VIDEO BY TRUMP DEFENSE PRESENTED TO CONGRESS IS ABSOLUTELY OUTSTANDING.

WHAT I WANNA’ KNOW IS WHY IT HAS TAKEN THIS LONG TO GET THIS CRAP FINALLY OUT? WHY DAMMIT?

Trump’s Lawyers Destroy Democrats Showing Everyone Using the Word “Fight”

Total Media Blackout: January Vaccine Adverse Events Report – Nearly 3,000 Entries – Nearly 460 Deaths! Media now engaging in the CONvid-1984 Ministry of Truth’s propaganda machine.

Discovered on The Health and Human Services’ Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System’s website.  This latest report for January 2021 included nearly 3,000 entries of those having been vaccinated and almost 460 deaths recorded, many of them occurring within 7 days of receiving the jab.

This information was broken on Thursday evening. There is a correction.  It mentioned this as a COVID vaccine.  Not all are listed as such, but the report has so many spaces empty of vital information, it’s really hard to tell.

The ages of those who have died range from 1-year-olds up to 105 years old.  Some of those reported were vaccinated prior to January, even years before, according to the report, but those numbers were very few.  One could also question the trustworthiness of the accuracy of dating in this report as many times they don’t even account for the date they received a VAERS report, the date of vaccination or the date of death!

• However, given the sheer number of those who were reported to have died, many within seven days of being given the vaccine, I ask, why is mainstream media not reporting on this?  How many of these people were vaccinated with the COVID vaccine?  This is vital information that the media should be reporting on rather than engaging in the CONvid-1984 Ministry of Truth’s propaganda to come alongside the medical tyranny we see rising not only in the US but around the world.

The report also included medical history for some of the entries, as well as any other prior vaccines and allergies, though many are left blank.

This is a very serious issue given that representatives have basically given immunity to Big Pharma pimps who produce these vaccines, of which the COVID vaccines are new mRNA injections that haven’t fully been tested in the first place and the real guinea pigs are the population.

Sons of Liberty’s health and wellness expert Kate Shemirani, as well as Dr. Kevin Corbett and others have warned over and over that what is being referred to as a “vaccine” is nothing more than a means that will create havoc in people, including killing them.

Last year and moving into this year,  Shemirani was blasted by the UK media for warning against the vaccines being produced and took many shows to show what was in them.

Guide To Being Woke

Being “woke” is very important in order to show the world you’re a good person, and also to avoid having your entire life wrecked by a Twitter mob!

In order to achieve success and respect from all the good woke people — which is the most important thing you can achieve in life — you need to learn how to be properly woke! Here is THE definitive guide:

Carefully choose your pronouns and then scream them at everyone you meet: Whenever you go to Costco, loudly scream your pronouns in shoppers’ faces. If anyone refuses to celebrate your pronouns, smash a giant box of pretzels over their head and call the manager.

Select the most oppressed identity possible: Test people’s loyalty to the cause by identifying as a walrus and cancel anyone who doesn’t make walrus noises every time they see you.

Compare everything to Nazis: Compare everything to Nazis (as long as you’re a Democrat. If you’re a Republican this might get you fired).

Learn to hate the right people: Hate is good when directed at the correct targets. All you have to do is follow the guidelines of a mentally ill Twitter mob who will help steer your hate in the right direction!

Pre-order David Hogg’s Good Pillow: You want to sleep at night, don’t you??

Classify everyone according to their race and not as an individual: Always loudly acknowledge the skin color of every person you talk to and make it the main subject of the conversation.

If you are white, do not have any black friends: This may trick you into thinking you aren’t racist.

To help atone for your racist past, try some casual segregation: Create safe spaces where everyone is segregated by race, gender, and gender identity. It’s the only way to achieve unity. Anyone who objects to this is racist.

Vote for policies that sound virtuous, no matter how much they actually harm people of color: Always vote for policies with virtuous-sounding names, even if they destroy black and brown communities. Appearance is everything!

Always have extremely low expectations of minorities: Be sure to constantly remind them they can never overcome their circumstances without your help.

Abandon religion, and instead accept everything the woke crowd believes without question: Your religious beliefs are at odds with others. You should fix that and accept Wokism. Repeat this: WOKISM IS NOT A CULT. WOKISM IS NOT A CULT. WOKISM IS NOT A CULT. WOKISM IS NOT A CULT. WOKISM IS NOT A CULT.

Achieve inner peace by constantly beating yourself up for not doing better: Place a hard yoke and a heavy lifelong burden upon yourself that will never be satisfied and that will never offer grace, forgiveness, or rest.

That’s pretty much it! Get back when you have achieved all these.

I’ll probably have a new list for ya’ by then!

CYA

Decades Before The Civil War, Lincoln Saw An Approaching Storm. Every American Should Read His Warning.

Beyond their brutality, the young lawyer feared these mobs for the lawlessness they embodied — and the idle familiarity with which his fellow Americans seemed to accept these incidents.

To a hall filled with young men on a cold Illinois night in January 1838, Abraham Lincoln delivered his earliest recorded public remarks.

For the 50 years prior, the living rooms, parlors, and public offices of our country had been teeming with the brave Americans who’d fought, struggled, and suffered to create these United States. “Nearly every American,” Lincoln recalled, “had been a participator in some of its scenes.”

But now that generation was dying off. What no invading army could, time, he lamented, had itself accomplished: “They were a forest of giant oaks; but the all resistless hurricane had swept over them, and left only, here and there, a lonely trunk… to combat, with its mutilated limbs, a few more ruder storms, then to sink, and be no more.”

Without their life experience, he realized, his was the first generation of Americans tasked with upholding their fathers’ noble experiment simply by the strength of their own virtues. This, he warned, would be very difficult.

As he looked around him, at both slave states and their northern neighbors, he saw and feared the evil of swelling mobs not merely for their unfortunate victims, but for our national tolerance of their violence and misrule — and the effect this shrugging of shoulders and murmuring of approval or disapproval would have on patriotic and unpatriotic men alike.

The incidents weren’t always seemingly connected by cause. A group of gamblers hanged; a mixed-race murderer burned alive; black men suspected of planning insurrection, and then white men suspected of sympathizing, and then simply out-of-state strangers caught in the middle of swelling hates. But beyond their brutality, the young lawyer feared these mobs were connected for the lawlessness they embodied — and the idle familiarity with which his fellow Americans seemed to accept these incidents.

While the 1830s mobs “hang gamblers, or burn murders,” he cautioned, tomorrow’s mobs would hang and burn the innocent — “and thus it goes on, step by step, till all the walls erected for the defense of the persons and property of individuals, are trodden down, and disregarded.”

While after January 2021’s Capitol riot we’ve all seen the ruthless efficiency with which our government is capable of cracking down on lawlessness, we too saw the summer before, when months of attacks on federal officers, politicians, police, private homes, courthouses, and innocent bystanders met calculated indifference and shrugged excuses for “historic racial injustices.”

This too, was all too familiar to Lincoln, who knew the mob will go further and spread deeper, warning, “by instances of the perpetrators of such acts going unpunished, the lawless in spirit, are encouraged to become lawless in practice; and having been used to no restraint, but dread of punishment, they thus become, absolutely unrestrained.”

“On the other hand,” he predicted, “good men, men who love tranquility, who desire to abide by the laws, and enjoy their benefits, who would gladly spill their blood in the defense of their country; seeing their property destroyed; their families insulted, and their lives endangered; their persons injured; and seeing nothing in prospect that forebodes a change for the better; become tired of, and disgusted with, a Government that offers them no protection; and are not much averse to a change in which they imagine they have nothing to lose.”

Combined, he warned, these seemingly opposing feelings come to one terrible conclusion: “the strongest bulwark of any Government, and particularly of those constituted like ours, may effectually be broken down and destroyed — I mean the attachment of the People.”

To ensure that the fading “scenes of the revolution are [not] now or ever will be entirely forgotten,” Lincoln prescribed “in history, we hope, they will be read of, and recounted, so long as the Bible shall be read.”

Yet today at The Washington Post, New York Times, and at the top of our government, the privileged and ignorant children of our country tell Americans our experiment is tainted, our Revolution was for evil, our Civil War was not enough. They demand reparations through re-education, racist quotas, kneeling subservience, and crude offerings of money. Neither the honored dead of the Revolution nor the lives of 300,000 Yankee boys lying stiff in Southern dust will appease them — they want more than the blood of our countrymen.

To “fortify against” the mob, Lincoln also prescribed an American “political religion” rested on law, order, morality, and reason, yet today’s revolutionaries reside at the very height of our government, inclined to rule toward the same terrible ends the newspapers, college professors and street activists demand. While we all agree the mob’s attack on the Capitol was intolerable, many claim that mobs of Black Lives Matter and Antifa members occupying and burning our cities are less wicked, justified by some imaginary historic cause.

Black separatism, the left-wing Southern Poverty Law Center claimed Thursday, is no longer born of hate, but “out of valid anger against very real historical and systemic oppression.” Lincoln, however, knew “there is no grievance that is a fit object of redress by mob law.”

Just more than two decades after his remarks, Lincoln was president. His office was characterized by a stunning bravery, as well as the very principles he called for in 1838 — “general intelligence, sound morality and, in particular, a reverence for the Constitution and the laws.”

Treading carefully but boldly between Southern sympathizers and abolitionist radicals, the man who in 1838 lamented the passing of our Founding Fathers would as president write the end of their page in history, uniting once and for all the truths espoused in our Declaration of Independence with the laws laid out in our Constitution.

For a century, Lincoln’s story was derided and dismissed by Southern apologists seeking to write him out of history. Today, his story is derided and dismissed by racists and radicals of different politics, working hard to undo the political religion he cemented.

Today, on Abraham Lincoln’s 212th birthday, Americans must remember his life, his deeds, his sacrifice, and the lives, deeds, and sacrifices of all who came before and after him in the service of these United States. If we cannot quickly return to the vision they fought and died for, heed the warnings of 1838, and remember the lessons of our Revolution and Civil War, we are just as sure to lose our country as ever before.

Lucasfilm fired Gina Carano for a Holocaust comparison. So what will they do with Pedro Pascal’s tweet doing the same?

Pascal compared former President Donald Trump’s immigration policies to the Holocaust.

February 11, 2021   

On Wednesday, Lucasfilm fired actress Gina Carano for a social media post referring to the Holocaust that her critics said was anti-Semitic. But she’s not the only “The Mandalorian” actor who has posted ill-advised Holocaust comparisons on social media.

Carano, who played Cara Dune on Disney+’s popular Star Wars series was fired ostensibly for making an “abhorrent and unacceptable” social media post citing Jewish oppression at the hands of the Nazis and comparing it to censorship of conservative points of view and cancel culture. Her post triggered a social media campaign by the left on Tuesday to have her fired by Lucasfilm.

This was the latest in a series of social media controversies surrounding the actress in which voices on the left demanded that she be canceled for holding unpopular opinions. Last September, when social media demanded Carano add pronouns to her bio to “support trans lives,” she jokingly added the words “boop/bop/beep” to her Twitter name.

“They’re mad cuz I won’t put pronouns in my bio to show my support for trans lives. After months of harassing me in every way. I decided to put 3 VERY controversial words in my bio.. beep/bop/boop,” she tweeted in response to the criticism. “I’m not against trans lives at all. They need to find less abusive representation.” This was apparently transphobic.

In subsequent social media posts, Carano tweeted a meme questioning COVID-19 mask mandates, made comments calling for laws to increase election security, and liked social media posts making the point that Black Lives Matter probably shouldn’t riot if they want people to sympathize with their cause.

Each of these social media posts generated a controversy with people calling for her to be fired. On Wednesday, a spokesperson for Lucasfilm finally confirmed that Carano was no longer employed by the company, which is owned by Disney. After news broke that Carano had been canned by Lucasfilm, many of the social media users calling for her firing cheered.

But if Carano’s post, in the words of the Lucasfilm spokesperson, is “denigrating people based on their cultural and religious identities” and also “abhorrent and unacceptable,” what does Lucasfilm make of this 2018 tweet from “The Mandalorian” star Pedro Pascal?

Here, Pascal is comparing former President Donald Trump’s immigration policies to the Holocaust. The tweet leaves out important context. The “kids in cages” narrative surrounding Trump’s policies was misleading, given that the Obama administration built the facilities where migrants detained under Trump’s “zero-tolerance” immigration enforcement policies were held.

There is no comparable outrage over Pascal’s tweet. No one on the left called or now calling for him to be fired, or accusing him of anti-Semitism or white supremacy for his Holocaust comparison.

The left is now nothing more than totalitarian identity politics with people that are the Mount Olympus of stupid where there is no lower level of stupidity, ignorance and less value to the planet.

The whole entire movement is in itself cannibalistic in nature and it will eat itself alive and eventually implode, as do all other socialist movements in history as is proven out.

How anyone who is left can wake up each morning and live with themselves, knowing full well that they belong to a party of cheats and liars is beyond my comprehension. Period.

SO HERE’S THE JEAPARDY QUESTION. PICTURE THE JEAPARDY THEME SONG TICKING AWAY IN THE BACKGROUND.

ANYONE WONDERING WHY BIDEN WILL DROP THIS CASE WITH A CHINESE COMPANY THAT TRUMP WANTED BANNED?

ANYONE? BUELLER. BUELLER.

Biden moves toward shutting down Trump TikTok fight

The Justice Department on Thursday motioned toward dropping a series of cases against the app TikTok, as the administration steers away from former President Donald Trump’s China strategy.

In a letter sent to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, attorneys at the Justice Department wrote that since the Biden administration is conducting “an evaluation” of Trump’s ban, the court should delay all litigation related to the issue. Biden lawyers added that it is likely that the review will “narrow the issues presented or eliminate the need for judicial review entirely.”

The Office of the Solicitor General asked that every case related to the TikTok ban be delayed until April, a position to which it said lawyers from TikTok agreed. The letter stated that the Biden administration will pursue other means of securing data security.

“The Department of Commerce remains committed to a robust defense of national security as well as ensuring the viability of our economy and preserving individual rights and data privacy,” wrote John Hall, a Justice Department attorney on the case.

Trump last year attempted to ban the popular app, owned by the Chinese company ByteDance, amid national security concerns surrounding its connections to the Chinese government. Trump’s crusade quickly became embroiled in an ongoing court battle that has played out alongside a federal push threatening to force TikTok to sell off its American operations.

In a case before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, TikTok took Trump to task for issuing orders “impermissibly banning” the app. The court in December ordered the president to respond to TikTok’s complaint by Feb. 18, at which point the case would be Biden’s responsibility.

As that deadline draws nearer, it is becoming increasingly clear that Biden will not pursue the case with Trump’s vigor and may even drop it altogether.

ByteDance indefinitely shelved a sale of the app to Walmart and Oracle, the Wall Street Journal reported Wednesday, with people familiar with the matter saying that they expect Biden to review Trump’s executive order calling for a ban.

And late Wednesday evening, the Justice Department sent a letter to a district court judge in one of the government’s cases, asking for a delay in proceedings as the administration reconsiders Trump’s policy.

That same evening, Biden took his first phone call with Chinese President Xi Jinping, in which the world leaders discussed trade and human rights. Before the call, White House press secretary Jen Psaki deflected questions about the administration’s stance on the TikTok ban.

“We are comprehensively evaluating the risks to U.S. data, including from TikTok, and will address them in a decisive and effective fashion,” Psaki said at a press briefing. “If we have news to announce, we will announce it.”

The Justice Department declined to comment on Biden’s attitude toward the proposed TikTok ban.

The Biden administration in the past month has switched the government’s position in a number of high-profile Trump-era cases. Biden’s Solicitor General Office on Wednesday informed the Supreme Court that the federal government no longer believes that Obamacare is unconstitutional. Earlier this month, the administration convinced the high court to de-list two immigration cases: one over funding for the Mexican border wall, the other challenging Trump’s “remain in Mexico policy.”

Troop Deployments in Washington Are a Disaster Waiting to Happen

“Tyranny in form is the first step towards tyranny in substance,” warned Senator John Taylor two hundred years ago in his forgotten classic, Tyranny Unmasked. As the massive National Guard troop deployment in Washington enters its second month, much of the media and many members of Congress are thrilled that it will extend until at least mid-March. But Americans would be wise to recognize the growing perils of the militarization of American political disputes.

The military occupation of Washington was prompted by the January 6 clashes at the Capitol between Trump supporters and law enforcement, in which three people (including one Capitol policeman) died as a result of the violence. Roughly eight hundred protestors and others unlawfully entered the Capitol, though many of them entered nonviolently through open doors and most left without incident hours later.

The federal government responded by deploying twenty-five thousand National Guard troops to prevent problems during President Joe Biden’s swearing-in—the first inauguration since 1865 featuring the capital city packed with armed soldiers. Protests were almost completely banned in Washington for the inauguration.

Instead of ending after the muted inauguration celebration, the troop deployment was extended for the Senate impeachment trial. Senator Chris Murphy (D-CT) declared, “So long as Donald Trump is empowered by Senate Republicans, there is still the chance that he is going to incite another attempt at the Capitol.” But the Senate vote on Senator Rand Paul’s (R-KY) motion labeling the trial as unconstitutional signaled that the trial will be anticlimactic because Trump is unlikely to be convicted. The actual trial may be little more than a series of pratfalls, alternating between histrionic Democratic House members and wild-swinging, table-pounding Trump lawyers. A pointless deluge of political vitriol will make a mockery of Biden’s calls for national unity.

Then the troop deployment was extended into at least mid-March because of unidentified threats made to members of Congress. Acting Army Secretary John Whitley announced last week: “There are several upcoming events—we don’t know what they are—over the next several weeks, and they’re concerned that there could be situations where there are lawful protests, First Amendment–protected protests, that could either be used by malicious actors, or other problems that could emerge.”

“We don’t know what they are” but somebody heard something somewhere, so the military deployment will continue. Threats have occurred in waves toward members of Congress at least since the farm crisis of the 1980s, but prior menacing did not result in the occupation of the capital city.

Perpetuating the troop deployment is also being justified by melodramatic revisionism. In congressional testimony last week, Capitol Police acting chief Yogananda Pittman described the January 6 clash at the Capitol as “a terrorist attack by tens of thousands of insurrectionists.” Apparently, anyone who tromped from the scene of Trump’s ludicrous “I won by a landslide” spiel to the Capitol was a terrorist, or at least an “insurrectionist” (which is simply “terrorist” spelled with more letters). Is “walking on the Mall with bad thoughts” sufficient to get classified as a terrorist in the Biden era? 

Placing thousands of troops on the streets of the nation’s capital could be a ticking time bomb. The longer the National Guard is deployed in Washington, the greater the peril of a Kent State–caliber catastrophe. The Ohio National Guard’s volley of fire in 1970 that killed four students and wounded nine others was a defining moment for the Vietnam era. 

Forty years later, the Cleveland Plain Dealer published an investigation of the Kent State shooting based on new analyses of audio recordings from the scene. The Plain Dealer concluded that an FBI informant who was photographing student protestors fired four shots from his .38-caliber revolver after students began threatening him. That gunfire started barely a minute before the Ohio National Guard opened fire. Gunshots from the FBI informant apparently spooked guard commanders into believing they were taking sniper fire, spurring the order to shoot students. The informant denied having fired, but witnesses testified differently. (The FBI hustled the informant from the scene and he later became an undercover narcotics cop in Washington, DC.) Though there is no evidence that the FBI sought to provoke carnage at Kent State, FBI agents involved in COINTELPRO (the Counterintelligence Program) in the 1960s and 1970s boasted of “false flag” operations which provoked killings.

If some malicious group wanted to plunge this nation into chaos and fear, National Guard troops at a checkpoint would be an easy target—at least for the first moments after they were fired upon (most of the troops do not have ammo magazines in their rifles). The sweeping reaction to January 6 might be far surpassed if troops are gunned down regardless of whether the culprits were right-wing extremists, Antifa, or foreign infiltrators. An attack on the troops would likely perpetuate the military occupation and potentially spur Biden to declare martial law.

Last spring, when riots erupted after the killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis, President Trump warned that “the Federal Government will step in and do what has to be done, and that includes using the unlimited power of our Military and many arrests.” Many activists were justifiably appalled at the specter of Trump seizing dictatorial power over areas wracked by violent protests. But the danger remains regardless of who is president.

Martial law is the ultimate revocation of constitutional rights: anyone who disobeys soldiers’ orders can be shot. There are plenty of malevolent actors here and abroad who would relish seeing martial law declared in Washington, the paramount disgrace for the world’s proudest democracy.

Unfortunately, Biden would have plenty of support initially if he proclaimed that violence in Washington required him to declare martial law. As the Washington Post noted in 2018, a public opinion poll showed that 25 percent of Americans believed “a military takeover was justified if there were widespread corruption or crime.” The Journal of Democracy reported that polls showed that only 19 percent of Millennials in the US believed that it would be illegitimate “in a democracy for the military to take over when the government is incompetent or failing to do its job.” But trusting to military rule for Millennial wish fulfillment would be the biggest folly of them all. Support for martial law is the ultimate proof of declining political literacy in this nation.

Regardless of the risks, some politicians are clinging to the presence of the troops in Washington like Linus clutching his “security blanket” in a Peanuts cartoon. Will we now see regular alarms from a long series of politicians and political appointees working to “keep up the fear”?

History is littered with stories of nations scourged by “temporary” martial law that perpetuated itself. Anyone who believes America is immune should recall Senator Taylor’s 1821 warning against presuming “our good theoretical system of government is a sufficient security against actual tyranny.”

WAIT. THE LEFT AND LEFT IN CONGRESS ARE USING TRUMP’S WORDS, ‘FIGHT LIKE HELL’ WHICH ALL PROUD AMERICANS SHOULD DO IN POLITICS FOR THEIR RIGHTS, AS MEANING LITERALLY AND PHYSICALLY CONTACTING OTHERS.

BUT, BUT, BUT ……..

WHY WAS USING SOCIAL MEDIA TO INFLUENCE THE ELECTION BY JIM MESSINA WHEN OBUMMER WAS RUNNING FOR PRESIDDENT OK TO DO BUT NOW IF IT’S CONSERVATIVES USING SOCIAL MEDIA IT’S NOW NOT OK?

JUST WATCH THIS VERY, VERY SHORT VIDEO AND TELL ME WHY THE HYPOCRISY NOW. WHY?

I WANNA’ KNOW WHY THAT IS DAMMIT. WHY?!

FLASHBACK: Messina Touts 2012 Obama Campaign’s ‘Targeted Sharing’ Technique on Facebook

Barack Obama campaign manager Jim Messina in 2013 touted the 2012 campaign’s use of “targeted sharing” on Facebook to use supporters as a way to persuade their undecided friends and family to support Obama.

A former Obama campaign official said this week that Facebook allowed the team to access data and information to a degree it wouldn’t normally allow, except “they were on our side.”

Messina discussed the campaign’s use of “big data” to propel Obama to victory in 2012 during the Milken Institute’s global conference in 2013.

“We decided on the first day of the campaign to use data across department, because we thought it was the best avenue to the truth, and we ended up using data to inform almost every major decision we did in the campaign, and we had a singular goal to run a personalized campaign, where you got a different campaign than you did, all based on our ability to move you and persuade you to vote and support Barack Obama,” he said.

“And there’s 332 electoral votes that show it worked,” Messina added. Obama trounced Mitt Romney in the electoral college, 332-206, and he also won a majority of the popular vote for the second time, a rare feat for any president.

Messina noted a sea change in social media between 2008 and 2012; his tech team began to use targeted sharing to get Obama re-elected.

“We built this thing called targeted sharing … It allowed us to use Facebook to persuade people,” he said. “We spent a billion dollars to figure out a simple truth: What your friends and family and neighbors say is more important to your consumer decisions and your political decisions than anything else because you’re getting so much data thrown at you.”

He touted how the campaign told people targeted on Facebook to share videos with specific friends who were being also targeted by the campaign.

“So the final six days of the campaign, six million people logged onto Facebook through BarackObama.com, and they saw a 20-second Michelle Obama video, because everyone loves Michelle Obama,” Messina said. “And at the end of the 20 seconds, we had matched our data with their data, and we gave them five of their best friends who are undecided voters, and said, ‘Click here to send them a video, click here to send them information.’ Of those people, 78 percent of them voted for Barack Obama.”

NOW THERE ARE TWO FINITE STANDARDS IN THE U.S. – LEFT SOCIALISM IS GOOD WHILE ALL CONSERVATISM IS NOW WRONG, UNACCEPTABLE AND NEEDS TO BE SILENCED.

Progressives demand that conservatives practice tolerance — at all times — and if they dare to say or post anything on social media that strays from politically correct speech, then they risk being “canceled” from society. The offender may lose their jobs and livelihoods, get blacklisted in Hollywood or be run out of corporate America.

Roseanne Barr is one such example. In 2018, her hit TV show, “Roseanne,” was abruptly canceled by ABC following a controversial tweet directed at a former Obama administration adviser. But that’s just the tip of the iceberg — if you’re a libertarian like Barr or lean right.

It’s commonplace that if you’re a professional athlete or play college sports, you risk being booted from your sports leagues over one bad tweet or post. And for nonathletes, one may be kicked out of college or see their hard-won acceptance to an Ivy League university revoked no matter how long ago the offensive transgression transpired. It doesn’t matter if you were a young, immature teenager.

If you’re a conservative, then your life and reputation could be permanently tarnished.

But that’s not the only penalty. If any conservative posts a homophobic or transphobic slur, for example, they will be swiftly banned from Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, Instagram and other Big Tech platforms — possibly forever. Good riddance!

However, apparently, if you hold a top position in the Biden administration, you’re permitted to tweet homophobic smears against U.S. Senator Lindsay Graham — and suffer no consequences. Talk about a rigged system!

In a recently unearthed tweet from last August, Biden’s liberal press secretary Jen Psaki — a former CNN contributor — tweeted, “Only in 2020 does #LadyG get to push a bunch of debunked conspiracy theories while questioning @SallyQYates (aka an American hero).”

Psaki mocked Graham’s sexual identity and harassed him, actions that unequivocally violate Big Tech’s terms of service. Others who commit similar offensive acts face suspension of their accounts or worse, being de-platformed by these networks. Biden’s spokeswoman also spread a conspiracy theory that Graham is a cross-dressing homosexual despite his public statements saying otherwise. Back in 2018, following a homophobic slur by another liberal, Chelsea Handler, Graham told a TMZ reporter: “She knows zero about me. To the extent that it matters, I’m not gay.”

So, at minimum, Psaki spread fake news about Graham’s sexual orientation while appearing to shame and bully the GOP lawmaker “out of the closet,” despite it being none of her business — or anyone else’s for that matter — what is his sexual preference or identity. Make no mistake. Graham’s sexuality isn’t the issue. Who he chooses to love, and how he chooses to identify, is his prerogative.

The issue is the appalling double standard and hypocrisy in America today. Conservatives and libertarians are held to completely different standards than progressives. It’s an unfair and unequal system that’s tearing apart the fabric of our nation.

Here’s what should happen: Psaki should be held to the same standards as all Americans. Twitter and other social media should shut her accounts like they do to others, and President Joe Biden should issue a statement condemning her homophobic tweets while announcing her replacement. Or Biden’s press secretary should apologize to Lindsay Graham and be given a second chance in the court of public opinion — as should all Americans guilty of offensive speech. If the Biden administration truly seeks to unify the country, it cannot perpetuate this arbitrary system that punishes some for speech that’s repugnant and not others based on political affiliation.

That’s an irrefutable form of discrimination.

Bottom line: Until progressives practice tolerance and hold members of their own party to the same standards as others, they have lost the moral authority needed to lead the nation.