AS ALWAYS, IT BEARS REPEATING BECAUSE THERE ARE NUMBSKULLS OUT THERE THAT IT STILL HAS NOT YET RESONATED WITH.
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty NOR Safety.
-Benjamin Franklin
BEARS REPEATING
31.May.2019.
HERE’S ANOTHER ONE FOR THE ‘BACK THE BLUE’ ASS KISSERS.
Governments and the left are fond of stating that people don’t need firearms because they have the police.
That’s the same thing as saying you don’t need a fire extinguisher in your house because you have the fire department.
BING…….BANG…………BOOOOOOOM…………..
Share this:
“Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” John Adams
And that includes the whiny, sniveling, sodomizing demoncraps
Share this:
IF YOU HAVE AN OPEN MIND TO THE DISCOVERY OF TRUTH, WHETHER A BELIEVER OR ATHEIST, IT SPEAKS VOLUMES TO THOSE WHO WOULD GIVE THIS VIDEO A TRUE LISTEN; AND I MEAN A TRUE AND UNBIASED LISTEN.
HUMANITY HAS BEEN GIVEN EVERYTHING IT NEEDS TO DEVELOP GOOD SOCIETIES AND IT ONLY BOILS DOWN TO TEN RESPONSIBILITIES.
THEREFORE THE TENS OF THOUSANDS OF CURRENT MAN-MADE LAWS ARE NOTHING MORE THAN HYPERBOLE, CONTROL AND EGO.
Share this:
Even a study ordered by the openly pro-gun control Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) found “defensive use of guns by crime victims is a common occurrence.”
“Almost all national survey estimates indicate that defensive gun uses by victims are at least as common as offensive uses by criminals, with estimates of annual uses ranging from about 500,000 to more than 3 million, in the context of about 300,000 violent crimes involving firearms in 2008.”
People like that rat faced David Hogg don’t realize there are 1,029,615 average total of defensive gun uses per year “for self-protection or for the protection of property at home, work, or elsewhere. That’s what they call a shitload and it far outweighs the loss of life from any planned mass shootings.
Share this:
REMEMBER THE STORY WHEN DEMOCRAPS WERE SQAUKING IN THE NEWS ABOUT THE WHITE VAN WITH STICKERS?
WHY ALL OF A SUDDEN WERE SO MANY DEMOCRATS THEN AND NOW RUNNING AS SOCIALISTS? WHY DID SOCIALIST CANDIDATES SUDDENLY JUST POP UP OUR OF NOWHERE?
WHY WAS A PRISTINE WHITE VAN WITH UN-FADED BRAND NEW TRUMP STICKERS NOT VANDALIZED IN A STRONGLY ARMORED DEMOCRATIC NEIGHBORHOOD?
ALL OF THOSE MAILED UN-EXPLOSIVES WAS A COMPLETE SETUP AND FABRICATION.
IT’S ALL ABOUT DESIGNED PLANS TO BRING DOWN CONSERVATISM IN THIS COUNTRY.
JUST LISTEN TO THE DAMNED VIDEO FER’ CRY EYE.
Share this:
AND THERE YA’ HAVE IT.
IF YOU LISTEN TO THE PRESS, YOU NEVER, EVER HEAR THE TRUTH. EVER.
IT’S THE PRESS ACTING LIKE UMPIRES INSTEAD OF SPECTATORS THAT THE POLITICAL DIVIDE IS SO STRONG IN THIS COUNTRY. THE PRESS DAMMIT. THE PRESS.
IN ITS PRESENT FORM, IT’S THE PRESS THAT IS THE ENEMY.
Share this:
NOW THAT AMERICA HAS GIVEN THE CRAZIES CONTROL OF THE HOUSE, THEY PLAN TO HIT TRUMP WITH A WAVE OF SUBPOENAS
This is a very dark moment in American history. On November 6th, the American people gave the keys to the U.S. House of Representatives to the Democrats, and that means that the crazies will soon be unleashed on Capitol Hill. They won’t be able to get much legislation pushed through because Republicans still control the Senate and Donald Trump is still in the White House, but they will be able to cause all sorts of chaos with their investigative powers. If you thought that things were bad the last two years, just wait, because you haven’t seen anything yet. Top Democrats are already talking about hitting Trump with a huge wave of subpoenas, and the White House is bracing for the worst. It is going to be a time of bitter partisan wrangling in Washington, and meanwhile, the nation as a whole is going to continue to fall apart.
In just a couple of months, Nancy Pelosi will be speaker of the House once again. That also means that if something suddenly happened to Donald Trump and Mike Pence, she would become the president of the United States.
Just the thought of that should chill you to the bone.
And of course, Pelosi is just the tip of the iceberg. All of the powerful House committees will now be chaired by Pelosi’s crazy allies, and they plan to use those positions to hurt President Trump as much as possible.
For example, Elijah Cummings will become the chair of the House Oversight Committee, and he has already been calling “for the panel to issue subpoenas to the Trump administration on seven different investigations”…
In September alone, Rep. Elijah E. Cummings, the ranking Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, called for the panel to issue subpoenas to the Trump administration on seven different investigations, ranging from immigration to Obamacare.
With Democrats now poised to take control of the House, Mr. Cummings will likely be in a position as chairman to issue those subpoenas on his own.
Another top Democrat that absolutely hates Trump is Richard Neal of Massachusetts. He is going to become the chair of the powerful Ways and Means Committee, and he has already stated that he plans to use his subpoena power to go after Trump’s tax returns…
Democrats are eager to peek into President Trump’s tax returns with their newfound power in the House.
Rep. Richard Neal of Massachusetts, the top Democrat in the Ways and Means Committee who is poised now to become chairman, has said that he intends to formally request the president’s tax returns.
And let us not forget Maxine Waters.
Yes, crazy Maxine is probably going to get her own committee too. She is likely to become chair of the House Financial Services Committee, and she seems quite eager to cause all sorts of chaos…
Meanwhile, Rep. Maxine Waters, another California Democrat and one who has repeatedly called for Trump’s impeachment, could soon control her own committee — which would yield her the power to subpoena and control the fate of legislation.
Waters, 80, could become chairwoman of the House Financial Services Committee, where she currently serves as ranking member. The committee oversees the housing, banking, insurance, and securities industries, and Waters has offered big plans if she can bag the job.
Last, but certainly not least, is nutjob Adam Schiff.
Schiff is likely to become the chair of the House Intelligence Committee, and in that position, he could cause a tremendous amount of trouble for Trump…
Another California Democrat, Schiff could likely rise to chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, where he is now the ranking member.
Schiff, 58, said in an interview with CNN that the committee would “investigate questions involving Russian money laundering and President Donald Trump’s businesses.”Schiff said his committee would work in tandem with Waters’ focus on potential money-laundering schemes involving the Trump campaign and Russia, saying he’ll back Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s probe into alleged collusion.
The next two years will be horrible for the Trump administration, horrible for our system of governance, and horrible for the nation as a whole.
But we didn’t get Pelosi, Waters, Cummings, Neal and Schiff as our leaders in Washington by accident.
Those that are representing us in Washington are a reflection of the nation as a whole. So when we look at Congress, we are essentially looking into a mirror. I once believed that if the American people could just see behind the curtain and understand how deeply corrupt these politicians on both sides of the aisle really are that they would make better choices.
Unfortunately, I don’t believe that anymore.
We have horrible leaders because that is what the American people want. This election cycle, a lot of really good men and women ran for office all over the nation, but almost all of them were defeated.
Real solutions to our very serious national problems have been proposed, but that isn’t what the American people want. Instead, what the American people want are more leaders like Nancy Pelosi and the rest of her gaggle of crazies.
It was very difficult for me to write this article this evening, and it is becoming increasingly difficult to see any sort of a positive future for our country.
We are facing crisis after crisis as a nation, but our leaders just keep getting more and more corrupt.
If our founders could see what has happened to the once great nation that they established, they would be rolling over in our graves.
The United States of America is in an advanced state of decline, and we just got more evidence of that fact on Tuesday night.
Share this:
UNFORTUNATELY THIS IS NOW A SOCIETY WHERE THE OPPOSITION COMES FIRST, ONLY THEN TO BE FOLLOWED BY THE PROFESSED REASON FOR THAT OPPOSITION.
THINK ABOUT THAT FOR A MOMENT. THINK ABOUT HOW THE LEFT HAVE BEHAVED THEMSELVES SINCE TRUMP HAS TAKEN OFFICE OF THE POTUS.
Share this:
Saving One Life “Does Not Justify” Right To Carry
GUN CONTROL ADVOCATES often use some version of the the phrase “if it saves one life” in order to justify their ineffective proposals. A few weeks ago, the anti-gun editorial page of -the Chicago Sun-Times offered a different take. Fearful that the Right to Carry was getting too much good publicity in the wake of an Illinois concealed-carry permit holder’s heroic actions, the Sun-Times editorial board felt it necessary to lecture its readers, “One brave rescue of a Cicero cop doesn’t justify concealed guns:’
According to a report from the Sun-Times, on Sept. 13, Cicero Police Officer Luis Duarte and his partner were attempting to pull over a vehicle when the driver sped off. Officer Duarte and his partner gave chase and were able to immobilize the suspect’s car. Trapped, the driver retrieved a gun and fired at the officers, striking Duarte four times.
As the officers and the suspect exchanged gunfire, a nearby motorist -and Right-to-Carry permit holder-exited his vehicle and came to the aid of the officers, firing at ‘the gunman.
After the incident, Cicero Police Superintendent Jerry Chlada praised the armed citizen, noting, “We were lucky enough to have a citizen on the street there who was a concealed-carry holder, and he also engaged in gunfire” Cicero Town President Larry Dominick offered similar appreciation for the carry permit holder, stating,
“He got out and started helping the police, which is something I’ve got to be proud of.”
All of this commendation for the selfless act of an armed hero proved too much for the Sun-Times. Lamenting the support the incident might provide for the Right to Carry, the editors argued that “one brave deed does not justify bad public policy:’
First, the Right to Carry is not bad public policy. Right-to-Carry permit holders have proven themselves to be exceptionally law-abiding.
Second, instances of private individuals using firearms to defend themselves and others go well beyond the anecdotes that make the press. In his most recent analysis of the data on defensive gun uses, Florida State University criminologist Gary Kleck determined that Americans use firearms for self-defense about 1 million times per year.
Decades of anti-gun messaging has told the American public that if a gun control measure “saves just one life “any infringement on the rights of law-abiding gun owners is justified.
For example, Chicago-related claims occurred in the 1990’s. In 1994, the Cook County Board of Commissioners passed a ban on commonly owned semi-automatic firearms. Upon passage, Commissioner John P. Daley told the Sun-Times, “If this legislation saves one life, so be it:’
In 1998, Mayor Richard M. Daley touted the Windy City’s frivolous lawsuit against the gun industry and other gun control measures in an op-ed for the Sun-Times. Demanding action, the the mercurial mayor wrote, “One life lost is one too many”.
Coupled with the messaging of their anti-gun allies, the Sun-Times appears intent on creating a can’t-lose scenario for gun control. This holds that if even one life may be saved by a particular gun control measure, it must be adopted.
However, if a measure permitting access to firearms for self-defense might save one life, it is not adequate justification to condone such freedom.
Freedom and Gun rights supporters should give this latest evolution in gun control rhetoric the same consideration as its traditional iteration: none. Which is all it deserves, if even use of the word deserving is appropriate here as well.
Share this:
For today’s exercise, we’ll let CNN’s Jim Acosta represent the entire liberal mainstream media (he wants to be a star, rub elbows with the glitterati, so today, the not-at-all humble journalist will be the be-all and end-all).
In the infamous press conference with President Trump earlier this month (Remember? When Acosta stood up to make some declarations [there was hardly a “question” in sight] and then brusquely swiped away a White House intern’s hand when she went to take back the microphone?), Acosta said the president was all wrong about the migrant caravan that was then marching toward the U.S.-Mexican border.
In the November 7 showdown, Trump called on Acosta, who stood and said: “I wanted to challenge you on one of the statements that you made in the tail end of the campaign in the midterms, that this —.” The president cut him off, knowing right away where this was headed, and said, “Oh, here we go.”
Acosta picked up the question. “That this caravan was an ‘invasion.’ ”
“As you know, Mr. President, the caravan was not an invasion,” Acosta said, lecturing the president. “It’s a group of migrants moving up from Central America towards the border with the U.S.,” he said smugly.
Having been properly schooled by the CNN reporter, Trump said: “Thank you for telling me that. I appreciate it.”
Acosta went on to spout nothing but opinion, using loaded words as he unloaded his bias.
“Do you think that you demonized immigrants in this election?” Acosta asked. “Not at all,” Trump said.
“But your campaign had an ad showing migrants climbing over walls and so on,” Acosta said. “They’re not going to be doing that. … They’re hundreds of miles away. … That’s not an invasion.”
Flash ahead less than three weeks and wham-o, an actual invasion as so-called “migrants” clashed with U.S. Border Patrol agents at the San Ysidro port, throwing rocks and yes, trying to climb over fences and walls “and so on.”
Yes, as the president predicted (and feared), thousands of migrants from the caravan gathered in the city of Tijuana, Mexico, and then stormed the border, overwhelming border patrol, who were forced to fire rubber bullets and tear gas to disperse the violent mob. Trump was right, Acosta was wrong.
In an odd twist, the outcome was not what Trump or Republicans wanted — but was exactly what liberals and Democrats (and Acosta) hoped for.
Newly-elected Democratic Socialist Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez compared the migrants at the U.S. border to Jews fleeing Nazi Germany. Sen. Brian Schatz, Hawaii Democrat, pondered on Twitter whether the use of tear gas perhaps violates the Chemical Weapons Conventions (duh, it doesn’t). And Rep. Barbara Lee, California Democrat, called on United Nations inspectors to investigate the gassing of “women and children” (it was mostly young men charging the border, if you want to stick with the facts).
But wait, there’s more hilarity. As the Left savaged the president and his administration for firing tear gas at violent rock-throwing men, reporters with even a skosh of institutional memory recalled when then-president Barack Obama did exactly the same thing to stem border “invasions.”
“A group of about 100 people trying to illegally cross the border Sunday near the San Ysidro port of entry threw rocks and bottles at U.S. Border Patrol agents, who responded by using pepper spray and other means to force the crowd back into Mexico, federal officials said,” the San Diego Tribune reported — on November 25, 2013.
Worse still (for liberals, anyway) is the fact that few of the thousands of men who have amassed on the border are applying for asylum — as Democrats (and Acosta) contended they were planning to do when they finally reached America.
“What I saw on the border yesterday was not people walking up to Border Patrol agents and asking to claim asylum,” San Diego Sector Border Control chief patrol agent Rodney Scott said on CNN. “Matter of fact, one of the groups I watched, one of the groups that several of them were arrested, they passed 10 or 15 marked Border Patrol units … numerous uniformed personnel, as they were chanting, waving a Honduran flag, and throwing rocks at the agents.
“If they were truly asylum seekers, they would have just walked up with their hands up and surrendered. And that did not take place,” he said.
So liberals (and Jim Acosta) were completely wrong. “This caravan is not an invasion” really turned out to be fake news.
And you gotta’ know that Trump knew as much when he clashed with Acosta.
Sure, the guy is crazy, but sometimes he’s crazy like a fox.
Share this:
IN THE MATTER OF HOME DEFENSE FOR THE SAFETY OF FAMILY AND SELF, THERE IS ONE CODE TO FOLLOW.
Of YOUR FIREARM, ABSOLUTELY DEMAND ONE WITH AN UNFAIR ADVANTAGE OF IT. THE LIVES OF YOUR FAMILY AND SELF MAY ONE DAY DEPEND ON THAT.
fox files 
Recent Comments