
In the early hours of July 4th, 2025, flash floods tore through Kerr County, Texas, overwhelming communities and claiming more than a hundred lives. As families were swept from homes and children clung to rooftops, the state called for help. Rescue boats were scarce. Time was short. And Austin’s elite Swift Water Special Operations Teams, some of the best-trained in the country, sat idle. Why? Because Fire Chief Joel Baker said no.
The justification was bureaucratic. Austin had, at one point, been owed approximately $800,000 in reimbursement for past deployments. But even Baker admitted the state was paying its bills and that no overdue balance existed. The real reason, it seems, was politics. And beneath that politics lies something even more disturbing: a bureaucracy that values optics over outcomes, identity over merit, and ideology over life.
Let us begin plainly. Chief Joel Baker was not hired because he was the best firefighter. He was hired because Austin, reeling from a fire department engulfed in scandal, needed a symbol. In the year prior to his 2018 appointment, the Austin Fire Department was under state, local, and federal investigation for alleged violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, including claims of both racial and sexual discrimination and harassment. Multiple lawsuits and sharp criticism from across the political spectrum made one thing clear: the city needed an identity hire to stem the bleeding. Baker, a black man with leadership experience, fit the profile. Since taking the post in December 2018, Baker has made it his mission to recruit based on race, sex, and sexual identity. He has said so proudly and publicly. Programs like “Pass the Torch,” which deliberately prioritize nonwhite, nonmale, and nonheterosexual applicants, are the centerpiece of his administration. The result? A fire department that is more diverse, but less competent.
The traditional qualifications for a firefighter, strength, stamina, intelligence, rapid decision-making under pressure, have not changed. But the standards have. In response to the predictable failure of his preferred demographics to meet existing thresholds, Baker simply changed the thresholds. He launched investigations into why minority applicants were underperforming. The answer was as predictable as the question: the tests were too hard. So Baker made them easier. Lowered the IQ bar. Softened physical expectations. All to ensure that more boxes could be checked on quarterly DEI reports.
The irony is brutal. The very teams Chief Baker refused to deploy, the Swift Water rescue units, are disproportionately composed of white men. They represent the last meritocratic redoubt within the Austin Fire Department. Many have years of experience and have saved hundreds of lives. But Baker did not build them. He has not promoted them. In fact, he has worked to marginalize them in favor of his DEI vision.
So when Governor Abbott issued the request for pre-deployment on July 2nd and 3rd, before the floodwaters peaked, Baker balked. Not because he feared for the safety of his crews, who train for this very scenario. Not because the request was unclear. And certainly not because of funding: Texas law mandates that the state reimburse such deployments. Baker knew this. But instead of action, he delivered delay. Instead of deploying a full contingent of trained teams, he sent a trickle. Three rescue swimmers at first. Eight more the next day. Another six after that. Lives were lost in those hours. And those lives are not coming back.
On July 7, the Austin Firefighters Association initiated a vote of no confidence in Chief Baker. Their accusation was blunt: his delay cost lives. They are right. But the story is larger than one man’s failure. It is about the machinery that elevated him in the first place, a bureaucracy more concerned with appearances than outcomes. DEI, diversity, equity, inclusion, sounds benign. In practice, it has become a license to discriminate against the competent and elevate the compliant.
Consider the broader pattern. In 2021, local media reported that nearly 75% of cadet interest cards came from “diversity targets,” a term that flattens human individuality into demographic quotas. African American interest increased 10%, Hispanic interest 21%, while traditional candidate pools shrank. Recruitment staff, under Baker’s orders, reoriented outreach toward these demographics, often to the exclusion of others. Qualified white male applicants were not merely overlooked; they were openly discouraged. Promotion boards began emphasizing identity over service record. The message to veteran firefighters was clear: your excellence is less important than your ethnicity.
And yet, when tragedy struck, it was those same sidelined men who were needed. Not the freshly hired recruits trained under softened standards. Not the symbolic hires who make for good press releases. But the swimmers, the climbers, the old hands who had trained for the worst and were ready to act. They were needed on July 4th. They were ready on July 4th. But they were told to wait.
The Austin Fire Department’s decline under Chief Baker is a microcosm of a national affliction. Public safety is no longer immune from ideology. Increasingly, departments across the US are being stacked from the top down with those whose chief qualification is fitting the narrative. It is not just about hiring. It is about purpose. When the goal of an agency becomes moral virtue as defined by progressive bureaucracy, instead of operational excellence, catastrophe follows.
Some will object that this criticism is unfair, that it ignores historical inequities or systemic bias. But fairness is not the standard in a flood. Competence is. When the waters rise and people scream from rooftops, they do not ask whether their rescuer ticks the right diversity box. They ask whether help is coming. Under Joel Baker, it did not come in time.
The truth is unkind but necessary. DEI ideology, when applied to public safety, kills. Not metaphorically. Not rhetorically. But physically, in water and mud and silence. When Austin refused to send its full water rescue force, it was not an accounting error. It was not a miscommunication. It was a bureaucratic decision rooted in contempt, contempt for the state government, contempt for those who did not fit the diversity mold, and contempt for the very idea that merit should matter more than metrics.
There is a place for diversity in public institutions. But that place must be downstream of excellence. Identity is not a substitute for skill. And when it becomes one, disaster is inevitable. In Kerr County, that disaster was measured in corpses. In Austin, it may soon be measured in resignations.

Leave a comment