fox files

Major German paper reveals Pfizer fabricated clinical trials to cover up deaths

According to new provisional data from the Scottish government, there were 7,314 deaths registered in January 2023, an increase of 17.7% compared to the average of 6,212. For the second week of January, there were more deaths in Scotland than ever before, including during the peak of the pandemic. Concurrently, there were 4,159 births registered in January 2023, a decrease of 6.8% compared to the average of 4,463. In other words, between a dearth of births and a plethora of deaths, there were roughly 1,400 fewer souls, the equivalent of roughly 86,000 in the United States. This is long after COVID. Why is there zero concern?

What on earth will it take to pull these death shots from the market?

Die Welt, a paper based in the home country of Pfizer partner BioNTech, revealed last week in a long expose what many of us have long known. All those sudden deaths, heart attacks, and strokes we’ve been witnessing over the past two years were indeed observed during the Pfizer clinical trial that supposedly showed the shots to be 100% safe and effective. The company simply covered up the severe adverse events by kicking those participants out of the trial and/or suggesting without evidence that the deaths had nothing to do with the experiment.

Remember, the CDC announced a few weeks ago that it had finally study a potential association between the COVID shots and strokes. Well, it turns out the agency had the opportunity to study it already in 2020 before a single human being outside the trial was injected. “Patient no. 11621327” was more than a mere number. He was a human being found dead from a stroke in his apartment just three days after the second dose. Typically, with a novel product in trial, any death – even one not so sudden – makes the product suspect until it is proven innocent. Yet in this case, Pfizer simply dismissed the death as not related to the vaccine, just as the company did with Patient #11521497, who died 20 days later from cardiac arrest.

The article also provides more details on the Buenos Aires trial site, the largest one in the world, in which attorney Augusto Roux was severely injured with pericarditis and liver damage. Instead of being recorded as a severe adverse event, he was marked as having had COVID (even though he tested negative) and was summarily removed from the trial. Roux was on my podcast last July and told me Pfizer refused to help treat his injury because officials felt it had nothing to do with the vaccine, and insurance also refused to pay for treatment because the insurance company blamed it on him willingly joining the trial.

Die Welt reports that on Aug. 31, 2020, 53 of those in the trial in Buenos Aires were unblinded and removed from the trial against the protocol, which calls for this only “in emergencies” (unless this was indeed an emergency!). By the end of the second dose, a further 200 individuals were removed from the trial, meaning that overall, more than 250 of the original 1231 participants were terminated, thereby making the entirety of the data from the largest trial site irrelevant to use in the final trial results.

Overall, 21 participants in Pfizer’s phase 3 trial died, as compared to 17 in the control group before they were unblinded, which should have been a red flag before the shot ever took off. Pfizer claimed there was no evidence anyone died from the vaccine, but after it’s been revealed that a number of people in the trial suffered heart ailments and strokes, the company’s defense holds no water. Yet here we are, over two years later, and the shots are still on the market, promoted like manna from heaven, and even mandated in most hospitals and universities, including in red states. How is this not the top public policy issue of our day?

Consider the following from a public policy standpoint. Pfizer gets the government to pony up billions in taxpayer dollars for the shots, several billion more to promote, advertise, distribute, and mandate them on every human being alive – all while absolving Pfizer of liability. So how do we know the shots are safe? Who gets to monitor the clinical trial? The very manufacturer that was absolved of liability by the government! The Die Welt article even mentions that Pfizer pushed through a liability waiver on its contract not just for negligence, but also for “fraud or bad faith on the part of Pfizer itself.”

Pfizer responded to the Die Welt reporter by asserting that, “Regulatory authorities around the world have approved our Covid-19 vaccine. These approvals are based on a robust and independent assessment of the scientific data on quality, safety, and efficacy, including the phase 3 clinical trial.” Sure, authorities guaranteed the company endless funding, marketing, mandates, and indemnity so that Pfizer would have no incentive to even release the true results of its trial, much less make the product better.

How can this continue to go on after all we know?

Yet in all honesty, this year’s legislative sessions in red states have been an utter disgrace – with medical freedom not even being on the back burner of policy issues. The few brave legislators who seek to impose some sort of accountability on the state departments of health for promoting and mandating these shots are summarily shouted down. Florida is the only state where officials are holding Pfizer accountable with the convening of a grand jury. Just last week, the Florida Department of Health sent an alert to doctors warning them to inform anyone inquiring about the COVID shots about the adverse events reported to the CDC’s VAERS. Where are the other red states? Why is Ron DeSantis the only governor who values the Nuremberg Code?

What is it going to take to give this issue the prominence it deserves so that the policies and laws reflect the human toll these odious policies have taken on humanity? How many more people need to die for a lie? Remember, a study from Thailand showed that 29% of young males in the study sample suffered some form of subclinical heart damage whether they experienced symptoms or not. We have potentially hundreds of millions of people in the world who are ticking time bombs and in need of the best research, diagnostics, and treatment.

Amid all the existential threats to our security, civilization, culture, and economy – and there are certainly many – can you think of anything that matches the severity of this issue? From died suddenly to plummeting birth rates, how is the vaccine issue not the top concern of all public policy, given that it was injected in 5.5 billion people and officials are on the cusp of approving more mRNAs? So we’re now supposed to believe Moderna’s own published phase 3 trial results of its RSV shot that it’s 84% effective and absolutely no serious adverse events occurred? Within months, if we don’t stop it, this shot will be in the arms of every senior and then, eventually, in the arms of every newborn baby.

After Pfizer purposely fabricated its clinical trial, the company must now be on the hook for a different sort of trial – one Steve Deace and Daniel Horowitz layed out in “Rise of the Fourth Reich.” Unless we begin holding pharma companies accountable and erecting legal firewalls to protect the people from their endless experimentation, they will do this again and again.

FBI Backs Off on Anti-Catholic Document – But Can They Be Trusted?

A majority of Americans now believe that the Federal Bureau of Investigation is acting as the Democrat Party’s secret police. They’re not wrong. In its most recent public embarrassment, the FBI was caught circulating a document that declares traditional Catholics to be domestic terrorists that the feds should keep an eye on. The document stated that Catholics are tied to the “far-right white nationalist movement that the Biden regime made up out of thin air. Once they got caught, the FBI retracted the document.

An FBI whistleblower leaked the document last week to Kyle Seraphin, a former FBI special agent who was suspended without pay last June for complaining internally about the FBI’s corruption. Seraphin then published the anti-Catholic document online and talked about it on Tucker Carlson Tonight.

According to Seraphin, having a preference for listening to the Catholic Mass in Latin is being equated by the FBI to “adherence to anti-Semitic, anti-immigrant, anti-LGBTQ and white supremacist ideology.”

Even if that were true of Catholics – which it’s not – none of those things are crimes. You’re allowed to dislike gay people or illegal aliens if you want because those are thoughts in your head. The FBI under the Biden regime, however, is now claiming to have mind-reading capabilities and declaring people to be thought criminals based on the likelihood that they’ll vote against Democrats.

Once it was confronted with this outlandish violation of the First Amendment, the FBI retracted the document, stating that it didn’t meet their exacting standards. But doesn’t it? What has the FBI done since 2015 to give us any reason to trust the bureau, its agents, or its actions against conservative and traditionalist Americans?

Let’s take a quick trip down memory lane to examine just a few of the many scandals the FBI has been embroiled in since partisan hack Merrick Garland became the head of the Department of Justice.

One of the very first acts of the FBI under Garland and the Biden regime was to begin arresting Americans who had peacefully protested on January 6th. Dozens of those people, who participated in a First Amendment-protected protest, are being held without bail to this day, and are still awaiting trial. They’re political prisoners who are guilty of – at most – misdemeanor trespassing. Merrick Garland has vowed to arrest another 1,000 of the J6 protesters in 2023.

Just last week, we learned that the Washington field office of the FBI had pressured the Boston office to open criminal investigations into 140 people who rode the bus from Boston to DC on January 6th. The Boston field office agents refused because riding the bus is not an actionable crime.

The Biden regime then set about spying on parents who protested transgender and gay propaganda at local school board meetings. The FBI has also been viciously arresting pro-life Christians for silently praying near abortion clinics.

When New York City fired thousands of teachers who refused to take the dangerous experimental COVID vaccines, the city sent the teachers’ fingerprints and personnel files to the FBI. We don’t know what the FBI did with all those files, because we only found out about it from the teachers’ lawsuit against the city.

They raided President Trump’s house at Mar-a-Lago and rifled through Melania’s wardrobe before suddenly deciding that classified docs were okey-doke after a tractor-trailer load of stolen classified documents was found in Joe Biden’s offices and mansions.

Just last week, we learned that the FBI was paying professional agitators and informants to start fires and break things during the Black Lives Matter protests in 2020.

And that only scratches the surface of what the FBI has been up to – none of which by the way was legal. The House Committee on Weaponization of Government just kicked off last week. Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) is the committee chair, and he says he’s “never seen anything like it” when it comes to the droves of rank-and-file FBI agents who are suddenly coming forward as whistleblowers.

So, can we trust the FBI? Not as far as we can throw them. Catholics and Christians across America need to understand that they are all in the crosshairs of this criminal regime and its secret police force in the FBI.

The Droid Stares Back. A user’s guide to AI and transhumanism.

It is clear to me that we have been more or less asleep as a civilization, and for a good long while, having been at first intoxicated and then addicted to the technologies that have come so insidiously to characterize our lives. That is to say that we have bought into the myth that technology is neutral. And now we seem to have no power to resist it.

The Shape We Take

This technological totalization, it appears to me, is now manifesting in two very discrete but nevertheless related developments: 1) in the rise of AI expertise to replace that of the human; and 2) the transhumanist project that not only has achieved almost universal adulation and acceptance by the World Archons (I use the Gnostic term deliberately) but has accelerated over the past three years at an astonishing rate. This leads to the following inference: as AI becomes more human-like, humans become more machine-like. It is in inverse ratio, and indeed a nearly perfect one. I don’t think it is an accident or in any way an organic development.

The advent of ChatGPT technology, for a very mild example, renders much of human endeavor redundant—at least for the unimaginative. And, trust me, the last thing the World Archons want around the joint is imaginative humans. I am already wondering how many of the student papers I receive are generated by this technology. It is certainly a step up from the reams of bad papers available on various internet college paper websites (aka, “McPaper”), but no less demeaning to the cultivation of a free-thinking and self-directed citizenry. And I’m sure you’ve already heard about various forays into Robot Lawyer and Robot Doctor AI. The rise and implementation of AI teachers and professors, I’d say, is only a matter of time. Some “experts,” of course, say such technology will never replace human beings. These are probably the same people who said the Internet would never be used for porn or surveillance.

As Heidegger warned us, the technologies we use don’t only change our relationship to things-in-the-world; more importantly they change our relationships to ourselves and to the very enterprise of being human. Heidegger’s contemporary, the undeniably prophetic Russian philosopher Nikolai Berdyaev, saw the proverbial handwriting on the wall as well. In 1947, a year before his death, he wrote: “the growing power of technological knowledge in the social life of men means the ever greater and greater objectification of human existence; it inflicts injury upon the souls, and it weighs heavily upon the lives of men. Man is all the while more and more thrown out into the external, always becoming more and more externalized, more and more losing his spiritual center and integral nature. The life of man is ceasing to be organic and is becoming organized; it is being rationalized and mechanized.”

This objectification has jumped into hyperdrive, certainly over the past three years, as bodies (a curious metaphor) like the World Economic Forum have been pushing for increased use of technology and the surveillance it assures, while at the same time promoting a kinder, gentler face of transhumanism. They look forward to the day of microchipping children, for example, in therapeutic and evolutionary terms under the pathetic appeal of “increased safety,” a term employed to further all manners of social engineering and totalitarianism, past and present. Theirs is not a convincing performance.

Interestingly, the recent cultural phenomenon of celebrating anything and everything “trans” functions as a kind of advance guard, whether or not by design, in the transhumanist project. This advanced guard is normalizing the idea that human bodies are ontologically and epistemologically contingent while at the same time implying that a lifetime subscription to hormone treatments and surgeries is part of a “new normal.” And one can only marvel at the marketing success of this experiment in social engineering—which has now become very real biological engineering. Even on children.

But the transhumanist project is nothing new. As Mary Harrington has recently argued in a stunning lecture, the promotion of hormonal birth control (“the pill”) has been modifying human females for decades; it has changed what it is to be a woman and even changed the interior lives and biological drives of the women who take it. The trans phenomenon, then, is simply part of the (un)natural progression of the transhumanist project begun with modifying women’s bodies via the pill.

Carnival or Capitulation?

As a sophiologist, I am keenly interested in questions of the feminine in general and of the Divine Feminine in particular, and, as we have seen from its very beginning, the transhumanist project is nothing if not a direct assault on both, even as early as Donna Jean Haraway’s cartoonish proposition almost 40 years ago. Certainly, women are the ones bearing the cost of the transhumanist project in, for instance, college sports, not to mention public restrooms, and this assault is at heart an assault on the divinely creative act of conception and bearing children, that is, on the feminine itself. Is it any wonder that the production of artificial wombs as a “more evolved way” of fetal incubation is being floated as a societal good? On the other hand, at least one academic recently proposed using the wombs of brain-dead women as fetal incubators. What, then, is a woman? Even a Supreme Court justice can no longer answer this question.

As sports, fertility, and motherhood are incrementally taken from women, what’s left? Becoming productive (again, note the metaphor) feeders for the socialist-capitalist food chain? OnlyFans? Clearly, the explosion of that site’s popularity, not to mention the use of AI to alter the appearance of “talent,” is tout court evidence of the absolute commodification of the female body as production venue for male consumption. Of course, Aldous Huxley called all of this nearly 100 years ago.

My suspicion is that the current propaganda about climate and overpopulation are likewise props of the transhumanist project and the AI revolution that accompanies it. Because, let’s face it, the transhumanist revolution is the old story of power v. the masses, and AI is the key to ensuring there will be no democratizing going on in the world of the tech titans. For one thing, democracy is not possible in a world of brain transparency. Ask Winston Smith. And “fifteen-minute cities” have nothing to do with the environment. It is clear that the Archons are actively promoting the idea of culling the human herd, though they are reluctant to describe exactly how this might be achieved. The techno-evolutionary advances promised by the high priests of transhumanism, however, will not be made available to everyone, though the enticement of acquiring “freedom” from biology is certainly the bait used to gain popular acceptance for the project.

The fact is, with AI taking over more and more responsibilities from human beings, humans themselves are in danger of becoming superfluous. As Noah Yuval Harari has observed, “fast forward to the early 21st century when we just don’t need the vast majority of the population because the future is about developing more and more sophisticated technology, like artificial intelligence [and] bioengineering. Most people don’t contribute anything to that, except perhaps for their data, and whatever people are still doing which is useful, these technologies increasingly will make redundant and will make it possible to replace the people.” I can assure you: Harari is not the only one who has come to this conclusion.

It is for these and other reasons that the Dune saga includes in its mythos the tale of the Butlerian Jihad, a human holy war against thinking/sentient machines. I admit, I kind of like the idea, and I wonder if such a thing might actually come to pass at some point. John Michael Greer, a man I deeply respect, suggests in his book The Retro Future that we might instead be in for a “Butlerian Carnival,” a “sensuous celebration of the world outside the cubicle farms and the glass screens” that situates the technologies we use to a human scale—and not the other way around, which is what we see in the transhumanist/AI revolution. I hope he’s right. But one thing I do know: the Archons won’t let that happen without a fight.

In truth, in the face of the transhumanist/AI revolution, we find ourselves once again confronted with the question posed by the psalmist, “What is man, that thou art mindful of him? and the son of man, that thou visitest him?” Are we nothing but data sets to be instrumentalized by technocratic overseers, or are we indeed a little lower than angels and crowned with glory and honor?

How we answer these questions will have tremendous bearing on the future now rushing toward us.

ACT OF WAR: The U.S. military blew up Nord Stream pipelines, plunging western allies into energy collapse in effort to harm Russia

A bombshell report from independent journalist Seymour Hersh — published on Substack — reveals and confirms exactly what we reported last year: That the US Dept. of Defense covertly blew up the Nordstream pipelines, carrying out an act of terrorism against its own western allies in an insanely dangerous effort to harm Russia’s energy exports.

The destruction of the Nordstream pipelines (also printed as Nord Stream) was reportedly carried out with the help of the government of Norway, and the planting of explosives used the cover of the BALTOPS 22 US Navy exercise in June of 2022, during which US Navy divers planted explosives that were, three months later, remotely detonated by a sonar buoy dropped into the Baltic Sea with a Norwegian Air Force P8 Poseidon patrol plane.

As Hersh writes:

The C4 attached to the pipelines would be triggered by a sonar buoy dropped by a plane on short notice, but the procedure involved the most advanced signal processing technology. Once in place, the delayed timing devices attached to any of the four pipelines could be accidentally triggered by the complex mix of ocean background noises throughout the heavily trafficked Baltic Sea—from near and distant ships, underwater drilling, seismic events, waves and even sea creatures. To avoid this, the sonar buoy, once in place, would emit a sequence of unique low frequency tonal sounds—much like those emitted by a flute or a piano—that would be recognized by the timing device and, after a pre-set hours of delay, trigger the explosives.

CIA, Air Force, Navy, State Dept and Biden leaders were all in on it

The CIA, US Air Force, US Navy, US State Dept. and the Biden administration were all in on the planning, which of course makes them all war criminals for blowing up civilian infrastructure that has caused unprecedented economic destruction and human suffering across all of Western Europe.

Widespread shutdowns of industry, metals smelting operations, fertilizer production and even the entire BASF manufacturing facility in Germany soon followed the loss of Nordstream. Cutting off affordable, abundant energy to Europe was the last straw, and it is already beginning to plunge Europe into a new era of poverty and deindustrialization from which Western European civilization will likely never recover. The 2023 and 2024 crop harvests will also be devastated due to the lack of fertilizer, as nitrogen-based fertilizers are produced from the hydrocarbons that came from Russia via the Nordstream pipelines. This means many Europeans will starve due to the terrorism acts of the US and Norway.

Also thanks to the greenie climate cultists, European countries are generally unwilling to tap their own energy resources, which made them almost entirely dependent on Russia. Norway was one exception to that, as the country is eager to export energy to other European nations, which also explains why Norway was apparently happy to go along with the unlawful destruction of the Nordstream pipeline.

US officials cheered this act of terrorism against its own allies, including Germany

US officials were thrilled to see the pipeline destroyed, even though the loss of affordable energy is currently devastating the economies of European countries. From the Hersh article:

Asked at a press conference last September about the consequences of the worsening energy crisis in Western Europe, Blinken described the moment as a potentially good one:

“It’s a tremendous opportunity to once and for all remove the dependence on Russian energy and thus to take away from Vladimir Putin the weaponization of energy as a means of advancing his imperial designs. That’s very significant and that offers tremendous strategic opportunity for the years to come, but meanwhile we’re determined to do everything we possibly can to make sure the consequences of all of this are not borne by citizens in our countries or, for that matter, around the world.”

More recently, Victoria Nuland expressed satisfaction at the demise of the newest of the pipelines. Testifying at a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing in late January she told Senator Ted Cruz, “?Like you, I am, and I think the Administration is, very gratified to know that Nord Stream 2 is now, as you like to say, a hunk of metal at the bottom of the sea.”

On February 7, less than three weeks before the seemingly inevitable Russian invasion of Ukraine, Biden met in his White House office with German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, who, after some wobbling, was now firmly on the American team. At the press briefing that followed, Biden defiantly said, “If Russia invades . . . there will be no longer a Nord Stream 2. We will bring an end to it.”

Twenty days earlier, Undersecretary Nuland had delivered essentially the same message at a State Department briefing, with little press coverage. “I want to be very clear to you today,” she said in response to a question. “If Russia invades Ukraine, one way or another Nord Stream 2 will not move forward.”

Thus, Joe Biden, Victoria Nuland, Jake Sullivan, Tony Blinken and other US officials were all-in on the US committing this act of terrorism against civilian infrastructure, impacting the lives of literally hundreds of millions of Europeans. This is the perfect demonstration of the real “values” of the West: Sacrifice the economies of your own allies to try to hurt your geopolitical enemies, no matter how many lives are destroyed in the process.

Putin demands punishment of those responsible

Validimir Putin is already demanding that those responsible for this act of terrorism against civilian infrastructure be named and punished. From the UK Daily Mail:

The Kremlin said on Thursday the world should know the truth about who sabotaged the Nord Stream gas pipelines and that those responsible should be punished after an investigative journalist said U.S. divers blew them up at the behest of the White House.

In a blog post, Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative journalist Seymour Hersh cited an unidentified source as saying that U.S. navy divers had destroyed the pipelines with explosives on the orders of President Joe Biden.

Importantly, all the war criminals who carried out this heinous act against Western Europe are, of course, denying any involvement. We’re supposed to believe the pipelines just spontaneously blew up for no reason. It’s a “mystery” that the media and the White House don’t ever want solved.

Go figure.

We must stop the feds from tracking immunization status and imposing medical apartheid. Period. End of story. Full stop already!

We know that no product in the history of the world has been promoted with as much force as the COVID shots. We also know that no group of people has been more maligned, discriminated against, and punished than those who rightfully chose not to get those shots. And we know the government badly wants to track your vaccination status across a spectrum of health care and governmental databases. What exactly do you think the feds will do with that information and why do they want it – if not to discriminate against and punish those who don’t comply? The latest news of the CDC tracking immunization status with new ICD codes should spawn a torrent of ironclad legislation in red states to prohibit such tracking.

Recently, the National File uncovered audio from a September 2021 CMS meeting in which medical officer David Berglund expressed an interest in the feds using new ICD-10 codes to track those who are unvaccinated or partially vaccinated. “We have had interest in coding people who are not immunized for COVID-19,” said Berglund in his presentation. Well, it turns out that in April 2022, CMS implemented the following codes in the subcategory of “underimmunization status”:

• Z28.310 Unvaccinated for COVID-19
• Z28.311 Partially vaccinated for COVID-19
• Z28.39 Other under-immunization status

But the most jarring point is the note placed at the bottom of these new codes on page 1915 of the new ICD catalogue. “Note: These codes should not be used for individuals who are not eligible for the COVID-19 vaccines, as determined by the healthcare provider.”

Now, according to this perverted logic, not getting the gene therapy is somehow synonymous with an illness, disease, or diagnosis that would make the status eligible for an ICD code. That in itself is very disturbing. But what this note reveals is that they are only using the codes for those who refused to get the shots, not for those who were somehow ineligible. But why? If they believe that someone remaining unvaccinated is tantamount to having a vulnerable condition, then the important fact is just that they are not vaccinated, not why they are unvaccinated.

What this clearly demonstrates is that they want to track those who refused to get the shots. What do you think they will do with that information? It’s quite evident that they want the ability to identify the critical thinkers in this country and retaliate against them by engaging in medical apartheid. We need not imagine that. We already have the warning of the nightmare from the past two years of denying travel rights, entry into stores, and even organ transplants based on this personal decision.

What is also peculiar is that they rushed to get codes for the mythical disease of “unvaccinated,” but despite 1.5 million VAERS reports of COVID jab injuries, there is still no special ICD for COVID-19 vaccine injury. As Dr. Jessica Rose points out, there are now injuries associated with 14,000 of the 24,289 Preferred Term (PT) MedDRA codes reported to VAERS, yet they still refuse to code one generically for the shot itself.

As an aside, if you add up all the vaccine injuries reported to VAERS for all the shots for three decades combined, they only account for 21% of the total MedDRA codes. The COVID shots chewed up 58% of all medical diagnosis codes in just two years! So clearly the fact that they are diagnosing under-immunization but not vaccine injury demonstrates this is not about medical billing or academic research, but the imposition of a biomedical tyranny.

It’s therefore quite evident that there is an urgent need for red states to block the transmission of private immunization information to the federal government. Consider the fact that states like New York passed laws making it a felony for state agencies to pass along information about criminal alien sex offenders to federal immigration officials. The Second Circuit even upheld the constitutionality of the bill, even though immigration enforcement is a legitimate purview of the federal government and immigrating and remaining here illegally are not constitutional rights. If blue states can protect criminal aliens from the feds, shouldn’t red states be able to protect Americans from medical apartheid facilitated by spying on vaccination status?

At a minimum, all red states should:

• Abolish their state immunization registries or at least require consent to be placed in them.
• Ban all immunization tracking.
• Preclude the health departments and medical professionals from including a person’s immunization records in any interstate or federal immunization tracking system without obtaining consent from the patient. Specifically, the ICD codes used for vaccine reluctance should not be included without the consent of the patient.
• Notify the citizen immediately if any federal agency pings a state or local office about an individual’s immunization status.
• Codify immunization status into state civil rights anti-discrimination statutes.

There has never been an issue that is a bigger direct threat to our existence than the biomedical security state. We already know what the feds have done to us and what they are planning. Maria Van Kerkhove, the lead author of the WHO plan to copy China’s lockdowns, recently warned, “We need to strengthen the systems within countries around surveillance.” We are forewarned. Now it’s our time to plan and fight back against this tyranny. This time, we won’t be able to contend that we didn’t see this unimaginable degree of tyranny coming.