The Truth Is Out There

Archive for May, 2019

MEDIA COVER-UP


I UNDERSTAND HE’S NOW GONE AND THIS IS NOT TO BASH SOMEONE NO LONGER HERE ABLE TO DEFEND THEMSELVES.

WHAT I HAVE A PROBLEM WITH IS THE COVER-UP FROM BOTH THE MEDIA AND CIA ALL THESE DECADES. THE FAILURE TO REPORT THOSE THINGS TO THE PUBLIC THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN REPORTED.

A FORCED STATEMENT UNDER DURESS CAN BE UNDERSTOOD, BUT JUST KNOW THERE WERE MANY OTHER POW WHO MADE NO SUCH STATEMENTS. AND TO THEN BUILD A CAREER ON A SILVER MEDAL STAR OF BEING A FALSE HERO AND A RESPECTED NATIONAL TREASURE AND WAR HERO WHICH WASN’T DESERVED IS VERY TROUBLING INDEED.

I ALSO HAVE A PROBLEM THAT HIS ENTIRE CAREER HAS BEEN PERPETUATED ON LIES AND DARE ANYONE ‘DEFY’ HIS NAME FOR FEAR OF BEING LABELED CALLOUS FOR LACK OF WORSE TERMS USED.

THIS IS A MAN WHO DURING HIS CAREER IN THE SENATE PROPOSED SOME OF THE MOST ANTI-CONSTITUTIONAL AGENDAS THERE EVER WERE.

LISTEN TO THIS SHORT VIDEO. JUST LISTEN.

PROTECTIVE CUSTODY. YEAH, RIGHT.


READ THIS AND THEN CONTINUE TO TELL ME HOW POLICE AND AUTHORITY DESERVE RESPECT.

ALSO THEN CONTINUE TO PREACH HOW THE PUBLIC ARE ANIMALS AND THE POLICE ARE ‘JUST DOING THEIR JOB.’

THIS IS ABSOLUTELY DISGUSTING AND I HOPE EVERY PERSON INVOLVED DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY AT THAT JAIL HOUSE ETERNALLY BURN IN HELL FOR THIS ATROCITY.

About this website

MSN.COM
A federal lawsuit was filed Wednesday, about a year after Coltrain died while in the Mineral County jail. Investigators say she was denied medical care.

The McCarran-Walter Act, the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952


Here’s the facts. So lets ask it to those of the likes of facebook, who keep removing the truth.

Wouldn’t it have been interesting if, at some point during the presidential campaign, one of the candidates asked, “Oh, and by the way, has anyone in Washington, D.C., ever heard of the McCarran-Walter Act Of 1952?”

This is a law for virtually 65 years now.

Here are the historic facts that would seem to indicate that many, if not most, of the people we elect to work for us in Washington do not have the slightest idea of what laws already exist in OUR country.

After several terrorist incidents were carried out in the United States, Donald Trump was severely criticized for suggesting that the U.S. should limit or temporarily suspend the immigration of certain ethnic groups, nationalities and even people of certain religions
(Muslims).

The criticisms condemned such a suggestion as, among other things, being un-American, dumb, stupid, reckless, dangerous and racist.

Congressmen and senators swore that they would never allow such legislation, and our president called such a prohibition on immigration unconstitutional.

As Gomer Pyle would say, “Well, surprise, surprise!”

It seems that the selective immigration ban is already law and has been applied on several occasions.

Known as the McCarran-Walter Act, the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 allows for the “suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by the president, whenever the president finds that the entry of aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States.”

“The president may, by proclamation and for such a period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens, immigrants or non- immigrants, or impose any restrictions on the entry of aliens he may deem to be appropriate.”

Who was president when this was passed? Democrat Harry Truman.

Who do you suppose last used this process? Democrat Jimmy Carter, no less than 37 years ago, in 1979 to keep Iranians out of the United States.

But Carter actually did more. He made ALL Iranian students, already in the United States, check in with the government. And then he deported a bunch of them.

Seven thousand were found in violation of their visas and a total of 15,000 Iranians were forced to leave the USA in 1979.

So, what do you say about all of the criticism that Donald Trump received from the Democratic senators, representatives and the Obama Administration?

Additionally, it is important to note that the McCarran-Walter Act also requires that an “applicant for immigration must be of good moral character and in agreement with the principles of our Constitution.”

Therefore, one could surmise that since the quran forbids muslims to swear allegiance to the U.S. Constitution, technically, ALL muslims should or could be refused immigration to OUR country.

Authenticated at: (look under 1952)
http://library.uwb.edu/Static/USimmigration
Go ahead … read it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/…/Immigration_and_Nationality_Act_…

WHAT THEY HEARD INSTEAD


From the Mind of a Dumb ole’ Biker

This interesting prayer was given in Kansas, at the opening session of their Senate.

It seems prayer still upsets some people.

When Minister Joe Wright was asked to open the new session of the Kansas Senate, everyone was expecting the usual fanfare.

This is what they heard instead.

“Heavenly Father, we come before you today to ask your forgiveness and to seek your direction and guidance. We know Your Word says: “Woe to those who call evil good”, but that is exactly what we have done.

* We have lost our spiritual equilibrium and reversed our values.
* We have ridiculed the absolute truth of Your Word and called it
Pluralism.
* We have worshipped other gods and called it multiculturalism.
* We have endorsed perversion and called it alternative lifestyle.
* We have exploited the poor and called it the lottery.
* We have rewarded laziness and called it welfare.
* We have killed our unborn and called it choice.
* We have shot abortionists and called it justifiable.
* We have neglected to discipline our children and called it
building self-esteem.
* We have abused power and called it politics.
* We have embezzled public funds and called it essential
expenses.
* We have insitutionalised bribery and called it sweets of office.
* We have coveted our neighbor’s possessions and called it
ambition.
*We have polluted the air with profanity and pornography and
called it freedom of expression.
* We have ridiculed the time-honored values of our forefathers
and called it enlightenment.

Search us, Oh GOD, and know our hearts today; cleanse us from every sin and set us free. Amen!”

The response was immediate. A number of legislators walked out during the prayer in protest.

In 6 short weeks, Central Christian Church, where Rev. Wright is pastor, logged more than 5,000 phone calls with only 47 of those calls responding negatively.

The church is now receiving international requests for copies of
this prayer from India, Africa and Korea.

With the LORD’S help, may this prayer sweep over our nation and WHOLEHEARTEDLY become our desire so that we again can be called “ONE NATION UNDER GOD.”

Maybe it’s time we reflect back and look at just how far we have slipped in just one generation.

But hey, What do I know, I’m just a Dumb ole Biker from Alvin, Texas.

Mark 13 29 So ye in like manner, when ye shall see these things come to pass, know that it is nigh, even at the doors.

30 Verily I say unto you, that this generation shall not pass, till all these things be done.

MOVING OVER TO UNDER ARMOUR


Kaya Kyle’s reply to Nike after her patriotic husband Chris Kyle’s life was taken trying to help a disturbed veteran. He gave the ultimate sacrifice Nike.

I love your gear, but you exhaust my spirit on this one. Your new ad with Colin Kapernick, I get the message, but that sacrificing everything thing…. It just doesn’t play out here. Sacrificing what exactly? A career? I’ve done that several times I chose to stay home and be with my kids instead of continuing my business climb… and it wasn’t sacrificing everything. It was sacrificing one career and some money, and it was because of what I believe in, and more importantly, who I believe in.

At best, that is all Colin sacrificed… some money, and it’s debatable if he really lost his career over it. Maybe he sacrificed the respect of some people while he gained the respect of others. Or maybe he used one career to springboard himself into a different career when the first was waning. I don’t know. What I do know is, he gained popularity and magazine covers he likely wouldn’t have gotten without getting on his knees or as you say, “believing in something.” I’m also thinking the irony is that while I am not privy to the numbers, it’s likely he gained a lucrative Nike contract. So yeah… that whole “sacrificing everything” is insulting to those who really have sacrificed everything.

You want to talk about someone in the NFL sacrificing everything? Pat Tillman. NFL STARTER, not benched, player who left to join the Army and died for it. THAT is sacrificing everything for something you believe in.

How about other warriors? Warriors who will not be on magazine covers, who will not get lucrative contracts and millions of followers from their actions and who have truly sacrificed everything. They did it because they believed in something. Take it from me, when I say they sacrificed everything, they also sacrificed the lives of their loved ones who will never be the same. THAT is sacrificing everything for something they believe in.

Did you get us talking? Yeah, you did. But, your brand recognition was strong enough. Did you teach the next generation of consumers about true grit? Not that I can see.

Taking a stand, or rather a knee, against the flag which has covered the caskets of so many who actually did sacrifice everything for something they believe in, that we all believe in? Well, the irony of your ad..it almost leaves me speechless. Were you trying to be insulting?

Maybe you are banking on the fact we won’t take the time to see your lack of judgement in using words that just don’t fit. Maybe you are also banking on us not seeing Nike as kneeling before the flag. Or maybe you want us to see you exactly that way. I don’t know.

All I know is, If I’m ever in the market for some new kicks, at least for now, I’ve never been more grateful for Under Armour.

RED FLAG LAWS!


The Texas Legislature is considering “Red Flag” proposals that could significantly threaten the freedoms to possess firearms — and they’re moving fast.

And if it passes in Texas, it’s just a matter of timing it will spread throughout the rest of the states.

Let me give you a few facts about these Gun Confiscation Order proposals.

“Red Flag” laws allow certain people — relatives, law enforcement, etc. — to report on gun owners with a personal opinion that they’re “dangerous” and shouldn’t own firearms.
“Red Flag” laws enable the confiscation of firearms from a law-abiding gun owner without probable cause of a crime having been committed.

“Red Flag” laws result in court-ordered removal of firearms, merely if a person is deemed to be a “risk” of a threat — with no crime having been committed.

By definition, Gun Confiscation Orders disregard due process.

Our justice system is supposed to prosecute and punish people who have broken an actual law, not those who are thought to be likely to commit a crime in the future. Stripping citizens of Constitutional rights based on what someone thinks they might do is dangerous to liberty and to our founding principles of due process.

Red flag laws hold high potential for abuse. A vengeful relative who dislikes guns could report someone’s gun ownership with a personal opinion that they are unfit to own guns. A peaceful citizen with odd, harmless habits could be reported as “dangerous” and be investigated and threatened with confiscation of firearms.

The possibilities are endless and alarming.

URGENT!!! Contact your State Senator today and let them know you OPPOSE Gun Confiscation Order laws.

THE ABSOLUTE WORST BILL


The Pennsylvania House Judiciary Committee could shortly consider several anti-gun bills as early as tomorrow.

None of them are good, and at least one is more like something you would see in gun control-dystopias like Venezuela.

REMEMBER. IF IT PASSES HERE, IT’S JUST A MATTER OF TIME BEFORE IT SPREADS TO THE REMAINING STATES.

1) The worst of the bills is HB 2227. It would allow the police or an angry “ex” to convene a secret star-chamber proceeding to strip you of your Second, Fourth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights.

The first thing you would learn of it is when the police show up at your door to ransack your home and, if you resist, to arrest or even shoot you.

Remember Ruby Ridge and Waco? Well, HB 2227 is all that — with a vengeance.

Later, the bill “generously” allows you to spend $10,000 of your own money to convince a judge that he made a mistake.

But guess what? That is never successful.

This legislation is straight out of the Tom Cruise movie, Minority Report (2002), where people are punished — not for what they have done, but for what they MIGHT do.

John Rosenthal of Stop handgun Violence hopefully predicts that passage of these Gun Confiscation Orders (sugar-coated as “red flag laws”) could be “a tipping point for states who have traditionally opposed” gun control.

2) Also, on the Judiciary Committee’s agenda is HB 1400 — the core of the anti-gun agenda. This bill would ban private sales of firearms.

A similar bill was defeated by a Democrat-controlled U.S. Senate in 2013 because it would lay the ground for national gun registration.

3) HB 2060 would require the seizure of a person’s guns within 48 hours, merely because he had been charged with certain misdemeanors. Like Alice in Wonderland, it would be “first the sentence, then the trial.”

4) HB 1872 would ban “accelerated triggers” using a sloppy definition that would ban a lot more.

5) And, finally, HB 273 would set up a “voluntary” gun ban list. Of course, it wouldn’t be “voluntary” for long.

Some in the House are trying to bludgeon “pro-gun” groups into accepting one or all of these bills.

But don’t be fooled: You don’t stop gun control by passing gun control “lite.”

Senate Bill 1141 & House Bill 2227


Gun Confiscation Coming to Pennsylvania?

In a dramatic attack on the Second Amendment, the Pennsylvania legislature is moving to authorize Gun Confiscation Orders in the Keystone State.

The bill numbers are Senate Bill 1141 in the Senate and House Bill 2227 in the House.

IF IT PASSES IN PA, THEN IT WILL PASS EVERYWHERE ELSE!

At their core, Gun Confiscation Orders — cynically disguised as “red flag laws” or “extreme risk protection orders” — would authorize the police or an angry “ex” to convene a secret star-chamber “ex parte” hearing on whether to suspend your Second, Fourth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights.

The first thing gun owners learn is when police knock on the door — ready to ransack their house and, if you resist, to arrest or even shoot you and your family.

The standard is not whether there is probable cause to believe that the gun owner has committed a crime, as the Constitution would seem to require. Rather, the standard is some subjective determination about whether the gun owner represents some “danger.”

As in the film Minority Report, Americans are stripped of their fundamental constitutional rights based on the subjective possibility of a “future crime.”

And we know from our limited experience that many accusers lie or make mistakes — even more reach delusional conclusions — and the target is frequently an abused victim who is most in need of the wherewithal to protect against an abuser.

When the accuser is the only one in court, the judge will normally sign the order. Thus, in Seattle, 28 of 29 Gun Confiscation Order applications were approved.

In Massachusetts, in connection with analogous but less far-reaching “restraining orders,” one of the sponsors admitted that “judges don’t ask very many questions” before rubber stamping ex parte orders.

After a fixed period of time, the gun owner can ask for a court hearing to restore his or her constitutional rights.

But guess what? Few gun owners have the sophistication or the thousands of dollars it would take to hire a lawyer and expert witnesses.

And few courts are willing to second-guess themselves and reverse the Gun Confiscation Order which has been issued.

In fact, hundreds of thousands of veterans have lost their gun rights without due process pursuant to a comparable procedure.

And recent revelations from the VA suggest that fewer than 50 have successfully invoked this “process” to get their rights back.

Although they preexisted in a couple of states, Gun Confiscation Orders really picked up steam when the Bloomberg/Giffords gun control organizations decided to push them as the most extreme aspect of California’s anti-gun laws.

Since then, the bills have been mass-produced based on a template in the backroom of Bloomberg’s New York offices and exported for quickie adoption with only minor tweaks to states like Pennsylvania.

Amazingly, the tweaks made by Bloomberg’s Pennsylvania agents make this state’s gun confiscation bills much more insidious than most other states:

• There is absolute civil and criminal immunity, which means that an angry “ex” can bring a vengeful, bad faith ex parte petition without consequences, so long as the person couches their lies in subjective accusations. It also means that police can break down your door and shoot you and your family without consequences.

• The definitions are poorly crafted and could expand the universe of complainants to distant relatives and high school sweethearts.

• Even if a gun owner is absent or unrepresented, the burden of proof is a scintilla of evidence past 50% in order to strip a person of his constitutional rights.

But there’s a larger issue: If the Constitution can be suspended in a secret hearing, where does this lead?

What if this newspaper could be shut down for 21 days without due process — based on a secret complaint? Or an individual could be arrested or imprisoned for 21 days? Or tortured?

Far from being a “consensus proposal,” the suspension of the Constitution in a secret hearing is a constitutional Rubicon from which there is no return.

So please contact your state legislators today in opposition to SB 1141 and HB 2227.

THE FUTURE OF THE US DOLLAR


The World Is Ganging up Against the Dollar

The U.S. has been highly successful at pursuing financial warfare, including sanctions. But for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.

As the U.S. wields the dollar as a weapon more frequently, the rest of the world works harder to shun the dollar completely.

There have been warnings for years about efforts of nations like Russia and China to escape what they call “dollar hegemony” and create a new financial system that does not depend on the dollar and helps them get out from under dollar-based economic sanctions.

These efforts are only increasing.

In the past four months, Russia has reduced its ownership of U.S. Treasury securities by 84% and has acquired enough gold to surpass China on the list of major holders of gold as official reserves.

Russia has almost 2,000 tons of gold, having more than tripled its gold reserves in the past 10 years. This combination of fewer Treasuries and more gold puts Russia on a path to full insulation from U.S. financial sanctions.

Russia can settle its balance of payments obligations with gold shipments or gold sales and avoid U.S. asset freezes by not holding assets the U.S. can reach.

Leading by Example

Of course, Russia is not the only country engaged in financial warfare with the United States. China and Iran are leading examples, but we can also add Turkey to the list after its latest currency crisis.

Russia is providing these and other nations with a model to achieve similar distance from U.S. efforts to use the dollar to enforce its foreign policy priorities.

Take a look at China and Iran. China is the second-largest economy in the world and the fastest-growing major emerging market.

China has a voracious appetite for energy but has little oil of its own. Iran is a major oil producer, and China is Iran’s biggest customer.

But oil is priced in dollars and dollars flow through the U.S. banking system.

Trump’s Iran sanctions make it impossible for China to pay Iran in dollars.

If U.S. sanctions prohibit dollar payments for Iranian oil, then Iran and China have no choice but to transact in yuan.

Allied Support Dwindles

Meanwhile, Europe has remained a faithful partner to the U.S. and has gone along with sanctions against Iran, for example.

That’s because European companies and countries that violate U.S. sanctions can be punished with denied access to U.S. dollar payment channels.

But now Europe is also showing signs it wants to escape dollar hegemony.

German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas recently called for a new EU-based payments system independent of the U.S. and SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication) that would not involve dollar payments.

SWIFT is the nerve center of the global financial network. All major banks transfer all major currencies using the SWIFT message system. Cutting a nation off from SWIFT is like taking away its oxygen.

The U.S. had previously banned Iran from the dollar payments system (FedWire), which it controls, but Iran turned to SWIFT to transfer euros and yen in order to maintain its receipt of hard currency for oil exports.

In 2013, the U.S. successfully kicked Iran out of SWIFT. This was a crushing blow to Iran because it could not receive payment in hard currencies for its oil.

This pushed Iran to the bargaining table, which resulted in the Iran nuclear deal with the U.S. and its allies in 2015.

Now Trump has negated that U.S.-Iran deal and is putting pressure on its allies to once again refuse to do business with Iran. And Congress is again pushing to exclude Iran from SWIFT as part of a sanctions program.

The difficulty this time is that our European allies are not on board and are seeking ways to keep the nuclear deal alive and work around U.S. sanctions.

Europe’s solution is to therefore create new nondollar payment channels.

In the short run, the U.S. is likely to enforce its sanctions rigorously. European businesses will probably go along with the U.S. because they don’t want to lose business in the U.S. itself or be banned from the U.S. dollar payments system.

But in the longer run, this is just one more development pushing the world at large away from dollars and toward alternatives of all kinds, including new payment systems and cryptocurrencies.

It’s also one more sign that dollar dominance in global finance may end sooner than most expect.

We are getting dangerously close to that point right now.

JUST A REMINDER


JUST A REMINDER.

THAT CINCINNATI BANK SHOOTING WHERE FOUR PEOPLE WERE KILLED AND THREE CRITICALLY WOUNDED………WELL……

ONE WAS A WOMAN WALKING INTO THE BANK WITH HEADPHONES ON OBLIVIOUS TO THE FRANTIC CALLS OF OTHERS TELLING HER TO STOP GOING INTO THE BANK.

BUT SHE DIDN’T HEAR AND WAS OBLIVIOUS TO IT ALL.

THIS IS WHAT IS CALLED AS CONDITION ‘WHITE’.

COMPLETELY AND UTTERLY UNAWARE OF YOUR SURROUNDINGS.

COMPLETELY AND UTTERLY NOT TAKING YOUR OWN SAFETY SERIOUSLY.

COMPLETELY AND UTTERLY RELYING ON SOMEONE ELSE TO PROTECT YOU.

AND THERE YOU HAVE IT.

KEEP THINKING IT WILL NOT HAPPEN TO YOU AND IF IT DOES, SOMEONE WILL BE THERE TO BAIL YOU OUT.

THAT’S GOOD THINKING (sarcasm)

SOMETHING TO PONDER


Passing a severe traffic accident on the highway last Friday got to me.

I share this story because this tragic incident got me thinking (again) about the comments I hear regarding the dangers of firearms and carry permit holders. People say they are concerned about everyday people walking around our everyday lives with guns. People are afraid firearms will go off by themselves or that people will suddenly go Wild West (which is not true, but rather Hollyrot created) on everyone (basically any time they get scared or angry) and use their firearms to settle price checks, road rage, rude comments or other random disagreements.

David Hemenway, who led a Harvard University analysis of figures from the National Crime Victimization Survey, alleged that “the average person … has basically no chance in their lifetime ever to use a gun in self-defense. But … every day, they have a chance to use the gun inappropriately.” The responsibly armed detest those comments. We understand that firearms are for self-defense and protection and are a last resort if avoidance and escape are not options.

All that said, I would be more inclined to be concerned about vehicles in the hands of distracted drivers than firearms in the hands of permit holders. Every year, car accidents cause more injuries and deaths than any other type of personal injury incident.

Get ready for this. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), an estimated 5,808,272 car accidents occur every year in the United States. That amounts to nearly 16,000 accidents per day. Additionally, national averages report that 2.35 million people suffer injuries or disabilities annually (that’s 6,438 per day) due to vehicular accidents, and about 37,000 fatalities every year are vehicle-related, which breaks down to more than 100 deaths per day.

In 2016, the NHTSA data showed that:

Drunk-driving deaths (10,497 fatalities) increased by 1.7 per­cent.
Speeding-related deaths (10,111 fatalities) increased by 4 percent.

Unbelted deaths (10,428 fatalities) increased by 4.6 percent.
Motorcyclist deaths (5,286 fatalities — the largest number of motorcyclist fatalities since 2008) increased by 5.1 percent.

Pedestrian deaths (5,987 fatalities — the highest number since 1990) increased by 9 percent.

All in all, this NHTSA data indicates that two out of three motorists will be involved in an injurious accident during their lifetimes. By car insurance industry estimates, you can expect to be involved in an accident once every 10 years. So, once every decade or so, expect to be involved in a traffic crash. With that, there is a 1 in 20 chance that the crash you have will involve a serious injury.

If you have not been in a car accident, consider yourself lucky (or overdue). Just think about how often we are in and around vehicles. Americans typically drive a lot for road trips, vacations, errands, school drop-offs, grocery store visits and work travel. According to data from the U.S. Department of Transportation, the average American driver puts in 13,474 miles behind the wheel each year. And that doesn’t include passenger time!

I may have a firearm with me at all times, but I use it only on the shooting ranges or training classes or at home dry-firing, dry practicing or cleaning it. I certainly do not spend as much daily time using it as I do using my car. With hundreds of thousands of vehicles on the road, the odds of getting into a collision are frighteningly high. Even the most prudent drivers cannot always avoid crashes with reckless people on the roadways. (By the way, it is difficult to calculate, but the estimated number of firearms nationwide is around 500 million, and the number of registered vehicles in 2016 was 268.8 million.)

So many people are afraid of so many things, and they are often quick to assign blame to firearms and firearm owners. But when it comes to driving, no problem! The normalcy and the repetition of using vehicles for transportation makes us comfortable and even complacent with driving. We are all guilty of letting our guards down.

Just something to ponder.

CONTINUING A LIE


I KEEP CONFIRMING OVER AND OVER AGAIN THAT LIBERALS CAN DISH IT OUT BUT CAN’T TAKE THE REBUFF.

NOTHING, NOT EVEN FRIENDSHIP, COMES BETWEEN THEM AND THEIR BELIEFS.

IN OTHER WORDS, DEALING WITH A LIBERAL IS NO DIFFERENT THAN DEALING WITH A LIE.

THEY’LL TELL YOU THEY ARE YOUR FRIEND, BUT IT’S ALL A LIE BECAUSE POLITICS IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN THE LOVE THEY ALL SO PROCLAIM.

SOMEHOW IN THE BACK OF MY MIND, THERE WAS NEVER ANY DOUBT. IT’S NOT GOOD IN THE END TO LEARN, BUT BETTER TO FIND OUT RATHER THAN CONTINUING A LIE.