THE ONLY THING TO HAVE COME OUT OF WUHAN WAS THE DISCOVERY OF THREE GENETIC MARKERS THAT A SUM TOTAL, BUT NOT ALL OR A MAJORITY OF HUMANS HAVE.
AS FOR COVID, THE ONLY WAY TO TEST IF A VIRUS IS COVID OR NOT IS BY APPLYING IT TO A LIVE HOST, AND NO ONE TO DATE ON THE FACE OF THIS PLANET HAS DONE THAT.
SO I ASK YOU, HOW CAN THEY APPLY WORLD-WIDE DICTATORIAL MANDATES FOR SOMETHING THAT HAS NEVER, EVER BEEN IDENTIFIED, LET ALONE CREATE VACCINES FOR IT! ABSOLUTELY ABSURD IT ALL IS. ABSURD.
The company claims Lindell’s accusations “have caused irreparable harm to Dominion’s good reputation and threatened the safety of our employees and customers.” In the case of Giuliani, the company claims: “For Dominion—whose business is producing and providing voting systems for elections—there are no accusations [other than Giuliani’s claims of fraud and election fixing] that could do more to damage Dominion’s business or to impugn Dominion’s integrity, ethics, honesty, and financial integrity.”
Behind all of this is the usual logic of a defamation lawsuit. Dominion’s owners are concerned that Lindell, Giuliani, and Powell have cost the company money by saying things that could potentially hurt Dominion financially.
It’s entirely possible that Dominion may have a case, at least legally speaking. Dominion is nominally a private company. But will need to prove the usual elements of a defamation suit, namely, that Lindell et al. made false statements about Dominion and that they knew these statements were false. Dominion must also show it suffered damages.
Fortunately, this is very difficult to do in American courts. This is especially true for government officials and “public figures” of any kind. In those cases, a plaintiff must also prove that the defamation was committed with malicious intent and recklessness.
This presents a very high legal standard to meet. And rightly so.
In any case, a respect for freedom of speech would render most, if not all, defamation suits null and void. As I’ve noted in the past, defamation law opens a Pandora’s box of legal strategies that can be employed to silence people the regime and its allies find to be inconvenient.
In the case of Dominion Voting Systems, however, the company should not be able to sue for defamation at all. This is because Dominion is a private company in name only, and in reality is a de facto government agency.
In the 1964 case New York Times v. Sullivan, the US Supreme Court concluded:
For good reason, “no court of last resort in this country has ever held, or even suggested, that prosecutions for libel on government have any place in the American system of jurisprudence.”
The reasons for this should be obvious. Government agencies enjoy monopoly privileges and are funded through the coercive collection of taxes. Even the most blue-pilled regime sympathizer can probably see the danger that arises from also granting this monopolistic agency the right to sue people for criticizing it. After all, the liberal notion of “free speech” was codified in documents like the Bill of Rights primarily for the purposes of ensuring critics of the regime would be legally immune from the regime’s attempts to retaliate.
This brings us to “private” organizations like Dominion.
In its lawsuits against Lindell, Giuliani, and Powell, the company is proceeding as if it were just another private company. The basic claim is “we’re just a poor, innocent group of entrepreneurs being defamed!”
But “private” is clearly not an appropriate term for describing a company like Dominion. And “entrepreneurship” has very little to do with it. This is a company that is overwhelmingly geared toward serving only government agencies and performing what can only be described as government services. Dominion provides ballot-counting software and related services. Its only “clients” are apparently government agencies. As such, Dominion’s revenue comes from tax revenue. The company and its founders are not “entrepreneurial” in any sense except in the sense of a “political entrepreneur,” who seeks profit through government subsidies and contracts. The company does not interact in a free and open marketplace where real customers exchange money with the company in exchange for a good or service. Rather, taxpayers are forced to support Dominion through taxation, and taxpayers have no meaningful say in whether or not they “pay” Dominion. In short, the relationship between Dominion and the people who ultimately fund Dominion is one of coercion and exploitation.
In this sense, Dominion is like many other de facto government agencies which rather unconvincingly claim to be “private” in any sense other than the legal. One such example is Academi—formerly known as Blackwater—which supplies mercenary troops and related services to government agencies. The company was founded and managed by former CIA agents and other bureaucrats who presumably wanted to cash in the on the lucrative business of government contracts. Academi’s revenue has overwhelmingly come through these contracts, and as such, it is funded by the sweat and toil of the taxpayer.
Of course, this hasn’t stopped Academi’s founder, Erik Prince, from ridiculously claiming to be some sort of free market entrepreneur.
We might also point to other “private” companies that cater to governments. This would include weapons manufacturers like Lockheed Martin, or even road construction companies whose business plan is based around construction of government projects.
It’s not unusual to encounter engineers and owners from companies like these who make snide remarks about “government bureaucrats.” In truth, these people are only describing themselves. If their income comes primarily from tax dollars, they are de facto government employees.
Naturally, we could see the danger that arises from allowing these companies to sue their detractors for defamation. For example, given that Academi has been a key component of the brutal and bloody US occupation of Iraq, many critics have claimed over the years that Academi has murdered countless Iraqis. Are such statements defamation? A court could agree. Were Academi to sue such critics, though, the company would just be using tax dollars to sue taxpayers for daring to criticize an agency carrying out government policy.
This is also true of Dominion when it attempts to sue critics for defamation.
So, was Dominion defamed by its critics? Who cares? This should be considered of no more importance than whether or not the ATF (Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives) is being defamed when critics of the Waco massacre contend that federal agents murdered Branch Davidian women and children. Allowing a government agency to sue in such cases would be a direct assault on free speech and the freedom to verbally attack perceived abuses by the regime.
De facto government agencies like Dominion (or Academi or Raytheon) (including entities like fakebook twatter and gooberl) should not be allowed to pose as legitimate private companies deserving of private sector legal protections. If they don’t like it, these firms can get in the business of offering real, voluntary services in the marketplace sans the taxpayer largesse.
The members of the “Committee of 300” are basically the people who run the world today. Above them, there is another group, called The Council of 33, and above that there is yet another group, The Council of 13 (a.k.a. Crown Council of 13), which is made of just 13 of the most powerful families on Earth.
The important thing about these families is not just their incredible wealth, but also their very long ancestry – these families can allegedly trace their lineages all the way back to the ancient “gods,” who gave Earth’s leadership to their “demigod” offsprings (i.e the children that the “gods” had with human women) before leaving Earth with the promise to return in the future.
These 13 families are considered top of the hierarchy of the global elite and all have ties to each other through marriage as well as blood so that the fortunes of each family are linked both to each other and to the success of the plan to create a New World Order.
You can read more about the Council of 13 at THIS LINK.
It is also important to note that the ruler of the Council of 13, and consequently the most powerful man on Earth, is the head of the Rothschild family (which is the most powerful of the “elite” families). He is called The Pindar, and you can read more on the subject HERE (before proceeding with this link, be warned that the rabbit hole is very deep and it is directly connected to otherworldly beings, hence why some of the top researchers have always maintained that the New World Order agenda is, in fact, the Alien Agenda).
Now back to the Committee of 300.
The Committee of 300 is a product of the British East India Company’s Council of 300.
The East India Company was chartered by the British royal family in 1600. It made vast fortunes in the opium drug trade with China and became the largest company on earth in its time.
Today, through many powerful alliances, the Committee of 300 rules the world and is the driving force behind the criminal agenda to create a “New World Order”, under a “Totalitarian Global Government”.
There is no need to use “they” or “the enemy” except as shorthand. We know who “they”, the enemy, is.
The Committee of 300 with its “aristocracy”, its ownership of the U.S. Federal Reserve banking system, insurance companies, giant corporations, foundations, communications networks, presided over by a hierarchy of conspirators – this is the enemy.
Secret societies exist by deception.
Each is a hierarchy with an inner circle at the top, who deceives those below with lies, such as claiming a noble agenda; thus, duping them into following a web of compartmentalized complicity.
The members of the Council of 300 are royals, top bankers, “elite” billionaires, top religious figures, media moguls, top military figures and some of the top politicians (personally, I suspect that the generals and the politicians are not permanent members of the Committee, and their seats can be vacated and filled by others, if necessary).
Some reports mention a Committee of 500, which means that it is possible that the Committee of 300 has been expanded to include 500 members (and, consequently, had to change its name), or maybe that is another Committee entirely, which is placed below the Committee of the 500.
Queen’s Signature on the Committee of 300 Document
Below, You Will Find The Complete List Of The Committee Of 300 As Of 2010*:
Abdullah II King of Jordan – Important imperial puppet in Middle East, British-educated, American wife
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abdullah_II_of_Jordan
Roman Abramovich – Russian Oligarch, $12B net worth, major British tieshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Abramovich
Josef Ackermann – Swiss Banker and CEO Deutsche Bank
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josef_Ackermann
Edward Adeane – British trustee, Eton graduate, private secretary of Prince of Wales
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Adeane
Marcus Agius – British-Maltese financier, Group Chairman Barclay’s Bank, sits on board of BBC, married to daughter of Edmund de Rothschild
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcus_Agius
Martti Ahtisaari – ex-president of Finland, 2008 Nobel peace prize, involved in UN action in Kosovo,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martti_Ahtisaari
Daniel Akerson – CEO General Motors, formerly CEO of MCI, General Instrument, Nextel, joined Carlyle group in 2003,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Akerson
Albert II King of Belgium – King of Belgium, same dynasty as Windsor (Saxe-Coburg-Gotha)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_II_of_Belgium
Alexander Crown Prince of Yugoslavia – heir to King of Yugoslavia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander,_Crown_Prince_of_Yugoslavia
Giuliano Amato – ex-PM of Italy, V.P of convention which drafted EU Constitution
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giuliano_Amato
Carl A. Anderson – 13th “Supreme Knight of the Knights of Columbus”, sits on council at Vatican Bank
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_A._Anderson
Giulio Andreotti – ex-PM of Italy, accused in court of mob ties and murder
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giulio_Andreotti
Andrew Duke of York – 2nd son of Elizabeth II, 4th in line to throne of 16 countries, connected to pedophile Jeffrey Epstein,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_Andrew,_Duke_of_York
Anne Princess Royal – daughter of Elizabeth II,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anne,_Princess_Royal
Nick Anstee – 682nd “Lord Mayor of the City of London” connected to Arthur Andersen accounting scandal, director of int’l law firm SJ Berwin
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nick_Anstee
Timothy Garton Ash – British historian, Professor at Oxford, European CFR, winner of “George Orwell Prize”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timothy_Garton_Ash
William Waldorf Astor – 4th Viscount Astor, heir to Astor dynasty, Eton graduate, sits on House of Lords,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Astor,_4th_Viscount_Astor
Pyotr Aven – Russian Oligarch with close British ties
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyotr_Aven
Jan Peter Balkenende – ex-PM of Netherlands, puppet of Queen Beatrix head of the Bilderbergs and cousin of Elizabeth II
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jan_Peter_Balkenende
Steve Ballmer – CEO of Microsoft, Net worth $15.7B, #5 on Jerusalem Post’s “World’s Richest Jews”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Ballmer
Ed Balls – British politician, Fabian society,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ed_Balls
Jose Manuel Barroso – President of the European Commission, ex-PM of Portugal, former Maoist,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jose_Manuel_Barroso
Beatrix Queen of the Netherlands – Queen of Netherlands, head of Bilderberg Group, Club of Rome
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beatrix_of_the_Netherlands
Marek Belka – ex-PM of Poland, former IMF, former head of National Bank of Poland,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marek_Belka
Fred Bergsten – US economist, author, and political adviser, and member of globalist think tanks, ex-US Treasury Department
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C._Fred_Bergsten
Silvio Berlusconi – ex-PM of Italy, $5.9B net worth, accused by courts of mafia collusion, false accounting, fraud, corruption and bribery
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silvio_Berlusconi
Ben Bernanke – Chairman of US Federal Reserve,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ben_Bernanke
Nils Bernstein – Danish National Bank
http://da.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nils_Bernstein
Donald Berwick – head of US Medicare, medicaid, connected to Obamacare, Professor at Harvard Medical School, several British Titles
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Berwick
Carl Bildt – ex-PM of Sweden, involved in Balkans, globalist instigator, Club of Madrid
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Bildt
Sir Winfried Bischoff – chairman of Lloyds Banking Group, ex-CEO of Citigroup,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sir_Winfried_Bischoff
Tony Blair – ex British PM, connected to illegal invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan, accused of war crimes,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony_Blair
Lloyd Blankfein – CEO Goldman-Sachs, connected to Rockefeller,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lloyd_Blankfein
Leonard Blavatnik – Russian Oligarch living in London, net worth $10.1B, owner of Access Industries, connected to Harvard and Tel Aviv University,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonard_Blavatnik
Michael Bloomberg – Mayor of New York City, net worth $22B, owner of Bloomberg Media,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Bloomberg
Frits Bolkestein – Dutch politician involved in EU directives and globalism initiatives
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frits_Bolkestein
Hassanal Bolkiah – Sultan of Brunei, net worth $20B, British Higher education, connected to Royal Dutch Shell, honorary Admiral of the Royal Navy of UK
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hassanal_Bolkiah
Michael C Bonello – Governor of the Central Bank of Malta
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_C_Bonello
Emma Bonino – EU minister, ex-EU Parliament,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emma_Bonino
David L. Boren – US Presidential Advisor, ex-Governor of Oklahoma, ex-US Senate, ex-chairman of Intelligence Committee in Senate,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_L._Boren
Borwin Duke of Mecklenburg – Duke of Mecklenburg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borwin,_Duke_of_Mecklenburg
Charles Bronfman – Owner of Seagram liquor, net worth $2B, Canadian Jew, founder of a Zionist charity,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Bronfman
Edgar Bronfman Jr. – ex-CEO of Warner Music Group, member of Bronfman dynasty
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edgar_Bronfman_Jr.
John Bruton – ex-PM of Ireland,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Bruton
Zbigniew Brzezinski – head of Trilateral Commission, former US presidential adviser, involved in globalist think tanks and propaganda, connected to 911, connected to bin Laden, connected to illegal war in Afghanistan, ex-Harvard, member of CFR, former head of Amnesty International,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zbigniew_Brzezinski
Robin Budenberg – head of UK governmental body that oversaw the bailouts
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robin_Budenberg
Warren Buffett – Owner of Berkshire Hathaway, Net Worth $44B, profits off of American impoverishment, connect to Gulf of Mexico disaster as owner of Nalco which manufactured Corexit, a toxin still dumped in the Gulf, connected to 911,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_Buffett
George HW Bush – ex-US President, ex-US Vice President, father connected to Nazis, international banking, big oil and drug trafficking, ex-CIA, connected to JFK and RFK assassinations, connected to 911 and both Iraq wars, head of an international terrorist crime family, known skull and bones and 33rd degree Freemason
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_HW_Bush
David Cameron – PM of UK, Eton and Oxford graduate, puppet of Elizabeth II, connected to Rothschilds,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Cameron
Camilla Duchess of Cornwall – 2nd wife of Prince of Wales,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camilla,_Duchess_of_Cornwall
Fernando Henrique Cardoso – ex-President of Brazil
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fernando_Henrique_Cardoso
Peter Carington – British Politician and Baron, House of Lords,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Carington
Carl XVI Gustaf King of Sweden – King of Sweden, close cousin of Elizabeth II,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_XVI_Gustaf_of_Sweden
Carlos Duke of Parma – Dutch royalty with many titles, and head of several orders, Knight of Malta,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carlos,_Duke_of_Parma
Mark Carney – governor of Bank of Canada, 13 years at Goldman Sachs,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Carney
Cynthia Carroll – CEO of Anglo American platinum mining,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cynthia_Carroll
Jaime Caruana – GM of Bank for International Settlements (BIS), ex-Governor of Bank of Spain,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaime_Caruana
Sir William Castell – Chairman of Wellcome Trust, Director of General Electric and BP
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sir_William_Castell
Anson Chan – Chinese politician involved in British rule of Hong Kong
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anson_Chan
Margaret Chan – Director-General of World Health Organization, ex Hong Kong government,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Chan
Norman Chan – Chief Executive of Hong Kong Monetary Authority
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norman_Chan
Charles Prince of Wales – heir to throne of British Commonwealth, pushes “sustainable development” globalist and monetary manipulation of 3rd world countries in particular resource extraction and population control at United Nations and hundreds of NGO’s, Freemason, connected to murder of his first wife Princess Diana,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_prince_of_wales
Richard Chartres – Anglican Bishop Of London
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Chartres
Stefano Delle Chiaie – “neofascist” Italian activist, Freemason, accused by a court of terrorism, connected to Operation Condor
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stefano_Delle_Chiaie
Dr John Chipman – Director-General of globalist British think tank International Institute for Strategic Studies,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Institute_for_Strategic_Studies
Patokh Chodiev – Uzbek Oligarch living in London, net worth $3.3B, involved in mining, oil, gas, and banking
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patokh_Chodiev
Christoph Prince of Schleswig-Holstein – Prince of Schleswig-Holstein
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christoph,_Prince_of_Schleswig-Holstein
Fabrizio Cicchitto – Italian politician, Marxist, admitted to being in the Masonic lodge P2, involved in putting Italy into the EU
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fabrizio_Cicchitto
Wesley Clark – US general, ex-Supreme Allied Commander Europe in NATO, Rhodes Scholar, involved in Balkans, connected to Waco, ran for US President,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wesley_Clark
Kenneth Clarke – British politician and bureaucrat,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenneth_Clarke
Nick Clegg – Deputy Prime Minister of UK,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nick_Clegg
Bill Clinton – ex-US President, ex-governor of Arkansas, Rhodes Scholar, involved in Balkans, involved in sheltering bin Laden, connected to Bush family, connected to international drug trafficking, connected to Rockefellers and Rothschilds, Freemason, connected to technology transfers to China,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Clinton
Abby Joseph Cohen – US economist, Goldman Sachs, ex-Federal Reserve, Chairman of Jewish Theological Seminary of America, Trustee of Cornell University,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abby_Joseph_Cohen
Ronald Cohen – Egyptian-born British Jewish venture capitalist, educated at Oxford,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ronald_Cohen
Gary Cohn – President and COO of Goldman Sachs
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_Cohn_%28businessman%29
Marcantonio Colonna di Paliano Duke of Paliano – Duke of Paliano
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcantonio_VIII_Colonna
Constantijn Prince of the Netherlands – third son of Queen Beatrix of Netherlands,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_Constantijn_of_the_Netherlands
Constantine II King of Greece – last King of Greece,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constantine_II_of_Greece
David Cooksey – British venture capitalist, ex-Director of Bank of England, chairman of Bechtel, knighted by Elizabeth II,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Cooksey
Brian Cowen – ex-PM of Ireland, helped cause Ireland capitulation to IMF and EU,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_Cowen
Sir John Craven – Director of Reuters, ex-Director of Deutsche Bank, ex-chairman of Deutsche Morgan Grenfell
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sir_John_Craven
Andrew Crockett – British Banker, ex-GM of Bank for International Settlements, ex-Bank of England, employed at JP Morgan Chase, member of Group of 30, knighted by Elizabeth II,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Crockett_%28British_banker%29
Uri Dadush – Senior Associate of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, ex-World Bank, educated at Hebrew University and Harvard,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uri_Dadush
Tony D’Aloisio – Chairman of Australian Securities and Investments Commission, ex-Director of World Federation of Stock Exchanges, pushed globalist initiatives,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony_D%27Aloisio
Alistair Darling – Scottish politician and MP,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alistair_Darling
Sir Howard Davies – British economist, Director of London School of Economics and Political Science, globalist initiatives and propaganda
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Howard_Davies_%28economist%29
Etienne Davignon – Belgian politician, ex-VP of European Commission, chairman of Bilderberg, chairman of Brussels Airlines,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Etienne_Davignon
David Davis – British MP,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Davis_%28British_politician%29
Benjamin de Rothschild – Swiss Banker, descendant of French branch of Rothschild dynasty,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_de_Rothschild
David Rene de Rothschild – chairman of Rothschild Continuations Holdings, French branch of Rothschild dynasty,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Rene_de_Rothschild
Evelyn de Rothschild – British financier, partner at N M Rothschilds and Sons, ex-Director De Beers, ex-Director IBM UK, ex-director Daily Telegraph, knighted by Elizabeth II,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evelyn_Robert_de_Rothschild
Leopold de Rothschild – British financier, ex-employee of Kuhn, Loeb, and Co., Morgan Stanley, partner at N M Rothschilds and Sons,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leopold_David_de_Rothschild
Joseph Deiss – Swiss economist and politician, ex-President of the United Nations General Assembly, globalist,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Deiss
Oleg Deripaska – Russian Oligarch, net worth $16.8B, CEO of Basic Element, CEO of United Company RUSAL aluminum, connected to Rothschilds,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oleg_Deripaska
Michael Dobson – British businessman, CEO of Schroders international asset management, connected to Rockefellers,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schroders
Mario Draghi – President of European Central Bank, ex- Governor of Bank of Italy, ex-Harvard professor,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mario_Draghi
Jan Du Plessis – South African Businessman, CEO of British American Tobacco, director of Lloyds TSB Group, chairman of Rio Tinto mining,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jan_Du_Plessis
William C. Dudley – President of Federal Reserve Bank of New York, ex-Goldman Sachs,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_C._Dudley
Wim Duisenberg – Dutch politician, ex-President of European Central Bank, ex-President of the Central bank of Netherlands, ex-IMF, DECEASED
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wim_Duisenberg
Edward Duke of Kent – Duke of Kent, First Cousin to Elizabeth II, Grand Master of Freemasons in England and Wales, President of Scout Association
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_Edward,_Duke_of_Kent
Edward Earl of Wessex – Third son of Elizabeth II,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_Edward,_Earl_of_Wessex
Elizabeth II Queen of the United Kingdom – Monarch of the British Commonwealth, Supreme Governor of Church of England, head of International Freemasonry, head of the Order of the Garter, head of Committee of 300, owns 1/6th of worlds landmass, connected to most crimes and fraud in the world,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabeth_II
John Elkann – Italian Industrialist, Owner of Fiat, Owner of Chrysler, CEO of Exor, member of Brookings Institution,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Elkann
Vittorio Emanuele Prince of Naples – Prince of Naples, Duke of Savoy, member of P2 masonic lodge, accused by a court of murder,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vittorio_Emanuele,_Prince_of_Naples
Ernst August Prince of Hanover – Prince of Hanover and married to heiress to throne of Monaco,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernst_August_V,_Prince_of_Hanover
Martin Feldstein – American economist, Professor at Harvard, ex-adviser to Reagan,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Feldstein
Matthew Festing – British Grand Master of the Sovereign Military Order of Malta, officer of the Order of the British Empire,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthew_Festing
François Fillon – Prime Minister of France,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fran%C3%A7ois_Fillon
Heinz Fischer – President of Austria,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heinz_Fischer
Joschka Fischer – German politician, ex-Foreign Minister and Vice Chancellor of Germany,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joschka_Fischer
Stanley Fischer – American-Israeli economist, Governor of the Bank of Israel, ex-Chief Economist of World Bank, Bilderberg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanley_Fischer
Niall FitzGerald – Irish Businessman, ex-CEO of Unilever, member of World Economic Forum, connected to Merck, Bank of Ireland and Prudential,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niall_FitzGerald
Franz Duke of Bavaria – Duke of Bavaria, co-heir of House of tuart,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franz,_Duke_of_Bavaria
Mikhail Fridman – Jewish Russian Oligarch, net worth $15.1B, member of Russian CFR, founder of Russian Jewish Congress,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikhail_Fridman
Friso Prince of Orange-Nassau – Prince of Orange-Nassau, second son of Queen Beatrix of Netherlands,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_Friso_of_Orange-Nassau
Bill Gates – ex-CEO Microsoft, net worth $61B, allowed unfettered surveillance of MS Windows, connected to globalist depopulation efforts through vaccines,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Gates
Christopher Geidt – Private Secretary of Elizabeth II, educated at Oxford,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Geidt
Timothy Geithner – US Treasury Secretary, ex-President New York Federal Reserve, connected to TARP bailout theft,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timothy_Geithner
Georg Friedrich Prince of Prussia – Prince of Prussia,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georg_Friedrich,_Prince_of_Prussia
Dr Chris Gibson-Smith – Chairman of London Stock Exchange,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_Stock_Exchange
Mikhail Gorbachev – Ex-Premiere of Soviet Union, Club of Madrid, Globalist Initiatives,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikhail_Gorbachev
Al Gore – ex-VP of USA, ex-US Senator, educated at Harvard, father was a senator connected to Armand Hammer – a communist Soviet, Nobel Peace Prize for pushing Global Warming Scam,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Gore
Allan Gotlieb – Canadian bureaucrat, member Trilateral Commission, member of Carlyle Group, chairman of Sotheby’s Canada, globalist pushing North American Union,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allan_Gotlieb
Stephen Green – British baron, Minister of State for Trade and Investment, ex-Chairman HSBC, educated at Oxford and MIT
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Green,_Baron_Green_of_Hurstpierpoint
Alan Greenspan – ex-Chairman of US Federal Reserve, Knight Commander of the British Empire,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Greenspan
Gerald Grosvenor 6th Duke of Westminster – Duke of Westminster, net worth 7.35B pounds, richest property developer in UK,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerald_Grosvenor,_6th_Duke_of_Westminster
Jose Angel Gurria – Secretary General of NGO OECD, ex-CEO of National Development Bank of Mexico, ex-CEO of Foreign Trade Bank,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jose_Angel_Gurria
William Hague – Foreign Secretary of UK, educated at Oxford,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Hague
Sir Philip Hampton – Chairman of Royal Bank of Scotland, ex-finance director of Lloyds, BT Group, BG Group and British Steel,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_Hampton
Hans-Adam II Prince of Liechtenstein – Prince of Lichtenstein, owner of LGT Banking Group, net worth $7.6B,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hans-Adam_II,_Prince_of_Liechtenstein
Harald V King of Norway – King of Norway,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harald_V_of_Norway
Stephen Harper – Prime Minister of Canada, Zionist, pusher of globalism and North American Union,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Harper
François Heisbourg – President of International Institute for Strategic Studies, a London-based globalist think tank
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fran%C3%A7ois_Heisbourg
Henri Grand Duke of Luxembourg – Duke of Luxembourg, Knight Grand Cross of the Royal Victorian Order,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henri,_Grand_Duke_of_Luxembourg
Philipp Hildebrand – ex-head of Swiss National Bank, Oxford-educated,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philipp_Hildebrand
Carla Anderson Hills – Co-chairman of Council on Foreign Relations, executive committee member of Trilateral Commission, ex-HUD secretary, pushes North American Union,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carla_Anderson_Hills
Richard Holbrooke – American bureaucrat, Presidential Advisor, connected to Vietnam, DECEASED
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Holbrooke
Patrick Honohan – Governor of Central Bank of Ireland,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patrick_Honohan
Alan Howard – British hedge fund manager managing $26B of assets, ex-Salomon Brothers,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Howard_%28hedge_fund_manager%29
Alijan Ibragimov – Kyrgyzstani Oligarch, mining, oil and gas in Kazakhstan,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alijan_Ibragimov
Stefan Ingves – Governor of central bank of Sweden,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stefan_Ingves
Walter Isaacson – CEO of globalist think tank Aspen Institute, Managing Editor Time Magazine, Chairman of Broadcasting Board of Governors, connected to Katrina,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Isaacson
Juan Carlos King of Spain – King of Spain, many other titles,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juan_Carlos_I_of_Spain
Kenneth M. Jacobs – CEO of Lazard,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenneth_M._Jacobs
DeAnne Julius – Chairman of Chatham House (RIIA), ex-World Bank, ex-CIA, founding member of Monetary Policy Committee of the Bank of England,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DeAnne_Julius
Jean-Claude Juncker – Prime Minister of Luxembourg, ex-President of European Council,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean-Claude_Juncker
Peter Kenen – Senior Fellow in International Economics at CFR, Ford Foundation, Globalist
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Kenen
John Kerry – US Senator, Presidential Candidate, Skull and Bones, family wealth from Heinz ketchup and the opium trade before that, Freemason, false heroics in Vietnam,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Kerry
Mervyn King – Governor of the Bank of England, Knight Grand Cross of the Order of the British Empire,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mervyn_King_%28economist%29
Glenys Kinnock – Council Member of European Council on Foreign Relations, ex-European Parliament, House of Lords,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glenys_Kinnock
Henry Kissinger – ex-US Secretary of State, Bilderberg, CFR, Bohemian Club, Nobel Peace Prize, connected to Vietnam and Cambodia, involved in Chile mass murder, connected to Balkans, accused by courts of war crimes and terrorism,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Kissinger
Malcolm Knight – Canadian Vice-Chairman of Deutsche Bank, ex-GM Bank for International Settlements, London education,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malcolm_Knight
William H. Koon II – Knights Templar, Rosicrucian, no link
Paul Krugman – American Economist and Globalist propagandist, educated at Yale and London School of Economics, CFR,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Krugman
John Kufuor – ex-President of Ghana, ex-Chairperson of the African Union,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Kufuor
Giovanni Lajolo – President of the Governate of Vatican City State, Cardinal emeritus President of the Pontifical Commission for Vatican City,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giovanni_Lajolo
Anthony Lake – Executive Director of the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF),
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Lake
Richard Lambert – ex-Director-General of the CBI, Chancellor of University of Warwick UK, knighted by Elizabeth II,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Lambert
Pascal Lamy – Director-General of World Trade Organization,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pascal_Lamy
Jean-Pierre Landau – ex-IMF, ex-Board of Directors for Bank for International Settlements, ex Bank of France,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean-Pierre_Landau
Timothy Laurence – husband of the only daughter of Elizabeth II,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timothy_Laurence
James Leigh-Pemberton – British Banker, Receiver-General for Duchy of Cornwall (Prince of Wales), educated at Eton, ex-S.G. Warburg and Co. and managing director at Credit Suisse
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Leigh-Pemberton
Leka Crown Prince of Albania – Prince of Albania, heir to King of Albania,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leka_Crown_Prince_of_Albania
Mark Leonard – British globalist in think tanks and propagandist, co-founder and director of European CFR,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Leonard_(writer)
Peter Levene – British Baron, chairman of NBNK Investments, ex-Lord mayor of City of London,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Levene
Lev Leviev – Bukharian-Israeli Oligarch, net worth $12B, diamond mining in Angola, and Palestinian settlements,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lev_Leviev
Arthur Levitt – ex-Chairman of SEC, advisor at Carlyle Group,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Levitt
President of CSV Jewish Care, Jewish Free School, and JLGB
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Levy
Joe Lieberman – American-Israeli Senator, connected to 911, connected to Patriot Act, connected to many tyrannical laws,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Lieberman
Ian Livingston – CEO of BT (British Telecom),
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ian_Livingston
Lee Hsien Loong – Prime minister of Singapore, British-educated,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lee_Hsien_Loong
Lorenz of Belgium Archduke of Austria-Este – Belgian royalty,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_Lorenz_of_Belgium,_Archduke_of_Austria-Este
Louis Alphonse Duke of Anjou – Duke of Anjou, claimant to defunct King of France,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Alphonse,_Duke_of_Anjou
Gerard Louis-Dreyfus – chairman of Louis Dreyfus Energy Services, net worth $2.9B,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerard_Louis-Dreyfus
Mabel Princess of Orange-Nassau – wife of 2nd son of Queen Beatrix of Netherlands,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Princess_Mabel_of_Orange-Nassau
Peter Mandelson – British bureaucrat, MP, ex-European Commissioner for Trade, connected to Rothschilds,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Mandelson
Sir David Manning – ex-British Ambassador to the United States, connected to Iraq invasion, ex-British ambassador to Israel,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sir_David_Manning
Margherita Archduchess of Austria-Este – Wife of Archduke of Austria-Este
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margherita,_Archduchess_of_Austria-Este
Margrethe II Queen of Denmark – Queen of Denmark,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margrethe_II_of_Denmark
Guillermo Ortiz Martinez – Mexican bureaucrat, ex-ambassador to IMF,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guillermo_Ortiz_Martinez
Alexander Mashkevitch – Khazak-Israeli Oligarch, metals and gas in Khazakstan, connected to ENRC,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Mashkevitch
Stefano Massimo Prince of Roccasecca dei Volsci – Scion of Massimo dynasty and Italian royalty,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massimo
Fabrizio Massimo-Brancaccio Prince of Arsoli and Triggiano – Massimo dynasty and royalty
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massimo
William Joseph McDonough – vice chairman of Merril Lynch, ex-President of NY Federal Reserve, ex-First National Bank of Chicago, CFR
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Joseph_McDonough
Mack McLarty – ex-White House Chief of Staff under Clinton, CEO of McLarty Companies, board of directors Arkla Gas, National Petroleum Council, connected to Kissinger,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mack_McLarty
Yves Mersch – Governor of Central Bank of Luxembourg, member of European Central Bank governing council, connected to BIIS,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yves_Mersch
Michael Prince of Kent – British Royalty, 1st cousin of Elizabeth II, grandmaster of two Masonic lodges,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_Michael_of_Kent
Michael King of Romania – King of Romania, 3rd cousin of Elizabeth II, connected to communism,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_of_Romania
David Miliband – British bureaucrat,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Miliband
Ed Miliband – British bureaucrat and MP, educated at Oxford and London School of Economics, father was Marxist,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ed_Miliband
Lakshmi Mittal – Indian steel magnate, CEO of ArcelorMittal – – world’s largest steel company, connected to Goldman Sachs,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lakshmi_Mittal
Glen Moreno – acting chairman of UK Financial Investments Limited which manages the UK government bank shareholdings, ex-Citigroup, director of Fidelity International, chairman of Pearson, connected to Lloyds Banking,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glen_Moreno
Moritz Prince and Landgrave of Hesse-Kassel – Prince of Hesse-Kassel,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moritz,_Landgrave_of_Hesse
Rupert Murdoch – Australian-American media mogul, owner of NewsCorp and Fox, accused by courts of bribery, wiretapping , libel, lying, insider trading, Freemason, connected to Norway mass shooting, connected to 911, connected to illegal Iraq War,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rupert_Murdoch
Charles Napoleon – head of Imperial House of France,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Napoleon
Jacques Nasser – Lebanese Chairman of BHP Billiton, connected to JP Morgan Chase, Sky Corp and Ford Motors,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacques_Nasser
Robin Niblett – Director of Chatham House (RIIA) – connected to every war, mass theft and atrocity since 1920,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chatham_House
Vincent Nichols – Archbishop of Westminster, head of Roman Catholic Church in England and Wales, connected to abuse of boys,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vincent_Nichols
Adolfo Nicolas – 30th Black Pope, Superior General of the Society of Jesus (Jesuits), head of largest male order of Vatican,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adolfo_Nicolas
Christian Noyer – Chairman of the Bank for International Settlements, governor of Bank of France, ex-VP Executive Board of the European Central Bank,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_Noyer
Sammy Ofer – Israeli shipping tycoon, net worth $10.3B with brother Yuli, DECEASED,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sammy_Ofer
Alexandra Ogilvy Lady Ogilvy – Princess of UK, cousin of Elizabeth II,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Princess_Alexandra,_The_Honourable_Lady_Ogilvy
David Ogilvy 13th Earl of Airlie – married to Princess Alexandra, Lord Chamberlain, educated at Eton, Knight of the Thistle, ex-Director of Schroders,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Ogilvy,_13th_Earl_of_Airlie
Jorma Ollila – Chairman of Nokia, board of directors of Ford Motor Company, non-executive chairman of Royal Dutch Shell, ex-Citibank, Bilderberg,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jorma_Ollila
Nicky Oppenheimer – South African chairman of De Beers diamond mining, shareholder in Anglo American mining, net worth $6B,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicky_Oppenheimer
George Osborne – British Bureaucrat, Chancellor of the Exchequer of UK, ex-MP, Bullingdon Club at Oxford, connected to Rotshchilds,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Osborne
Frederic Oudea – CEO Societe Generale,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frederic_Oudea
Sir John Parker – ex-Chairman of National Grid and Anglo American mining, ex-Bank of England, knighted by Elizabeth II,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sir_John_Parker
Chris Patten – chairman of BBC Trust, last Governor of British-held Hong Kong, ex-MP, connected to Pope Benedict,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Patten
Michel Pebereau – Chairman of National Bank of Paris,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michel_Pebereau
Gareth Penny – CEO of AMG Mining the #1 mining company in world, ex-De Beers and Anglo American mining, Rhodes Scholar at Oxford, Eton
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gareth_Penny
Shimon Peres – President of Israel, ex-PM of Israel, connected to assassination of Y. Rabin, false peacemaker, connected to 911,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shimon_Peres
Philip Duke of Edinburgh – husband of Elizabeth II, a German-Danish royal, patron of over 800 organizations, globalist, racist, has spoken publicly in favor of mass genocide and depopulation, Freemason, alleged to have given order to murder his grandson’s mother Princess Diana
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_Duke_of_Edinburgh
Dom Duarte Pio Duke of Braganza – Duke of Braganza,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duarte_Pio,_Duke_of_Braganza
Karl Otto Pohl – German economist, President of Deutsche Bundesbank, ex-Chairman of Central Bank Council,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Otto_Pohl
Colin Powell – ex-US Secretary of State, retired general, ex-Chairman of Joint Chiefs of Staff, ex-National Security Adviser to Reagan, connected to both Iraq wars,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colin_Powell
Mikhail Prokhorov – Russian Oligarch, ex-owner of Norilsk Nickel, ex-chairman of Polyus Gold, ex-President of ONEXIM GROUP $17B investment fund, net worth $13.2B,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikhail_Prokhorov
Guy Quaden – Governor of National Bank of Belgium, member of governing board of European Central Bank,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guy_Quaden
Anders Fogh Rasmussen – Secretary-General of NATO, ex-PM of Denmark, ex-President of European Union, connected to Iraq war,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anders_Fogh_Rasmussen
Joseph Alois Ratzinger (Pope Benedict XVI) – 265th Pope, ex-Hitler Youth, participated in Vatican II, head of Inquisition at Vatican, covered up untold number of abuse cases allowing them to continue and the perpetrators to remain unpunished, covered up Native Canadian Holocaust (by UK and Vatican) discoveries
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Alois_Ratzinger
David Reuben – British Jewish Oligarch, net worth with brother of $9B, CEO of Reuben Brothers, owner Trans-World Metals, owner of Global Switch, many other business interests
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Reuben
Simon Reuben – British Jewish Oligarch, net worth with brother of $9B, CEO of Reuben Brothers, owner Trans-World Metals, owner of Global Switch, many other business interests
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Reuben
William R. Rhodes – CEO William R. Rhodes Global Advisers, ex-Citigroup and Citibank, involved in international banking schemes in South America, Director of Private Export Funding Corporation, CFR, globalist, and much much more
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_R._Rhodes
Susan Rice – US Ambassador to United Nations, ex-National Security Council, Rhodes Scholar, connected to Clinton,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_Rice
Richard Duke of Gloucester – Duke of Gloucester, cousin of Elizabeth II,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_Richard,_Duke_of_Gloucester
Sir Malcolm Rifkind – British Bureaucrat, ex-Secretary of State for Scotland, Defence Secretary, Foreign Secretary, ex-MP,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sir_Malcolm_Rifkind
Sir John Ritblat – ex-CEO of British Land Company, head of several British royal organizations,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Ritblat
Stephen S. Roach – A senior executive at Morgan Stanley, professor at Yale and Jackson Institute for Global Affairs,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_S._Roach
Mary Robinson – ex-President of Ireland, ex-United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, received Presidential medal for Freedom for knowing when to talk and when not to as it refers to human rights
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Robinson
David Rockefeller Jr. – eldest son of David Rockefeller, 4th generation member of Rockefeller dynasty, Rockefeller foundations used to sew evil worldwide and particularly in USA, in the guise of good,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Rockefeller,_Jr.
David Rockefeller Sr. – patriarch of Rockefeller family, net worth $2.9B, owner Chase Manhattan Bank, owner of Exxon Mobil, connected to CIA, connected to Kissinger, admitted head of a globalist cabal, strict control of much of US media, Trilateral Commission,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Rockefeller
Nicholas Rockefeller – Rockefeller dynasty, warned Aaron Russo of 911, no link
Javier Echevarria Rodriguez – Spanish Roman Catholic Bishop, Head of Opus Dei,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Javier_Echevarr%C3%ADa_Rodr%C3%ADguez
Kenneth Rogoff – Professor of Economics at Harvard, ex-IMF, Board of Governors Federal Reserve,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenneth_Rogoff
Jean-Pierre Roth – Chairman of Board of Bank for International Settlements, governor of IMF for Switzerland, ex-Chairman Swiss National Bank, director of Nestle and Swatch,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean-Pierre_Roth
Jacob Rothschild – 4th Baron Rothschild, Chairman of RIT Capital investments, Eton education, ex-chairman N M Rothschild & Sons, Council for the Duchy of Cornwall of Prince of Wales, Advisory Board of Blackstone Group, ex-Chairman of BSkyB Television, Director of RHJ International,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacob_Rothschild
David Rubenstein – co-founder Carlyle Group, net worth $2.6B, CFR, presidential advisor To Carter,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Rubenstein
Robert Rubin – ex-US Treasury Secretary, ex-Goldman Sachs, ex-Citigroup, Co-chair of CFR, executive board at Harvard, ex-board of directors of NYSE, board of trustees Carnegie Corp. and U.s Securities and Exchange Commission, connected to Enron,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Rubin
Francesco Ruspoli 10th Prince of Cerveteri – Italian royalty,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francesco_Ruspoli,_10th_Prince_of_Cerveteri
Joseph Safra – Syrian-Brazilian Jewish banker, Owner of Safra Group, net worth $11.4B,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Safra
Moises Safra – Syrian-Brazilian Jewish banker, co-founder Banco Safra,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moises_Safra
Peter Sands – British banker, CEO of Standard Chartered, Oxford and Harvard-educated, Board of Directors – Institute of International Finance
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Sands_%28banker%29
Nicolas Sarkozy – ex-President of France (5/15/12), bureaucrat,http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicolas_Sarkozy
Isaac Sassoon – born into Sassoon dynasty of London, Sephardic Rabbi, author,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaac_S.D._Sassoon
James Sassoon – Commercial Secretary to the Treasury in UK Treasury, House of Lords, adviser to UK PM David Cameron,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Sassoon
Sir Robert John Sawers – Chief of Secret Intelligence Service of UK (MI6), ex-British Permanent Representative to UN, ex-Foreign Affairs Advisor to Tony Blair,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Sawers
Marjorie Scardino – CEO Pearson PLC, non-executive director of Nokia, ex-CEO of Economist Group,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marjorie_Scardino
Klaus Schwab – founder of World Economic Forum, ex-Professor at Geneva University,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klaus_Schwab
Karel Schwarzenberg – Prince of Schwarzenberg, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Czech Republic, Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karel_Schwarzenberg
Stephen A. Schwarzman – co-founder Blackstone Group, net worth $4.7B, Yale Skull and Bones, also educated at Harvard, ex-Lehman Brothers,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_A._Schwarzman
Sidney Shapiro – Jewish-American, naturalized Chinese, member of China’s People’s Political Consultative Council,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sidney_Shapiro
Nigel Sheinwald – British bureaucrat, ex-British Ambassador to US, adviser to Tony Blair, Knight Grand Cross,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nigel_Sheinwald
Sigismund Grand Duke of Tuscany Archduke of Austria – Grand Duke of Tuscany and Archduke of Austria, Grand Master of the Order of Saint Joseph,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archduke_Sigismund,_Grand_Duke_of_Tuscany
Simeon Borisov of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha – Prime Minister of Bulgaria, ex-Tsar of Bulgaria, cousin of Elizabeth II (Saxe-Coburg-Gotha Dynasty),
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simeon_Saxe-Coburg-Gotha
Olympia Snowe – US Senator, worked for William Cohen, connected to Rockefeller, helped acquit Bill Clinton during impeachment, supported Kosovo war, Afghanistan and Iraq, pro-abortion,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olympia_Snowe
Sofia Queen of Spain – Wife of King Juan Carlos of Spain, Princess of Greece and Denmark, cousin of Elizabeth II,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queen_Sof%C3%ADa_of_Spain
George Soros – Jewish Hungarian-American Oligarch, chairman of Soros Fund Management hedge fund, net worth $20B, chairman of Open Society Institute, described Nazi occupation of Hungary and his accompanying an official seizing Jewish property as “the best time of my life”, attended London School of Economics, globalist and vulture tied to numerous economic upheavals and contrived revolutions especially in Eastern Europe,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Soros
Arlen Specter – US Senator, Jewish, educated at Yale, ex-Federal Judge, devised “single bullet theory” in Warren Commission JFK assassination cover-up, professor at University of Pennsylvania Law School, helped push Iraq war and Patriot Act,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arlen_Specter
Ernest Stern – ex-Managing Director of World Bank, ex-Director JP Morgan, member of Group of 30, Director of Center for Global Development, on Board of Overseers International Center for Economic Growth,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Group_of_Thirty,
http://sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Ernest_Stern
Dennis Stevenson – British Baron, House of Lords, Commander of the Order of the British Empire award, knighted by Elizabeth II, Director of British Technology Group, Tyne Tees Television, Manpower Inc., Thames Television, J. Rothschild Assurance, English partnerships, BSkyB, Lazard Bros, St. James Place Capital, Chairman of Maocap and Aldeburgh Music, director of Western Union, Loudwater Partners and the Economist, Chair of HBOS formerly Halifax plc and Bank of Scotland, Chancellor of University of Arts London,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dennis_Stevenson,_Baron_Stevenson_of_Coddenham
Tom Steyer – founder of Farallon Capital Management hedge fund, Board of Trustees Stanford University, connected to Warren Buffett, educated at Yale, ex-Goldman Sachs, connected to Robert Rubin, ex-Morgan Stanley, connected to Hillary Clinton,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Steyer
Joseph Stiglitz – Jewish-American economist author and professor, Senior Vice President and Chief Economist of World Bank, Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics for a technique called screening used to extract private information from another economic agent, founder of globalist think tank Initiative for Policy Dialogue, professor at Columbia University, member of Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, ex-professor MIT, Yale, Stanford, Duke, Oxford and Princeton, chair of President’s Council of Economic Advisers under Clinton,http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Stiglitz
Dominique Strauss-Kahn – French politician, ex-Managing Director of International Monetary Fund (IMF), ex-Minister of Economy and Finance, ex-Minister of Industry and Foreign Trade, Communist, accused by a court of sexual assault,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dominique_Strauss-Kahn
Jack Straw – British politician, MP, ex-Home Secretary, ex-Foreign Secretary, ex-Leader of the House of Commons, ex-Lord High Chancellor, ex-Secretary of State for Justice, ex-Shadow Lord High Chancellor, allegations of rendition and torture,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Straw
Peter Sutherland – chairman of Goldman Sachs International, EU Commissioner, ex-Attorney General of Ireland, ex-Director-General of the World Trade Organization (WTO), ex-director of Royal Bank of Scotland, formerly on board of ABB, steering committee of Bilderberg, Honorary Chairman of Trilateral Commission, ex-vice chairman of European Round Table of Industrialists, connected to getting Ireland into the EU, President of globalist British think tank Federal Trust for Education and Research, member of British pro-European and globalist think tank Businesses for New Europe, Goodwill Ambassador to the UNIDO (UN), Chair of London School of Economics council, financial adviser to the Vatican, co-Chairman of High Level Group, connected to Rockefeller, honorary knighthood by Elizabeth II,http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Sutherland
Mary Tanner – British Anglican, President of the World Council of Churches, Dame Commander of the Order of the British Empire,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Tanner
Ettore Gotti Tedeschi – Italian Banker, President of the Vatican Bank,
http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ettore_Gotti_Tedeschi
Mark Thompson – Director-General of the BBC, Jesuit-educated, also Oxford-educated, general public accusations of bias,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Thompson
Dr. James Thomson – ex-President and CEO of RAND Corporation, ex-National Security Council, CFR, member of globalist think tank International Institute for Strategic Studies, director of AK steel Corporation, Encysive Pharmaceuticals, and Object Reservoir,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Thomson_%28executive%29
Hans Tietmeyer – Vice-Chairman of the Board of Directors at Bank for International Settlements (BIS), ex-President of Deutsche Bundesbank, ex-President of London Business School, member of Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, Professor at Catholic University of Eichstatt-Ingolstadt,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hans_Tietmeyer
Jean-Claude Trichet – French ex-President of European Central Bank, member of Group of 30, ex-governor of Banque de France, pushes for greater European Integration, chairman of Breugel’s, on board of European Aeronautic Defence and Space Company,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean-Claude_Trichet
Paul Tucker – executive director Bank of England, Deputy Governor of Bank of England
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Tucker_%28banker%29
Herman Van Rompuy – President of the European Council, Grand Cordon of the Order of Leopold, ex-PM of Belgium,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herman_Van_Rompuy
Alvaro Uribe Velez – President of Colombia, educated at Harvard, awarded Simon Bolivar Scholarship of the British Chevenin Scholarships, Senior Associate member at St. Antony’s College at Oxford, alleged connections to Medellin Drug Cartel, major proponent of Communitarianism, connected to IMF and World Bank, awarded Presidential Medal of Freedom by Bush 43,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alvaro_Uribe_Velez
Alfons Verplaetse – ex-Governor National Bank of Belgium, board of governors of the European Monetary Institute, Governing Council of European Central Bank,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfons_Verplaetse
Kaspar Villiger – ex-Chairman of the Board of Swiss bank UBS (Union Bank of Switzerland), ex-member of Swiss federal Council, board of directors of Nestle and Swiss Re, member of globalist Global Leadership Foundation,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaspar_Villiger
Maria Vladimirovna Grand Duchess of Russia – Grand Duchess of Russia, Oxford-educated, disputed heiress to Empress of Russia and to head of Romanov dynasty, Dame Grand Cross Sovereign Military
Order of Malta,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maria_Vladimirovna,_Grand_Duchess_of_Russia
Paul Volcker – ex-Chairman of the Federal Reserve, ex-Chairman of the Economic Recovery Advisory Board under Obama, educated at Princeton, Harvard, and London School of Economics, Rotary Foundation Ambassadorial Fellow, connected to end of the dollar gold standard in US, ex-chairman of Wolfensohn & Co., Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the Group of Thirty, Trilateral Commission, member of Trust Committee of Rockefeller Group, Inc. ex- Chase Bank,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Volcker
Otto von Habsburg – Archduke of Austria, ex-Crown Prince of Austria-Hungary, ex-Head of Imperial House of Habsburg, Sovereign of the Order of the Golden Fleece, ex-Vice President of International Paneuropean Union, ex-European Parliament, played a role in Eastern European revolutions against Communist rule, DECEASED
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Otto_von_Habsburg
Hassanal Bolkiah Mu’izzaddin Waddaulah Sultan of Brunei – LISTED TWICE
Sir David Walker – ex-chairman Morgan Stanley International, ex-Assistant Secretary of UK Treasury, ex-chairman of Securities and Investments Board, Executive Director for finance and industry at Bank of England, ex-Deputy Chairman of Lloyds TSB, member of Group of 30, ex-Reuters Holdings, Chairman of London Investment Bankers’ Association,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sir_David_Walker
Jacob Wallenberg – Swedish banker and industrialist, ex-President and CEO of Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken, board of directors of Atlas Copco, SAS Group, ABB group, Coca-Cola Company, Investor, Stockholm School of Economics, Knight of the Order of the Seraphim,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacob_Wallenberg
John Walsh – ex-US Comptroller of Currency, ex-executive director of Group of 30, ex-staff of US Senate Banking Committee, ex-US Treasury Department, helped implement Basel III in US, DECEASED
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_G._Walsh
Max Warburg – Owner of M.M. Warburg and Co. , scion of Jewish Warburg banking dynasty,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M._M._Warburg_%26_Co.
Axel Alfred Weber – German economist and banker, chairman of the Board of UBS, ex-President of Deutsche Bundesbank, ex-member of European Central Bank Governing Council, professor at University of Chicago, ex-Board of Directors Bank for International Settlements,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axel_Alfred_Weber
Michel David-Weill – French Investment banker, ex-Chairman of Lazard Freres, director of Groupe Danone foods, Commander of the Legion of Honor, Commander of Ordre des Arts et des Lettres
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michel_David-Weill
Nout Wellink – Dutch economist and central banker, President of De Nederlandsche Bank (DNB), Director of the Bank for International Settlements, member of Governing Council of European Central Bank, Governor of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), member of the Financial Stability Board (FSB), ex-Dutch Ministry of Finance, Trilateral Commission, ex-chairman of Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Knight of the Order of the Netherlands Lion,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nout_Wellink
Marina von Neumann Whitman – ex-Director Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), Professor at University of Michigan, and Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy, board of directors at Peterson Institute, ex-VP of General Motors Corp., ex-Council of Economic Advisors, ex-board of Trustees Princeton University,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marina_von_Neumann_Whitman
Willem-Alexander Prince of Orange – Prince of Orange, Prince of Netherlands, heir to throne of Kingdom of Netherlands, eldest son of Queen Beatrix, head of House of Amsberg, cousin of Elizabeth II, member of Global Water Partnership established by World Bank, UN and Sweden, member of Raad van State, member of many international orders,http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Willem-Alexander,_Prince_of_Orange
William Prince of Wales – Prince of Wales, Duke of Cambridge, Second in Line to throne of British Commonwealth, educated at Eton College, Royal Knight Companion of the Most Noble Order of the Garter, descendant of several powerful royal dynasties,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_William,_Duke_of_Cambridge
Dr Rowan Williams – Archbishop of Canterbury, Primate of all England, titular head of Anglican Church, educated at Oxford, Professor at Oxford,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rowan_Williams
Shirley Williams – President of Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA), British Baron, House of Lords, ex-MP, Professor at Harvard, educated at Oxford, CFR, Bilderberg, member of many globalist think tanks and organizations,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shirley_Williams
David Wilson – Baron Wilson of Tillyorn, ex-Governor of Hong Kong, ex-Chairman of Scottish Hydro Electric, member of Board of British Council, Knight of the Thistle, President of Royal Society of Edinburgh,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Wilson,_Baron_Wilson_of_Tillyorn
James Wolfensohn – ex-President of World Bank Group, educated at Harvard, ex-director J. Henry Schroder & Co investment bank, ex-Salomon Brothers executive, founder of Wolfensohn & Company, chairman of International Advisory Board of Citigroup, member of International Advisory Council for China Investment Corporation, trustee of globalist Brookings Institution, trustee of Rockefeller Foundation, CFR, Bilderberg, World Economic Forum, globalist Aspen Institute, knighthood of the Order of the British Empire, connected to Rothschilds,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Wolfensohn
Neal S. Wolin – US Deputy Secretary of the Treasury, National Security Council under Clinton, educated at Yale, executive assistant to 3 CIA directors, member of Brookings Institution, CEO of Hartford Financial Services Group, CFR
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neal_S._Wolin
Harry Woolf – Baron Woolf, Jewish-British, Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales, ex-Master of the Rolls, ex-judge in Hong Kong,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_Woolf
James Jr. Woolsey – ex-head of CIA, Rhodes Scholar at Oxford, also educated at Yale, member of many globalist foundations, think tanks and NGO’s, ex-chairman of Freedom House, Senior Vice President of Booz Allen Hamilton, member of Project for a New American Century linked to 911 and Iraq war, tied to global warming scam, employee of Lux Capital, co-founder US Energy Security Council, accused of profiting from Iraq War and a crusader-like zealousness for conflict with Islam,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R._James_Woolsey,_Jr.
Sir Robert Worcester – founder of Market and Opinion Research International (MORI), International Director of Ipsos Group, Knight Commander of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire, Freeman of the City of London, trustee of Magna Carta Trust, member of many globalist organizations,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sir_Robert_Worcester
Sarah Wu – Director General of Hong Kong Monetary Authority (London)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hong_Kong_Economic_and_Trade_Office,_London
Robert Zoellick – President of World Bank, educated at Harvard, ex-US Department of Treasury, ex-Executive VP of Fannie Mae, ex-Professor at US Naval Academy, ex-White House Deputy Chief of Staff under Bush 41, member of PNAC linked to 911 and Iraq War, ex-head of globalist Center for International Studies, ex-advisory board Enron, ex-member of Executive Office under Bush 43, helped bring China into WTO, heavily promoted the Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA), tied to legal attempts by WTO to force Genetically modified foods in the European Union, promotes globalism,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Zoellick
The ADMITTED “nations” of the British Commonwealth (ALL “former” colonies”):
Africa
Botswana
Cameroon
The Gambia
Ghana
KENYA
Lesotho
Malawi
Mauritius
Mozambique
Namibia
NIGERIA
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
SOUTH AFRICA
Swaziland
Tanzania
UGANDA
Zambia
ZIMBABWE (formerly RHODESIA)
Asia
BANGLADESH
INDIA
Maldives
PAKISTAN
Sri Lanka
Carribean
Antigua and Barbuda
The Bahamas
Barbados
Belize
Dominica
Grenada
Guyana
Jamaica
St Kitts and Nevis
St Lucia
St Vincent and the Grenadines
Trinidad and Tobago
Pacific
AUSTRALIA
Kiribati
Nauru
NEW ZEALAND
Papua New Guinea
Solomon Islands
Tonga
Tuvalu
Western Samoa
Brunei
Malaysia
Singapore
OTHER
CANADA
Cyprus
Malta
United Kingdom (England, Scotland, Ireland, Wales)
USA?
Israel?
EU?
How many more?
*The net worths are estimated and are the Wikipedia figures, which are almost certainly smaller in some cases. Conspirator details are not implied to be exhaustive. The list includes several now deceased members, and the Sultan of Brunei is listed twice (so 1 member is missing from the start). The expected changes since 2010 should also be taken into consideration.
Why did I post this?
The news is important to all people because it is where we come to know new things about the world, which leads to the development of more life goals that lead to life wisdom. The news also serves as a social connection tool, as we tend to relate to those who know about and believe the things we do. With the power of an open truth-seeking mind in hand, the individual can grow wise and the collective can prosper.
ANYONE INTERESTED IN THE REAL NEWS ABOUT WHAT HAS HAPPENED WITH TX POWER OUTAGES, LISTENING TO THE LAMESTREAM MEDIA JUMPING TO PROTECT THEIR GOLDEN CALF OF POLITICAL RENEWABLE ENERGY AGENDA WILL NOT GET THE TURTH.
WHILE IGNORING THE TRUTH AND PEOPLE DYING FROM THIS, THE LAMESTREAM MEDIA CARES NOTHING ABOUT THAT OR TRUTH, AND YET THE LAMESTREAM MEDIA AND THE SO-CALLED ‘FACT CHECKERS’, REGARDLESS, ARE STILL GASLIGHTING EVERYONE TO PROTECT THEIR GOLDEN CALF, THE GREEN NEW DEAL, EVEN AT THE EXPENSE OF HUMAN LIVES. THEIR ONLY CONCERN IS THAT THEIR SACRED COW IS NOT DISCREDITED.
AND HERE’S THE RUB. THE COLLECTIVE WORD THEY ARE ALL USING, BEING THAT GREEN ENERGY IS NOT THE ‘MAIN’ ISSUE, IS THEIR ‘SECRET SAUCE’ TO MAKE BELIEVERS OF THE USEFUL VILLAGE IDIOTS. MAIN OR NOT, THE RENEWABLE INDUSTRY WAS PART OF A BREAKDOWN WITH GAS AND NUCLEAR SOURCES AND THAT’S WHAT COUNTS WHEN HUMAN LIVES ARE LOST, BUT THE DEMS INSTEAD CONTINUE POLITICIZING EVERYTHING THAT THEY CAN.
WATCH BONGINO GIVE YOU THE FACTS AND THE TRUTH OF THE ISSUE.
Microsoft founder and the man who could never rid his Windows product of viruses and the blue screen of death but wants you to take his experimental “vaccines,” Bill Gates, has his grimy hands in virtually everything that exists in the world. However, now he is talking about wanting to change “every aspect of the economy” to push for the climate change hoax all while the people eat fake, lab-created “meat.”
Bill Gates & Food Corporations Worked To End Livestock Production – Pushed Lab-Grown Meat
When It Comes To Vaccines, Who Is Really Killing Children, Bill Gates? (Video)
Bill Gates: We Need “Pandemic Fire Squads” To Control You In The Post COVID-19 World
The Real Bill Gates & His Ruthless, Money Hungry Pursuit Of Vaccines (Video)
Microsoft founder Bill Gates is pushing drastic and ‘fundamental’ changes to the economy in order to immediately halt the release of greenhouse gasses – primarily carbon dioxide – and ‘go to zero’ in order to save the planet from long-prognosticated (and consistently wrong) environmental disaster.
Changes we’ll need to make in order to realize Gates’ vision include:
And since producing plants to make fake meat emits gases as well, Gates has backed a company which uses fungus to make sausage and yogurt, which the billionaire calls “pretty amazing.”
“When you say fungi, do you mean like mushroom or a microbe?” asked Anderson Cooper in a recent “60 Minutes” interview to promote Gates’ new book, “How to Avoid a Climate Disaster
“It’s a microbe,” replied Gates, adding“The microbe was discovered in the ground in a geyser in Yellowstone National Park. Without soil or fertilizer it can be grown to produce this nutritional protein — that can then be turned into a variety of foods with a small carbon footprint.”
(Speaking of which, it appears that we’re already rounding the corner on C02 emissions)
Gates isn’t just looking to cut future carbon emissions, he is also investing in direct air capture, an experimental process to remove existing CO2 from the atmosphere. Some companies are now using these giant fans to capture CO2 directly out of the air, Gates has become one of the world’s largest funders of this kind of technology.
But of all his green investments, Gates has spent the most time and money pursuing a breakthrough in nuclear energy — arguing it’s key to a zero carbon future.
He says he’s a big believer in wind and solar and thinks it can one day provide up to 80% of the country’s electricity, but Gates insists unless we discover an effective way to store and ship wind and solar energy, nuclear power will likely have to do the rest. Energy from nuclear plants can be stored so it’s available when the sun isn’t shining and the wind isn’t blowing.
Gates also admits he’s a hypocrite – telling Cooper “I probably have one of the highest greenhouse gas footprints of anyone on the planet,” adding “my personal flying alone is gigantic.”
He’s atoning for his climate sins by purchasing plant-based aviation fuel, switching to an electric car, using solar panels, and buying carbon credits to the tune of $7 million per year.
Gates’ climate pivot is getting a full-court media press. As Paul Joseph Watson of Summit News writes:
Bill Gates has been lauded as the man to “save the world” and help the planet reach zero carbon emissions in a new report by Wired Magazine, despite such standards not being reflected in the billionaire philanthropist’s own lifestyle.
The article investigates how Gates plans to achieve a “zero carbon” world and promotes his new book which argues “it’s time we make real societal, economic and logistic changes to our way of life to avoid disaster.”
According to Gates, the planet needs to reach zero carbon emissions in order to “avoid catastrophe.”https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?creatorScreenName=http%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2FFPPTim&dnt=true&embedId=twitter-widget-0&frame=false&hideCard=false&hideThread=false&id=1361243904876699650&lang=en&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fsonsoflibertymedia.com%2Fbill-gates-wants-to-use-climate-change-hoax-to-change-every-aspect-of-economy-like-he-did-with-the-coronavirus-hoax%2F&siteScreenName=BradleeDean1&theme=light&widgetsVersion=889aa01%3A1612811843556&width=550px
Gates’ efforts to reduce CO2 emissions may have an environmentalist sheen, but that goal also risks reducing living standards in the west, something that Gates isn’t likely to embrace for himself.
As has been previously noted, while Americans are being told that the dream of owning private property is over under a future ‘Great Reset’, Gates and other billionaires have been buying up huge amounts of farmland.
Gates is now the biggest owner of farmland in America, according to a Forbes report.
While the mainstream media continues to champion Gates’ influence, he has received harsh criticism elsewhere.
As we highlighted last week, Lawyer Robert F. Kennedy Jr., son of Robert F. Kennedy and the nephew of former U.S. president John F. Kennedy, wrote a comprehensive report accusing Gates of engaging in neo-feudalism.
Kennedy warns that, “To cloak his dystopian plans for humanity in benign intentions, Gates has expropriated the rhetoric of “sustainability,” “biodiversity,” “good stewardship” and “climate.”
He also accused Gates of attempting to monopolise and dominate global food production, labeling it “a dark form of philanthrocapitalism based on biopiracy and corporate biopiracy.”
Kennedy was subsequently banned by Instagram after his report was published.
As was highlighted earlier, pro-Gates messaging has also found its way into children’s television programming.
* * *
Does Gates have a plan to force the rest of the world to adopt his vision?
Bill Gates should be arrested and charged with crimes against humanity for every adverse reaction and death that were the results of his experimental vaccines. Instead the world parades him around as though he is some sort of savior and humanitarian when nothing could be further from the truth.
Many Americans were perfectly fine with Islamic terrorists being shipped off to Guantanamo Bay where they would be endlessly waterboarded and tortured in countless other ways. But now members of Congress are talking about “applying the same penalties” to domestic “extremists” here in the United States. Does that mean that American citizens will soon be grabbed off the streets and sent to prison camps indefinitely without a trial? Personally, I am very much against terrorism wherever it is found all over the globe, but what some of our politicians are proposing to do to fight “domestic extremism” goes way over the line. Once you are done reading this article, I believe that you will share my concerns.
Even before the last election, the Department of Homeland Security was putting out some very alarming statements. For example, last October DHS officials came to the conclusion that U.S.-based extremists are now “the primary terrorist threat inside the United States”…
“The primary terrorist threat inside the United States will stem from lone offenders and small cells of individuals,” said the department’s first Homeland Threat Assessment. “Some U.S.-based violent extremists have capitalized on increased social and political tensions in 2020, which will drive an elevated threat environment at least through early 2021.”
If DHS officials had been referring to the groups that have been rioting, looting and burning our cities for the past 12 months, that assessment would make a lot of sense.
But of course, that was not who they were talking about.
Following the election, we witnessed the horrific attack on the U.S. Capitol on January 6th. In the aftermath of that attack, Democrats in Congress have been “insisting that domestic terrorism has eclipsed the threat from foreign actors such as the Islamic State and al-Qaeda”…
The attack has left many lawmakers, and especially Democrats, insisting that domestic terrorism has eclipsed the threat from foreign actors such as the Islamic State and al-Qaeda. DHS and its agencies are responsible for securing the country’s borders, ports, transportation and cyber systems, generally leaving the monitoring of extremist groups and terrorism investigations to the FBI. But DHS and its agencies have nearly eight times as many employees as the FBI, and calls for the department to play a more muscular role in combating domestic extremism have policymakers looking at new ways to enlist its resources.
Once again, these Democrats are not talking about the groups that attack police stations, courthouses and federal buildings on an almost nightly basis.
Instead, their focus is almost exclusively on those that have “far right” political views.
Democrat Tulsi Gabbard is warning that her colleagues in Congress intend to define “extremist” so broadly that it could apply to nearly half the country…
“What characteristics are we looking for as we are building this profile of a potential extremist, what are we talking about? Religious extremists, are we talking about Christians, evangelical Christians, what is a religious extremist? Is it somebody who is pro-life? Where do you take this?” Gabbard said.
She said the proposed legislation could create “a very dangerous undermining of our civil liberties, our freedoms in our Constitution, and a targeting of almost half of the country.”
Last month, I wrote an article about the new bill that she was talking about. It is called the Domestic Terrorism Prevention Act of 2021, and it is basically the Patriot Act on steroids.
Of course, it won’t be used against terrorists on the left. During a recent discussion about domestic extremism, Democrat Bennie Thompson (who is the chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee) specifically used the word “patriots” to describe the sort of person that he intends to target…
“A lot of them mask themselves under some guise of being patriots or some form of citizen, but the question is, what do they advocate?”
That statement should chill you to the core.
“Republican” Michael McCaul, who is also on the House Homeland Security Committee, has gone even farther.
If you can believe it, he is actually suggesting that domestic extremists should face “the same penalties as those that exist for terrorism that originates overseas”…
Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Tex.), the committee’s former chairman, joined lawmakers calling for specific federal sanctions for domestic terrorism, potentially applying the same penalties as those that exist for terrorism that originates overseas. Such legislation could include penalties for providing material support to domestic groups and laws holding technology companies responsible for violent and extremist content on their platforms.
“I think it sends a strong message about where Congress is that we’re going to treat domestic terrorism on an equal plane as international terrorism,” McCaul said.
So what happens to terrorists overseas?
They are ruthlessly gunned down, their homes are hit by unexpected drone strikes, or if they are really lucky they get hauled off to Guantanamo Bay.
Without a doubt, terrorism has no place in our society.
And if authorities really wanted to do something about it, they should arrest the terrorists that are endlessly committing violence in Seattle, Portland and other major cities.
But whenever an American citizen is arrested, it is imperative that every constitutional right is respected and that citizen is given a fair trial.
Sadly, the measures that some members of Congress are now proposing cross quite a few lines that should never, ever be crossed.
Detaining U.S. citizens indefinitely without a trial is something that should never, ever be done.
Sending drones to “take out” U.S. citizens simply because of what they believe is something that should never, ever be done.
And torturing U.S. citizens in the name of “fighting extremism” is something that should never, ever be done.
All of these things have been done to ISIS and Al-Qaeda terrorists, and now members of Congress want “domestic extremists” to be treated the same way.
Since the definition of a “domestic extremist” now covers close to half the country, there is a very good chance that you could potentially be considered a “domestic extremist” too.
We have reached such a critical turning point in our history, and we really are on the verge of losing all of our precious constitutional rights.
Recently, we’ve been hearing the calls from the tyrants regarding “domestic terrorists,” and we already know how they are labeling law-abiding, patriots, Christians and Constitutionalists in that manner simply because we oppose them and their agenda. Congress is even pushing bills to label most Americans as domestic terrorists. However, actually thinking and formulating your own opinions and conclusions about the corporate-owned, CIA-controlled media’s narrative or that of a government narrative could also get you that label.
Conspiracies for good and for evil do exist now, as they have from time immemorial, Matthew Ehret writes. The only question is which intention do you want to devote your life towards?
If you are starting to feel like forces controlling the governments of the west are out to get you, then it is likely that you are either a paranoid nut job, or a stubborn realist.
Either way, it means that you have some major problems on your hands.
If you don’t happen to find yourself among the tinfoil hat-wearing strata of conspiracy theorists waiting in a bunker for aliens to either strike down or save society from the shape shifting lizard people, but are rather contemplating how, in the 1960s, a shadow government took control of society over the dead bodies of many assassinated patriots, then certain conclusions tend to arise.
Three Elementary Realizations for Thinking People
The first conclusion you would likely arrive at is that the United States government was just put through the first coup in over 58 years (yes, what happened in 1963 was a coup). Although it is becoming a bit prohibitive to speak such words aloud in polite society, Nancy Pelosi’s official biographer Molly Ball, recently penned a scandalous Time Magazine article entitled ‘The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign that Saved the 2020 Elections’ which admitted to this conspiracy saying:
“Even though it sounds like a paranoid fever dream- a well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information.” (Lest you think that this was a subversion of democracy, Ball informs us that “they were not rigging the election; they were fortifying it.”)
Another conclusion you might come to is that many of the political figures whom you believed were serving those who elected them into office, actually serve the interests of a clique of technocrats and billionaires lusting over the deconstruction of western civilization under something called “a Great Reset”. Where this was brushed off as an unfounded conspiracy theory not long ago, even Canada’s Deputy Prime Minister (and neo-Nazi supporting Rhodes Scholar) Chrystia Freeland decided to become a Trustee of the World Economic Forum just weeks ago. In this role, Freeland joins fellow Oxford technocrat Mark Carney in their mutual endeavor to be a part of the new movement to decarbonize civilization and make feudalism cool again.
Lastly, you might notice that your having arrived at these conclusions is itself increasingly becoming a form of thought-crime punishable in a variety of distasteful ways elaborated by a series of unprecedented new emergency regulations that propose extending the definition of “terrorism”. Those implicated under the new definition will be those broad swaths of citizens of western nations who don’t agree with the operating beliefs of the ruling oligarchy.
Already a 60 day review of the U.S. military is underway to purge the armed forces of all such “thought criminals” while McCarthyite legislation has been drafted to cleanse all government jobs of “conspiracy theorists”.
Another startling announcement from the National Terrorism Advisory Bulletin that domestic terrorists include: “ideologically-motivated violent extremists with objections to the exercise of governmental authority [and] perceived grievances fueled by false narratives.”
While not yet fully codified into law (though it will be if not nipped in the bud soon), you can be sure that things are certainly moving fast as, before our very eyes, the right to free speech is being torn to shreds by means of censorship across social media and the internet, cancelling all opinions deemed unacceptable to the ruling class.
The Conspiracy to Subvert Conspiracy Theorizing
This should not come as a surprise, as Biden’s new addition to the Department of Homeland Security is a bizarre figure named Cass Sunstein who famously described exactly what this was going to look like in his infamous 2008 report ‘Conspiracy Theories’ (co-authored with Harvard Law School’s Adrien Vermeule). In this under-appreciated study, the duo foresaw the greatest threat to the ruling elite took the form of “conspiracy theorizing” within the American population using as examples of this delusion: the idea that the government had anything to do with the murders of John F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King Jr, or the planning and execution of 9-11.
Just to be clear, conspiracy literally means ‘two or more people acting together in accord with an agreed upon idea and intention’.
The fact that Vermeule has made a legal career arguing that laws should be interpreted not by the “intentions” of lawgivers, but rather according to cost-benefit analysis gives us a useful insight into the deranged mind of a technocrat and the delusional reasoning that denies the very thing which has shaped literally ALL of human history.
In their “scholarly” essay, the authors wrote “the existence of both domestic and foreign conspiracy theories, we suggest, is no trivial matter, posing real risks to the government’s antiterrorism policies, whatever the latter may be.” After establishing his case for the threat of conspiracies, Sunstein says that “the best response consists in cognitive infiltration of extremist groups”.
Not one to simply draw criticisms, the pro-active Sunstein laid out five possible strategies which the social engineers managing the population could deploy to defuse this growing threat saying:
“(1) Government might ban conspiracy theorizing. (2) Government might impose some kind of tax, financial or otherwise, on those who disseminate such theories. (3) Government might itself engage in counter speech, marshaling arguments to discredit conspiracy theories. (4) Government might formally hire credible private parties to engage in counter speech. (5) Government might engage in informal communication with such parties, encouraging them to help”.
(I’ll let you think about which of these prescriptions were put into action over the ensuing 12 years.)
Cass Sunstein was particularly sensitive to this danger largely because: 1) he was a part of a very ugly conspiracy himself and 2) he is a world-renowned behaviorist.
The Problem of Reality for Behaviorists
As an economic behaviorist and lawyer arguing that all “human rights” should be extended to animals (blurring the line separating human dynamics from the law of the jungle as any fascist must), Sunstein has spent decades trying to model human behavior with computer simulations in an effort to “scientifically manage” such behavior.
As outlined in his book Nudge (co-authored with Nobel Prize winning behaviorist Richard Thaler), Sunstein “discovered” that people tend to organize their behavioral patterns around certain fundamental drives, such as the pursuit of pleasure, avoidance of pain, and certain Darwinian drives for sex, popularity, desire for conformity, desire for novelty, and greed.
One of the key principles of economic behaviorism which is seen repeated in such popular manuals as Freakonomics, Nudge, Predictably Irrational, The Wisdom of Crowds, and Animal Spirits, is that humans are both biologically determined due to their Darwinian impulses, but, unlike other animals, have the fatal flaw of being fundamentally irrational at their core. Since humans are fundamentally irrational, says the behaviorist, it is requisite that an enlightened elite impose “order” upon society while maintaining the illusion of freedom of choice from below. This is the underlying assumption of Karl Popper’s Open Society doctrine, which was fed to Popper’s protégé George Soros and which animates Soros’ General Theory of Reflexivity and his Oxford-based Institute for New Economic Thinking (INET).
This was at the heart of Obama’s science Czar John Holdren’s call for world government in his 1977 Ecoscience (co-written with his mentor Paul Ehrlich) where the young misanthrope envisioned a future utopic world governed by a scientifically managed master-class saying:
“Perhaps those agencies, combined with UNEP and the United Nations population agencies, might eventually be developed into a Planetary Regime- sort of an international superagency for population, resources, and environment. Such a comprehensive Planetary Regime could control the development, administration, conservation, and distribution of all natural resources, renewable or nonrenewable”.
The caveat: If Darwinian impulses mixed with irrational “animal spirits” were truly all that animated those systems which behaviorists wish to map and manipulate (aka: “nudge” with rewards, punishments), then a scientific priesthood would indeed be a viable and perhaps necessary way to organize the world.
Fortunately, reality is a bit more elegant and dignified than behaviorists wish to admit.
Why Computer Modellers Hate Metaphysics
On a closer inspection of history, we find countless instances where people shape their individual and group behavior around sets of ideas that transcend controllable material impulses. When this happens, those individuals or groups tend to resist adapting to environments created for them. This incredible phenomenon is witnessed empirically in the form of the American Revolution, Warsaw Ghetto Uprisings, Civil Rights movements, and even some bold manifestations of anti-lockdown protests now underway around the world.
Among the most troublesome of those variables which upset computer models are: “Conscience”, “Truth”, “Intentions”, “Soul”, “Honor”, “God”, “Justice”, “Patriotism”, “Dignity”, and “Freedom”.
Whenever individuals shape their identities around these very real, though immaterial (aka: “metaphysical”) principles, they cannot be “nudged” towards pre-determined decisions that defy reason and morality. Adherence to these principles also tends to afford thinking people an important additional edge of creative insight necessary to cut through false explanatory narratives that attempt to hide lies behind the appearance of truth (aka: sophistry).
As witnessed on multiple occasions throughout history, such individuals who value the health of their souls over the intimidating (and extremely malleable) force of popular opinion, will often decide to sacrifice personal comfort and even their lives in order to defend those values which their minds and consciences deem important.
These rare, but invaluable outliers will often resist policies that threaten to undo their freedoms or undermine the basis of their society’s capacity to produce food, and energy for their children and grandchildren. What is worse, is that their example is often extremely contagious causing other members of the sheep class to believe that they too are human and endowed with unalienable rights which should be defended.
The Intentions Ordering World History
Perhaps, most “destructive” of all is that these outlier people tend to look for abstract things like “causes” in historical dynamics shaping the context of their present age, as well as their current geopolitical environment.
Whenever this type of thinking is done, carefully crafted narratives fed to the masses by an enlightened elite will often fail in their powers to persuade, since seekers after truth soon come to realize that IDEAS and intentions (aka: conspiracies) shape our past, present and future. When the dominating intentions shaping society’s trajectory is in conformity with Natural Law, humanity tends to improve, freedoms increase, culture matures and evil loses its hold. Inversely, when the intentions animating history are out of conformity with Natural Law, the opposite happens as societies lose their moral and material fitness to survive and slip ever more quickly into dark ages.
While sitting in a jail in Birmingham Alabama in 1963, Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. described this reality eloquently when he said:
“A just law is a man-made code that squares with the moral law or the law of God. An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law. Any law that uplifts human personality is just. Any law that degrades human personality is unjust… One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws”
From Plato’s organization of his Academy and efforts to shape a Philosopher King to beat the forces of the Persian Empire, to Cicero’s efforts to save the Roman Republic, to Augustine’s battles to save the soul of Christianity all the way to our present age, conspiracies for the good and counter-conspiracies for evil have shaped history. If one were to begin an investigation into history without an understanding that ideas and intentions caused the trajectory of history, as is the standard practice among history professors dominant in todays world, then one would become incapable of understanding anything essential about one’s own reality.
It is irrelevant that behaviorists and other fascists wish their victims to believe that history just happens simply because random short-sighted impulses kinetically drive events on a timeline- the truth of my claim exists for any serious truth seeker to discover it for themselves.
Back to our Present Sad State of Affairs
Now we all know that Sunstein spent the following years working as Obama’s Regulatory Czar alongside an army of fellow behaviorists who took control of all levers of policy making as outlined by Time Magazine’s April 13, 2009 article ‘How Obama is Using the Science of Change’. As the fabric of western civilization, and traditional values of family, gender, and even macro economic concepts like “development” were degraded during this period, the military industrial complex had a field day as Sunstein’s wife Samantha Power worked closely with Susan Rice in the promotion of “humanitarian bombings” of small nations under Soros’ Responsibility to Protect doctrine.
After the Great Reset Agenda was announced in June 2020, Sunstein was recruited to head the propaganda wing of the World Health Organization known as the WHO Technical Advisory Group where his skills in mass behavior modification was put to use in order to counteract the dangerous spread of conspiracy theories that persuaded large chunks of the world population that COVID-19 was part of a larger conspiracy to undermine national sovereignty and impose world government.
The head of WHO described Sunstein’s mandate in the following terms:
“In the face of the COVID-19 pandemic, countries are using a range of tools to influence behavior: Information campaigns are one tool, but so are laws, regulations, guidelines and even fines…That’s why behavioral science is so important.”
Today, hundreds of Obama-era behaviorists have streamed back into influential positions of government under the new “scientifically managed”, evidence-based governance coming back to life under Biden promising to undo the dark days of President Trump.
Ideologues who have been on record calling for world government, the elimination of the sick and elderly (see Obamacare architect Ezekiel Emmanuel’s Why I Hope to Die At 75), and population control are streaming back into positions of influence. If you think that anything they have done to return to power is unlawful, or antithetical to the principles of the Constitution, then these technocrats want you to know that you are a delusional conspiracy theorist and as such, represent a potential threat to yourself and the society of which you are but a part.
If you question World Health Organization narratives on COVID-19, or doubt the use of vaccines produced by organizations like Astra Zeneca due to their ties to eugenics organizations then you are a delusional conspiracy theorist.
If you doubt that global warming is caused by carbon dioxide or that implementing the Paris Climate accords may cause more damage to humanity than climate change ever could, then you must be a conspiracy theorist.
If you believe that the U.S. government just went through a regime change coordinated by something called “the deep state”, then you run the risk of being labelled a delusional threat to “the general welfare” deserving of the sort of treatment dolled out to any typical terrorist.
It appears that the many comforts we have taken for granted over the past 50-year drunken stupor called “globalization” are quickly coming to an end, and thankfully not one but two opposing intentions for what the new operating system will be are actively vying for control. This clash was witnessed in stark terms during the January 2021 Davos Summit, where Xi Jinping and Putin’s call for a new system of win-win cooperation, multipolarity and long-term development offset the unipolar zero-sum ideologues of the west seeking to undo the foundations of industrial civilization.
Either way you look at it, conspiracies for good and for evil do exist now, as they have from time immemorial. The only question is which intention do you want to devote your life towards?
Between the thought police and the Ministry of Truth, the tyrants expect to either bring you into compliance with their lawlessness or eliminate you from society.
The Democrat impeachment case against President Trump began with the false claim that “President Trump incited a violent mob to attack the United States Capitol during the Joint Session” and concluded with the false claim that he had engaged in “insurrection or rebellion.”
In between these two false claims lay a multitude of lies, misstatements of law, exaggerations of events, false conclusions, and fundamental attacks on our entire political system.
It’s no wonder that despite the media hysteria and political pressure, President Trump was acquitted of a baseless charge based on arm-waving, pulpit-pounding, zero witnesses and fewer facts. The Democrats littered their case with terms like “incitement”, “insurrection”, and “sedition” using them in the way that totalitarian regimes do to mean opposition to the regime.
President Trump’s defense team had the facts on their side while the Democrats had the lies.
The Democrat impeachment case falsely claimed that President Trump “imperiled” Congress.
The alleged peril came from an “armed, angry, and dangerous” crowd whose members, according to the Democrats, were waving “many American flags wielded” because “they believed they were performing a patriotic act in the service of their President.”
Only Democrats could use American flags and patriotism as evidence of a threat.
Meanwhile, poll numbers showed that in September, 41% of Democrats believed that there could be justification for violence if President Trump won.
Left-wing groups had been prepared to “flood the streets” with protesters.
The Working Families Party had, according to the New York Times, had “been in touch with bail funds that could be activated in response to mass arrests” and even had a “fund to raise money for the families of anyone killed in violence on or around Election Day.”
Preparing for protests so violent that people would die is angry and dangerous. So does 4 in 10 Democrats believing that violence could be justified if President Trump won the election.
But the Democrats and their media have built a false narrative to smear Republicans as violent.
Democrats, from Rep. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez on down, have claimed without evidence that they were on the verge of being murdered. While AOC’s claim is particularly absurd, there were no shots fired during the battles between police and rioters. The only weapons used were the familiar ones from many riots: fists, shields, poles, assorted bludgeons, and chemical sprays.
President Trump addressed a crowd that he knew “was armed and primed for violence,” the House Democrat impeachment managers wrote in their rebuttal.
In their original impeachment, they contend that, “armed insurrectionists breached the Capitol.”
It’s an odd sort of insurrection and coup in which the rebels never actually fire a shot in a country with some 400 million firearms. The Capitol Police drew guns and in one case used them, but nobody actually took any shots at them. Democrats, their media, and their political allies have repeatedly claimed without evidence that Senator Mitt Romney and others were on the verge of being killed. Yet the only violence that took place was between rioters and police.
The impeachment managers claim that “many feared for their lives”, but showed no basis for it.
Journalists and photographers were able to capture photos and videos of the rioters, most notably the QAnon Shaman, without being assaulted. The one single incident of an attack on a journalist involved an AP photographer attacked outside when he was mistaken for Antifa.
No one seems to have touched a reporter inside Congress, despite partisan hostility, leaving little basis for believing that anyone was going to physically assault House or Senate members.
Let alone kill them.
The Democrats have repeatedly played on the idea that Senate members, including Romney, were within minutes of being killed in order to bias the jury. That’s cynical and dishonest.
“President Trump is personally responsible for inciting an armed attack on our seat of government that imperiled the lives of the Vice President, Members of Congress and our families, and those who staff and serve the Legislative Branch,” the Democrats concluded.
The only arms were physical bludgeons used in exchanges with Capitol police. The Democrat misuse of “arms” to refer to poles and shields is deliberately misleading. The Democrats insist on claiming that the lives of everyone were imperiled, but they never actually proved it.
There was no insurrection. Nor was there a coup. Once inside, there was nothing more than vandalism. A group of protesters had made a strategic move to breach the Capitol, but once inside no efforts were made to secure the premises, to set up a defensive perimeter, let alone any of the fantastic claims that hostages would be taken or executions would be carried out.
Once inside, there was no plan. Offices were broken into. Some petty vandalism occurred. A few rioters posed for photos. Others cooperated with Capitol Police. The atmosphere was indistinguishable from student occupations of campuses in the sixties with no one having much of a clue what to do once they were inside the building itself and there was no one to protest.
There’s no excuse for violently assaulting police officers. But that’s a riot, not an insurrection.
The Democrat impeachment falsely transforms a protest and a riot into an insurrection with no actual evidence that the protesters were there to do anything more than protest a stolen election beyond a few people chanting violent slogans that they made.no attempt to actually carry out.
President Trump couldn’t be convicted of an insurrection that never happened. Redefining protests and riots as insurrections and support for them as incitement would mean impeaching nearly every Democrat who has held elected office in the last 60 years.
And the evidence for the incitement was even thinner than the evidence for the insurrection.
“He launched into an inflammatory speech that was bound to result in the violence that followed,” the Democrat rebuttal argued.
Democrats keep mixing inflammatory and incitement together. Political speeches, including their own impeachment histrionics, are frequently inflammatory. They’re not incitement.
The Democrat impeachment case hinged on President Trump using the word “fight” to his supporters, while ignoring the fact that he told them to protest peacefully. Democrat politicians repeatedly urge people to fight for their agendas. If using “fight” in a speech is incitement, then every politician in the country is guilty of incitement and can be impeached over it.
That’s a point that President Trump’s defense team made with a video highlight reel.
The Democrat impeachment case falsely claimed that President Trump had made “a militaristic demand that they must fight to stop what was occurring in the Capitol at that very moment.”
If telling people to “fight like hell” is “militaristic”, then what of Senator Kirsten Gillibrand’s “Now is the time to fight like hell” speech, and former Senator Barbara Boxer praising Senator Harry Reid for being willing to “fight like hell”? Is fighting like hell “militaristic” only when Trump says it?
The Democrat case accusing President Trump of incitement even began by noting that, “President Trump praised Giuliani, saying ‘he’s got guts, he fights.’” Does that mean that Giuliani physically assaults people, or that fighting refers to aggressively working toward a political goal?
It’s bad enough that the Democrats insisted that fighting is literal when Trump said it, but a figure of speech when they say it, but they also have to insist that when President Trump said it, it was both a figure of speech and a militaristic call for violence whenever it’s convenient for them.
“President Trump said that those marching toward the Capitol should do so ‘peacefully,’” the Democrats conceded, but then argued that he then spoke “using highly inflammatory rhetoric—exactly the kind of language calculated to incite violence”. What sort of rhetoric?
“Fight like hell”.
The Democrat argument for incitement ignored the literal meaning of what President Trump said, insisting that the Senate shouldn’t take him seriously when he called for a peaceful march, but should assume that when he said, “fight like hell”, he was calling for a violent insurrection.
“The tenor of his speech (and his repeated demand that they ‘fight like hell’ and ‘show strength’ to save their country) belied any desire for a peaceful demonstration,” the Democrats argued.
Their case for incitement rested on the indefinable “tenor” which is a wholly subjective argument that ignored what President Trump actually said. The Democrats then made the even more dangerous argument that Trump incited the violence because violence then took place.
“The insurrectionists themselves made clear that they understood that they were following President Trump’s commands,” the Democrats argue. Also, the Son of Sam believed that he was following the commands of a dog. Charles Manson believed that a Beatles album was telling him to start a race war. Democrats claimed to be following the will of the Framers by unconstitutionally impeaching President Trump. The deranged criminal behavior of the Son of Sam, Manson, and the Democrats is not the fault of the dog, the Beatles, or the Framers.
“Videos of the crowd eliminate any doubt that President Trump’s words in fact incited the crowd to commit violence,” the Democrats argued, because some people responded with, “take the Capitol right now!” That’s in line with the New York Times’ ethos that intent doesn’t matter. But the Democrats are making the even worse argument that President Trump’s intent can be inferred from the response of some members of the crowd who called for taking the Capitol.
President Trump had never called for taking the Capitol. He had called for a peaceful protest outside the Capitol. Nor did the Democrat managers ever explain how he would have benefited from anyone breaking into the Capitol, let alone “taking the Capitol”.
“President Trump’s speech did not promote election security—it exhorted a mob to attack Congress in order to overturn a free and fair election,” the Democrats falsely claimed.
At no point in time did President Trump exhort anyone to attack Congress. And how would breaking into the Capitol even possibly overturn an election? It wouldn’t and it didn’t.
The Democrat case rested on a complete disconnect between what they accuse President Trump of wanting to do and what any possible outcome of doing so would actually accomplish.
That is its fundamental structural weakness. It’s why impeachment had to fail.
To buy the Democrat case is to contend that the alleged insurrection would have overturned an election. The Democrats never actually explain how it could have done so. They’ve constructed a foolish and dishonest house of cards in which words mean whatever they want them to, evidence never actually needs to be presented, and motives never have to line up with reality.
President Trump wanted an election protest. He did not want an assault. And he certainly didn’t benefit from the violent confrontations between some protesters and police. Just the opposite.
Democrats had protested the 2016 election certification, both legislatively and physically, to disrupt the count without being accused, as the Democrat Impeachment managers accused President Trump of placing his “own political ambition above our Nation’s commitment to democracy” and thus having become guilty of “high crimes and misdemeanors”.
If challenging an election is a high crime and misdemeanor, the Democrats are guilty.
But, once again, whether it’s fighting like hell or challenging an election, it’s not a crime when Democrats do it. The very same case in which Democrats claimed that challenging an election is somehow a crime, they repeated the false claim that, “Gore and many of his political supporters thought he would have won the Presidency had all of Florida’s votes been properly counted.”
Democrats can imply that Florida’s votes were not properly counted and that the election was stolen in the same breath in which they contend that claiming an election was stolen is an attack on the country and incitement to violence. But that’s the animating hypocrisy of the Democrats.
Impeachment failed. But then it was always going to fail because it was meant to fail.
Just like the Russia hoax, impeachment served as a pretext for national security abuses. It allowed them to deploy troops in D.C. until March. And now they’re plotting to extend it until the fall.
The troop deployment is itself theater. Much like impeachment, it creates the atmosphere of a national emergency that allows the Democrats to investigate political opponents as enemies of the state.
The Democrats have wrongly described a riot as an insurrection. That is the lie that goes to the heart of their case because it also depends on accusing President Trump of plotting to benefit in some way from the riot. But it’s also their justification for a national emergency.
Like their previous Russia smear, the accusations depend on outrage and false claims of an urgent threat because the Democrats have no actual evidence to back up any of their charges.
The Democrats falsely claimed that the 2016 election had been stolen by a Russian conspiracy. After four years of threats, smears, and riots, they belatedly declared that election conspiracies are an incitement to violence. That’s because they were the ones inciting the violence all along.
The Russian hoax and the insurrection hoax are both pretexts for a state of emergency.
Impeachment, like the Russia election hoax, never proved anything, never explained how one thing led to another, and never laid out credible motives. Instead, it followed the Democrat pattern of declaring an emergency and accusing anyone who questions it of treason.
And that has always been the underlying motive.
The Democrats went from attacking an election on false grounds to criminalizing challenging an election. But their one consistent theme has been to accuse their political opponents of posing a national security threat, pushing a state of emergency, and moving to criminalize dissent.
Impeachment, like the thousands of soldiers occupying D.C., was political theater. The reality behind the theater is meant to sweep away the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, due process and free elections as if they had never existed under the guise of fighting domestic extremism.
And that is a true emergency.
There is an axiom known as “Hanlon’s razor” that holds “never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.” It is similar to the more well-known “Occam’s razor,” the principle that the simplest explanation is typically the correct one. As an instinctual conservative, and as someone who strives not to be constantly outraged, I find these rules of thumb quite useful for moderating my thinking. It is simply better, and oftentimes more accurate, to first assume that our political or ideological opponents are ignorant but well-meaning rather than the opposite.
Yet stupidity is not without consequence, and while preferable to malevolence, it can be just as harmful. Take, for instance, the San Francisco public school board. Most people don’t pay much attention to any school board other than the one directly involved with their children (if even then), but the San Francisco Unified School District board has managed to make national news multiple times over the past two weeks for several controversial actions, highlighting the way school boards across the country, with little scrutiny, have a big effect on what and how students learn. Each of these moves was made with an explicit purpose of pursuing so-called “anti-racism” and far-left notions of social justice, which, while bad for students’ education, is not altogether unusual. What made these local decisions become national points of discussion was how utterly inane the reasoning behind these and other similar decisions revealed themselves to be.
Put frankly: There isn’t much thought put into many decisions that shape American education from an early age. San Francisco gives us a window into how this happens.
Late last month, the school board voted 6-1 to change the names of 44 district schools, including those named after George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln, and San Francisco mayor and longtime California Sen. Dianne Feinstein. According to the board, anyone who had “engaged in the subjugation and enslavement of human beings; or who oppressed women, inhibiting societal progress; or whose actions led to genocide; or who otherwise significantly diminished the opportunities of those amongst us to the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” should not have schools named after them. Washington and Jefferson were axed for owning slaves, Lincoln because of the treatment of Native Americans during his presidency. Feinstein’s name was removed because when she was mayor of San Francisco in the ’80s, her administration replaced a Confederate flag at a civic center historical display after it was torn down by a protester.Recommended For YouThe COVID-19 restrictions in every state
To be clear, changing the name of a public school is different than, say, tearing down a statue, and school names are routinely changed to honor particularly influential teachers, principals, or community figures. But the reason for renaming matters, and the school district’s fails on all counts. Reducing Washington, Jefferson, and Lincoln to a single disqualifying sin is a blatant erasure of history and of each one’s positive contributions to our country, something I believe most reasonable people outside of certain Ivy League graduate school classrooms would agree with. The criterion for Feinstein’s removal is just as hollow, albeit for a different reason, as the incident she was apparently punished for boils down to executing simple mayoral duties. Willie L. Brown Jr. Middle School, named after the longtime San Francisco mayor, was also changed because, according to the committee, he was “responsible for much of gentrification in SF while he was mayor.”
It gets worse. The district board committee published its reasoning for each of the 44 name changes in a Google doc publicly available online. Several of them rely on singular sourcing from Wikipedia — you know, that website teachers tell students not to get their information from without verifying elsewhere — and several of these disqualifying “facts” are provably wrong. For instance, as Joe Eskenazi recounted in San Francisco’s Mission Local, “While reading out a Wikipedia entry on the beliefs of 19th-century poet and diplomat James Russell Lowell, a committee member stated that ‘he did not want Black people to vote.’ In point of fact, a scholarly biography of the high school’s namesake states that … he ‘unequivocally advocated giving the ballot to the recently freed slaves.’”
Paul Revere’s name was removed from another school, nominally because of his connection to the Penobscot Expedition. This was a somewhat disastrous Revolutionary War naval mission against the British in 1779, but the committee inaccurately convinced itself during the meeting it was somehow related to the “colonization” of the Penobscot Indian tribe. “This is a telephone game-like invention of fact, and never happened,” reports Eskenazi.
One might think that consulting a historian would have been beneficial to this process. Yet committee chairman Jeremiah Jeffries openly scoffed at the idea. “What would be the point? History is written and documented pretty well across the board. … Based on our criteria, it’s a very straightforward conversation. And so, no need to bring historians forward to say — they either pontificate and list a bunch of reasons why, or [say] they had great qualities. Neither are necessary in this discussion.” Much of history is indeed documented “pretty well across the board,” yet that didn’t stop these pompous cretins from getting easily verifiable facts wrong.
In an interview earlier this month, the New Yorker’s Isaac Chotiner asked San Francisco Board of Education President Gabriela Lopez about the obvious flaws in this adjudication process, including why the committee did not ask any historians to testify. The interview is worth quoting extensively because it reveals the staggering depth of idiocy at play here.
When asked about whether historians should have been involved due to the fact that the committee got facts wrong, such as Revere’s involvement with the Penobscot Expedition, Lopez replied:
“I see what you’re saying. So, for me, I guess it’s just the criteria was created to show if there were ties to these specific themes, right? White supremacy, racism, colonization, ties to slavery, the killing of indigenous people, or any symbols that embodied that. And the committee shared that these are the names that have these ties. And so, for me, at this moment, I have the understanding we have to do the teaching, but also, I do agree that we shouldn’t have these ties, and this is a way of showing it.”
This is, of course, not an answer to Chotiner’s question, but just a regurgitation of woke buzzwords. And to his credit, Chotiner continued with this line of questioning, explaining, “Part of the problem is that the ties may not be what the committee said they were. That’s why I brought it up.” To which Lopez replied:
“So, then you go into discrediting the work that they’re doing, and the process that they put together in order to create this list. So, when we begin to have these conversations and we’re pointing to that, and we’re given the reasoning, and they’re sharing why they made this choice and why they’re putting it out there, I don’t want to get into a process where we then discredit the work that this group has done.”
Lopez believes that pointing out factual errors is somehow “discrediting the work” done by the committee, when, in fact, it is those errors made by the committee that discredit the work. Imagine being a student and telling the teacher grading your exam that marking wrong answers is “discrediting your work” and thus unacceptable. Worse still is that Lopez and the committee are completely uninterested in the work being factual, thorough, or thoughtful, but rather simply that it was done, and done by members of certain communities — that is, with a focus on identitarian box-checking rather than expertise.
“So, none of the errors that I read to you about previous entries made you worried that maybe this was done in a slightly haphazard way?” asked Chotiner. She replied:
“No, because I’ve already shared with you that the people who have contributed to this process are also part of a community that is taking it as seriously as we would want them to. And they’re contributing through diverse perspectives and experiences that are often not included, and that we need to acknowledge.”
An increasingly common observation is that “anti-racism” is treated like a religion by its woke adherents. This is undoubtedly true, but oftentimes, it is more blind and thoughtless. Christians and Jews and Muslims hold their beliefs to be true, but they do not assume that others must believe them too simply via fiat; instead, they marshal arguments to defend or convert. The way that Lopez and others of her ilk employ empty, anti-racist dogma is more like magic than religion.
In the interview, Lopez doesn’t seem to understand why Chotiner continues to question her on whether it matters if the committee’s facts are accurate because she already said the magic words: “We did the work.” Magic does not have to have internal logic because it’s inherently a cheat; it trumps the normal operating procedures of reality. It’s not a thing you question; it’s a thing you accept and move on from.
Like magic, these anti-racist tropes and woke buzzwords are employed, almost purposefully, to cheat the need to explain yourself beyond invoking the special words. But in the real world, words mean things (at least for now). Vague assertions without fact or acknowledgment of process or error are not how education is meant to function.
Will Wilkinson, formerly of the Niskanen Center, recently tweeted, “I don’t understand why people get so hyperbolically distressed about a school board somewhere they don’t live changing the names of schools for dumb reasons. It’s embarrassing to see.” For starters, pointing out that something stupid is, in fact, stupid is not the same as getting “hyperbolically distressed.” But more importantly, people have focused on this issue because they understand that slippery slopes are the way of our world. The slipshod method and specious reasoning employed by the San Francisco school district to remove Washington and Lincoln from schools is straight out of the anti-racist playbook and is not limited to one district or state or to the issue of school names.
These bumbling activist educators are more than happy to make sweeping changes on what is and is not acceptable to teach students based on nothing more than their inaccurate and unverified notions. Along with renaming the schools, the district also voted recently to abandon the academic admissions standards for Lowell High School, the city’s highest-achieving public school. The resolution explicitly sought to move the school’s focus away from academic excellence toward anti-racism, instead “framing its work around questions” such as “Where do we see tenets of white supremacy culture and patriarchy showing up … at Lowell High School?” and “How can we leverage Ethnic Studies, Equity Studies and Black Studies in this work?”
In October, the San Francisco Board of Education’s vice president, Alison Collins, spoke about the need to move away from ideas of “meritocracy” and academic achievement: “When we’re talking about … meritocracy, especially meritocracy based on standardized testing, I’m just going to say it, in this day and age we can’t mince words: Those are racist systems,” said Collins. “If you’re going to say that merit is fair, it’s the antithesis of fair, and it’s the antithesis of just.” Claiming that meritocracy and achievement are somehow related to whiteness is a preposterous yet pervasive idea in anti-racist circles. The KIPP charter school network recently abandoned its founding “Work Hard, Be Nice” motto because, it claimed, it was at odds with being “actively antiracist.” And marshaling such arguments, leftist reformers have taken aim at standardized tests and admissions criteria in schools from San Francisco to New York. Never mind that admissions methods that don’t rely on standardized test scores are actually often more discriminatory and subject to abuse — magic words spoken, analysis over.
In the background of all this leftist moralizing nonsense is the crucial fact that district leaders in San Francisco and elsewhere still refuse to open schools. As San Francisco Mayor London Breed stated following the school board vote to rename the schools, “What I cannot understand is why the School Board is advancing a plan to have all these schools renamed by April, when there isn’t a plan to have our kids back in the classroom by then.” Meanwhile, as reported by the San Francisco Chronicle, the district’s black, Asian, and Latino students are suffering tremendous academic learning setbacks at the hands of ineffectual online remote learning.
These are blatant ideologues, yes, but even the most ardent zealot can be interested in what is in students’ best interest. The bigger issue for parents to realize is that a great many of the people in charge of their children’s education are simply too stupid to know what that is.
fox files 
Recent Comments