The University of Chicago’s John Mearsheimer recently summarized the situation, and this is an analysis as well:

Assange is a journalist, and he did not break the law, as it is commonplace for journalists to publish classified information that is passed on to them by government insiders. If journalists in the United States were sent to jail for publishing classified material, the jails would be filled with many of America’s most famous reporters from newspapers like The New York Times, The Washington Post, and The Wall Street Journal.

But of course, that hardly ever happens. Simply put, newspapers publish classified material, and hardly anybody ever goes to jail. Why is this the case? What is the reason for this situation? Governments of every type, and this includes liberal democracies like the United States and Britain, sometimes go to great lengths to hide their actions or their policies from public view, which makes it almost impossible for the public to evaluate and criticize their behavior….

Thus, a rich tradition has developed over time in the United States, where insiders leak information about classified policies to journalists who publicize the information so that the public can evaluate it and push back hard against misguided policies.

The most famous case that illustrates this phenomenon involves the famous Pentagon Papers, which were a multi-volume study of the American decision to enter the war in Vietnam in the 1964-65 period and then escalated in subsequent years.

Daniel Ellsberg, who was an insider and had access to classified material, leaked the papers in 1971 to The New York Times, which subsequently published them. The story in those documents was starkly at odds with what the Johnson administration had been telling the American people about US policy in Vietnam.

By most accounts at the time, and certainly since then, both Ellsberg and The New York Times performed an important public service…. Ellsberg did not go to jail despite leaking classified information, although it did appear at the time that he might be sent to jail. Certainly, nobody at the New York Times went to jail because, again, journalists don’t go to jail for publishing classified information in the United States.

It is very important to remember that in the case of Julian Assange, he is not the equivalent of Ellsberg because he was not an insider who leaked the information. Chelsea Manning was the insider. Assange was the equivalent of the New York Times, and thus he should not be extradited….

Two final points. First, it is important to emphasize that nobody was hurt because of the documents that Assange published. Nobody’s life was put in danger because of what he posted on Wikileaks, and certainly nobody was killed….

Second, Assange has already paid a huge price for his actions. He has effectively been in prison for years. Sending him to the United States, where he is likely to be convicted and sentenced to a long jail term, would be a case of cruel and unusual punishment.

Exactly right. I would add: the regime Assange exposed hates you. If you’re feeling compelled to defend it, don’t. It will only laugh that one of its victims wants to speak in its favor.

I was glad to see that Assange’s brother, Gabriel Shipton (whom I interviewed on the Tom Woods Show not too long ago), accompanied Rep. Thomas Massie as the latter’s guest at last week’s State of the Union.

Massie has made the point that with RFK, Jr. (who supports pardoning Assange) siphoning votes from the two major parties, there’s every political reason for one of the two major-party candidates to declare his own support for pardoning Assange as well. (Interestingly, Donald Trump, Jr., recently noted that he had changed his mind on the subject and now favors the pardon.)

Google wants to know what color of underwear you are wearing…

I’m not joking even though it sounds like a joke. Google (and Big Tech) want to know everything about you down to the smallest detail…

It’s common knowledge that Google listens to you without your consent. Even the most “anti-conspiracy theorist” people know this is true.

I’m sure you’ve been creeped out before when you saw an ad online for something you were just talking about in real life!

But Google’s spying isn’t just to give you “personalized ads” or “personalized search results”. In reality, it’s much more sinister.

So why does Google (and Big Tech) want to know everything about you?

Many people know that Big Tech is “in bed” with Big Brother, but did you know that Google’s origins come from CIA and NSA funds? It’s no accident.

The internet is designed to be a surveillance tool.

And Google is one of the worst.

Google has been caught…

• Placing microphones in their devices without letting people know.
• Tracking phones even if you disabled “Location Tracking” and don’t have a SIM card in.
• Storing the unconsensual voice recordings that they gather from their devices for posterity.

I’ll cover all of that and MORE in today’s video.

I really recommend that you watch it here.

The history of humankind is that of domination—of kings and queens ruling over their “subjects,” of the “elite” dictating to the peasants, of the powerful brutalizing the weak, and of cruel tyrants enslaving the masses.

Our Founding Fathers fundamentally changed this hierarchical approach with the Declaration of Independence and the US Constitution. They declared that we are endowed by our Creator with certain unalienable rights. These rights are inherent in us, and no government has the authority to infringe upon them.

These two sacred documents took away power from the so-called ruling class and gave it to the people. More than this, they declared, and codified into law, that “We the People” own this country. We are in charge! The President, Congress, the courts, and government bureaucrats, are not our “rulers”; rather, they are our servants.

These values are in our DNA. “We the People” choose freedom!

The world’s elitists, however, are predators who are determined to gain power over us “peasants.” Many of them are members of the World Economic Forum (WEF). For years, the WEF has worked to create a cartel of the powerful, whose goal is to crush our freedoms and take away our possessions. Billionaires, multinational corporations, international bankers, celebrities, activists, professors, government leaders, and heads of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) have declared war on us and on Western culture.

Why? Because the concept of individual rights is a Western value, and it flies in the face of the control structures they are trying to put in place.

This is why Europe and the US are facing an all-out invasion of illegal immigrants. The illegal crossings at the Mexico/US border, which number in the thousands per day, go on unimpeded. More than this, the federal government is doing everything it can to encourage this invasion of migrants who do not share our values.

This is why “woke” Hollywood screenwriters are pushing gender dysphoria and bodily mutilation on teens. It’s why universities and scientific institutions are corrupting the scientific method and critical thinking by pushing cult-like beliefs of gender and race and by firing and silencing doctors and scientists who challenge the narrative. It’s also why prosecutors are letting violence and crime go unpunished.

We are witnessing an all-out attack on our values of self-reliance, generosity, and individual liberty. It is the planned destruction of the West.

But why do they want to destroy our values of individual freedom?

Their goal is to implement a system of absolute surveillance and control. WEF founder Klaus Schwab put it succinctly, “You will own nothing and be happy.”

There are a number of key aspects of their plan, such as a digital ID, total surveillance, a collapse of the free market system, censorship, destruction of small businesses and family-owned farms, corruption of science, decimation of Christian churches, and complete control over everyone’s financial lives with a new central bank digital currency (CBDC), which will replace the US dollar (and every country’s currency).

These puzzle pieces will come together to form a social credit system, which will literally enslave the human race (see this month’s article, “A Legacy of Freedom”).

Already the central banks of 140 countries are taking steps to launch a CBDC. The WEF, which is the linchpin of this plan, is working with Big Tech and the central banks to develop a unified control system. Many countries launched a vaccine passport during the COVID panic—their way of sneaking in the digital ID.

Each country’s social credit system will reward or penalize individuals and institutions for how well or how poorly they abide by their ESG system—also referred to as Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI).

This is an incredibly tightknit system of control. It is already shaping universities and multinational corporations, many of which are now almost completely captured. The next goal is for every country to implement digital IDs and CBDCs nationwide.

The timeline for having the entire control system in place globally is 2030. That’s shockingly soon! This is why we see such tremendous upheaval in the world right now.

Once the systems of control are in place, it will be too late for us to stop them. We must act now.

Unfortunately, we cannot count on the federal government to fix this problem. Rather, it is up to citizens and state governments to take back power from the technocratically controlled federal government.

How can our states check this power grab?

By following the law. The US Constitution is the foundation of our legal system, and all laws that violate it are illegal laws. The Tenth Amendment of the US Constitution drastically limits the power of the federal government. It says: “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”

Our federal government is not superior to state and local governments. The Constitution’s Supremacy Clause gives the former “supremacy” only in accordance with the Constitution. The states have the right and obligation to nullify federal overreach.

I believe our only hope for saving this great land is for states to step up and protect our individual rights. Beyond this, “We the People” must remember that our rights come from God and that no government has the authority to infringe upon our rights.

For the sake of our freedom and the freedom of future generations, we must act immediately to proactively pass laws that protect our rights and our values.

The time to take back our power is now. The law is on our side and not theirs.

FEB 26, 2024

Share

We’ve put together an intermediate summary of evidence for those who are interested in halting the Covid-19 injections among the population, especially children. We’ve dispelled the notion that the Covid-19 injections are ‘safe & effective’ as advertised.

The following information is indisputable and would qualify as evidence in any legitimate court hearing. It should be noted that the data provided below is merely scratching the surface of what we’ve uncovered and should, in no way be misconstrued as the sum of available data.

I’m sure the ‘fact checkers’ will attempt to discredit, undermine or minimize the data presented as it certainly goes against the prescribed narrative. Before Covid, getting a ‘second opinion’ used to be wise standard practice – now it just gets you labeled ‘anti-vaxxer’ and shouted down. Whether they choose to accept it or not, this is what some experts are saying and it’s concerning enough to warrant – at minimum – a pause on the Covid-19 injections.

Please Credit Tom Renz as well as tomrenz.substack.com & tomrenz.com. Reproductions must include promotional materials.

Thank you for reading Tom Renz’s Newsletter. This post is public so feel free to share it.

Share

---

🪓TRUTH: Vaccines are Unavoidably Unsafe

We know that the Covid-19 injections are not actually vaccines – but since they’ve been marketed to the public as such -the following information is necessary.

The vaccine industry got immunity from liability by convincing the President and Congress that vaccines are ‘unavoidably unsafe’. As such, the court takes as true the premise that vaccines are unavoidably unsafe.  Since the government mandates the use of an unavoidably unsafe product, it is reasonable to believe that some people will be injured by it. Therefore, the assertion that Covid-19 vaccines are ‘safe’ is patently false.

42 U.S.C.A. § 300aa-22(1).

On February 22, 2011, the Supreme Court upheld this when they ruled on Bruesewitz v. Wyeth, a case involving the scope of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. They considered whether 42 U.S.C. Section 300aa-22(b)(1) of the act precludes all vaccine design defect claims even if the vaccine’s side effects were avoidable, or whether the vaccine manufacturer has to show on a case-by-case basis that the side effects could not have been avoided by some alternatively designed vaccine.

They held that the Vaccine Act expressly preempts all design defect claims against manufacturers.

‘Unavoidably Unsafe’: RFK Jr. Reveals the Untold Truth Why Vaccines Have Liability Protections

“And so, anybody who tells you vaccines are safe and effective, the industry itself got immunity from liability by convincing the President and Congress that vaccines are unavoidably unsafe.” -Robert Kennedy Jr.

🪓TRUTH: It’s Not a Vaccine – It’s Gene Therapy

The mRNA Covid-19 injections are not vaccines. They are gene therapy products. 

On page 148 & 149 of Moderna’s 2019 SEC filing there is a legally mandated discussion of “risk factors” that reads as follows:

“No mRNA drug has been approved in this new potential class of medicines and may never be approved as a result of efforts by others or us. mRNA drug development has substantial clinical development and regulatory risk due to the novel and unprecedented nature of this new class of medicines.

As a potential new class of medicines, no mRNA medicines have been approved to date by the FDA or other regulatory agency… currently mRNA is considered a gene therapy product by the FDA.”

mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines Should Be Labeled Gene Therapy Products: Peer-Reviewed Paper (published June 9, 2023):

• “The prime reaction of an mRNA vaccine is that it instructs the body how to make the antigen of interest. So, it’s similar to a prodrug, which is converted inside the body via metabolism and enzymes into the desired drug effect. The substance you’re injecting isn’t doing the final action; it leads to the thing that does the final action. With a prodrug, the molecule you inject does not get changed into the final molecule of the antigen, it simply provides instructions because it’s gene therapy.” Since Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines meet the definition of gene therapy, they should be handled according to gene therapy guidelines.”

Share

The March 2015 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the FDA and the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research published a ‘guide for industry’ entitled: “Determining the Need for and Content of Environmental Assessments for Gene Therapies, Vectored Vaccines, and Related Recombinant Viral or Microbial Products” lists their definition of gene therapy.

It’s been reported that lobbyists for BioNTech & Moderna are active in European Parliament, seeking to redefine gene therapy as it relates to mRNA vaccines.

Gene therapy products require a much more stringent regulatory process and the FDA guidance for industry documents that we’ve discussed in depth, prove that GTP’s have the potential to integrate into the host genome and wreak havoc on the body.

They have the potential to effectuate ‘altered expression’ of the host’s genome, shed on others, produce undesirable biologic events & delayed adverse reactions – including autoimmune issues, malignant transformation (cancer) and death. The longer they are in the body, the more potential for damage. It was deceptive to market these injections as vaccines when they are gene therapy products. This is a violation of proper informed consent and the Nuremburg Code.

Give a gift subscription

---

🪓 TRUTH: Pfizer Did Not Know Whether the Covid Vaccine Stopped Transmission Before Rollout

https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/mnxlxzxoZx0?rel=0&autoplay=0&showinfo=0&enablejsapi=0

---

🪓 TRUTH: Pharma Knew the Covid-19 Injections Would Harm People

Former VP of Pfizer Confirms Pharma Knew the Shots Would Be Toxic

Sasha Latypova published a leaked audio recording that allegedly exposes an AstraZeneca internal executive meeting that took place at the end of 2020. The audio file purportedly has AstraZeneca’s CEO, Pascal Soriot admitting that there are people who should not be vaccinated.

‘And for those of you who may not be totally familiar with antibodies, you know, you have to know a number of people cannot be vaccinated, like if you have an immune disease, lupus or some other immune condition… or multiple sclerosis, you cannot be vaccinated.’

---

🪓 TRUTH: We Can’t Trust the Data Used for Approval

Whistleblower and former regional director for Ventavia Research Group, a company hired to run clinical trials for Pfizer’s COVID shot – Brook Jackson alleges to have witnessed deeply disturbing practices at trial sites that she affirms corrupted the data used by FDA to approve the Covid-19 injections.

Donate Subscriptions

The data that we were told to trust is allegedly tainted by unsanitary practices, absurdly unqualified staff and even forged informed consent forms. So, how can we trust the data?

Pfizer Whistleblower Exposes Rampant Clinical Trial Fraud

They said the Covid-19 injections would not leave injection site. That was wrong.

The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology published a pre-proof “Transplacental Transmission of the COVID-19 Vaccine mRNA: Evidence from Placental, Maternal and Cord Blood Analyses Post-Vaccination”(February 1, 2024):

The Children’s Health Defense Network explains the study:

“This study involved just two patients. Patient 1, a 34-year-old pregnant woman, received a Pfizer two-shot primary round and two boosters (one Pfizer, one Moderna), with the last dose administered two days before delivering by cesarean section. Investigators collected samples of her placenta, blood and cord blood post-delivery.

Patient 2 was 33 and received two Pfizer doses, the last 10 days before her vaginal delivery. Only placental samples were available from this patient.

Vaccine mRNA was detected in both placentas. Spike protein was found in the placenta of Patient 2 but not Patient 1. mRNA from the vaccine was found in the cord and maternal blood of Patient 1.”

---

🪓 TRUTH: The Covid-19 Vaccines Don’t Prevent Covid & Exhibit Negative Efficacy

In Pfizer’s September 2021 post-hoc analysis, Pfizer states that their mRNA injections increase the risk for COVID-19. Page 22 of the 2021 FDA Briefing Document states:

“An additional analysis appears to indicate that the incidence of COVID-19 generally increased in each group of study participants with increasing time post-Dose 2.”

According to a Cleveland Clinic study, the people who had the most shots had the greatest chance of contracting Covid-19.Subscribe

The Science’ has now been established by the Cleveland Clinic. Genetic vaccines damage your immune system and make you not less likely but more likely to be infected with Covid.’

-The Expose

The Epoch Times reported on a paper published in the International Journal of Epidemiology which determined:

‘A single dose of the Pfizer vaccine was pegged at minus 121 percent effectiveness on day 84 and minus 85 percent effectiveness on day 98. A second Pfizer dose held up better, but still dipped below 50 percent at day 98.

A single dose of the AstraZeneca vaccine turned negative at day 70 and a second dose turned negative at day 84.’

“I’ve never seen a vaccine like this,” testified pediatric cardiologist Dr. Kirk Milhoan.

“The lowest risk for getting COVID is if you’ve had zero vaccines. As you add vaccines, your risk of getting COVID goes up. I’ve never seen a vaccine like this. That’s not the basis of vaccines. They shouldn’t have what we would call negative efficacy.”

Share

Conclusion from Study: IgG4 Antibodies Induced by Repeated Vaccination May Generate Immune Tolerance to the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein (published May 17, 2023): 

• “…evidence suggests that the reported increase in IgG4 levels detected after repeated vaccination with the mRNA vaccines may not be a protective mechanism; rather, it constitutes an immune tolerance mechanism to the spike protein that could promote unopposed SARS-CoV2 infection and replication by suppressing natural antiviral responses. Increased IgG4 synthesis due to repeated mRNA vaccination with high antigen concentrations may also cause autoimmune diseases and promote cancer growth and autoimmune myocarditis.”
• “All in all, reviewed data indicate that IgG4 production induced by repeated vaccination does not in any way constitute a protective mechanism.” 

Vaccines shouldn’t cause an autoimmune response against your own healthy cells: 4.8.23.

https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/CWc2E3URCDc?rel=0&autoplay=0&showinfo=0&enablejsapi=0

What Dr. Pengilly said is in direct contradiction to the study below. He said ‘myocarditis is generally an autoimmune phenomenon where antibodies are formed against the cells, in this case the heart, and it occurs after Covid at a higher rate than it does after vaccination…’

The studies below conclude the virus doesn’t infect the heart. We have a right to question why what Dr. Pengilly said is the opposite of what these autopsies say. It’s necessary!

If SARS-CoV-2 infection caused myocarditis or inflammation of heart muscle tissue, then it would be seen on autopsy in fatal cases of COVID-19.

• ‘In the heart, SARS-CoV-2 positivity was found only in the endocardium and endothelium of a single case. Even though many have found the presence of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 to be consistent in the heart (especially in people with heart comorbidities), our results suggest that myocardial damage is not imputable to direct viral assault. The virus probably penetrates the heart, but the lack of cytopathic findings and the viral antigen negativity, observed by us as well as by others, indicates that the virus does not replicate within the heart, despite the presence of ACE-2 receptors that are, however, mainly expressed by endothelial cells.’

‘Poloni et al specifically examined the heart of fatal COVID-19 cases and concluded the virus does not infect the heart.’

---

🪓 TRUTH: Natural Immunity is Superior

People who recovered from COVID-19 were better off than those who received a COVID-19 vaccine.Subscribe

Risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and hospitalization in individuals with natural, vaccine-induced and hybrid immunity: a retrospective population-based cohort study from Estonia

Takeaways from the study as reported by The Epoch Times:

• People who received a vaccine were nearly five times as likely as the naturally immune to test positive for COVID-19 during the Delta era. 
• 1.1 x as likely to test positive for COVID-19 during the Omicron era.
• The vaccinated were also seven times as likely to be admitted to a hospital for COVID-19 amid the spread of the Delta variant. 
• Two times as likely to be admitted to a hospital during the Omicron period, when compared with the naturally immune.

Former CDC Director Rochelle Wallensky was privately discussing breakthrough infections right at the start of the “vaccine” rollout in January 2021.

---

🪓 TRUTH: Children Are Being Harmed by the Covid-19 Injections

https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/fC90quQ6oz8?rel=0&autoplay=0&showinfo=0&enablejsapi=0

It is statistically and clinically impossible to make a vaccine for children that is more effective or safe than their own innate immune response to SARS-CoV-2.

Share

The Lancet: Children and young people remain at low risk of COVID-19 mortality (March 10, 2021):

The Lancet: Child & Adolescent Health published ‘The immune system of children: the key to understanding SARS-CoV-2 susceptibility’ (May 6, 2020):

Dr Ros Jones Breaks Down the Covid Mortality Rate by Age (September 2022):

“There were a total of only 25 deaths that occurred within 28 days of a positive Covid PCR tests [in UK children] where Covid was actually thought to be a factor. So, in the UK, the risk of all children dying from Covid is around 1 in 500,000. But out of those 25 children, 19 had severe pre-existing conditions — which means the risk for healthy children is about 1 in 2,000,000.’

Epoch Health Reports:

‘Research out of Germany observing rat and human heart cells shows that within 48 hours of vaccination, the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines form spike proteins.’

The authors concluded that at the cellular level, the effects of the COVID-19 vaccines seemed to align closer with cardiomyopathy than with myocarditis. Cardiomyopathy is a condition where heart muscles become both structurally and functionally abnormal in the absence of other heart diseases. This differs from myocarditis and pericarditis, which occur when heart muscles become inflamed and damaged.

‘Dr. James Gill, led autopsies on two boys who died in their sleep after administration of the COVID-19 Pfizer vaccines. He concluded that the boys did not suffer from typical myocarditis but rather something that resembled cardiomyopathy caused by toxic stress.’

UK Govt. Data Shows C19-Boosted Kids Are Over 130x MORE Likely to Die from C19 Than Unvaxxed Kids:

“In regard to Covid-19 deaths, the ONS reveals that the mortality rate among unvaccinated children aged 10 to 14 equates to 0.31. But in regard to one-dose vaccinated children, the mortality rate equates to 3.24 per 100,000 person-years, and in regard to triple vaccinated children, the mortality rate equates to a shocking 41.29 per 100,000 person-years.”Subscribe

‘These figures reveal that unvaccinated children are much less likely to die of Covid-19 than children who have had the Covid-19 injection.’

A study in The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), Effects of Vaccination and Previous Infection on Omicron Infections in Children revealed that children aged 5-11 who had a prior infection but were not vaccinated had a lower risk of being reinfected than did vaccinated children who had a prior infection.

---

🪓 TRUTH: The Documented Side Effects Are Extensive

Pfizer Recorded Almost 5 million Harmful Outcomes Across 1.5 million mRNA Injected Victims (Dec 2020 – June 2022)

An internal 393-page Pfizer document, which included an interval reporting period recorded harmful results reported to (or collected by) Pfizer since receiving the emergency use authorization (EUA) up until June 18, 2022.

A quick analysis revealed that there were nearly ‘5 million (4,964,106) harmful clinical outcomes reported across nearly 1.5 million (1,485,027) mRNA injected victims since December of 2020.

696,605 nervous, 317,811 gastro, 126,993 cardiac, 100,970 blood/lymphatic, 61,518 eye and 31,895 immune system disorders; and 167,382 victims developed bacterial, viral, or parasitic infections.’ (This includes more than 20k cases of herpes. Thanks Pfizer!)

Share Tom Renz’s Newsletter

Speaking of ‘herpes’ – According to a study published in the Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, “T-cell-mediated immunity” is significantly worsened in fully vaccinated people, leading to the reemergence of viruses and illnesses previously dormant in the person.

• ‘One of the more significant findings to emerge from this study is that, although vaccines are critical for controlling the COVID-19 pandemic, vaccine administration could lead to the reactivation of the herpes virus family.’
• ‘The results from our study are in line with recent systematic reviews which also reported an association between COVID-19 vaccine and VZV reactivation.’

The Gateway Pundit reports:

“The top two public health agencies in the United States conducted a joint study showing that the risk of developing autoimmune heart disease among the “fully vaccinated” for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) is a shocking 13,200 percent higher than it is among the unvaccinated. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) discovered that compared to the background risk in the general population, the risk of myocarditis is 133 times greater in those who took the mRNA injections from either Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna.”

The Epoch Times – Epoch Health Reports:

• ‘Almost a third of individuals who received a COVID-19 vaccine suffered from neurological complications including tremors, insomnia, and muscle spasms, according to a recent study published in the journal Vaccines.’
• ‘The study found that about 31.2 percent of vaccinated individuals developed post-vaccination neurological complications, particularly among those injected with the AstraZeneca jab. Different vaccines had a different ‘neurological risk profile’.’
• ‘Caution should be used when administering COVID-19 vaccines to vulnerable people, such as to those who suffer from allergies.’Share

A study from Turkey finds that rats injected with these vaccines gave birth to offspring exhibiting symptoms of autism and lower neuronal counts.

“Our findings reveal that the mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine significantly alters WNT gene expression and BDNF levels in both male and female rats, suggesting a profound impact on key neurodevelopmental pathways. Notably, male rats exhibited pronounced autism-like behaviors, characterized by a marked reduction in social interaction and repetitive patterns of behavior. Furthermore, there was a substantial decrease in neuronal counts in critical brain regions, indicating potential neurodegeneration or altered neurodevelopment. Male rats also demonstrated impaired motor performance, evidenced by reduced coordination and agility.”

The authors of the study noted that even though it causes autism in rats, people should use caution before generalizing these results to humans, citing a need for further studies. We know that rats are an animal model of Alzheimer’s and while the study cites the use of wistar rats the study does not distinguish if transgenic rats were used (i.e. mice with human ACE2 receptors).

---

🪓 TRUTH: The Covid-19 Injections Are Deadly

Senator Ron Johnson found that the COVID shots were 55 times more lethal (25.1 vs 0.46 deaths per million doses) than the flu vaccines.

Autopsy Review Blows Government Narrative Out of the Water: “The Patients Did Die of the Vaccine”

Note: This study was originally published for peer review in the Lancet and within 24 hours was censored and removed.

Doctors Peter McCullough & colleagues reviewed 325 autopsy cases, and they found:

• “a total of 240 deaths (73.9%) were independently adjudicated as directly due to or significantly contributed to by COVID-19 vaccination.”Subscribe
• Most deaths occurred within a week from the last vaccine administration, and the most implicated organ system in COVID-19 vaccine-associated death was the cardiovascular system (53%). The other deaths were attributed to things like auto accidents, suicide, and people who died in hospice with conditions unrelated to the vaccine, etc.

---

🪓 TRUTH: The Perceived Benefits Don’t Outweigh the Risks

The information presented clearly shows that the ‘benefits’ of Covid-19 vaccination do not outweigh the risks.

Pezzulo et Al Study (published Dec 18, 2022): 

• “The infection fatality rate of COVID-19 for those aged 0-19 documented by Pezzullo et al was 0.0003% while the risk of myocarditis from mRNA vaccination was found to be 1/2000-1/3000. The benefits don’t seem to outweigh the risks here.”

mRNA vaccine boosters and impaired immune system response in immune compromised individuals: a narrative review

Reuters reports:

‘Sweden has decided against recommending COVID vaccines for kids aged 5-11, the Health Agency said on Thursday, arguing that the benefits did not outweigh the risks.

“With the knowledge we have today, with a low risk for serious disease for kids, we don’t see any clear benefit with vaccinating them,” Health Agency official Britta Bjorkholm told a news conference.’

---

🪓 TRUTH: Experts are Calling for a Halt on the Covid-19 Injections

Dr. Peter A. McCullough: Testifying before the Arizona State Senate: The COVID-19 Vaccines are NOT SAFE for Human Use

The World Council for Health and the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, have called for the removal of the COVID-19 vaccines from the market, contradicting the narrative that all doctors and agencies universally support the vaccines.

A virtual hearing with the following internationally renowned immunologists,
geneticists, specialist physicians and research scientists shared their findings.

Give a gift subscription

Researcher Kevin McKernan, CSO and founder of Medicinal Genomics.

Biologist and biochemist Jessica Rose, Ph.D.eneticists, specialist physicians and research scientists shared their findings with
the audience.

Australian lawyer Katie Ashby-Koppens.

German-Thai microbiologist Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi.

Viral immunologist Dr. Byram Bridle of the University of Guelph in Canada.

Geneticist Alexandra Henrion-Caude, Ph.D., former director of research at the French National Institute of Health.

Microbiologist Dr. Brigitte König, head of the Department of Molecular Diagnostics and Molecular Microbiology at Otto-von-Guericke University in Magdeburg, Germany.

Toxicologist Dr. Janci Chunn Lindsay, executive editor of the Journal of Toxicology Current Research.

Cardiologist Peter McCullough

“I believe today in 2023 after three years of the failed Covid 19 vaccine campaign which has been a biologic disaster for the world that the multi-hit hypothesis for oncogenesis has been fulfilled… the Covid 19 vaccines work to impair tumor suppressor systems P53 and BRCA 1 and 2. Additionally, the genetic vaccines also impair DNA repair … they impair the bodies’ ability to repair itself.”

Dr Peter McCullough, Scientific Advisor to World Council

Scientists Call for Global Moratorium on mRNA Vaccines, Immediate Removal from Childhood Schedule

A review paper published January 24, 2024, in the journal Cureus is the first peer-reviewed paper to call for a global moratorium on the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines.

‘The authors say that reanalyzed data from the vaccine makers’ trials and high rates of serious post-injection injuries indicate the mRNA gene therapy vaccines should not have been authorized for use.’

“It is unethical + unconscionable to administer an experimental vaccine to a child who has a near-zero risk of dying from COVID-19 (IFR, 0.0003%) but a well-established 2.2% risk of permanent heart damage based on the best prospective data available.”

Genomics expert Kevin McKernan recently testified to the Massachusetts Legislature on the DNA contamination found in the Covid-19 injections.

“The sequence that’s in these doses, at billions of copies per dose, interacts with the P53 gene. This is a tumor suppressor gene so anything that interacts as a contaminant in the gene is a red flag. Hit the brakes, stop cold. You’ve got billions of copies of something that interact with our tumor suppressor system. This is a cancer risk. It’s in Moderna’s patents. We know it’s now in the Pfizer vaccines. This needs to be a red stop halt.”

– Kevin McKernan, CSO Medicinal Genomics

Many governments including those of the United Kingdom, Denmark, Sweden, Norway, and Finland have at various points, suspended their recommendations for child Covid-19 vaccinations. This is an ever changing dynamic and pauses and recommendations affect different age groups and various brands of vaccine – but at the end of the day – there are enough safety signals that cause recommendations to change rapidly and that is concerning.

Share Tom Renz’s Newsletter

We should be very sure about a product before injecting it into the human body, especially children. The constant vacillating between ‘safe’ and ‘possibly not safe’ – is problematic and means we should pause. A logical person can see that there is virtually no benefit to these injections – only risk. Why are we being mandated into something where the risk clearly outweighs any potential benefit?

Too many of the studies that admit the harm caused by the Covid-19 injections like to add the caveat: “Covid-19 vaccination is safe and remains strongly recommended.” Safe?! How can they claim these are safe when there are over 5 million documented adverse events, including death – with virtually no protection or benefit? They don’t prevent Covid, and natural immunity is superior. You’re more likely to not only catch Covid -but die from it after being injected. How can anyone of sound mind give this to kids?Subscribe

---

Sources:

1. Vaccines | Free Full-Text | IgG4 Antibodies Induced by Repeated Vaccination May Generate Immune Tolerance to the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein (mdpi.com)
2. pfizer-report.pdf (globalresearch.ca)
3. https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/new-research-paper-mrna-covid-19-vaccines-are-gene-therapy-products_5360853.html?
4. Parliamentary question | Lobbies calling for mRNA vaccines not to be classified as gene therapy | E-000355/2024 | European Parliament (europa.eu)
5. https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/24/13/10514.
6. https://www.congress.gov/bill/99th-congress/house-bill/5546
7. https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/R41538.html
8. 42 U.S. Code § 300aa–22 – Standards of responsibility | U.S. Code | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute (cornell.edu)
9. https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/good-morning-chd/pfizer-knew–clinical-trial-fraud-exposed/
10. Pfizer Recorded 5 Million Harmful Outcomes Across 1.5 Million mRNA Injected Victims (substack.com)
11. Audio recording leaked from AstraZeneca (substack.com)
12. Covered Up: mRNA Shedding, Transmissibility and Cancer. (substack.com)
13. Yes – The COVID Vaccines ARE Profoundly Linked to Cancer – Did They Contribute to the Death of Toby Keith? (substack.com)
14. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0002937824000632
15. Waning of first- and second-dose ChAdOx1 and BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccinations: a pooled target trial study of 12.9 million individuals in England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales | International Journal of Epidemiology | Oxford Academic (oup.com)
16. Another Study Finds COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness Turns Negative Within Months | The Epoch Times
17. A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF AUTOPSY FINDINGS IN DEATHS AFTER COVID-19 VACCINATION | Zenodo
18. Age-stratified infection fatality rate of COVID-19 in the non-elderly informed from pre-vaccination national seroprevalence studies | medRxiv
19. Effects of Vaccination and Previous Infection on Omicron Infections in Children | NEJM
20. COVID-19 Much Less Deadly Than Previously Thought, Major Study Finds – The Daily Sceptic
21. One in Every 500 Small Children Who Receive the Pfizer Vaccine are Hospitalised By It, Study Finds – The Daily Sceptic
22. Comparative Safety of the BNT162b2 Messenger RNA COVID-19 Vaccine vs Other Approved Vaccines in Children Younger Than 5 Years | Infectious Diseases | JAMA Network Open | JAMA Network
23. toepfner_2022_oi_221053_1665165481.06107.pdf (silverchair.com)
24. Report 94: Pfizer Secretly Studied a Heart Damage Marker, Troponin I, in Five- to 15-Year-Olds, Following mRNA COVID Vaccination in 2021. (substack.com)
25. https://vigilantnews.com/post/bombshell-new-found-emails-prove-biden-white-house-hid-covid-vaccine-harms-from-the-public/
26. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-47043-6
27. Myocarditis Cases Reported After mRNA-Based COVID-19 Vaccination in the US From December 2020 to August 2021 | Vaccination | JAMA | JAMA Network
28. Prenatal Exposure to COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 Induces Autism-Like Behaviors in Male Neonatal Rats: Insights into WNT and BDNF Signaling Perturbations | Neurochemical Research (springer.com)
29. Heart disease risk skyrockets 13,200% following covid injections, CDC admits – NaturalNews.com
30. https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/natural-immunity-better-than-protection-from-covid-19-vaccination-study-5534822
31. mRNA vaccine boosters and impaired immune system response in immune compromised individuals: a narrative review – PMC (nih.gov)
32. 12-06-2023-DOH-Letter-to-FDA-RFI-on-COVID-19-Vaccines.pdf (floridahealth.gov)
33. Florida State Surgeon General Calls for Halt in the Use of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines | Florida Department of Health (floridahealth.gov)
34. https://expose-news.com/2022/12/03/covid-vaccinated-children-137x-more-likely-die-2/
35. https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/multimedia/dr-ros-jones-covid-19-vaccines-kids/
36. https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/scientists-global-moratorium-mrna-vaccines-removal-childhood-schedule/?utm_source=telegram&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=defender&utm_id=20240129
37. 2022.12.17.22283625v1.full.pdf (medrxiv.org)
38. https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/news/news-releases/peer-reviewed-papers-suspension-covid-19-vaccines/
39. Humanity Projects – V Damage (phinancetechnologies.com)
40. Covid Vaccination knocks up to 2.5 Decades off a Man’s life according to CDC – The Expose (expose-news.com)
41. Herpesviruses reactivation following COVID-19 vaccination: a systematic review and meta-analysis | European Journal of Medical Research | Full Text (biomedcentral.com)

Hans Mahncke on X: “Turns out this was a big fat lie. Walensky was privately discussing breakthrough infections right at the start of the “vaccine” rollout in January 2021. (notice also that Covid origin fraudsters Collins and Fauci were entangled in this and then lied about it) h/t @ZackStieber https://t.co/2zoR3wA8TE” / X (twitter.com)

Purchase the latest in the 404-book series, “The COVID Fight 404: Why It Matters & Other Essays” here:

Amazon

http://tinyurl.com/3zv2rupu

Barnes & Noble

https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/the-covid-fight-tom-renz/1144780620

Please consider subscribing and if possible, donating to our GiveSendGo (https://www.givesendgo.com/renzlaw). We are a nation of 320+ million, if only 100,000 could give $20/month we could unleash lawfare on a level I truly believe would have the potential to save our nation.

Purchase the second 404 book “CBDCs 404: Central Bank Digital Currency & Other Essays” here:

– https://amzn.to/3FIz9me
 Barnes & Noble

– https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/book/1144313792?ean=9798868958335

In CBDCs: Central Digital Bank Currency & Other Essays Tom Renz offers a cursory exploration of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs), shedding light on their significance in the modern financial landscape. From explaining the general concept to investigating the potential socio-economic impact on readers, this book offers elementary insight into this emerging monetary paradigm.

This little book cautions readers about the potential risks and dangers associated with CBDC implementation including privacy concerns, cybersecurity threats, and the implications of a digital currency system on individual liberties. Readers are guided through thought-provoking essays that critically examine the darker facets of CBDCs in language that could be understood by anyone intrigued by the future of money.

The 404 Series is a series of short books on various topics that are largely complicated and misunderstood. about action and beating censorship. 404 is the internet error for “site not found” and references the difficulty of finding true information. The 404 series presents true information concisely and will allow you to articulate the argument clearly as well as take action on specific issues related to the fight for freedom.

Purchase my first 404 book modRNA: Why It Matters & Other Essays here:

 Amazon – https://a.co/d/3uZxYEB

 Barnes & Noble – https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/modrna-thomas-renz/1144182070?ean=9781088145364

In modRNA: Why It Matters & Other Essays, Attorney Thomas Renz delivers a wake-up call, exposing the potential catastrophes of introducing untested vaccines and gene therapies into the human food supply. With meticulous research this little book unravels the dark side of tinkering with the building blocks of life. Drawing on expert insights, it’s a stark reminder that the consequences of unregulated innovation can be catastrophic.

Tom Renz – Renz is an Attorney, Analyst, and commentator. You can follow his substack at www.TomRenz.SubStack.com and his work generally at www.TomRenz.com. He also has a GiveSendGo to support his work at https://www.givesendgo.com/RENZLAW.

Watch The Tom Renz Show LIVE Every Weekday right here on Rumble at 10am ET.

Subscribe to my locals channel @TomRenz.Locals.com for full access to The Tom Renz Show.

Please support us at www.TomRenz.com and become a Renz Warrior at www.RenzWarrior.com and if you’ve been injured by these jabs and need disability, please go to www.Renz-Law.com & let us know or call 1-877-736-9773.

If you give to our GiveSendGo (https://www.givesendgo.com/renzlaw), subscribe to my Locals Community (TomRenz.locals.com), Rumble (@RenzLaw), and SubStack (tomrenz.substack.com), & buy from our sponsors and tell them Renz sent you then you are helping to fund our fight against tyranny.

Watch Lawfare with Tom Renz on Brighteon TV every Tuesday at 11:30am and Saturday at 12:30pm ET – https://www.brighteon.tv/Lawfare

To support lawfare and help fund freedom for all please donate to our charity: For God Family Country at Donate (forgodfamilycountry.org).

Leave a comment

mRNA IS in Food – There’s ONLY 1 Way to Stop This

CALL/EMAIL NOW!!! HEARING IS WEDNESDAY

APR 17, 2023•

TOM RENZ

Damar Hamlin, the Buffalo Bills, the Vaccines, Tragedy & Truth

On Jan 2, Monday night football I watched in horror as I saw another 24 year old professional athlete make a very average tackle, stand up and then…

Eat Your Vaccines!… I Mean Vegetables!

… Said Bill Gates

APR 2, 2023•

TOM RENZ

Ready for more? Subscribe

Many Super Bowl commercial trophies have been handed out but there was one commercial that didn’t make the cut but still deserved to be talked about.

Jewish groups take the side of Hamas sympathizers and call for a ceasefire in Gaza. And other ‘experts’ on Judaism, such as Rep. Jamaal Bowman, who “uplifted deeply” what it means to be Jewish:

Democrat Rep. Jamaal Bowman: “By me calling for a ceasefire with my colleagues and centering humanity, I am uplifting deeply what it actually means to be Jewish” pic.twitter.com/nXq16qPX3j— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) November 14, 2023

Thanks for that, congressman.

And then there are Christian groups we just don’t get. One such group called HeGetsUs ponied up the big bucks to run a Super Bowl spot reminding us that “Jesus didn’t teach hate” and showed loving Christians washing the feet of their “enemies.” We admire their restraint in showing a white police officer washing the feet of a black woman and not George Floyd himself. Watch as Christians wash the feet of their enemies: Muslims, Native Americans whose land they’ve stolen for oil, illegal immigrants (we presume) getting on a bus, and a young woman outside an abortion clinic.

In reality, Christians face 11 years of prison for allegedly blocking access to abortion clinics under the FACE Act. Instead, they should be washing the feet of those working there.

Jesus washed the feet of friends and enemies. No ego or hate. He humbly loved his neighbors. How can we do the same? pic.twitter.com/kXift42ZG9— HeGetsUs (@HeGetsUs) February 11, 2024

A lot of white people are filled with hate, apparently.

Life News reports:

One of the situations depicted is an AI photo showing a woman washing the feet of a woman outside an abortion business that the ad misleadingly labeled as a “Family Planning Clinic.”

Some pro-life advocates criticized the ad for making it appear that it was endorsing women getting abortions, which kill unborn children and violate Biblical pro-life principles. Other say the ad merely calls on us to follow Jesus’ command to love our neighbors and people regardless of who they are and what they do.

Joel Berry, the managing editor of the Babylon Bee, thought the commercial was leftism surrounding by a Jesus message.

Here’s Joel Berry’s tweet:

There’s a reason the “He Gets Us” commercial didn’t show a liberal washing the feet of someone in a MAGA hat, or a BLM protestor washing an officer’s feet. That would’ve been actually subversive.

Because they were strictly following oppressed v oppressor intersectionality… pic.twitter.com/R1ZS1wkTQ4

— Joel Berry (@JoelWBerry) February 12, 2024

There’s a reason the “He Gets Us” commercial didn’t show a liberal washing the feet of someone in a MAGA hat, or a BLM protestor washing an officer’s feet. That would’ve been actually subversive.

Because they were strictly following oppressed v oppressor intersectionality guidelines. This tells me they were either: 

A) trying to sell Jesus to Leftists by hinting Jesus thinks just like them, or 

B) cynically using Jesus to sell a political movement.

Why not both?

Since the campaign admits it’s funded by both Christians and non-Christians, I’m thinking the answer is both.— Joel Berry (@JoelWBerry) February 12, 2024

And it’s framed in this devilishly clever way to where anyone mad about the commercial is made to look like they’re “preachers of hate,” angry at the very idea of foot washing. A deceptive, nasty, passive-aggressive, but effective tactic.— Joel Berry (@JoelWBerry) February 12, 2024

He gets us. pic.twitter.com/7WgBmXNTi4— The Chivalry Guild (@ChivalryGuild) February 12, 2024

Jesus didn’t affirm sin https://t.co/oUy9h8pZKQ— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) February 12, 2024

Progressivism will hollow out your religion and wear its skin like a trophy https://t.co/s8luDcXuYc— Auron MacIntyre (@AuronMacintyre) February 12, 2024

This ad was not about accepting the Gospel, it was about accepting sin. It’s naive at best and subversive at worst.— Is This Objective (@IsThisObjective) February 12, 2024

“Wash the feet of your enemy” has been perverted into “demand your enemy wash your feet.”— Dan Kent, hoping God puts this tweet on his fridge (@thatdankent) February 12, 2024

Pretty sickening to see Christianity used to promote an obviously leftist political message.

It cheapens and debases the spiritual significance of Jesus Christ.

— Harrison H. Smith ✞ (@HarrisonHSmith) February 12, 2024

“If you are a real Christian you will accept innumerable buses of illegals into your neighborhood, and you will wash their feet when they arrive”

2/10 psyop, a little too blunt and obvious pic.twitter.com/ixJ3zCe8KS

— Steve Stevenson (@AverageSteveS) February 12, 2024

Illegals? You mean enemies. 

The “compassion” and “tolerance” always seems to be required only in one ideological direction, doesn’t it?😔— Jennifer Cory Alvey (@JenCoryAlvey) February 12, 2024

A humiliation ritual. Nothing more.— The Air Loom 🇫🇷 (@Styx_Boatman) February 12, 2024

Well, also, Jesus washed the feet of SINNERS, not the oppressed.

Oh, yeah, and then after he told them to stop sinning.

So that might rule out the cop and the patriot too.

— wasserman (@adamzwasserman) February 12, 2024

I didn’t hear the “sin no more” part. Did I miss it?— Richard Altmaier (@richalt2) February 12, 2024

A passive aggressive attack on “Christians” in general, rather than a true yearning for all of us to love one another. An attack on Gods requirement that we be repentant sinners before we’re washed of our sins.— Free Sea (@MajorLeeOssum) February 12, 2024

Leftists miss the point: Jesus washed his disciples feet to show he was a humble servant but STILL their “teacher” Son of God. The living God as human. He knew that many would be martyred. These images show the foot-washers as humble gods, NOT “oppressors” seeking forgiveness.— Clifford Wilson (@clwriter47) February 12, 2024

The obvious answer to this is a meme campaign. Would Joy Reid wash Sarah Palin’s feet? Why not?— NERV2nd Branch (@NERV2nd) February 12, 2024

If it sells the idea that Jesus is just like them, liberal cosmopolitan, then it also tells them who they think Jesus is “not”. It also informs the audience who is “evil”
A powerfully subversive message.— Seth L (@SethL_intheWord) February 12, 2024

There really does seem to be some intersectionality in who is washing whose feet. It looks like white Christians see every “marginalized” group as the oppressed enemy while they themselves should be subservient to them.

Disgusting.

January 22nd marked the 51st anniversary of the landmark Roe v. Wade ruling about abortion. In a statement from the White House, President Biden marked the occasion as something he wants the American people to feel more celebratory about, even after the Supreme Court finally shut it down in 2022 via the Dobbs decision.

“Fifty-one years ago today, the Supreme Court recognized a woman’s constitutional right to make deeply personal decisions with her doctor—free from the interference of politicians. Then, a year and a half ago, the Court made the extreme decision to overturn Roe and take away a constitutional right. As a result, tens of millions of women now live in states with extreme and dangerous abortion bans…In states across the country, women are being turned away from emergency rooms, forced to go to court to seek permission for the medical attention they need, and made to travel hundreds of miles for health care.”

His mission to trash the conservative platform didn’t just end with this statement. Instead, he kept droning on about claiming that women were being deprived of their “rights.”

“Even as Americans—from Ohio to Kentucky to Michigan to Kansas to California—have resoundingly rejected attempts to limit reproductive freedom, Republican elected officials continue to push for a national ban and devastating new restrictions across the country. On this day and every day, Vice President Harris and I are fighting to protect women’s reproductive freedom against Republicans officials’ dangerous, extreme, and out-of-touch agenda. We stand with the vast majority of Americans who support a woman’s right to choose, and continue to call on Congress to restore the protections of Roe in federal law once and for all.”

What he conveniently overlooks is that there is no Constitutional amendment or ruling that grants women the right to an abortion. There is nothing on the books requiring doctors to perform them or that even deems them a medical necessity, minus a few “one-in-a-trillion” types of cases.

Nevertheless, the Biden administration has attacked the topic of abortion with two smoking barrels since he took office. From executive orders to the gift of giving non-elected officials a platform to spew their opinions on the issue as if they were medical facts, he has been the most pro-choice President to date. Along with VP Harris, the duo has waged a war on the pro-life movement from all sides. In their opinions and liberal “fact” gathering efforts, abortions are something all women should be able to have as easily as getting a bottle of NyQuil for a cold.

What these Godless heathens fail to see is that not only is abortion a mortal sin, but it is also, on its basis, an illegal action. As almost all residents of the US can agree, killing someone is illegal and should not be tolerated. While liberals love to jump on the debate about when life begins, it is simple; life begins at conception. These tiny cells would not be reproducing and spreading at such an astronomical rate if there was no life. Women wouldn’t be feeling the sensations and changes inside their bodies without life.

The women who go through abortions, have something in common with people who had parents who allowed them to transition genders as a teen, deep regret for their decisions. By keeping abortion away from being a “right” we ensure it is only occurring as a medical necessity. Not simply being used as birth control, or a way to avoid responsibility for their actions or lack of action to prevent this from occurring.

In many pockets of America, this has become a hotly contested issue, with many taking the easy wrong of being pro-choice. While it certainly is easy to say “It’s like owning a gun, if you don’t want one, don’t buy one,” it’s not so easy when these decisions impact you directly. As a man, if these abortion “rights” exist, then we are fundamentally stripped of our right to have something to say about this decision. If we are paying when they are keeping the child, then we need to have the ability to say something about keeping those children alive dammit!

In the latest disturbing incident from the state of Massachusetts, the dangerous convergence of the Biden administration’s lax border policies and local sanctuary laws has once again endangered the safety of the American public. This alarming case involves a Haitian national who entered the United States illegally in late 2022 through the Brownsville, Texas, port of entry. Rather than facing deportation, this migrant received a mere notice to appear (NTA) before an immigration judge – a scenario that has become all too familiar in recent years.

Several months later, the 31-year-old individual was arrested by Boston Police on charges of rape and indecent assault and battery against a developmentally disabled person. Boston, proudly labeled a sanctuary city, shields illegal immigrants from deportation by prohibiting cooperation with federal authorities, even in cases involving violent criminals. Shockingly, this policy is replicated in seven other cities across Massachusetts.

In this particular instance, the Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) division within Boston’s Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) office attempted to detain the illegal immigrant for deportation. However, local authorities callously refused to cooperate, leading the Dorchester District Court to release the accused Haitian rapist with a monitoring device pending trial for his heinous sexual assault charges.

ERO Boston Field Office Director Todd M. Lyons expressed his dismay, stating, “Disturbingly and despite our filing an immigration detainer, this individual was released back into the community by the criminal court.” He stressed that a key part of the ERO’s job is to apprehend persons who are unlawfully present and that the organization is dedicated to protecting the community from those who threaten public safety.

Despite this setback, federal authorities diligently launched an investigation upon learning of the Haitian migrant’s criminal arrest and unlawful immigration status through various sources. When the county court callously refused to honor the immigration detainer, ERO took matters into their own hands, apprehending the suspect in Dorchester earlier this month. As a result of the work of ICE, the accused will remain in federal detention until an immigration judge hears his case. Once the state criminal prosecution is closed, ICE will seek his deportation from the United States.

Unfortunately, this is not an isolated incident but rather part of a national crisis fueled by local governments protecting even the most violent illegal immigrant offenders. Rather than assisting federal authorities in deporting illegal aliens, local and county law enforcement agencies are releasing them, even though they have serious convictions such as child sex offenses, rape, and murder, due to the 287(g) collaboration’s refusal to honor ICE detainers.

This issue has become so pervasive that ICE had to resort to a billboard campaign a few years ago, seeking the public’s assistance in capturing alien felons released by various sanctuary law enforcement agencies in a single state. Judicial Watch has extensively reported on this crisis, detailing shocking instances where elected law enforcement officials released child sex offenders, central counties discharged numerous violent convicts, and an entire state – North Carolina – released nearly 500 illegal immigrant criminals within a year.

The issue of sanctuary cities presents a grave concern as a result of the intersection between the Biden administration’s lenient border policies and local jurisdictions prioritizing the protection of illegal immigrants over the safety of American citizens.

This troubling scenario allows for the release of potentially dangerous individuals, such as the recent case in Massachusetts involving a Haitian national accused of rape and assault. Similar to seven other Massachusetts cities, the sanctuary rules make it harder for federal officials, particularly the Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) component of ICE, to hold and deport undocumented immigrants.

By ignoring immigration detainers in the name of helping illegal immigrants, we put communities at risk of re-releasing violent offenders who have already caused harm by slipping through the gaps. This widespread issue demands urgent attention and reform to strike a balance between compassion and safeguarding the well-being of American citizens.

To combat this dangerous trend, ICE has had to employ creative strategies, such as publicizing the release of offenders complete with mug shots, as was the case in two notorious Maryland counties, Montgomery and Prince George’s. The offenders were incarcerated for heinous crimes, including sexual offenses against children, rape, and murder. Such instances underscore the urgent need to address the systemic flaws in our immigration and law enforcement policies, putting the safety of Americans first.

Chinese leader Xi Jinping’s purge of those not fully aligned with his ever-evolving party line has led to unexplained and sudden changes in senior military personnel, including the removal of the Defense Minister and the expulsion of nine high-ranking People’s Liberation Army officers (PLA) from the national legislature, as well as dropping three top defense-industry executives from their government advisory roles.

Among those thus removed are two generals who previously commanded China’s strategic missile force, a former Air Force Chief, and an admiral who led naval forces in the South China Sea, where China is increasingly at odds with the United States and other nations in this contentious region.

Beijing has not disclosed its reasons for their removal nor released information on any investigations into their conduct. Analysts who study China’s military, however, believe it is likely that the ongoing shakeup is part of Xi’s effort to combat corruption related to arms procurement and to stem potential disloyalty within the PLA and state-owned enterprises associated with defense production.

Xi faces a virtually insurmountable problem in rooting out corruption. Communism exhibits systemic inadequacies and fosters a culture of impunity in which corruption can flourish, often unchecked. These inherent failures of socialism are intensified by a lack of personal accountability, a fruit of an atheistic society.

The negative public perception of informants, used by the State to enforce communism, hinders the support for whistleblowers, which is more common in the Free World. Thus, instances of corruption are seldom reported to officials with the authority to prosecute them.

Lyle Morris, a senior fellow at the Asia Society Policy Institute specializing in Chinese security affairs, has noted that China’s military arms development and procurement agency has long been considered a breeding ground for corruption. However, until recently, few senior officials involved in such work were targeted in Xi’s anti-corruption campaign.

The present purge reflects Xi’s secure power base within the PLA, enabling him to undertake such a massive campaign without fear of backlash. At the same time, however, it evidences the inherent weakness of a dictator who must impose his will without regard for the law.

While the impact of such radical restructuring on the PLA’s operational readiness remains unclear, analysts suggest that the corruption probes could lead to increased scrutiny of personnel appointments and procurement processes, which will likely slow Xi’s efforts to modernize the military.

Beijing claims initial success in upgrading the PLA through complex drills, including combined aerial and naval maneuvers. While acknowledging shortcomings requiring attention, the overall combat capabilities of the PLA are unlikely to have been compromised significantly in the short run.

By addressing arms procurement and the strategic missile force, Xi hopes to ensure long-term military effectiveness. Chinese high command has taken note of the abysmal performance of Russian weapons systems in its Ukraine conflict, much of which is attributed to systemic corruption.

The PLA could focus greater attention on party loyalty within its ranks and increase political education for military personnel. Indeed, under Xi, the party has intensified ideological indoctrination, indicating that Xi’s purge may not be as much about private gains at the State’s expense as it is about adherence to the party line.

Such focus may come at the expense of operational training and combat readiness. Experts on Chinese policy argue that Xi has used continual purges to consolidate his authority and enforce commitment to his policies. This reliance on coercion underscores a significant weakness of communism. As hardly anyone believes in communist doctrine, compliance must be motivated by fear rather than commitment to noble ideals to combat corruption.

Since assuming power in late 2012, Xi has employed corruption probes to control the military establishment and implement an ambitious modernization program to transform the Chinese military from a Soviet-style force into a modern 21st-century military. In the initial years of Xi’s regime, several senior generals were purged to pave the way for officers considered more professional and doctrinally reliable.

While they retain their military and party ranks, they are expected to be removed entirely from leadership positions. Military analysts also believe investigations will likely be launched at lower levels and other departments.

Nonetheless, the PLA has maintained a high operational pace. Aerial sorties and naval drills have been conducted along China’s borders and beyond. In recent months, a Chinese aircraft carrier task group conducted combat training in the Pacific Ocean, and PLA forces took part in joint exercises with foreign counterparts.

The PLA’s Southern Theater Command recently announced the dispatch of naval and air forces on routine patrols in the South China Sea. China continues to harass countries with the deployment of balloons that have been flown over the United States and Taiwan as part of Beijing’s “gray-zone” tactics to intimidate without the direct use of force.

It is unlikely that Beijing will challenge Washington’s status as the dominant world military power or unilaterally alter the status quo in the Taiwan Strait in the foreseeable future. James Char, a research fellow at Nanyang Technological University in Singapore, believes that the PLA will likely continue to engage in military operations that remain below the threshold of war, using harassment and intimidation to test the mettle of the West.

Xi recognizes that China’s military is suffering from an outdated Soviet-style structure similar to Russia’s, which has been incapable of conquering a border country a quarter its size. This is not the performance one would anticipate from a world military power. While Xi’s dream of creating a first-world military remains to be realized, it would be foolhardy to continue to sleep as Communist China advances in its quest to vanquish the remnants of Christian Civilization in the West.

	“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. This article was written because many people have indicated that the country they live in (France) does not allow them to see certain free-speech sites, such as Rumble. Governments do NOT have the authority to restrict their citizens, so I want to show you how to evade unethical censorship from governments. Please share this with others. The United States was created based on the core principle that the rights of man come from God, not from the state. In other words, the government does not have the authority to take away our rights. We the People own this country and our politicians are our servants, not our masters. But while this truth is recognized in the United States, it is not limited to the United States. Truth is truth. All people, regardless of where they live, receive their rights from God, not from the State (if you don’t believe in God, then you have declare yourself as having inherent rights). Governments are run by power-seeking people, often psychopaths. This has always been true and it always will be true. The largest threat to people, their property and peace itself is not what we call the common criminal. It is the government. Of all of our inherent, natural and God-given rights, the most vital is the freedom of speech. Why is freedom of speech so vital? Because if freedom of speech exists, truth wins. No lie can withstand the disinfecting light of truth. This is why the World Economic Forum, the UN and governments around the world are trying desperately to crush freedom of speech. The system of enslavement that they are trying to create is based on lies, and as long as we are able to speak freely and share the truth, then their lies will fail. We absolutely must not let them crush freedom of speech. As Martin Luther King, Jr. said in his famous letter from Birmingham Jail: “One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws.“ We must fight any action to crush freedom of speech. It is our duty to do so. This is why many refuse to put any videos on YouTube. YouTube (Google) is actively colluding with the government to censor people, which is wrong. You do not want to support these actions in any way, and thus should refuse to give Google a single dollar in advertising revenue from videos that you would post. Many now do so on Rumble, which is a free speech platform. But people in France and other European countries ban Rumble in those countries which is yet another reminder that the threat of tyranny is closer than we think. You do not need to simply accept this. Watch Rumble anyway. But, you may ask how you can watch videos on Rumble in banned countries and those that block Rumble? The answer: with a VPN. protonvpn.com (completely free, freedom built and designed)

AI is a reality of our world now. And it will be as significant a change as the industrial revolution, electricity and the internet.

It’s important that we understand the power of AI, how it will be used for good and bad, and most importantly, how it is being used right now to influence your children and teens.

This posting is for the express purpose of your sharing it far and wide with your friends, your State senators, your governor and everyone else that will listen and even those that may not.

---

Before November 2022, artificial intelligence (AI) existed only in the realm of science fiction for the average person. But with the introduction of ChatGPT, humanity finally witnessed the reality that is AI.

And it shocked us.

For the first time, we witnessed the workings of “intelligent” software. Software that could have a real conversation. Software that could write stories and even create startling images from just a few written words.

And as people began to use it, the software learned. The more it was used, the better it became.

Whereas in early 2023 you may have been able to tell the difference between an AI chatbot and a real person, towards the end of 2023 it became increasingly difficult to tell one from the other. 

We also saw an amazing improvement of text-to-image creation. In early 2023, images were often grotesque distortions of people, but by the end of 2023 anyone could use AI to create a stunning image of whatever they wanted—simply by typing in a few words.

Programmers have been awed by AI’s ability to write computer code. In fact, there are now many AI-powered websites that write computer code and assist computer programmers.

This ability of AI to learn on its own without the direction of a software programmer is startling.

It brings us to ask these questions: If AI is self-learning, what does the future hold? Will it be a boon for mankind? A powerful tool used on behalf of humanity? Or a dreadful weapon for tyranny? A sophisticated machine for scammers and hackers?

Or will AI ultimately destroy the human race?

Elon Musk believes that AI is a threat to humanity. He is worried that a future, more advanced version of AI will wipe out all humans on the planet. He puts it this way:

“With artificial intelligence, we are summoning the demon. You know all those stories where there’s the guy with the pentagram and the holy water, and he’s like, yeah, he’s sure he can control the demon? Doesn’t work out.

On the other side of the coin is Marc Andreessen, co-founder of Netscape, which created one of the earliest web browsers, and a leading figure in Silicon Valley. He says: 

“The era of Artificial Intelligence is here, and boy are people freaking out. Fortunately, I am here to bring the good news: AI will not destroy the world, and in fact may save it.

So, what’s the right way to think about AI?

Let’s first look at what AI is not.

When most science fiction lovers think of AI, they think of the Commander Data character from Star Trek. Commander Data was a sincere, innocent, intelligent android who desired to become more human-like. But for all his existential ponderings of “what makes someone a living being,” Data was a manufactured human. He was more than just AI. He was AGI—short for artificial general intelligence.

AGI is akin to human cognition. By contrast, AI is not at AGI levels, and many think it will never get there.

For that matter, the researchers who develop AI never had the goal of creating a Commander Data-like manufactured human, or AGI. Rather, Big Tech and governments have been pumping money into AI for the purpose of processing the incredible amounts of data that their surveillance tools collect about us—and then using that data against us.

To understand, let’s look at the business models of Google, Facebook, and most other Big Tech companies. These companies have adopted the surveillance capitalism business model. Every product Google makes, including its Chrome browser, Chromebook computers, Gmail, the Google search engine and the Android phone operating system, are made for one purpose: to spy on us. They are, in fact, Trojan horses.

They gather tremendous amounts of data and store it in a database. They then use this data to feed us ads that generate money for them. Google is, in fact, an extremely sophisticated advertising company. Facebook uses the same business model.

Beyond advertising, though, both Facebook and Google have figured out that they have the ability to shape people’s opinions and perspective on the world.

Dr. Robert Epstein, an American psychologist, professor, author, and journalist, has studied the power that Google and Facebook possess to both change and mold public opinion.

According to Dr. Epstein: 

“To understand how the new forms of mind control work, we need to start by looking at the search engine – one in particular: the biggest and best of them all, namely Google. [. . .] Google has become the main gateway to virtually all knowledge. [. . .] Google decides which of the billions of web pages it is going to include in our search results, and it also decides how to rank them. How it decides these things is a deep, dark secret – one of the best-kept secrets in the world, like the formula for Coca-Cola.

In 2012, Dr. Epstein started performing tests to see how Google could change people’s opinions in political races by simply changing the order of search results so that people would see links to web pages that made a particular candidate look better than his or her opponent.

Even early on, the results were astounding.

Epstein said of that research:

“On average, we were able to shift the proportion of people favouring any given candidate by more than 20 per cent overall and more than 60 per cent in some demographic groups. Even more disturbing, 99.5 per cent of our participants showed no awareness that they were viewing biased search rankings – in other words, that they were being manipulated.

In August 2015, Epstein published his findings in the prestigious Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS). In his report, he declared that “Google now has the power to flip upwards of 25 per cent of the national elections in the world with no one knowing this is occurring.”

Facebook does the same thing and has the same ability to influence elections.

Epstein observed:

“In 2010, Facebook sent ‘go out and vote’ reminders to more than 60 million of its users. The reminders caused about 340,000 people to vote who otherwise would not have. [. . .] Are there laws prohibiting Facebook from sending out ads selectively to certain users? Absolutely not; in fact, targeted advertising is how Facebook makes its money. Is Facebook currently manipulating elections in this way? No one knows. . . .”

Another famous study—this one conducted by Facebook on itself in 2012—showed that Facebook manipulated the newsfeed of almost 700,000 people for one week and found that in so doing it could manipulate people’s emotional states. None of the 700,000 people had any idea that they were being manipulated.

Google and Facebook invest heavily in their people-manipulating projects. They hire psychiatrists and social scientists to create an engaging experience for customers. They also hire statisticians and the best coders in the world. 

And, of course, they pay billions to other companies to gather data on people.

For instance, Google pays Apple an astounding $20 billion per year to make Google the default search engine in the Safari browser. How can Google afford to shell out that kind of money? It’s a simple mathematical equation: Google knows it will turn a profit simply by collecting people’s data and using that data to manipulate them.

Google does the same thing with its other products. We might ask: Why do 65% of computer users around the world use Google’s Chrome browser? Because Google pays computer-makers and phone manufacturers to preinstall Chrome and make it the default browser. Google has done the research and learned that most people won’t change their computer’s default browser.

Moreover, Google purchases sources of data from other companies. Did you ever wonder why Walgreens asks for your phone number every time you check out? The answer is that after the drugstore gets a clear picture of your buying habits, it turns around and sells your data to Google and other tech giants. Using its customers as products, Walgreens, like Google, has worked out a smashingly lucrative deal for itself. 

The grocery store Kroger, too, makes an incredible amount of money from your customer data. It sells your name, email address, mailing address, phone number, purchase history, location, financial information, health-related information, age, marital status, gender, ethnicity, biometric data (facial recognition) and even your behavior to Google and others.

As a result, Google knows everything about you. So do Facebook and TikTok and countless other Big Tech companies.

The tech companies soon ran into a problem, though. They were gathering so much data on each of us that they needed a better way to process it and develop predictive mechanisms to “understand” what motivates you.

This is where AI comes in.

AI is a fantastically sophisticated software program that allows Big Tech to collect every single piece of data about you and use that data to predict your actions, emotions, and hot buttons. AI has gotten so good at these predictions that even the smartest programmers don’t understand how it is able to know you so well.

But AI is not just about understanding what makes each of us tick, AI’s superpower lies in its ability to manipulate us. AI knows our hot buttons, what we care about, what we don’t care about, what makes us sad, what makes us furious, and what makes us happy.

Add to this AI’s infinite capacity to learn and the infinite patience that any machine possesses, and it becomes clear that AI can become a terrifying weapon of mind controll. Whereas propaganda was once the manipulation of large groups of people, propaganda influenced by AI is a laser-focused brainwashing instrument.

This phenomenon would be extremely disturbing if it were just Big Tech we’re talking about, but it’s worse than that. Big Tech is now colluding with Big Brother, which exponentially increases the threat AI poses.

This is not science fiction. Everything mentioned here is being done with today’s technology.

So, what we really want to know is: How are Big Tech and Big Brother using their combined power—and are they abusing it?

Since corporations are not required to be transparent about what they do, and governments act without transparency, there is no way to provide proof of exactly how these entities are joining forces against us and abusing their power. But it’s safe to say that because this software was designed with the goal of gaining power, Big Tech and Big Brother are certainly abusing it.

I became aware of AI’s influence because of something that happened to my son.

A number of years ago, my son was going through a dark time in his life. He was depressed and angry, and he sometimes considered suicide. One day he was working as a chef in a restaurant, and he was particularly upset. He listened to the song “Rotten Apple” on repeat all day long at work.

At the end of the day, he got off work and looked at TikTok. On his newsfeed he saw a very strange meme. It was an angry drawing of a chef, and the meme said, “When you are a line cook and you listen to Rotten Apple 24 hours a day and you want to kill yourself.”

<Insert meme right here LOL>

Under the meme it said that this post had been viewed hundreds of times and that it was liked by many people. But I don’t believe this. I believe it was a meme created in real time by TikTok’s AI that was specifically designed to push my son over the edge.

Let’s examine what transpired and explore it more deeply by asking a few questions.

1. Is it possible that AI could have created this meme on the fly?
2. Could AI have known my son’s emotional state and his hot buttons?
3. Could AI then take this data and use it to influence my son to hurt himself?
4. Could AI do the same to groups of people and possibly influence an entire population?
5. Why would they target my son (and teens in general)?

First, is it possible that AI could have created this meme on the fly?

Yes. This meme is actually child’s play for an AI. Nowadays, people are creating hyper-realistic drawings and even videos from just a few words of text. The software is available to the general public, which means it’s obviously years behind what is available to Big Tech behind the scenes.

Second, could AI have known my son’s emotional state and his hot buttons?

Yes. Again, this is child’s play. The very reason social media exists is to collect real-time data on everything you, including your emotions, and from it learn what influences you and changes your mind and behaviors.

Third, could AI then take this data and use it to influence my son to hurt himself?

Yes. The business model of Big Tech is to take your data and then influence you with it. Indeed, there is no reason to collect your information unless it can then be used against you. This is why Google, Facebook, and TikTok are the most powerful companies in the world today.

Fourth, could AI do the same to groups of people and possibly influence an entire population?

Yes. If it can be done to one user, it can be done to all users. Just as Google Maps can direct each of us from one location to another, AI allows the programmers to tell the AI to direct each of us to a specified belief or emotional state. In other words, the user can be guided from where he is now to where the AI wants him to be.

Fifth, why would they target my son (and teens in general)?

TikTok is a Chinese company. China openly states that it wants to become the only superpower in the world. Thus, the Chinese have a very real desire to defeat the USA.

Remember what the ancient Chinese general Sun Tzu said: 

“The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting. [. . .] Be extremely subtle, even to the point of formlessness. Be extremely mysterious, even to the point of soundlessness. Thereby you can be the director of the opponent’s fate.”

Here’s how China could pursue its goal of domination. President Xi, the dictator of China, could call Shou Zi Chew, the CEO of TikTok, to his office. (Chinese companies are required to obey the government.) President Xi could announce to Shou Chew that he wants to destabilize the USA and that TikTok should take actions to accomplish this.

CEO Shou Chew gives a directive to his programmers to train TikTok’s AI to bring American teens to despair. The AI then learns about each teen and subtly adjusts that teen’s newsfeed to bring him down a dark rabbit hole of hopelessness.

Is what I’ve described happening now? I think so. When the CBS newsmagazine 60 Minutes did a segment on TikTok, it interviewed Center for Humane Technology co-founder Tristan Harris, who explained that the Chinese version of TikTok is drastically different from the American version. He described the former as “the spinach version” and the latter as “the opium version.” Whereas Chinese children are shown positive videos that offer them encouraging, inspirational videos, American children are hit with videos about drug abuse, gender confusion, radicalization, and depression.

How powerful is this brainwashing? I believe the power of this kind of mind control is almost absolute, and I will give two examples that prove it.

Example #1. Question: What is one thing that every human has known since the beginning of time?

Answer: A man is a man, and a woman is a woman, and never the twain shall meet. There is nothing as obvious, biologically scientific, or even instinctual than this fact. Yet, within the past few years, huge numbers of people have been brainwashed into a state of confusion about this subject to the point where they will aggressively fight anyone who thinks clearly and sanely about the issue.

Example #2. Question: What is a feminist?

Answer: For generations, feminists have promoted the advancement of females so that their rights under the law are acknowledged to be equal to the rights of males. But today feminists do the exact opposite. Instead of fighting for women’s rights, they fight for MEN’s rights.

And not only that, but the men’s rights they are fighting for infringe on women—specifically, on women’s sports, on women’s locker rooms, on women’s bathrooms, and on women’s prisons. In fact, the same feminists who once argued for equal rights for women now have vitriol for women who dare stand up for women’s rights.

Most importantly, many of the so-called feminists don’t seem to realize they’ve completely flipped-flopped on their position within the past few years.

Both these examples are indications of what must be very powerful brain washing.

To be clear, TikTok is far from the only culprit. Facebook, Instagram, and other social media platforms use the same technology to bring their users (especially teens) into an emotional abyss.

But why would Facebook be a party to this sick trend?

A recent high-level Facebook data scientist-turned-whistleblower, Frances Haugen, said she finally left the company when her regular pleas of concern fell on deaf ears. She observed that Facebook repeatedly chose its bottom line over the well-being of users. And she described how Facebook’s own studies show that people use the platform more when they are angry or depressed than when everything’s going smoothly.

According to an NPR article about Haugen: 

“She said Facebook harms children, sows division and undermines democracy in pursuit of breakneck growth and astronomical profits. 

Haugen told Congress that Facebook consistently chose to maximize its growth rather than implement safeguards on its platforms, just as it hid from the public and government officials internal research that illuminated the harms of Facebook products.

‘The result has been more division, more harm, more lies, more threats, and more combat. In some cases, this dangerous online talk has led to actual violence that harms and even kills people,’ Haugen testified.

But I believe the problem is more massive than Facebook’s greed. It’s also the “woke” mind virus, which is the same destructive mindset that’s behind the ruin of many of America’s once-great cities. The leading Big Tech companies, which are headquartered in these very same trashed West Coast cities (San Francisco, Portland, Seattle, to name a few) have exported their crazy ideas all around the world via social media.

And there’s another driving force. We are facing an unprecedented move towards tyranny in the “free” Western countries, including the US. Higher-ups in our own government, in our intelligence agencies and military ranks and academia and financial system—many of whom are aligned with the World Economic Forum (WEF)—are just as bent on destroying Americans and America as the Chinese government is.

Let’s get back to the question, “Is AI a dangerous weapon of tyranny or a boon for humanity?”

My reply: It depends on whether this incredibly powerful tool is controlled by good people or by the psychopaths who run the world.

We need to be clear about this point. For, although AI is intelligent, it is not alive. AI does not have a conscience. It has no real intellect. It doesn’t know what it is doing, and will take actions without any understanding of good or bad. Nor can it experience remorse. Even though AI can accomplish a tremendous number of complex tasks, it is merely doing what it has been programmed to do.

Right now, global power is held by the psychopaths who create and control it.

This includes Sam Altman. Elon Musk and Sam Altman co-founded OpenAI—the maker of ChatGPT—as a nonprofit. Elon’s stated goal was to create an open-source AI that could not be controlled by any individual or company. But in 2019 Sam Altman kicked out Musk, changed OpenAI to a for-profit, and received a large investment from Microsoft. He then closed the source code. Such deceptive maneuvers show the true character of Sam Altman.

Similarly, Larry Page and Sergey Brin, the founders of Google have proven time and again that they will do anything to expand their power while hurting others—a clear sign of psychopaths.

As for psychopaths in government, there must be plenty of them in China, an incredibly powerful nation whose dictators seem determined to gain power on the world stage and take us down—one person at a time, if need be.

But I think there are an equal number of psychopaths in the US government. Our leaders constantly breach the US Constitution and infringe on our freedoms for the sole purpose of increasing their own power. Certainly, the heads of the CIA and the NSA and the FBI are psychopaths, for they are using this latest technology to hoard power for themselves, to the detriment of their own countrymen.

So, yes, while AI has the potential to be a powerful tool for all peoples of all nations, the reality is that it is currently in the hands of the psychopaths, who are already using it against us. To control and manipulate us. To change our beliefs. To radicalize us. To make us depressed and angry. To cause division and chaos. To influence elections around the globe. And they’re able to do all of this damage without our knowledge or consent.

Furthermore, AI will be a key component in the new social credit system that the UN and WEF and national governments around the world are creating. With AI, they will be able to watch every move we make. Worse, depending on how in line or out of line our thinking and behavior is, the AI will dish out immediate rewards or punishments designed to train each of us to obey.

What can we do individually and collectively? 

FIRST, we must become aware—and help others become aware—of the power of AI and how it is being used against us. For starters, share this issue of The Liberty Zeppelin with others.

SECOND, stop using TikTok, Facebook, Instagram, and Google. Minimize your use of Google-owned YouTube and other social media platforms. Instead, use freedom of speech-minded companies such as Substack, Rumble and Twitter.

THIRD, stop giving the tech companies and government your data by learning how to remain private online. This requires knowledge, a change of habits and privacy-oriented phones, computers and phones. It absolutely is possible to secure your privacy.

FOURTH, States should pass laws that obligate companies to disclose when someone is talking to an AI as opposed to a human being, or when content is created by AI, with severe penalties for violations and strong protections for whistleblowers. Also, States need to force social media companies, to prove that they aren’t engaged in manipulating people, especially as it pertains to elections. The penalties for these actions would have to be fantastically severe to actually change Google and Facebook’s actions.

As a final note, AI is a fantastically powerful tool that we should not shy away from. Just as nuclear power can be used for creation or destruction, AI can be used to empower or enslave. If we surrender this technology to the bad people of the world, they will gain so much power over us that our fate will be sealed.

The good people of the world need to continue to develop AI for the benefit of all. AI has tremendous potential to help us create solutions, to identify scams and hacks before we fall victim to them, to protect our privacy and to fight back against the people who desire to oppress us.

I urge developers to keep their source code open, to minimize the amount of data collection on users, and to uphold the highest standards of ethics. Yes, the world is changing rapidly.

Embrace it but with one eye open at all times!

Claudine Gay may have resigned in disgrace as president of Harvard University, but she is in no way chastened by the experience, and in fact took to the pages of the New York Times to portray herself as (what else?) the victim.

The result illustrates the extraordinary lack of self-awareness that all our elites share, but which is especially striking coming from Claudine Gay.

For instance, if you can believe it, the former Harvard president writes, “College campuses in our country must remain places where students can learn, share and grow together, not spaces where proxy battles and political grandstanding take root. Universities must remain independent venues where courage and reason unite to advance truth, no matter what forces set against them.”

This from someone who presided over an institution whose intellectual life is one of stultifying intellectual conformity and who politicized hiring, admissions, and even which portraits were to hang inside campus buildings.

She says people who “relentlessly campaigned to oust me since the fall often trafficked in lies and ad hominem insults, not reasoned argument.”

Oh, really? So when your defenders said the campaign against you was based on “white supremacy,” you considered that a “reasoned argument”?

And then of course it’s time for the boo-hoo-I’m-a-black-woman-and-that-scares-people speech:

“It is not lost on me that I make an ideal canvas for projecting every anxiety about the generational and demographic changes unfolding on American campuses: a Black woman selected to lead a storied institution.”

And it is not lost on the rest of us, Claudine, that had you belonged to a different race you wouldn’t have been president of Harvard in the first place. The reign of terror whereby people feared stating the obvious like this is rapidly coming to an end.

Then this whopper:

As you return to “scholarship,” Claudine? You mean the grand total of 11 articles over two decades, all of them about race and gender, topics by which so many mediocrities make their careers? How about the 50+ examples of plagiarism, which don’t even merit a mention in your apologia?

And who exactly is seeking to “undermine” the university? Could it be people who hire only those who are ideological clones of themselves, people who reject academically outstanding students so that far weaker ones can take their places, and people who consistently want to throw out objective tests?

The best part of all, though, is her “warning” that the campaign against her was part of a larger strategy to “unravel public faith in pillars of American society…. Trusted institutions of all types — from public health agencies to news organizations — will continue to fall victim to coordinated attempts to undermine their legitimacy and ruin their leaders’ credibility.”

You’re darn right, Claudine. The rightful citizens of this country fully intend to do just that, because they shouldn’t have trusted these institutions to begin with — especially “public health agencies,” which have been doing the work of undermining themselves for us since 2020.

It’s about time the peoples of the U.S. take back their country.

To say the Biden administration speaks with a forked tongue on the Second Amendment is an understatement. But translating the ultimate message is easy: They want your guns, and they will say or do whatever is necessary to get them.

In October, Kamala Harris—the nominal head of the White House’s recently launched Office of Gun Violence Prevention—issued a statement in response to the attack in Lewiston, Maine. It was a classic example of doublespeak and dishonesty.

Harris said, “Let us … continue to speak truth about the moment we are in.” Then she said, “Gun violence is the leading cause of death for children in our nation.” NRA-ILA has debunked this claim on multiple occasions. It has also been exposed by even mainstream fact checkers as requiring manipulation of data and definitions to be even partially “true.”

But this administration has never let truth get in the way of an opportunity to push for gun control, which Harris did when she went on to say, “It is a false choice to suggest we must choose between either upholding the Second Amendment or passing reasonable gun safety laws to save lives.” She then gave several examples of what she considered “reasonable gun safety laws,” including “universal” background checks, “red flag” firearm confiscation laws, “high-capacity” magazine bans and bans on semi-automatic long guns.

First, these laws do not uphold the Second Amendment. While none of them have been scrutinized by the U.S. Supreme Court, various iterations of at least three out of the four have been ruled unconstitutional under that provision by various lower courts. There is certainly no consensus that they are constitutionally permissible.

Nor has it been convincingly established that any of them save lives. A long-running and well-funded effort by the RAND Corporation to review the effects of gun control on violent crime and homicide has determined that the evidence of the four laws’ efficacy is generally “inconclusive,” with only “limited” evidence to support limiting magazine capacity.

But even if one could conceive of a world in which some version of the policies could pass constitutional muster and have some marginal effect on public safety, that is not the world imagined by the Biden administration. Instead, they seek the most-extreme version of these laws yet attempted, a legal regime that would be totally at odds with the text, history, and tradition of the U.S. Constitution.

Harris quickly made clear that this administration’s version of “reasonable” gun control includes banning and confiscating Americans’ lawfully acquired firearms. In remarks at a state luncheon whose guests included Prime Minister Anthony Albanese of Australia, Harris used the occasion to again push for extreme gun control by endorsing the gun-control regime of her guest from Australia: “And let us be clear, it does not have to be this way, as our friends in Australia have demonstrated.”

We have discussed the Australian experience with gun control many times, as it is a regime that has been promoted as a template for America by such gun-control stalwarts as Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. Yet that template means making armed self-defense (which the U.S. Supreme Court has declared the “core” of the Second Amendment) illegal and instituting a “needs-based” firearm licensing system (also invalidated by U.S. Supreme Court precedent). These principals were enforced in Australia through retroactively banning and compelling the surrender of lawfully obtained guns, including handguns and several types of long guns.

There is certainly nothing “reasonable” about recharacterizing peaceable citizens as criminals based merely on possession of guns and magazines lawfully obtained and never misused, nor about threatening them with imprisonment if they don’t turn that property over to the government.

Many firearm owners will also be familiar with the ugly advertising used by Australian states to compel their citizens to comply with the confiscation regime. The advertisements told gun owners they had limited time to comply “without penalty” and even depicted prison scenes with information on how to surrender the banned firearms. The message was clear: surrender your arms or face the consequences.

This regime is incompatible not only with America’s history and tradition of arms, but our entire ideal of due process under the law. When the Biden administration endorses Australia’s gun laws, what they are endorsing is a regime arising from a country that has no constitutional protection for the right to keep and bear arms and that treats armed self-defense as a crime.

However they try to couch it, that message and that goal should be rejected by the American people. Thankfully, firearm owners will be given the opportunity to reject the administration’s push for Australia-style gun control when they head to the polls this November.