fox files

YOUR HOBBY

Gun customization’s can be a hobby, fun and flashy, but did you know that customizing can also be used as evidence against you in a trial?

They also go as far as to attack posters on your car, what is written on your T-shirts and every single word scrutinized on your social media accounts.

LET’S PUT IT THIS WAY. ALL DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S ARE CAREER ASPIRING, NOT TO MENTION COMPLETE SCUMBAGS, SO THE ASSHOLES WILL USE EVERYTHING AND ANYTHING IN THEIR POWER TO RAISE THEIR STATUS, EVEN AT THE COST OF YOUR LIFE.

MAIN STREAM MEDIA

YOU ALL DO KNOW THAT THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THE MEDIA IS ONLY TO STIR UP THE POT, RIGHT?

GUN CONTROL

GUN CONTROL IS EQUIVALENT TO RELIGION FOR ADVOCATES OF IT. REMEMBER THAT!

WHILE GUN OWNERS SIMPLY WISH TO BE LEFT ALONE, PROHIBITIONISTS AREN’T SO INCLINED.

START LEARNING

START TAKING LESSONS FROM THE GUN CONTROL CROWD.

THEY NEVER STOP AND THEY NEVER GIVE UP. THEY CONTINUE TO PUSH AND KEEP PUSHING THEIR ‘AGENDAS’.

IT’S NO LONGER ENOUGH TO JUST POST PRO 2ND AMENDMENT SOCIAL MEDIA POSTS OR DONATE A CAUSAL $5 TO THE NRA OR OTHER GROUP(S) OF CHOICE AND THEN SIT BACK AND THUMP YOUR CHEST AND THINK YOU’VE NOW ‘DONE YOUR PART’.

INSIDER KNOWLEDGE

THE FACTS ABOUT DONALD TRUMP AND THE DEMOCRATIC RUSH TO IMPEACH HIM FOR RUSSIAN COLLUSION

With all the stories out there today regarding these ever-present words, ‘Trump’, ‘Russia’, ‘Collusion’, ‘Mueller’, here are some background details you are very likely not aware of, but I am.

This is insider knowledge.

The news is full of commentary and analysis on the Mueller Report.

One of the fundamental and most critical aspects of this unprecedented “investigation” is of the origins of law enforcement and intelligence agencies “spying” on Donald Trump, members of his campaign and family members.

The entire investigation was founded on intelligence collected through the process of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) Warrant issued by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC). A Warrant Application that was clearly fraudulent and blatantly treasonous. An application that could only have been presented to the FISC with the illicit support and criminal coordination of America’s top law enforcement departments.

The talking heads on TV (cable and the internet included) have never had their boots on the ground in one of these operations.
Neither has 99% of the US Intelligence operatives or DOJ agents.

There are very clear safety measures and procedures in place to prevent exactly what ‘they’ did to candidate and president-elect Donald Trump and his associates and organizations.

I think the most effective way to reveal how bad, evil, corrupt and conspired the government sanctioned spying on Donald Trump was is to explain exactly how it is supposed to work and exactly what safeguards were built into the process to protect and prevent this very crime. Safeguards designed and demanded upon by both Houses of Congress before they authorized the FISA.

The FISA process has one and only one purpose…

The FISC issues a FISA Warrant for legal espionage efforts against a U.S. person or persons after a preponderance of evidence has been developed by federal law enforcement officers that an American Citizen is a witting or unwitting agent of a foreign power engaged at some level of espionage against America.

The laws of this nation prohibit spies from spying on any American in the US – for virtually any reason. The only exception is if during the course of an approved and proper investigation by a federal law enforcement agency, it is discovered that an American citizen is conducting espionage.

The FBI has an incredible array of powers and tools to legally investigate suspected criminal activities. However, in the course of their investigations, agents have to follow stringent rules that are in place to protect citizen rights, with focus especially on the First, Fourth, and Fifth Amendments.

Federal law enforcement agents must develop cases based on evidence and then preserve the chain of evidence. Their powers of investigation and invasion are properly limited while allowing them to build and present a case for public trial.

Spies have no such restrictions. They can use all of their expertise, training, resources, technology and every source and method in their repertoire without being concerned about following the rules of evidence collection.

Why? Because their mission is not to build a legal case in a criminal investigation to submit to a prosecutor who will then present the case to a judge. Their mission is to ruthlessly and aggressively protect American national security through spying on adversaries and preventing them from spying on us. None of what they do ever gets into the court system, as all of their sources and methods are deemed classified and remain classified.

Before a FISA warrant is issued to any intelligence operative, the DOJ has to submit verified, corroborated and authenticated evidence to the FISC. And the application for that warrant has to unquestionably describe the activities of an American citizen here in the US engaged in an act of espionage against the US.

Then, the secret panel of judges (their identities are concealed to protect them from threats, blackmail, bribery and even hostile espionage) reviews the submitted application for the Warrant.

Their role is to protect the civil liberties and ensure due process of any American listed on the application.

By the very nature of the separation of powers, the judges of the FISC must rely on the veracity of the information contained in the application for a FISA Warrant submitted to them by the DOJ.

Once satisfied that the DOJ, through proper legal criminal investigative procedures, has produced sufficient evidence that an American is involved in spying on America, they issue the FISA warrant to the Intelligence Community.

It is then incumbent on the specially trained operatives of America’s international espionage network to engage in a no-holds-barred domestic espionage operation.

So, has this legal and authorized procedure been adhered to since its inception in 1978 under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act?

Nope. Most definitely not.

In 2002, the court revealed that the FBI Director (Freeh) and the AG/DOJ had “supplied erroneous information to the court” in more than 75 applications for search warrants and wiretaps.

Then in 2011, the Obama administration reversed restrictions on the National Security Agency, (NSA) permitting the agency to deliberately search Americans’ communications.

This became possible due to a new provision, section 702, being included in the 2008 legislation on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. An Act passed during the Obummer Administration and the 110th. US Congress.

And without Congressional approval, the Obama Administration no longer required a warrant for each individual target. That change meant that the NSA could listen and record any communications of a U.S. Citizen without a court first determining that there is probable cause that the people they were talking to were terrorists, spies or “foreign powers”.

Note that this Executive Branch change to the FISA procedures and limits was accomplished by the Obummer Administration without public debate or any specific authority from Congress.

The purpose of the Warrant is to transfer the actionable intelligence out of law enforcement and over to the Intelligence Community.

Understand, the FBI has fully trained and qualified counter-intelligence agents who can develop a case and arrest criminals engaged in espionage. But they are limited to legal and authorized methods to procure and collect evidence. Spies have no such limitations or restrictions.

Understanding this process helps you understand that the FBI needed the services of the American intelligence agencies in order to ‘uncover’ the proprietary activities of Donald Trump, his family, associates and campaign for U.S. President.

The FBI simply does not have the expertise or resources to conduct full blown espionage, so they brought on members of the intelligence community to conspire with them to circumvent the law and founding principles of the Constitution and the rights it guarantees to its sovereign citizens.

That’s the background.
And here is what happened to our President…

Beginning no later than 2015 and I suspect as early as 2013, the party in control of the White House leveraged its powers over the CIA, NSA, DNI, DHS, DOJ and especially the FBI Director and the senior leadership of the FBI to develop a falsified FISA application.

The White House instructed the various players to coordinate with the Hillary Clinton campaign and enlist the aid of its politically/monetarily motivated allies at CNN, MSNBC, ET EL, etc. to cast an international plume portraying the ‘evidentially’ proven tale of a U.S. Presidential candidate who was conspiring with Russia to bring America to its knees.

The FBI and others colluded and repeated the same false story until the claims appeared to have veracity.

Meanwhile, the FBI/DOJ used the “wide-spread” knowledge of this Russian collusion to trick the FISC into issuing a FISA Warrant.

How much domestic espionage did the FBI and other secret government intelligence gathering organizations (including many that you have never heard of; Q Group, SCS, F9, etc.) conduct against Trump and his efforts to win the White House? I do not know for sure. But what I do know is that this is the most massive, treasonous criminal coupe attempt in America’s history.

In the past, we have seen many waves of abuse of the police and intelligence gathering powers of the federal government, but to my knowledge, this is the first orchestrated effort to include the illicit collusion of all of the highest law enforcement and espionage agencies in the executive branch.

We have also seen plenty of openly biased news and media outlets, but this is the first time that they have openly worked with top level authorities in the federal government in order to affect/alter an election, challenge the efficacy of an election and then attempt a conspired coupe to overthrow and replace a duly elected president.

Was there a conspiracy to collude with Russia for the purposes of overthrowing the U.S. Government and instituting socialism (Liberalism) in America?

Hell yes! And the Democrats almost got away with it.

BEWARE LEVI STRAUSS & COMPANY. BEWARE.

LEVI STRAUSS CEO CHIP BERGH is all fired up and he seems unwilling to rest until he’s single-handedly alienated every freedom-loving customer the company ever had.

Bergh has been in the news for some time now sounding off and piping in about his absolute hatred, distaste and contempt for the 2nd. Amendment and has just recently outlined the three ways that he plans to use his company name recognition and money to bolster his anti-gun, anti-2nd. Amendment agenda.

ANOTHER DEPLORABLE STATE

For ignoring the nationwide success of permitless carry, also known as Constitutional Carry, the Kentucky State Journal newspaper deserves the latest raspberries award.

In an editorial written for when Kentucky Governor signed the bill to make it the nation’s 16th. permitless carry state, this good for nuthin’ news organization, and I use those words very loosely, and its editorial board wrote the following:

SO-CALLED ‘GUN VILOENCE’

THERE’S NO SUCH THING AS ‘GUN’ VIOLENCE!

Anti-gunners like to bring up a term when they argue for gun control: “gun violence.” They make it sound so reasonable that gun violence must be stopped, but we need to ask ourselves: What is gun violence, and is gun violence even real?

If you talk to an anti-gunner, they will, of course, tell you that gun violence is the most horrible thing occurring in the world today, but Robert A. Margulies, M.D. (yes, a medical doctor) begs to differ. In fact, Margulies says that gun violence is a myth. He writes,

I DO NOT BELIEVE THAT THERE IS ANY SUCH THING AS “GUN VIOLENCE.” THERE IS ALSO NO SUCH THING AS KNIFE VIOLENCE, CAR VIOLENCE, ALCOHOL VIOLENCE, ETC. VIOLENCE IS PERPETRATED BY AN INDIVIDUAL OR GROUP. THE TOOL USED IS IRRELEVANT.

MOST ARTICLES ABOUT ‘GUN VIOLENCE’ ARE WRITTEN AS IF TO JUSTIFY POSITIONS THAT THE AUTHORS DON’T RECOGNIZE OR ACCEPT AREN’T TRUE. LET’S BREAK IT DOWN:

1. SUICIDE, WHETHER INVOLVING FIREARMS OR NOT, IS AN ACT OF DESPERATION, REMORSE, INABILITY TO ACCEPT CIRCUMSTANCES, OR CHOOSING TO AVOID A SITUATION THAT THE INDIVIDUAL CANNOT CONTROL.

THE LITERATURE IS REPLETE WITH DATA ABOUT OTHER COUNTRIES’ NUMBERS AND RATES OF SUICIDE. CULTURE STRONGLY INFLUENCES RATES AS WELL AS THE PREFERRED MECHANISMS. SUICIDE BY FIREARM MAKES UP APPROXIMATELY TWO-THIRDS OF UNITED STATES FIREARM-ASSOCIATED DEATHS.

2. JUSTIFIABLE HOMICIDE FALLS INTO THE CATEGORY OF SELF-DEFENSE, INCLUDING LAW ENFORCEMENT ACTION. WHETHER IT INVOLVES FIREARMS, CONDUCTED ELECTRICAL WEAPONS, BLUNT OBJECTS, POINTED OBJECTS OR BLADES, OR HANDS MAKES NO DIFFERENCE IN THE END.

THESE MAKE UP 20 TO 25% OF FIREARMS-ASSOCIATED DEATHS. THESE OUTCOMES ARE SOCIALLY AND CULTURALLY ACCEPTABLE.

3. THERE ARE SMALL AND DECLINING NUMBERS OF ACCIDENTAL FIREARM DEATHS IN THE UNITED STATES.

4. THAT LEAVES APPROXIMATELY 25% OF FIREARMS ASSOCIATED DEATHS DUE TO CRIMINAL ACTIVITY. MORE THAN HALF OF THESE OCCUR IN JUST A FEW OF OUR LARGE CITIES AND ARE ASSOCIATED WITH GANG ACTIVITY AND OTHER DRUG OR SEX TRAFFICKING CRIME.

WITH THAT BASIC INFORMATION ON THE TABLE, THE QUESTION BECOMES: WHAT TO DO ABOUT VIOLENCE? THE EMPHASIS ON FIREARMS IS A PROVERBIAL RED HERRING. THE PROBLEM IS NOT FIREARMS, KNIVES, OR TIRE IRONS IN THE HANDS OF THE POLICE OR HONEST CITIZENS.

THE AVOWED INTENT OF MUCH OF THE LITERATURE ON “GUN VIOLENCE” IS TO DESIGN LAWS THAT WILL PRECLUDE CRIMINALS OBTAINING FIREARMS. THAT IDEA IS EITHER MISTAKEN OR MALICIOUS. NO LAW WILL PREVENT A CRIMINAL FROM BREAKING THE LAW. THAT IS WHAT DEFINES “CRIMINAL”. THE ONLY PURPOSE OF LAWS IS TO PUNISH PEOPLE FOR VIOLATING THEM, WHICH MAY BE OF SOME DETERRENCE. UNTIL HUMAN NATURE BECOMES ANGELIC, THERE WILL BE THE NEED TO PUNISH CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR.

Dr. Margulies nails this issue on the head. Gun violence is a myth. Violence is a reality, but the tool used in violence is irrelevant, and banning guns hasn’t and won’t solve the problem of violence committed by criminals.

It is exactly this reason that we need to both oppose all gun control laws and also train to be able to protect ourselves and those we love. Because a law isn’t going to prevent a criminal from doing evil; you will be what restrains evil when it happens near you.

Yes you, because YOU are YOUR OWN FIRST LINE OF DEFENSE and YOU are responsible for your own safety and the safety of family, friends and others dependent up such circumstances.

You do NOT wait minutes for the police to arrive when seconds count. PERIOD! GOT THAT.

BEING SILENCED

AMERICA IS BEING SILENCED ONE FB AND ONE TWITTER POST AT A TIME!

GOVERNMENTS. POLITICIANS. AUTHORITY. DEGREES, ET EL.

That all stems from humans being indoctrinated from birth onward that government is a necessary babysitter for humanity because, as the indoctrination continues to preach, mankind is not intelligent enough to govern himself. And of the people, by and for the people is NOT how it is working out even though it is stated that way. BAM!

SO-CALLED ‘COMMON SENSE’ GUN LAWS

SO MUCH FOR THE SO-CALLED ‘GUN-SAFETY’ ADVOCATES

I have a big problem with anti-gun groups adopting and utilizing the descriptor “gun-safety advocates.” It seems that their marketing and PR people are trying to spin their efforts in a new light. They don’t want to be seen as “anti-gun” or against the Second Amendment. They don’t want to be heard pushing for “gun control.” So they are now attempting to re-brand, if you will.

They’re trying to change the wording to create more positive connotations and good vibes about their intentions. I mean: Who doesn’t like gun safety? Anyone? Is there anyone out there trying to get people to be unsafe with guns?

LIFE VS DEATH

Life asked death:

Why do people love me and  hate you?

Death replied:

Because you’re a beautiful lie and I am the painful truth.