefore significantly lowering the value of Twitter. Elon baited them with $44 billion, knowing full well the bot activity was not what they reported, knowing he could get a better deal, while simultaneously exposing them.
But the most genius aspect of this plan, is as a CITIZEN, he’s exposing Twitter at warp speed, on the world stage. As opposed to a government intervention and a years long investigation with a snail’s pace Justice System. Elon got them on the hook with too much money to refuse, then made them admit all their deepest darkest secrets within a month. The government could never do what Elon is doing at the speed he is doing it.
Most importantly, it appears to be organic. If the US MIL directly intervened, it would be bad optics and the left-wing media would cause mass turmoil and claim it’s a military coup, so on and so forth. So maybe the US MIL and white hats found a workaround? A path of least resistance.
I cant assume it’s a coincidence that the US MIL’s highest paid contractor is flawlessly carrying out a highly calculated plan, with militaristic precision, that just so happens to dismantle an enemy of the US MIL, at lightning speed, in the middle of a propaganda/information war.
Yes, I’m suggesting the US MIL is utilizing Elon as a proxy/asset to conduct operations as a citizen that the US MIL would not be unable to do from their government position.
The civilian route was exponentially faster, highly effective, appears organic, easy for the public to digest, and the mission is accomplished with relative ease and little resistance.
“Military tactics are like unto water; for water in its natural course runs away from high places and hastens downwards. So in war, the way is to avoid what is strong and to strike at what is weak. Water shapes its course according to the nature of the ground over which it flows; the soldier works out his victory in relation to the foe whom he is facing. Therefore, just as water retains no constant shape, so in warfare there are no constant conditions.”

Last June, the Biden administration unveiled its “National Strategy for Countering Domestic Terrorism.” Despite its anodyne-sounding name, the “National Strategy” was anything but anodyne.
The pamphlet represented the logical culmination of the left’s cynical use of the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot as a means of ginning up large-scale anti-Republican voter sentiment.
The result, evinced by Attorney General Merrick Garland’s disgraceful October 2021 memo directing the FBI to intrude on local school board meetings and crack down on anti-critical race theory parental revolts, has been a roiling cold war waged by the ruling class against us deplorables and our political wrongthink.
Now, seven months after Garland’s infamous Oct. 4 memo, the better question to ask is not whether President Joe Biden is engaged in a cold war merely against the deplorables. We know the answer to that: yes.
Instead, the more relevant question is whether the Biden administration is now engaged in a cold war against a broader target: the entire American citizenry. The answer to that question, based on all relevant data and metrics, seems to be the same: yes.
Most obvious and perhaps most important, inflation — which the Federal Reserve finally recently conceded is not “transitory” but here to stay for a while — is now the highest it has been in four decades. The consumer price index increased 8.3 percent in April on an annualized basis — slightly lower than March’s 8.5 percent clip, but still painfully above the Fed’s 2 percent target.
Biden recently declared fighting inflation to be his top domestic priority, but he shows no appetite for curbing the mass deficit spending that has characterized his presidency. Nor has Biden communicated to Fed Chair Jerome Powell that he is prepared to accommodate the drastic interest rate hikes that are now necessary to bring inflation back under control.
Biden is also looking to “fight” inflation — a de facto regressive tax that eats away at everyone’s savings, but hits lower- and middle-class earners the hardest — in all the wrong places.
The traditional economic definition of inflation is too much money chasing too few goods, but Democrats seem wholly uninterested in working with Republicans on the sort of industrial policy measures needed to immediately revamp domestic production. On the contrary, Biden’s priorities are completely backward.
Is the Biden administration making inflation worse?Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Amidst unprecedented — and potentially lethal — shortages of baby formula, he has not acted swiftly to either invoke the Defense Production Act to ramp up domestic production (after his own FDA shut down a baby formula production facility) or temporarily lift the import tariffs that have helped cartelize the domestic baby formula market. At the same time, Biden has openly mused about ending the Trump administration’s signature tariffs on China. But all that would accomplish would be to make the American consumer even more dependent on our geopolitical arch-foe.
Fed-driven monetary policy aside, the way to fight inflation on the fiscal side is to accelerate production — not to fortify China’s cheap labor sword of Damocles that dangles over the American economy.
Perhaps most revealing, Republican Rep. Kat Cammack of Florida tweeted photos appearing to show “shelves and pallets packed with baby formula” at holding facilities for illegal aliens. This, of course, while U.S. citizen parents are frantically scrambling from store to store to ensure their babies don’t starve.
But it’s not just the pro-illegal alien lobby that plays our ruling class like a fiddle; it’s also the zealots in the environmentalist movement.
During the same week that nearly 30 states reported all-time highs for average gas price at the pump, the Biden administration canceled offshore oil and natural gas leases in both Alaska and the Gulf of Mexico. But Biden has simultaneously admitted that energy accounts for a whopping 60 percent of the inflation Americans are now experiencing. Higher fuel prices for trucks and tractors, after all, trickle down and affect all goods and foodstuffs farmed and shipped.
Amidst this carnage, it is unfathomable for the administration to further restrict domestic energy production. The only effect of such restrictions, intended to appease the greenie and Malthusian radicals who increasingly dominate the Democratic donor base, is to make Americans even more energy-dependent on such human rights bastions as Venezuela and Saudi Arabia.
Our ruling class, full of virtue-signaling electric car owners, no doubt sleeps well at night as normal gasoline-dependent Americans get annihilated at the pump.
Meanwhile, Congress is racing to pass an emergency $40 billion appropriation in aid to Ukraine, hardly a pressing domestic concern. Ukraine is a well-known playground for venal slush funds and parochial NGO interests, but that apparently did not give the U.S. House any pause; it rapidly passed the legislation by a lopsided tally of 368-57.
The situation in Ukraine is tragic — but so is the situation at the porous U.S.-Mexico border, which has been completely overrun in recent months by drug cartel-trafficked illegal migrants. Those migrants and cartels are incentivized to make and orchestrate the hazardous journey north due to the Biden administration’s various amnesty magnets, such as the return of the Obama-era “catch-and-release” policy for illegal aliens in the U.S. interior.
Translation: Ukraine’s border with Russia matters more than America’s border with Mexico.
It is difficult to recall the last time a U.S. president persistently acted in a manner so contrary to the interests of the average citizen to whom that president took a constitutional oath to protect and defend.
Fortunately, Biden’s historically low approval ratings hint at a ballot box remedy for our national woes: A red wave beckons this fall.
Well folks, you don’t have to believe me, you heard it from Nunes’ mouth that Trump encouraged Elon to buy Twitter. Trump and his camp support Elon and his mission.
Just as I suspected and laid out for you all over the past few weeks, the entire timeline reeks of white hat involvement. It was calculated, methodical, strategical, well timed to maximize damage and enemy exposure, and captivated a massive global audience. Moves and countermoves were flawlessly projected and executed and the enemy not only lost control of one of their most powerful brainwashing assets, but also exposed their own corruption whilst under the world spotlight.
Notice how Trump and his team waited until AFTER Twitter was fully secure, before going public that they were involved.
Now does it make more sense why the left-wing media complex went scorched earth on Elon and declared this as the greatest threat to democracy? Why the Biden admin went full blown authoritarian dictator and created the Ministry of Truth? Because they knew Trump was involved in this move. They knew Elon was working with Trump to some extent. They knew this path leads to the end of their reign.
All the while, Trump is off screen, in the shadows. Just quietly working on TruthSocial, saying he’s not coming back to Twitter, etc. Giving off the OPTICS that he is distant from the entire situation. When in reality, he was advising it. And in all likelihood, based on the success and the Modus Operandi, it’s clear to me that Elon had significant operational help from Trump and military assets.
Now, why did Elon and Trump ensure that Trump seemed distant from the operation? TO TARGET THE NORMIES.
If Trump would have been linked to this deal before it was finalized, the centrists and leftists would have immediately discredited it and be less likely to pay attention. Because they are, quite literally, programmed to despise anything associated with Trump. By Trump appearing uninvolved, the story was followed by centrists and leftists as well, and allowed for this operation to result in a broader range of normies waking up to the reality of censorship online and the war on truth.
Conservatives are already all too aware of this reality, so there was no need to try and target that base. This was designed to penetrate centrist/left-wing echo chambers.
You’re welcome to believe all of this happened on accident and just so happened to be massively beneficial to Trump and his political campaign. I’m more inclined to believe that this was a meticulously calculated normie-waking operation, specifically designed to target centrists and leftists. Coordinated and advised by Trump and white hats.
Keep in mind Elon is the US MIL’s highest paid contractor… and the US MIL supports Trump.
Get the picture?
-Clandestine
Man, what a terrible day to have eyes.
I can’t do anything without seeing outrageously asinine takes on this situation. I can’t even consume sports or entertainment related media without being bombarded with Roe v Wade nonsense. As much as it is painful to watch, I think it’s going to wake up normies to some extent.
The left are fumbling over themselves trying to articulate how this is now the greatest threat to our democracy, after foaming at the mouth for the past month over Elon and Free Speech. It’s the perfect maelstrom of conflicting narratives they cannot support simultaneously. This will break the minds of many of the sheep.
After spending the last 2 years claiming that they know what’s best for our bodies and everyone should be vaccinated regardless of religious or personal beliefs; now they must contradict themselves to say “my body my choice” so they can justify slaughtering their unborn children. Just as during the Kavanaugh smear campaign, they cried “believe all women”. Now they can’t even define what a “woman” is.
And when you think big picture, by imagining how future generations look back on what we went through in today’s world, they will look back in horror at the leftist ideology. Future generations will associate liberalism with:
-forced harmful injections
-forced mask wearing
-election fraud
-propaganda
-supporting actual nazis in Ukraine
-grooming children
-anti-free speech
-slaughtering unborn children
And this was just the crazy shit they defended over the past month.
So if you ask me what I think is happening with the SCOTUS leak? No idea. But what is the overalll effect of the happenings? Normies waking up because the left are fucking insane and the more they talk, the more the sane people start to realize just how far the left has gone off the deep end.
And I don’t know if you all feel it, but the rate of these “happenings” seems to be escalating incrementally. The sheep are being forced to change their identities rapidly. The narrative they are being fed directly contradicts the previous narratives, and I believe more and more of them will recognize it.
When the enemy is under duress, they become sloppy and more prone to mistakes.
-Clandestine
“If a thing is free to be good it is also free to be bad. And free will is what has made evil possible. Why, then, did God give them free will? Because free will, though it makes evil possible, is also the only thing that makes possible any love or goodness or joy worth having.”
C.S. Lewis
An antiviral COVID-19 pill that’s known as Paxlovid exists. It’s been a hard-to-find item – and in some instances, the Biden administration pulled its availability in some states.
For the most part, the pill is reserved for those who are “at high risk for progression to severe COVID-19, according to the FDA.
The office for Kamala Harris identified that she began taking the antiviral pill after she tested positive for COVID. It is now causing quite the stir – why?
Why would the VP, a healthy 57-year-old who has been vaccinated and boosted against COVID, need to take the antiviral pill?
Harris, according to her office, has been completely asymptomatic. So, there would be no reason to put her on this medication. Meanwhile, people who DO need the pill are being denied.
Does the VP have any underlying health conditions that we don’t know about? That’s where things start to get a bit interesting. Her office won’t comment. This means that there may be something else going on with Harris. And considering that Biden is the only thing standing between her and the head title in the U.S., we should probably know if her health is an issue.
Jonathan Reiner, the professor of medicine and surgery at George Washington University School of Medicine & Health Sciences asked “Why would you give Paxlovid to someone without symptoms?
Others have been asking the same question. Jerome Adams, who served as Surgeon General under Trump, was quick to point out that Paxlovid isn’t supposed to be used for those who are asymptomatic and with no medical issues.
An infectious disease expert, Celine Gounder, addresses it by using another approach. “We know that the way that presidents, or in this case vice presidents, are treated is not necessarily the way the average person is treated.” Gounder said that it’s not always about what might be right for Harris but what might be best for the nation.
So, perhaps she was given Paxlovid as a way to guarantee that she wouldn’t fall victim to COVID. After all, if Biden does get taken out by the 25th amendment, we need to have Harris standing. She’s not ideal, but she’d most certainly be better than Nancy Pelosi. Until the midterms shake things up, we have to be cautious of who the line of succession would bring to the Oval Office.
While Gounder may want to make excuses for Harris since she’s the VP, there are others who take a more pragmatic approach. It’s not a fair system – and medical ethicists, in particular, are concerned that the moral rationalization for Harris to take the antiviral pill is simply because of her position.
Harris was able to get the antiviral pill the same day that she tested positive. Meanwhile, many people struggle to get a prescription.
The only people who can provide a prescription are physicians, physician assistants, and registered nurses. Patients have to get tested, visit a doctor’s office, and then, find a participating pharmacy that will fill the prescription.
We’ve seen the way in which Harris has been able to work around the COVID protocols. Unfortunately, her gaining access to Paxlovid even though she doesn’t need it isn’t the first time she’s been able to use her position to her benefit. Her communications director tested positive in April, and she showed up maskless. And when she’s been maskless around others who have tested positive, her office was quick to say that she was “practicing social distancing – with limited and brief interactions from her chair.”
This is yet another example of rules for thee but not for me. Harris will get the COVID antiviral medication while others get sicker because of their inability to get it. Fair? Hardly.
You’ve surely heard that a Supreme Court decision overturning Roe vs. Wade has been leaked to the public.
Let me say from the outset: nothing is more certain than a stream of outraged emails about this issue presently being submitted. But I still feel it necessary to speak up about something I believe in and not avoid it just because I thought it’s what people simply wanted or didn’t want to hear.
The leaked decision has Samuel Alito declaring that the legal reasoning in Roe was “exceptionally weak.” Of course, the “trust the science”/”15 days to stop the spread”/”here’s my Ukrainian flag even though I haven’t given a rat’s behind about any other war for the past 20 years” people are predictably registering their outrage over such a statement.
But Alito’s statement isn’t even debatable. In fact, legal scholars at the time and over the years, despite generally favoring abortion themselves, have been known to admit that the legal reasoning in Roe was flimsy to nonexistent.
Thus in 1973, the very year of that fateful decision, John Hart Ely, himself sympathetic to abortion, attacked the Court’s legal reasoning in the Yale Law Review, arguing that the legal rationale for the decision was simply made up. Roe, he wrote, is “bad because it is bad constitutional law, or rather because it is not constitutional law and gives almost no sense of an obligation to try to be.”
Geoffrey R. Stone, who was a law clerk to Justice William Brennan at the time, later admitted: “Everyone in the Supreme Court, all the justices, all the law clerks knew it was ‘legislative’ or ‘arbitrary.'”
According to Edward Lazarus, who clerked for Roe‘s author, Justice Harry Blackmun:
As a matter of constitutional interpretation and judicial method, Roe borders on the indefensible. I say this as someone utterly committed to the right to choose, as someone who believes such a right has grounding elsewhere in the Constitution instead of where Roe placed it, and as someone who loved Roe‘s author like a grandfather. . . . .
What, exactly, is the problem with Roe? The problem, I believe, is that it has little connection to the Constitutional right it purportedly interpreted. A constitutional right to privacy broad enough to include abortion has no meaningful foundation in constitutional text, history, or precedent. …
The proof of Roe‘s failings comes not from the writings of those unsympathetic to women’s rights, but from the decision itself and the friends who have tried to sustain it. Justice Blackmun’s opinion provides essentially no reasoning in support of its holding. And in the almost 30 years since Roe‘s announcement, no one has produced a convincing defense of Roe on its own terms.
Even Yale’s Harold Koh, who clerked for Blackmun, was reduced to saying: “I’d rather have Blackmun, who uses the wrong reasoning in Roe to get to the right results, and let other people figure out the right reasoning.”
In other words: Blackmun was full of it, but since I like the results, I guess the law — which I’m supposed to have devoted my life to — really doesn’t matter.
The United States has a federal system in which the central government has a few enumerated powers, with the rest reserved to the states. No authority to regulate abortion was ever delegated to the central government, so it remains with the states. All the convoluted legal reasoning in the world cannot evade this simple and exceptionally obvious fact.
But as Robert Barnes said in his interview on the Tom Woods Show that comes out this week, the law schools are churning out judges who pretend the law says whatever they need it to say in order to get the outcomes they want.
Is that really the society you want?
An analysis was created on the Oversight and Judiciary Committees’ memo to the US Dept of Health back in January 2022, pertaining to the highly disturbing revelations found in the released NIH emails via the FOIA. Representatives Jim Jordan and James Comer had some serious questions for Collins and Fauci at the NIH, as it pertains to the true origin of covid, and why the NIH chose to hide all of this information from us.
These emails are DAMNING, and confirm that many of the world’s top virologists and biologists believed, based on many factors, that C19 was created in a lab. As well as how Fauci and Collins covered up this reality from the public. Given what we know now via allegations from Russia and China, ie the US DoD funded biolabs in Ukraine, and the supplementary action taken by the Russian military; this piece of the puzzle makes all the more sense.
You seriously need to read this entire memo. It’s only 2.5 pages and a few emails, but I will outline the main snippets and translate the political/corporate speak.
Jordan and Comer’s thesis for the memo is as follows:
“Dr. Fauci was warned of two things: (1) the potential that COVID-19 leaked from the Wuhan Institute Virology (WIV) and (2) the possibility that the virus was intentionally genetically manipulated.”
They go on to speak on the dangerous Gain of Function (biological weapon) research, as well as the NIH attempts to circumvent oversight and failed to report what they were doing. Requesting a written interview from Fauci and Collins to explain why their emails directly contradict their public statements and why they ignored and silenced the world’s most qualified scientists. Fauci claims he is the sole representation of “science”, yet chooses to ignore the global subject matter experts. Sacrificing the safety of every single human being on Earth for his own political agenda.
See the following emails with statements from the world’s top scientists, reporting to the NIH on their analysis on the origin of covid.
–Michael Farzan, Ph.D.
Chair & Professor Of Department Of Immunology And Microbiology. University of Florida. Discoverer of the SARS Receptor.
He states that he is “bothered by furin site, and has a hard time explaining that as an event outside the lab (though there are possible ways in nature but highly unlikely)”.
-Bob Garry, Ph.D.
Professor of Microbiology and Immunology.
Tulane School of Medicine.
He states that “I really can’t think of a plausible natural scenario where you get from the bat virus or one very similar to it to nCoV where you insert exactly 4 amino acids 12 nucleotide that all have to be added at the exact same time to gain this function – that and you don’t change any other amino acid in S2? I just can’t figure out how this gets accomplished in nature.”
So two ofthe world’s top virologists told the US NIH, all the back in February 2020, it’s borderline molecularly impossible for C19 to occur naturally. And how did Collins at the NIH respond to the top virologists claiming C19 is man made?
Collinsstates ”a swift convening of experts in a confidence inspiring framework (WHO seems really the only option) is needed, or the voices of conspiracy will quickly dominate, doing great potential harm to science and international harmony…”
Yupyou read that right. The former director of the NIH, said that we need to ignore the top virologists, and the incontrovertible evidence that C19 came from an NIH funded lab. Otherwise, the public might think that NIH are conducting a nefarious conspiracy and that might damage public trust in science… in short, Collins is covering his ass because his agency created C19. They followed this up with a narrative setting teleconference to the world’s top scientists, pushing medical propaganda to ignore the fact that the virus was clearly man made in a lab.
Despite the repeated attempts from the NIH to establish that the lab leak reality was a “conspiracy theory”, the top virologists still pushed back.
–Jeremy Farrar, Ph.D.
Former Professor of Tropical Medicine.
Oxford University.
And
–Ed Holmes, Ph.D.
Professor of Medicine.
University of California.
“(Ed Holmes) 60-40 Lab. I’m (Jeremey Farrar) 50-50.”
So despite the gaslighting seminar, top scientists worldwide are still saying the lab leak possibility is more likely than not. The NIH chose to keep all of these conversations hidden from us, declaring that the science confirmed it was naturally occurring, and anyone suggesting otherwise is spreading disinformation. They took it further and used their collusion with big tech to censor anyone on the Internet who suggested that the virus was man made. Despite the science clearly confirming the mathematical certainty it was man made.
Think about how this correlates with the battle for control of Twitter. Think about why the Biden admin is so desperate to maintain control of what is considered “disinformation”. When the public finds out that Fauci, and the Dems created covid and lied about it… the jig is up. C19 affected nearly every person on the planet.
So two months go by, and in April of 2020, Collins reaches out to the rest of the NIH leadership and asks how they can combat this “destructive conspiracy”, in reference to a Fox News article citing that there is increasingly significant evidence that C19 came from the NIH funded lab in Wuhan.
Fauci responds in a private message just to Collins: “I would not do anything about this right now. It is a shiny object that will go away in times.”
So thepublic are catching on to the fact that the NIH lied about the origin of C19 the entire time, and the NIH respond with doubling down and continuing to cover up their involvement in the creation of a bioweapon that they used to shut down the world and implement a medical police state. And Fauci infers that the public is stupid and we will forget about it after the next “shiny object” presents itself.
In conclusion, the US NIH created C19 in a lab, via Gain of Function research in nations abroad, intentionally to avoid congressional oversight. One of their experiments either got out or was released. The NIH knew it was man-made, but told the public it was naturally occurring, in order to cover their asses. They got caught, and began censoring scientists that dared to point this out. As well as censored any dissent on the internet, despite the fact that all of this was true. Seems they have a common MO of censoring the truths that are inconvenient for their plot to take over the world.
So when normies claim that C19 wasn’t man-made and you’re a conspiracy theorist, show them the emails and congressional memo, confirming the virus is man-made, and confirming the NIH covered it up. Keep in mind Collins “stepped down” shortly after this memo was sent out, and Fauci has largely disappeared since then as well.
Now, with all of this prerequisite knowledge, does it make more sense as to why Russia is destroying/occupying US DoD funded biolabs near their border in Ukraine? Now does it make sense why the other two world superpowers formally accused the US of creating biological weapons? Now does it make sense why the US government and big tech really want me off the internet?
The US NIH is responsible for creating the bioweapon known as C19 and this is the secret they can’t let their normies find out about. Now that they can’t control free speech on Twitter, they are going all on with the “Disinformation Governance Board” to attempt to keep this secret under wraps. Because once the greater public is exposed to this reality, the normies will be right along side us calling for military tribunals and Fauci’s head on a spike.
-Clandestine

It turns out that BlackRock and Vanguard have been gradually gobbling up ownership of the means of production, and now intend to lord it over the masses by centralizing all food production technologies in the United States and enslaving everyone under their control.
The top three shareholders of CD Industries Holdings, the world’s largest fertilizer company, include both BlackRock and Vanguard. BlackRock and Vanguard are also the top shareholders in Union Pacific, the railroad giant that moves fertilizer and other agriculture inputs all across the country.
The world’s top 10 food companies are also largely owned by both BlackRock and Vanguard. These include Nestlé, PepsiCo, General Mills, Kellogg’s, Associated British Foods, Mondel?z, Mars, Danone, Unilever, and Coca-Cola.
“What happens when they control all of the seeds, produce, and meat too?” asks Corey’s Digs.
“What happens when produce and meat are all grown inside secured facilities after a gene splice or inside a petri dish, and farmland becomes dormant due to overreaching regulations, lack of supplies, and manufactured inflation?”
BlackRock and Vanguard’s influence over CF Industries Holdings and T. Rowe Price Associates is having a major and direct impact on farming in the Midwest. It is also important to note that Union Pacific recently began mandating railroad shipping reductions of 20 percent, further impacting American agriculture.
“This will directly impact key agricultural areas such as Iowa, Illinois, Kansas, Nebraska, Texas, and California,” Corey’s Digs adds. “This will ultimately affect food supply and pricing. CF Industries is only one of 30 companies dealing with these restrictions.”
Another major transporter of agricultural goods, the Canadian National Railway (CN), is reportedly trying to help the fertilizer market grow. But its largest owner is none other than billionaire eugenicist Bill Gates, whom was reported is buying up as much American farmland as he can get his grubby little demonic hands on.
Back to BlackRock and Vanguard, the finance giants are also top shareholders in AppHarvest, a Kentucky-based agriculture company that boasts one of the biggest greenhouses in the world at 2.76 million square feet on 60 acres. The facility grows only tomatoes, which are sold at Kroger, Meijer, and Walmart.
Then there is Hydrofarm Holdings, based in Pennsylvania. This company also grows crops in a controlled environment with vertical farming technology. BlackRock and Vanguard are top shareholders in this company as well.
BlackRock currently boasts more than $20 trillion in investments, all of which follow the ESG and “socially responsible” guidelines required by its CEO Larry Fink. Fink infamously stated that “it’s time to force people’s behavior to change,” and he is apparently doing that by seizing control of American agriculture.
“Despite the LED lighting, robotics, computer data analysis, and ventilation systems required to power vertical growing facilities of this magnitude, since water is being saved and less of Bill Gates’ landmass is being used, investments are flowing into these alleged sustainable and environmentally friendly facilities, as well as massive greenhouses,” Corey’s Digs further explains.
Meanwhile, the World Health Organization (WHO) is capturing medicine and health care by moving swiftly to pass a new “pandemic treaty” that will give the United Nations total control over public health. This one-two punch of seizing both food and medicine spells a grim future of totalitarian fascism in the entire world.
Recent Comments