YUP. GOD BLESS OUR LAW ENFORCEMENT.
THIS FOR ALL OF THE SURGICALLY IMPLANTED ASS-KISSERS WHO THINK ‘THEY’ WOULDN’T TURN ON THE PUBLIC IN THE BLINK OF AN EYE BECAUSE THEY SURE WOULD AS VIEWED RIGHT THE HELL HERE FOLKS. RIGHT THE HELL HERE.
NOW GET READY FOR THE AVALANCHE OF POUNCERS.
THERE ‘YA GO FOLKS. THE LEFT IS EXACTLY WHO YOU THOUGHT THEY WERE. PERIOD. END OF STORY. FULL STOP.
Hundreds of Yale Law Students Disrupt Bipartisan Free Speech Event
Dr. Francis Boyle was interviewed by Owen Shroyer (Infowars.com) on Monday and dropped several important bombshells (see video below). First, know that Dr. Boyle is the author of the international agreement prohibiting gain-of-function bioweapons research, signed by Reagan in the 1980s. And since that time, Dr. Boyle has been battling the efforts of Tony Fauci who has been incessantly pushing illegal bioweapons research with the support of both Democrats and the Neocons.
On Monday’s show with Shroyer, Dr. Boyle stated that America’s corrupt government is running and sponsoring a “Nazi death cult” of bioweapons scientists and collaborators, and he specifically named Fauci (NIAID), Collins (NIH) and Walensky (CDC) as those deserving prosecution for crimes against humanity. He has previously stated that “thousands” of scientists who worked on gain-of-function research should be prosecuted and sentenced to life in prison. (Dr. Boyle does not believe in the death penalty.)
Furthermore, Dr. Boyle confirmed the decades-long existence of US-built bioweapons labs in Ukraine and discussed how the United States government is guilty of violating the global treaty against gain-of-function weapons development while working to surround Russia with bioweapons labs.
What’s fascinating in all this is how the gaslighting corporate media is now telling the (oblivious) American masses that there are no bioweapons labs in Ukraine at all.
It’s a blatant lie, of course, and literally hundreds of publicly-available online documents discuss the operations surrounding these bioweapon labs.
One such document, forwarded to us by a whistleblower source, is entitled:
DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY
BROAD AGENCY ANNOUNCEMENT
HDTRA1-14-24-FRCWMD-BAA
Amendment 9
January 2019
Research and Development Directorate (RD)
Chief Scientist and Innovations Department (RD-ST)
Fundamental Research to Counter Weapons
of Mass Destruction (C-WMD)
The original document is available at this link from MSRDconsortium.org. In case the document is scrubbed, it is also mirrored at this link on Natural News servers.
The document states: (emphasis)
The Cooperative Biological Engagement Program (CBEP), a component of the DoD Cooperative Threat Reduction (CTR) Program, recognizes the danger to U.S. and global health security posed by the risk of outbreaks of dangerous infectious diseases, whether natural or manmade.
CBEP is interested in collaborative research engagements with foreign partners in any one of the following regions: Countries of the Former Soviet Union (FSU) (specifically, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Kazakhstan, and Ukraine), Africa (including, but not limited to, Kenya, Tanzania Uganda, South Africa), Southeast Asia (including, but not limited to, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Philippines, Thailand), and Middle Eastern /South Asian countries (including, but not limited to, Afghanistan, Iraq, India and Pakistan). CBEP encourages proposers to develop projects in conjunction with foreign institutions in CBEP-engaged countries.
Note that the document specifically says the DoD is targeting former Soviet Union countries such as Ukraine as designated locations for so-called “threat reduction” research. This is code speak for building bioweapons, of course. When these documents claim that they will definitely not be building bioweapons, what they actually mean is they will be building bioweapons while lying to the world about what they’re actually doing.
In other words, the occupying US (illegitimate) government has been a criminal bioweapons “headquarters” for decades, running illegal bioweapons research and development operations around the world, threatening all of humankind with deadly pathogens that are truly an extension of the Nazi war machine from the 1930s.
In fact, it is Nazi scientists who first brought the precursors of this technology to America in the days after World War II. Operation Paperclip brought actual Nazi scientists into the USA to run NASA’s rocketry development program, while other scientists were brought into the USA to work on pharmacology, pesticides and chemical industry research. The result is that America’s bioweapons institution is literally an extension of Nazi war scientists who now threaten the entire world with their mad science depopulation weapons.
Dr. Boyle is correct in all this: The US government has been running a “Nazi death cult” of criminal bioweapons development since at least the 1980s. And dozens of these labs have been built in Ukraine, as confirmed recently by Deputy Secretary of State Nuland. Under international treaties, this means that the US and Ukraine have been operating in violation of international law while refusing to stop their actions that place the entire world population at risk.
Turns out Fauci really is a Josef Mengele.
THIS ONE IS WITHOUT A DOUBT ABSOLUTELY DISGUSTING
If you think relativism is dead just because people proclaim moral absolutes like “thou shalt not be intolerant,” think again
For many years, relativism was the craze in apologetic circles. It was a primary target for apologists because it was part of the modern cultural landscape. “You have your truth, I have mine” was the catchphrase.
Some have suggested that relativism is long gone. David Brooks, a political commentator, argued a few years back for The New York Times that although American college campuses used to be “awash in moral relativism” as late as the 1980s, it is not so anymore. Rather, Brooks argues, “college campuses are today awash in moral judgment” and are a hotbed for what some have termed the “shame culture”—a culture in which unmerciful moral crusades are initiated against those who violate the absolute moral values of inclusion and tolerance. You can’t shame people and be a moral relativist at the same time, so it’s said.
This idea that relativism is dead seems to have gained traction even among some Christians, non-Catholic and Catholic alike.
But I’m not sure this is entirely true.
It’s obvious that most people today affirm certain moral absolutes—“thou shalt not be a white supremacist,” “thou shalt not be intolerant,” “thou shalt not be a judgmental, hateful bigot,” etc. On the surface, people who say these things don’t seem to be relativists of any sort, whether intellectual or moral. But when examined more closely, such moral absolutes turn out to be code for some form of relativism.
Consider, for example, “thou shalt not be a white supremacist.” In 2017, the president of Pamona College (Claremont, California), David Oxtoby, wrote an email to the entire campus in response to protesters who had shut down a speech intended to be given by Black Lives Matter critic Heather Mac Donald. In the e-mail, Oxtoby expressed his disapproval of the shutdown, arguing that it conflicted with the mission of Pamona College, which is “the discovery of truth” and “the collaborative development of knowledge.”
A group of students responded to the e-mail with an open letter, claiming that “the idea that there is a single truth. . . is a myth and white supremacy.” The letter, written by three self-identified black students and signed by at least thirty others, further stated that “historically, white supremacy has venerated the idea of objectivity . . . as a means of silencing oppressed peoples.” The implication of these statements seems to be that there is no such thing as objective truth, which is what philosophers call global or total relativism, the most universal relativism of all.
Other institutions express this idea, too. For example, in 2021, California’s Instructional Quality Commission proposed for a mathematics curriculum framework the use of a document entitled “A Pathway to Equitable Math Instruction: Dismantling Racism in Mathematics Instruction.” This manual gives a list of indicators of “white supremacy culture in the mathematics classroom,” one of which is a focus on “getting the right answer” and teaching math in a “linear fashion.” The manual goes on to state, “The concept of mathematics being purely objective is unequivocally false,” concluding that “upholding the idea that there are always right and wrong answers perpetuates ‘objectivity.’” Apparently, for this California Commission, the truth that two plus two doesn’t equal five is false, and to claim otherwise is white supremacy. This is global relativism at its height.
Another example is the Minnesota Department of Inclusion and Community Engagement. On its website, the department provides a “list of characteristics of white supremacy culture.” Like the California Commission, it lists “objectivity” as an indicator of white culture and defines it as “the belief that there is such a thing as being objective.” If there’s no such thing as being objective, then there doesn’t seem to be any room for objective truth.
Now, someone might say “objectivity” here doesn’t mean objective truth, but only freedom from biased or cultural influences. Perhaps. But the language of “objectivity” seems to be coming from the same echo chambers as the California Commission, which clearly identified “objectivity” as pertaining to right and wrong answers.
Moreover, the document says other things that suggest it’s denying objective truth. Just a few lines below, under the same heading “Objectivity,” it identifies “white culture” as “requiring people to think in a linear fashion and ignoring or invalidating those who think in other ways.”
Well, to think in a linear fashion is to argue for true conclusions based on true premises. If such thinking is white supremacy, and thus morally repugnant, then seeking to know objective truth is morally repugnant. It’s hard to see how seeking objective truth would be morally repugnant unless you’re denying the existence of objective truth.
But let’s grant for argument’s sake that by “objectivity,” all the document means is freedom from biased or cultural influences. What would be the implication? If the implication is that what we think is true is mere cultural conditioning, then it amounts to a form of cultural relativism. If the implication is that we can’t ever be objective enough to know what objective truth is, then it at least amounts to a form of skepticism, which makes objective truth irrelevant, since we can never know it. That’s not relativism, but it’s definitely a sister!
So much for “thou shalt not be a white supremacist.” What about “thou shalt not be intolerant”?
Suffice it to say here that what many people mean by tolerance is the acceptance of everyone’s beliefs as equal and valid. Let that one sink in for a moment! If all beliefs are equal and valid, can there be such a thing as absolute truth? Of course not! There can be no objective truth if all beliefs are just as good as another. Therefore, when decoded, “thou shalt not be intolerant” is nothing more than masked relativism, and its global form at that.
Now, if by “tolerance” someone simply means that we ought not to coerce people into believing what we believe, then we have no qualms. But most of those who tout this moral absolute don’t have this kind of tolerance in mind. It’s more of the egalitarian tolerance mentioned above.
This sort of decoding also applies to the modern absolute of “thou shalt not be a judgmental, hateful bigot.” But for our purposes here, such a moral absolute is code for we must accept everyone’s lifestyle choices, as if they’re all equal and valid—a similar line of reasoning to the tolerance absolute above, just restricted to moral choices.
Now, lifestyle choices can be equally permissible only if there is no objective truth about such choices. But if there’s no objective truth about lifestyle choices, then there’s no such thing as objective morality. That’s moral relativism. And if the charge is meant just to demand approval of certain sinful sexual behaviors, then that’s not moral relativism—it’s just special pleading, wrapped in a cloak of moral relativism.
So relativism might be dead for some who jump on the bandwagon of modern moral absolutism. But for many, relativism is still alive, coded within the language of modern moral absolutes. We just need to decode such absolutes and expose them for the relativism they are.
Ever since the charges against Jeffrey Epstein came down, people associated with him have been dropping off. Some just from the public eye, others completely from their life in general. With the first trial of Ghislaine Maxwell completed, many are left with questions. Most commonly asked is about her lists of his clients, friends, and associates who visited Epstein’s famed Little St. James private island.
Considering the lack of media access to the trial, the number of high profile people who stepped down from their posts in the wake of her conviction, and the number of career politicians who have remained largely silent about the case, there is a lot left to investigate. Somehow, this keeps being brushed under the rug by the mainstream media. It’s as if there is nothing to gain and everything to lose in their minds by being transparent. Yet, for the young girls who were victimized at the hands of Maxwell and Epstein, time is of the essence.
So when another of the big players drops dead while in custody, there is a lot of things to be concerned about. Jean-Luc Brunel was a former modeling agent who was also referred to as Epstein’s pimp. He had hung himself in his cell by his bedsheets. As a report in Daily Mail stated “His death in an alleged hanging will fuel conspiracy theories around the Epstein affair after the financier also died in prison while awaiting trial in what authorities concluded was a hanging.”
The problem is, this isn’t so much of a conspiracy when people start dropping like flies by suicide. Considering Brunel had been indicted on rape charges in December 2020 as well as September 2021, his victims now get no justice, and his victims through Epstein lose their justice as well. With the number of big names connected to two notorious pedophiles, no trial because they committed suicide… in jail with guards and a security system that mysteriously “malfunctioned” people know something is up.
When someone dies in prison, there is always an investigation. In the Epstein case, there was little to no investigation because, miraculously, nobody saw anything. Naturally of course, so far the Brunel suicide investigation is yielding the same results, with no expectation of improvement. At least one anonymous source spoke up about this death to The Daily Mail.
The source claimed “There is an investigation going on to confirm all this, but at the moment it looks like he killed himself alone, and it was a routine patrol that found his body hanging. There were no obvious fears for the prisoner’s health, and he was not on a suicide watch, having already been in prison for many months.” The source went on to allege that he was being kept in a part of the jail with no cameras, but that is contradictory to initial official reports.
No matter his location at the time of his death and the cameras, the lack of answers, in this case, is troublesome as it is. When they aren’t ensuring they stay alive long enough to face the music and testify about other people who could have been a part of the problem, it’s a big issue. With the allegations against people like Bill Clinton, Bill Gates, Prince Andrew, and former President Donald Trump, the American people, and the globe as a whole, deserves answers.
Until the prisons and the legal teams responsible for securing convictions begin to take their jobs more seriously and they keep the prisoners safe, we will have a total lack of answers to what happened here. The victims deserve justice, the pedophiles deserve prison, and given the status of many of the attackers, the American people deserve to see them taken to a proper trial. With any luck, the Maxwell case will be naming names in the coming weeks. Unless she has a camera slip, too, that is.
The financial sanctions Biden has announced against Putin are nothing compared to the Canadian government’s own financial terrorism that it has unleashed against its own peaceful citizens. Donate just $20 to the freedom convoy and all your bank funds can be stolen without notice, completely outside of due process. But we’re told that Putin is the worst villain on the planet. Yet Putin hasn’t stolen anyone’s bank accounts in the USA or Canada (for starters).
For the record, I don’t see Putin demanding Americans and Canadians be injected with spike protein bioweapons that have already killed nearly one million Americans right here at home, either. Those demands came from our own corrupt governments, media propagandists, fraudulent science institutions and pharma-infiltrated Big Tech giants.
Similarly, when the fake Biden president decries Putin’s violation of Ukraine’s “sovereign borders,” the corporate media is utterly silent about America’s invasions, attacks and military violence committed against Yemen, Libya, Iraq, Somalia, Afghanistan, Syria and dozens of other countries. Over the years, the media cheered those attacks, never once caring about how many innocent people would be “displaced” in those countries.
When America attacks innocent nations, it’s never described by the western media as a “brutal onslaught that’s killing innocents.” It’s always described as an effort to “defend freedom.”
Funny, isn’t it, how America’s violence is dressed up as “peace,” but when anybody else does it around the world, suddenly it’s a “brutal onslaught.”
The corporate media is so dishonest in its coverage of conflict that if Ukraine were being invaded by Black Lives Matter with the exact same weapons as the Russian military, we would all be told the incursion was “mostly peaceful” with only “rare” episodes of bombs or missiles.
Missiles and bombs aren’t the only forms of violence that kill people. Vaccine violence is another concept that’s become crystal clear these days as literally millions of people are now dead from the covid vaccines that were pushed onto innocent people by pharma-controlled governments and complicit corporate media giants over the last 18 months or so.
Thanks to a bombshell “smoking gun” analysis of the covid-19 spike protein, it turns out that Moderna actually patented a particular genetic sequence three years before the covid outbreak… and that sequence is found in the covid-19 spike protein. This is proof that Moderna helped synthesize the virus that got released onto the world, which in turns generated tens of billions of dollars in revenues for Moderna.
In other words, the entire covid outbreak and all its damage — lives lost, economies destroyed, liberties demolished — was done on purpose and was engineered by powerful corporations and governments (NIH, Fauci) in order to deliberately harm humanity. In the world of pure evil, Putin doesn’t even hold a candle to Fauci.
That crime against humanity dwarfs the current events in Ukraine, as devastating as they are. While Putin has launched missiles at targets in Ukraine, global governments and pharma corporations launched a deadly biological weapon against the entire planet, causing untold death, suffering and destruction on a scale that has never been witnessed in the history of human civilization.
Big Media, Big Tech, Big Science, Big Government and Big Pharma all went along with it. They pushed the false narrative that “vaccines are safe and effective” while deliberately conspiring to destroy the reputation of ivermectin and other interventions that could save lives. In a world where Joe Biden claims Russia is “attacking the people of Ukraine,” it was actually Biden’s own government (and Trump’s before) that attacked the people of America with a biological weapon and a fraudulent “vaccine.”
So to anyone that’s going to scream about Putin and Russia, get your crisis hierarchy sorted out correctly so that you at least recognize that Putin’s attack of Ukraine pales in comparison to the USA / CCP attack on the entire world via biological weapons and deadly jabs that transform the bodies of innocent people into spike protein weapons factories. And NOT to back Putin, because the guy IS a thug, but he’s a smart thug unlike brain-dead Biden. He’s an accomplished pianist, which means he’s a mathematician, martial artist and champion chess player and right now he’s playing chess with the idiot lamebrain here. It’s all about geography. Ukraine has always followed Russian ways. Russia has always maintained fleets off the island close to Ukraine having the Port of Sevastopolof because geographically, it is the only location on earth that Russia can keep vessels in warmer waters because the remaining Russian coastlines harbor Icelandic frozen waters. Again, I’m not backing or protecting Putin, but his approach to Ukraine is not what the U.S. media is making it to be. It’s just not. Chalk that up to the second-raters in the W.H. now guiding geopolitical affairs.
For the record, we are opposed to all forms of violence against innocent people. That includes kinetic violence, of course, but it must also consider vaccine violence, medical violence, hospital homicide and gain-of-function biological weapons development. Yes, war is bad. Kinetic war is horrible. But so is biological warfare, economic warfare, censorship, government propaganda, journo-terrorism and everything else we’ve all been subjected to under the fraudulent covid narrative.
Putin didn’t make our children wear masks and lock our elderly in nursing homes and hospital beds where you’re not even allowed to visit them. America’s own medical tyrants did that. And they tried to force deadly spike protein shots on everyone, all in the effort to achieve global depopulation and extermination of the human race.
Remember that when you’re watching the propaganda media whine about Russia. CNN has killed far more Americans than Putin has Ukrainians, just from the network’s vaccine propaganda alone.
fox files 
Written
on 6.March.2022.