The Truth Is Out There

SOCIETAL RIGHTS


OUR RIGHTS DO NOT DEPEND ON WHAT CRIMINALS DO.

DOING SO CAN AND WILL END UP INFRINGING ON FREE SPEECH.

THAT’S SOMETHING THAT SHOULD CONCERN EVERYONE. EVEN THOSE ON THE LEFT.

BAM


February 2nd, 1871 the biggest treasonous act in history, created the corporation called the UNITED STATES. The flag of this foreign entity is the red bar with three red stars above on a white background. The vatican, the crown and the wealthy few conspired to rob the nation. The organic Constitution was counterfeited and called the constitution OF the United States; Not the Constitution FOR these United States of America.

UNalienable rights became INalienable rights. Articles became amendments.

All HUMAN SOULS have UNalienable rights.

INalienable rights: Rights which are not capable of being surrendered or transferred without the consent of the one possessing such rights. Morrison v. State, Mo. … INalienable rights are NOT inherent in man and can be alienated by government.

The final version of the Declaration of Independence ORIGINALLY DECLARED: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain UNalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

These congressional criminals sold out America to the british bastards that we already kicked off our backs. Through many more acts and frauds, the british regency attorneys have ushered in statutes and equity/admiralty law of the sea on our land.

THIS IS WHERE YOUR PAPER STRAWMAN RIGHTS CAME IN. WHERE YOU LOST YOUR SOVEREIGN RIGHTS TO BRITISH ADMIRALTY LAW. AND WHY THE THE US NEVER WON THE WAR. THE BRITS SIMPLY TURNED THEIR BACKS ON US AND IS THE REASON WHY THE BRITISH CROWN STILL OWNS THE US TO THIS VERY DAY. YES. THE US IS STILL INDEBTED TO THE CROWN.

Now through fraud, deception and secret adhesionary contracts, we have gone from total freedom to complete slavery called voluntary servitude thanks to the UN-ratified 14th amendment.


I JUST FINISHED READING A BOOK BY YALE LEGAL SCHOLAR JAMES WHITMAN.

THE BOOK IS TITLED ‘HITLER’S AMERICAN MODEL’

IN IT, HE PROVIDES IRREFUTABLE PROOF THAT HITLER AND THE NAZI’S CULLED MANY OF THEIR SOCIALISTIC ‘IDEALS’ FROM THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY.

BUT YOU CAN’T ARGUE THAT WITH DEMOCRATS BECAUSE THEY KNOW IT BUT WILL NEVER ADMIT ITS TRUTH.


I AM A WARRIOR.

NOT BECAUSE I WILL ALWAYS WIN.

BUT BECAUSE I WILL ALWAYS FIGHT.


I’M A CONSERVATIVE BECAUSE:

I DO MY BEST TO FOLLOW THE 10 COMMANDMENTS


IF DISARMING AMERICA LEADS TO GREATER SAFETY AND SAFER SCHOOLS, THEN LET US REMOVE ARMED SECURITY FROM CONGRESS, HOLLYROT, BANKS, OFFICE COMPLEXES AND SPORTS VENUES.


SAFETY FOR OUR CHILDREN THIS COMING SCHOOL YEAR?

IT’S ALL RIGHT HERE. ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS READ IT AND PASS IT ON. IT’S THAT SIMPLE!

“One of the greatest burdens you have in a leadership position is knowing you’ve done all you can to ensure that everyone is safe.”

Rosa Blackwell Superintendent (Ret), Cincinnati Public Schools

“WE MUST DO SOMETHING!” After every horrific school shooting, so-called “mainstream” media, anti-gun politicians and self-righteous Hollywood celebrities raise the same battle-cry to do something … anything, to stop the slaughter of innocents.

That “something,” of course, always turns out to be gun control. It matters not that such action has been taken in the past and, in fact, is still in effect in large swaths of the country; just as long as we do something, it doesn’t have to actually address the problem at hand.

It’s baffling that these powerful forces don’t leap at the chance to fund efforts that do make children safer—threat assessments and response strategies tailored by, and for, local school systems; efforts to identify risks long before they kick in the front door; partnerships with local law enforcement that harden schools and reduce response times; links with community organizations that can flag challenged youth; and training that empowers school administrators, boards, teachers, parents and cops to not only craft solutions specific to their situations, but to also train others to do the same.

Not one media conglomerate has funded such efforts on a national scale, despite the windfall of ad revenue created by their sensationalizing these rare shootings. Not one billionaire gun-banner has carved out a few dollars, of the millions earmarked to get anti-gun politicians elected, for school security. Not one obscenely wealthy Hollywood celebrity has tweeted an announcement of a nationwide grant program to aid schools in keeping our children safe.

In fact, only one organization involved in the national school safety conversation funds a nationwide effort to keep our school children safe. That’s the National Rifle Association, through its NRA School Shield program, provided free of charge to any community interested in making its schools more secure.

Starting this month, nearly 56 million American children will file into K-12 classrooms in more than 132,800 schools. In the evening, schools are focal points for sporting events, performances, club activities and transportation hubs. It’s estimated that one in six Americans will set foot onto a school campus every day. However, few of these schools will start the year prepared for the unthinkable.

This is understandable; school shootings, though horrific, are rare, and education budgets are strained. Sheila Brantley, the director of the NRA School Shield program, compares this dilemma to Maslow’s famous hierarchy of needs, which prioritizes physical needs—food, water, shelter, sleep—before all others. “We see free/ reduced meals, after-school snacks and sometimes even dinner,” Brantley said. “We see back-to-school supply drives. We see kids taking naps before and after school. But, for whatever reasons, there hasn’t been a call to action for the next level of the hierarchy: safety and security”

The NRA stepped into the gap between the need for increased security and the lack of resources in 2012. In the aftermath of the Sandy Hook tragedy, NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre announced the creation of a task force that would make recommendations to keep our schools safer. Heading the task force was Asa Hutchinson, former U.S. attorney and congressman from Arkansas, now the state’s governor. The results of that task force became the foundation for the NRA School Shield program.

Through the program, the NRA sends a team of subject-matter experts to school systems. Their mission is not to tell them what they are doing wrong, or even to make recommendations. Neither is it their mission to arm teachers and staff, though that may be an effective strategy for a given situation.

Rather, their mission is to do what the NRA does better than anyone else: to train. NRA assessors spend five days on the school campus, always in conjunction with local law enforcement. During that time, up to 20 local officials receive training on how to conduct their own vulnerability assessments and develop appropriate response strategies. These groups include two to three people per agency to facilitate partnerships and multi-agency response relationships. They often include personnel from other school systems, jurisdictions or even states; these officials use their newfound skills to conduct assessments back home.

“NRA’S vulnerability assessors help local stakeholders build best practices in four areas: Preparedness, Prevention, Mitigation and Response,” explains Brantley. “They look for opportunities to improve’ Because of who the NRA is, “some believe were only looking to address active shooters, and our answer is solely focused on firearms in the schools,” Brantley added. “They fail to understand there are other much more common threats existing in the school environment that could escalate if you don’t address them on the front end. We identify potential threats like bullying, which is not just kids being kids; it’s something that should be nipped in the bud:’

During the training, participants learn to determine the potential adversarial path when approaching a campus, probing for vulnerabilities beginning at the outer perimeter and working their way into the building. They assess physical security components, technology, personnel, school resource officers (sRos), incident management and response protocols. Groups learn to document and report their findings. It’s critical that this process takes place during school hours; otherwise, it’s impossible to predict mass gathering points and before- and after-school activity patterns.

At the end of 2017, 154 vulnerability assessments had been reported by program trainees. Over 250 assessors have been trained to date, and this fall 10 more classes will likely double that number.

None of the participating school systems, public or private, have been charged a penny for this effort. NRA School Shield is funded 100 percent by donations to the NRA from members, individual donors and foundations, in addition to the support from Friends of NRA.

Even more impressive is the fact that trainees can easily turn their vulnerability assessments into needs assessments for grant requests at the federal, state and local level. They can even use them to apply for grants from The NRA Foundation, which has distributed more than $800,000 to schools so far.

The NRA’S team of “subject-matter experts” is large and diverse, as a panel discussion at the 2018 NRA Annual Meetings & Exhibits in Dallas demonstrated.

Wayne Black oversees vulnerability assessments and response planning for private schools and synagogues out of his office in Miami. Black has been in law enforcement for over 40 years; after 9/11, he ran a Red Team for the Department of Homeland Security, staging mock assaults to probe for vulnerabilities. He was hooked on the concept of NRA School Shield after a conversation with Hutchinson, and has donated his time as an adviser to the program ever since.

“No other nationwide organization is doing what NRA. School Shield does:’ says Wayne. “It’s proactive; unlike groups who spring up after a specific incident and who may lose interest, NRA School Shield has been a constant”

Black is clear and concise about the mission of NRA School Shield. ‘At the end of the day, the team with the best plan wins. If you have to deal with a problem at the doorway to the school, you’ve failed. Instead of being at the school door, looking in, you need to be on the perimeter, looking out.

“Normalcy bias is our biggest security-related issue. We believe people are good at heart; we want things to be normal, so we expect them to be normal. Victims’ accounts of a violent attack share a common denominator; they never thought it would happen here. They had such a nice school, such a nice community … they’re in denial. They don’t have a plan:”
Dr. Eric Dietz of Purdue University, another panel participant, has created data models that compare response tactics and produce measurable results. The effectiveness of tactics such as SRO deployment, arming school staff, putting locks on classroom doors and waiting for police to arrive does not achieve a one-size-fits-all solution.

“The same country that has Chicago has Alaska and Wyoming. Improving police response times may be a good option in urban areas, but rural schools will never achieve a quick response time. For them, arming an SRO or staff might be a better approach. In New York City, there’s a cop on every corner; is that safer? We don’t know, but we do know that better decisions are made at the local level:”

Eric Kaiser is the chief of police of Jourdanton, Texas, the first police department (and the first school system) in Texas to host an NRA School Shield training. As such, it drew officers from Austin, Houston and San Antonio, as well.

“One of the things that I appreciated about NRA School Shield was that it addressed all different facets of school safety, not just school shooters. I was impressed that an appropriate amount of time was given to each of the topics. It didn’t devote a large amount of time to arming teachers or staff; it’s an option that should be given consideration, but the same plan isn’t going to work in each district.”

Kaiser was also impressed by the lack of bias in the training. “There’s sometimes an apprehension that this is an NRA program, but I was very impressed by the level of professionalism. No political overtones, no ‘guns are good or bad, which went a long way with people who weren’t familiar with NRA and didn’t know what to expect. It was an NRA program, but completely apolitical, just focused solely on how to make the school safer.”

Gun control advocates may claim that the recommendations of these experts are somehow tainted by their association with the NRA, in as much the same way they attack the NRA Eddie Eagle GunSafe program, which never promotes gun ownership or usage.

Consequently, consulting with subject matter experts with no connection to the NRA might be instructive. In July, the U.S. Secret Service’s National Threat Assessment Center published a guide for schools titled ‘Enhancing School Safety Using A Threat Assessment Model: An Operational Guide For Preventing School Violence.’ Within its 32 pages are detailed observations and recommendations; perhaps the most chilling of which is ‘keep in mind, there is no profile of a student attacker.’ (Emphasis theirs.)

School violence is an equal-opportunity terror that does not reflect gender, achievement or social status.

The Secret Service guide contains expert recommendations on reporting mechanisms, training, intervention, thresholds for law enforcement involvement, examination of social media, community involvement, building relationships, motives, inappropriate interests and access to weapons. However, nowhere in its pages can a reference to gun control be found. Blaming the NRA is popular in some circles, but claiming the NRA influenced the recommendations of the U.S. Secret Service is just abominable.

To make certain we didn’t overlook any programs similar to the NRA School Shield, we placed a call to the main number of the Michael Bloomberg’s Everytown for Gun Safety to inquire what resources the organization could provide for schools looking to better protect children. On the contacts page of the group’s website, we’re told, “Due to volume, we are unable to respond to every email. Please take the time to read our FAQ before sending us a message. If you’d prefer to leave a message, please call (646) 324-8250.” We left three messages over two days, but had not received a response by press time.

By contrast, the NRA School Shield lists a phone number and email address on the home page. A member of the program’s team answered on the third ring. Any school administrator, teacher, parent or law enforcement officer truly looking for help is encouraged to reach out to NRA School Shield for assistance.

The team can be reached by phone at (844) 467-7723 or by email at info@NRAschoolshield.org.

NRA SCHOOL SHIELD IS FUNDED 100 PERCENT BY DONATIONS TO NRA FROM MEMBERS, INDIVIDUAL DONORS AND FOUNDATIONS.


THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT I HAVE BEEN TELLING EVERYONE OVER THE YEARS.

SIGNING THAT BIRTH CERTIFICATE AND HOSPITAL RELEASE FORM EFFECTIVELY RENDERS THE STATE AS OWNER OF YOUR CHILDREN, WHICH IS WHY IT’S NOW SO EASY FOR THE GOVT AND DCFS TO COME IN AND WRECK FAMILIES.

I WALKED EVERY SINGLE DAY BACK AND FORTH TO SCHOOL AS WELL AS TO AND FROM FOR LUNCH STARTING FROM THE 1ST. GRADE.

THE ONLY DIFFERENCE NOW IS THAT THE MEDIA HAS CREATED THE BOOGEYMAN AND TURNED EVERYONE INTO HAND WRINGERS.

About this website

MSN.COM
Just after returning home from a walk around the block with her dog, Marshmallow, an 8-year-old Wilmette girl expected a visit from a playmate.

Spies Are Infiltrating the U.S…. But Not Where You Think

On Oct. 17, 1989, the Loma Prieta earthquake hit California’s Bay Area destroying buildings, bridges and freeways and causing landslides and tsunamis. Sixty-three people were killed and thousands more were injured. It was one of the biggest earthquakes to hit the region in over 80 years.

After the devastating quake, many folks applied for government relief funds established under President Bush. The president allocated roughly $3.5 billion to help the people of northern California.

Rick Smith, who worked for the FBI’s counterintelligence San Francisco Soviet squad at the time, used this opportunity to meet a potential spy.

The FBI had learned that a known Soviet spy working under diplomatic cover had filed a claim for loses from the earthquake. When Smith heard this, he believed it was an opportunity to make repeated payments to the spy in the hopes of being able to recruit him to work on behalf of the U.S.

At the first meeting, Smith along with fellow FBI agents told the Soviet, “We can offer your full claim, come meet us again.” The spy agreed. However, at the second meeting, the Soviet spy didn’t come alone…

He brought with him the head of Soviet counterintelligence in San Francisco. At that point, the operation was over. The fact that the Soviet boss was there meant that the spy the FBI was attempting to turn had simply reported the whole thing to his boss.

The reality is when most people think about espionage in the U.S., they picture spies working out of embassies in Washington, D.C., or conducting dead drops in wooded parks in northern Virginia. While this is true, the fact is there are spies all over the U.S. — and the number of foreign spies is growing, especially in Silicon Valley.

Obviously, these spies aren’t targeting government secrets, but rather, they’re looking for trade and technology information they can share with their government. The problem is most tech companies aren’t prepared to deal with espionage.

And it’s not only Russia that is operating heavily in Silicon Valley. Chinese agents are also carrying out spying in hopes of sharing technology with Chinese companies.

Silicon Valley is known for its liberalism. Many technology companies are inept or too politically delicate to increase security protocols and screenings of their employees.

In other words, they don’t want to hurt any feelings or upset the political climate. In addition, many tech companies in Silicon Valley simply don’t report cases of potential tech espionage.

According to LaRae Quy, a former Palo Alto-based FBI counterintelligence agent, “They would have an employee sell technology to, say, the Russians or the Chinese, and rather than let their stockholders or investors know about it, they just let it walk.”

In July, for example, a Silicon Valley-based Apple employee, Xiaolang Zhang, allegedly stole information on Apple’s self-driving car technology to benefit a China-based competitor.

You’re on Your Own

Here’s the thing: Spying in Silicon Valley isn’t new. It’s been going on for decades, but has increased dramatically in recent years — especially by Russia.

The reason this is now such a concern is because everyone knows Silicon Valley is the tech capitol of the world. And sadly, many of these tech companies don’t take the necessary security steps to keep out potential spies.

When it comes to technology, it’s up to you to protect yourself since you can’t rely on the tech companies to do so. The big tech companies say they care about cyber security and protecting your privacy, but it’s not true. It’s the same with your own personal physical protection that I’ve been ‘preaching’ all along as well.

This is why you have to be careful when you turn your life over to technology and the expanding Internet of Things. Whether it’s your thermostat or refrigerator or home automation hub (like Alexa), hackers can easily tap into these devices to spy on you.

So the next time you consider allowing some device to have access to your location or the camera on your phone or any personal information at all — you may want to think twice.

Stay safe,


I UNDERSTAND HE’S NOW GONE AND THIS IS NOT TO BASH SOMEONE NO LONGER HERE ABLE TO DEFEND THEMSELVES.

WHAT I HAVE A PROBLEM WITH IS THE COVER-UP FROM BOTH THE MEDIA AND CIA ALL THESE DECADES. THE FAILURE TO REPORT THOSE THINGS TO THE PUBLIC THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN REPORTED.

A FORCED STATEMENT UNDER DURESS CAN BE UNDERSTOOD, BUT JUST KNOW THERE WERE MANY OTHER POW WHO MADE NO SUCH STATEMENTS. AND TO THEN BUILD A CAREER ON A SILVER MEDAL STAR OF BEING A FALSE HERO AND A RESPECTED NATIONAL TREASURE AND WAR HERO WHICH WASN’T DESERVED IS VERY TROUBLING INDEED.

I ALSO HAVE A PROBLEM THAT HIS ENTIRE CAREER HAS BEEN PERPETUATED ON LIES AND DARE ANYONE ‘DEFY’ HIS NAME FOR FEAR OF BEING LABELED CALLOUS FOR LACK OF WORSE TERMS USED.

THIS IS A MAN WHO DURING HIS CAREER IN THE SENATE PROPOSED SOME OF THE MOST ANTI-CONSTITUTIONAL AGENDAS THERE EVER WERE.

LISTEN TO THIS SHORT VIDEO. JUST LISTEN.


READ THIS AND THEN CONTINUE TO TELL ME HOW POLICE AND AUTHORITY DESERVE RESPECT.

ALSO THEN CONTINUE TO PREACH HOW THE PUBLIC ARE ANIMALS AND THE POLICE ARE ‘JUST DOING THEIR JOB.’

THIS IS ABSOLUTELY DISGUSTING AND I HOPE EVERY PERSON INVOLVED DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY AT THAT JAIL HOUSE ETERNALLY BURN IN HELL FOR THIS ATROCITY.

About this website

MSN.COM
A federal lawsuit was filed Wednesday, about a year after Coltrain died while in the Mineral County jail. Investigators say she was denied medical care.

Here’s the facts. So lets ask it to those of the likes of facebook, who keep removing the truth.

Wouldn’t it have been interesting if, at some point during the presidential campaign, one of the candidates asked, “Oh, and by the way, has anyone in Washington, D.C., ever heard of the McCarran-Walter Act Of 1952?”

This is a law for virtually 65 years now.

Here are the historic facts that would seem to indicate that many, if not most, of the people we elect to work for us in Washington do not have the slightest idea of what laws already exist in OUR country.

After several terrorist incidents were carried out in the United States, Donald Trump was severely criticized for suggesting that the U.S. should limit or temporarily suspend the immigration of certain ethnic groups, nationalities and even people of certain religions
(Muslims).

The criticisms condemned such a suggestion as, among other things, being un-American, dumb, stupid, reckless, dangerous and racist.

Congressmen and senators swore that they would never allow such legislation, and our president called such a prohibition on immigration unconstitutional.

As Gomer Pyle would say, “Well, surprise, surprise!”

It seems that the selective immigration ban is already law and has been applied on several occasions.

Known as the McCarran-Walter Act, the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 allows for the “suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by the president, whenever the president finds that the entry of aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States.”

“The president may, by proclamation and for such a period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens, immigrants or non- immigrants, or impose any restrictions on the entry of aliens he may deem to be appropriate.”

Who was president when this was passed? Democrat Harry Truman.

Who do you suppose last used this process? Democrat Jimmy Carter, no less than 37 years ago, in 1979 to keep Iranians out of the United States.

But Carter actually did more. He made ALL Iranian students, already in the United States, check in with the government. And then he deported a bunch of them.

Seven thousand were found in violation of their visas and a total of 15,000 Iranians were forced to leave the USA in 1979.

So, what do you say about all of the criticism that Donald Trump received from the Democratic senators, representatives and the Obama Administration?

Additionally, it is important to note that the McCarran-Walter Act also requires that an “applicant for immigration must be of good moral character and in agreement with the principles of our Constitution.”

Therefore, one could surmise that since the quran forbids muslims to swear allegiance to the U.S. Constitution, technically, ALL muslims should or could be refused immigration to OUR country.

Authenticated at: (look under 1952)
http://library.uwb.edu/Static/USimmigration
Go ahead … read it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/…/Immigration_and_Nationality_Act_…