“If a thing is free to be good it is also free to be bad. And free will is what has made evil possible. Why, then, did God give them free will? Because free will, though it makes evil possible, is also the only thing that makes possible any love or goodness or joy worth having.”
C.S. Lewis
An antiviral COVID-19 pill that’s known as Paxlovid exists. It’s been a hard-to-find item – and in some instances, the Biden administration pulled its availability in some states.
For the most part, the pill is reserved for those who are “at high risk for progression to severe COVID-19, according to the FDA.
The office for Kamala Harris identified that she began taking the antiviral pill after she tested positive for COVID. It is now causing quite the stir – why?
Why would the VP, a healthy 57-year-old who has been vaccinated and boosted against COVID, need to take the antiviral pill?
Harris, according to her office, has been completely asymptomatic. So, there would be no reason to put her on this medication. Meanwhile, people who DO need the pill are being denied.
Does the VP have any underlying health conditions that we don’t know about? That’s where things start to get a bit interesting. Her office won’t comment. This means that there may be something else going on with Harris. And considering that Biden is the only thing standing between her and the head title in the U.S., we should probably know if her health is an issue.
Jonathan Reiner, the professor of medicine and surgery at George Washington University School of Medicine & Health Sciences asked “Why would you give Paxlovid to someone without symptoms?
Others have been asking the same question. Jerome Adams, who served as Surgeon General under Trump, was quick to point out that Paxlovid isn’t supposed to be used for those who are asymptomatic and with no medical issues.
An infectious disease expert, Celine Gounder, addresses it by using another approach. “We know that the way that presidents, or in this case vice presidents, are treated is not necessarily the way the average person is treated.” Gounder said that it’s not always about what might be right for Harris but what might be best for the nation.
So, perhaps she was given Paxlovid as a way to guarantee that she wouldn’t fall victim to COVID. After all, if Biden does get taken out by the 25th amendment, we need to have Harris standing. She’s not ideal, but she’d most certainly be better than Nancy Pelosi. Until the midterms shake things up, we have to be cautious of who the line of succession would bring to the Oval Office.
While Gounder may want to make excuses for Harris since she’s the VP, there are others who take a more pragmatic approach. It’s not a fair system – and medical ethicists, in particular, are concerned that the moral rationalization for Harris to take the antiviral pill is simply because of her position.
Harris was able to get the antiviral pill the same day that she tested positive. Meanwhile, many people struggle to get a prescription.
The only people who can provide a prescription are physicians, physician assistants, and registered nurses. Patients have to get tested, visit a doctor’s office, and then, find a participating pharmacy that will fill the prescription.
We’ve seen the way in which Harris has been able to work around the COVID protocols. Unfortunately, her gaining access to Paxlovid even though she doesn’t need it isn’t the first time she’s been able to use her position to her benefit. Her communications director tested positive in April, and she showed up maskless. And when she’s been maskless around others who have tested positive, her office was quick to say that she was “practicing social distancing – with limited and brief interactions from her chair.”
This is yet another example of rules for thee but not for me. Harris will get the COVID antiviral medication while others get sicker because of their inability to get it. Fair? Hardly.
You’ve surely heard that a Supreme Court decision overturning Roe vs. Wade has been leaked to the public.
Let me say from the outset: nothing is more certain than a stream of outraged emails about this issue presently being submitted. But I still feel it necessary to speak up about something I believe in and not avoid it just because I thought it’s what people simply wanted or didn’t want to hear.
The leaked decision has Samuel Alito declaring that the legal reasoning in Roe was “exceptionally weak.” Of course, the “trust the science”/”15 days to stop the spread”/”here’s my Ukrainian flag even though I haven’t given a rat’s behind about any other war for the past 20 years” people are predictably registering their outrage over such a statement.
But Alito’s statement isn’t even debatable. In fact, legal scholars at the time and over the years, despite generally favoring abortion themselves, have been known to admit that the legal reasoning in Roe was flimsy to nonexistent.
Thus in 1973, the very year of that fateful decision, John Hart Ely, himself sympathetic to abortion, attacked the Court’s legal reasoning in the Yale Law Review, arguing that the legal rationale for the decision was simply made up. Roe, he wrote, is “bad because it is bad constitutional law, or rather because it is not constitutional law and gives almost no sense of an obligation to try to be.”
Geoffrey R. Stone, who was a law clerk to Justice William Brennan at the time, later admitted: “Everyone in the Supreme Court, all the justices, all the law clerks knew it was ‘legislative’ or ‘arbitrary.'”
According to Edward Lazarus, who clerked for Roe‘s author, Justice Harry Blackmun:
As a matter of constitutional interpretation and judicial method, Roe borders on the indefensible. I say this as someone utterly committed to the right to choose, as someone who believes such a right has grounding elsewhere in the Constitution instead of where Roe placed it, and as someone who loved Roe‘s author like a grandfather. . . . .
What, exactly, is the problem with Roe? The problem, I believe, is that it has little connection to the Constitutional right it purportedly interpreted. A constitutional right to privacy broad enough to include abortion has no meaningful foundation in constitutional text, history, or precedent. …
The proof of Roe‘s failings comes not from the writings of those unsympathetic to women’s rights, but from the decision itself and the friends who have tried to sustain it. Justice Blackmun’s opinion provides essentially no reasoning in support of its holding. And in the almost 30 years since Roe‘s announcement, no one has produced a convincing defense of Roe on its own terms.
Even Yale’s Harold Koh, who clerked for Blackmun, was reduced to saying: “I’d rather have Blackmun, who uses the wrong reasoning in Roe to get to the right results, and let other people figure out the right reasoning.”
In other words: Blackmun was full of it, but since I like the results, I guess the law — which I’m supposed to have devoted my life to — really doesn’t matter.
The United States has a federal system in which the central government has a few enumerated powers, with the rest reserved to the states. No authority to regulate abortion was ever delegated to the central government, so it remains with the states. All the convoluted legal reasoning in the world cannot evade this simple and exceptionally obvious fact.
But as Robert Barnes said in his interview on the Tom Woods Show that comes out this week, the law schools are churning out judges who pretend the law says whatever they need it to say in order to get the outcomes they want.
Is that really the society you want?
An analysis was created on the Oversight and Judiciary Committees’ memo to the US Dept of Health back in January 2022, pertaining to the highly disturbing revelations found in the released NIH emails via the FOIA. Representatives Jim Jordan and James Comer had some serious questions for Collins and Fauci at the NIH, as it pertains to the true origin of covid, and why the NIH chose to hide all of this information from us.
These emails are DAMNING, and confirm that many of the world’s top virologists and biologists believed, based on many factors, that C19 was created in a lab. As well as how Fauci and Collins covered up this reality from the public. Given what we know now via allegations from Russia and China, ie the US DoD funded biolabs in Ukraine, and the supplementary action taken by the Russian military; this piece of the puzzle makes all the more sense.
You seriously need to read this entire memo. It’s only 2.5 pages and a few emails, but I will outline the main snippets and translate the political/corporate speak.
Jordan and Comer’s thesis for the memo is as follows:
“Dr. Fauci was warned of two things: (1) the potential that COVID-19 leaked from the Wuhan Institute Virology (WIV) and (2) the possibility that the virus was intentionally genetically manipulated.”
They go on to speak on the dangerous Gain of Function (biological weapon) research, as well as the NIH attempts to circumvent oversight and failed to report what they were doing. Requesting a written interview from Fauci and Collins to explain why their emails directly contradict their public statements and why they ignored and silenced the world’s most qualified scientists. Fauci claims he is the sole representation of “science”, yet chooses to ignore the global subject matter experts. Sacrificing the safety of every single human being on Earth for his own political agenda.
See the following emails with statements from the world’s top scientists, reporting to the NIH on their analysis on the origin of covid.
–Michael Farzan, Ph.D.
Chair & Professor Of Department Of Immunology And Microbiology. University of Florida. Discoverer of the SARS Receptor.
He states that he is “bothered by furin site, and has a hard time explaining that as an event outside the lab (though there are possible ways in nature but highly unlikely)”.
-Bob Garry, Ph.D.
Professor of Microbiology and Immunology.
Tulane School of Medicine.
He states that “I really can’t think of a plausible natural scenario where you get from the bat virus or one very similar to it to nCoV where you insert exactly 4 amino acids 12 nucleotide that all have to be added at the exact same time to gain this function – that and you don’t change any other amino acid in S2? I just can’t figure out how this gets accomplished in nature.”
So two ofthe world’s top virologists told the US NIH, all the back in February 2020, it’s borderline molecularly impossible for C19 to occur naturally. And how did Collins at the NIH respond to the top virologists claiming C19 is man made?
Collinsstates ”a swift convening of experts in a confidence inspiring framework (WHO seems really the only option) is needed, or the voices of conspiracy will quickly dominate, doing great potential harm to science and international harmony…”
Yupyou read that right. The former director of the NIH, said that we need to ignore the top virologists, and the incontrovertible evidence that C19 came from an NIH funded lab. Otherwise, the public might think that NIH are conducting a nefarious conspiracy and that might damage public trust in science… in short, Collins is covering his ass because his agency created C19. They followed this up with a narrative setting teleconference to the world’s top scientists, pushing medical propaganda to ignore the fact that the virus was clearly man made in a lab.
Despite the repeated attempts from the NIH to establish that the lab leak reality was a “conspiracy theory”, the top virologists still pushed back.
–Jeremy Farrar, Ph.D.
Former Professor of Tropical Medicine.
Oxford University.
And
–Ed Holmes, Ph.D.
Professor of Medicine.
University of California.
“(Ed Holmes) 60-40 Lab. I’m (Jeremey Farrar) 50-50.”
So despite the gaslighting seminar, top scientists worldwide are still saying the lab leak possibility is more likely than not. The NIH chose to keep all of these conversations hidden from us, declaring that the science confirmed it was naturally occurring, and anyone suggesting otherwise is spreading disinformation. They took it further and used their collusion with big tech to censor anyone on the Internet who suggested that the virus was man made. Despite the science clearly confirming the mathematical certainty it was man made.
Think about how this correlates with the battle for control of Twitter. Think about why the Biden admin is so desperate to maintain control of what is considered “disinformation”. When the public finds out that Fauci, and the Dems created covid and lied about it… the jig is up. C19 affected nearly every person on the planet.
So two months go by, and in April of 2020, Collins reaches out to the rest of the NIH leadership and asks how they can combat this “destructive conspiracy”, in reference to a Fox News article citing that there is increasingly significant evidence that C19 came from the NIH funded lab in Wuhan.
Fauci responds in a private message just to Collins: “I would not do anything about this right now. It is a shiny object that will go away in times.”
So thepublic are catching on to the fact that the NIH lied about the origin of C19 the entire time, and the NIH respond with doubling down and continuing to cover up their involvement in the creation of a bioweapon that they used to shut down the world and implement a medical police state. And Fauci infers that the public is stupid and we will forget about it after the next “shiny object” presents itself.
In conclusion, the US NIH created C19 in a lab, via Gain of Function research in nations abroad, intentionally to avoid congressional oversight. One of their experiments either got out or was released. The NIH knew it was man-made, but told the public it was naturally occurring, in order to cover their asses. They got caught, and began censoring scientists that dared to point this out. As well as censored any dissent on the internet, despite the fact that all of this was true. Seems they have a common MO of censoring the truths that are inconvenient for their plot to take over the world.
So when normies claim that C19 wasn’t man-made and you’re a conspiracy theorist, show them the emails and congressional memo, confirming the virus is man-made, and confirming the NIH covered it up. Keep in mind Collins “stepped down” shortly after this memo was sent out, and Fauci has largely disappeared since then as well.
Now, with all of this prerequisite knowledge, does it make more sense as to why Russia is destroying/occupying US DoD funded biolabs near their border in Ukraine? Now does it make sense why the other two world superpowers formally accused the US of creating biological weapons? Now does it make sense why the US government and big tech really want me off the internet?
The US NIH is responsible for creating the bioweapon known as C19 and this is the secret they can’t let their normies find out about. Now that they can’t control free speech on Twitter, they are going all on with the “Disinformation Governance Board” to attempt to keep this secret under wraps. Because once the greater public is exposed to this reality, the normies will be right along side us calling for military tribunals and Fauci’s head on a spike.
-Clandestine
It turns out that BlackRock and Vanguard have been gradually gobbling up ownership of the means of production, and now intend to lord it over the masses by centralizing all food production technologies in the United States and enslaving everyone under their control.
The top three shareholders of CD Industries Holdings, the world’s largest fertilizer company, include both BlackRock and Vanguard. BlackRock and Vanguard are also the top shareholders in Union Pacific, the railroad giant that moves fertilizer and other agriculture inputs all across the country.
The world’s top 10 food companies are also largely owned by both BlackRock and Vanguard. These include Nestlé, PepsiCo, General Mills, Kellogg’s, Associated British Foods, Mondel?z, Mars, Danone, Unilever, and Coca-Cola.
“What happens when they control all of the seeds, produce, and meat too?” asks Corey’s Digs.
“What happens when produce and meat are all grown inside secured facilities after a gene splice or inside a petri dish, and farmland becomes dormant due to overreaching regulations, lack of supplies, and manufactured inflation?”
BlackRock and Vanguard’s influence over CF Industries Holdings and T. Rowe Price Associates is having a major and direct impact on farming in the Midwest. It is also important to note that Union Pacific recently began mandating railroad shipping reductions of 20 percent, further impacting American agriculture.
“This will directly impact key agricultural areas such as Iowa, Illinois, Kansas, Nebraska, Texas, and California,” Corey’s Digs adds. “This will ultimately affect food supply and pricing. CF Industries is only one of 30 companies dealing with these restrictions.”
Another major transporter of agricultural goods, the Canadian National Railway (CN), is reportedly trying to help the fertilizer market grow. But its largest owner is none other than billionaire eugenicist Bill Gates, whom was reported is buying up as much American farmland as he can get his grubby little demonic hands on.
Back to BlackRock and Vanguard, the finance giants are also top shareholders in AppHarvest, a Kentucky-based agriculture company that boasts one of the biggest greenhouses in the world at 2.76 million square feet on 60 acres. The facility grows only tomatoes, which are sold at Kroger, Meijer, and Walmart.
Then there is Hydrofarm Holdings, based in Pennsylvania. This company also grows crops in a controlled environment with vertical farming technology. BlackRock and Vanguard are top shareholders in this company as well.
BlackRock currently boasts more than $20 trillion in investments, all of which follow the ESG and “socially responsible” guidelines required by its CEO Larry Fink. Fink infamously stated that “it’s time to force people’s behavior to change,” and he is apparently doing that by seizing control of American agriculture.
“Despite the LED lighting, robotics, computer data analysis, and ventilation systems required to power vertical growing facilities of this magnitude, since water is being saved and less of Bill Gates’ landmass is being used, investments are flowing into these alleged sustainable and environmentally friendly facilities, as well as massive greenhouses,” Corey’s Digs further explains.
Meanwhile, the World Health Organization (WHO) is capturing medicine and health care by moving swiftly to pass a new “pandemic treaty” that will give the United Nations total control over public health. This one-two punch of seizing both food and medicine spells a grim future of totalitarian fascism in the entire world.
If you think of shipping containers as red blood cells, the jamming up of these containers at the locked-down ports in China is the equivalent of blood clots in the human body. For an individual or a society to survive and thrive, resources must smoothly flow and be distributed across the system. Clot shots (covid vaccines) kill people by blocking that flow, just as deliberate shutdowns of port cities creates an economic arterial blockage with devastating effects.
It’s fascinating that the globalists, in their desire to tear down human civilization and achieve mass extermination on a global scale, have resorted to the exact same practice at both the nanotechnology (biological) scale as well as the global macro scale.
China’s punishing lockdown of Shanghai is obviously contrived, but Western nations can’t condemn China for the lockdowns since they did the same thing to their own citizens. The strategic goal of these lockdowns is two-fold: 1) Eliminate political dissidents by starving them out, even if it means starving an entire building of innocent people at the same time. 2) Disrupting the supply chain of parts and materials to Western nations, wounding their economies and hampering their ability to manufacture munitions and weapons systems (which are being sent to Ukraine to fight Russia).
In doing this, China is giving the entire global economy a heart attack, and it’s not clear whether the patient will survive.
Case in point: Raytheon is now saying it can’t make any Stinger missiles until 2023, and plans for an updated design of the Stinger missile won’t even begin to be manufactured until 2027. (We would point out that America as we know it likely won’t exist by 2027, so the entire timeline is moot.) This is a screaming warning sign that America can’t manufacture weapons of war with any degree of timeliness or volume. And that means America can’t defend itself against an invasion waged by China.
Meanwhile, the International Energy Agency is calling for “climate lockdowns” to reduce fossil fuel usage, apparently realizing that since the covid lockdowns didn’t exterminate enough people or crush the economy with the desired level of carnage, they need a whole new excuse for yet more lockdowns. Some of their hare-brained suggestions include criminalizing people who drive vehicles on Sundays, which smacks of an attack against church-goers.
Is the IEA really suggesting having armed roadway checkpoints every Sunday, arresting or ticketing people who dare to drive their own private vehicles on that day? This will only jam up the roads on Saturdays and Mondays, likely causing the burning of far more fossil fuel since people will be stuck in traffic, idling their vehicles. (These climate tyrants are out-of-their-minds insane, as if they are running a kind of death cult that seeks the complete destruction of human civilization.)
It just never ends with these globalist lunatics.
People are left scratching their heads after vice president Kamala Harris got done speaking about Outer Space. The clueless Democrat was put in charge of the space program when she first took office. But since that pointless day, all she has done is make remarks that are proven to be incorrect and make statements that make no sense.
There was a time when the vice president tried to talk about her involvement in a kid’s program on space. But the way she came across as childish led people to make fun of her as usual. Ordinary people would have learned their lesson and not talked about their past in certain subjects. But Kamala Harris needs to be an authority even though she knows nothing about space.
Harris had herself briefed on current space events before she arrived at the Vandenberg Space Force Base. She was there to talk to the United States Space Force members. She is the foremost expert on that branch of the military in her mind. After all, she was put in charge of the organization by Joe Biden.
Harris noted that during her speech, “Our Administration is working to establish international rules and norms for space. Yesterday at Vandenberg Space Force Base, I announced a new commitment that will help promote peaceful and responsible behavior in space.”
Harris is acting like a typical tyrant of Democrats who believes she has the sole ownership of Outer Space. And yet that was not the worst part of her speech. She had to tell people that she was setting the rules for space travel and international involvement in space.
The vice president tried talking down to the crowd of officers forced to listen to her lies about space. She tried to act like she was some kind of scholar trying to impart wisdom to her hearers. Her words of wisdom were an offense to the men and women that make up that part of the military. Every person in the room had more knowledge and experience dealing with space matters than Harris could even imagine.
Harris stated that “Space is exciting. It spurs our imaginations, and it forces us to ask big questions. Space? It affects us all. And it connects us all.” The sad little toddler thinks she was talking to grade-schoolers looking for information about space. She tried to inspire their minds, but they were already intrigued with space, or they would not have signed up for the program in the first place.
Her pointless words quickly would become the backend of jokes on social media. Her speech was likened by Bradley Skistimas, a songwriter, as being as good a speech as something she tried to speak on without being prepared. People who think that Joe Biden has mental problems seem to overlook that Harris’s mental ability is not far off from crazy.
The problem that Harris faces is that she has come to believe the lies of her propaganda. She believes that she is the most knowledgeable and experienced person alive in the programs she leads.
The fake queen of the south proves that she is an empty-headed person with no knowledge to share. She does not know as much as she thinks she does. She is a living example of what it means to be an imposter and a fraud.
The Democratic Party put its best foot forward with Joe Biden and Kamala Harris. Since their entrance into the executive branch, they have proven to be the worst pair ever to lead the country. And it would take fraudulent actions to get them into the White House.
The country stands in great danger because both noobs have deserted the American people for their selfish desires. Biden and Harris seek only what they can do for themselves because they lust for power and money. And they are willing to do whatever they can to secure it for themselves. They want to appear as they care, but their actions tell an opposite story about their true nature.
| Everyone needs to pay close attention to the aftermath of the Elon news. Closely examine how the enemy responds. They reveal most when they are desperate. They get sloppy and obvious when under duress. And right on cue, the current deep state assets at Twitter are mass deleting their bot farms. The politically charged entities operating Twitter are in a mass frenzy trying to cover up all of their nefarious Orwellian activity. Why is bot deletion significant? Well firstly it proves that Twitter uses bots. Which in of itself is Orwellian, deceptive, and evil in nature. For those who don’t know how it works, Twitter and other social media cites use bots they control, to prey on human’s emotional and psychological natural groupthink tendencies. For example, let’s say Twitter uses thousands of bots to like a tweet about the Pfizer vaccine. That tweet gets more interactions via algorithm manipulation due to likes, more people see it, and real users are naturally inclined to agree with something if they see thousands of other people agree with it, not wanting to be left out from the group, they like the tweet, the cycle continues. Next thing you the tweet has 60k likes, even though the majority of people don’t agree with it and lots of the likes are from bots. Same with how they will decide what is “Trending” based on what they want you to see and not based on actual numbers of what people are talking about. As well as giving more credibility to their liberal blue checkmark bootlickers by jacking up their follower counts with bots. It’s pretty messed up human psychological manipulation. When they compound the bot usage with algorithm/hashtag manipulation, and censorship of dissenting voices; they can directly alter they way people perceive the overall public opinions on differing subjects. Giving them the ability to sway public opinion via psychological manipulation. Essentially making the sheep believe a false reality that they create. In layman’s terms, they have been brainwashing the shit out of everyone and now they are trying to cover their asses before Elon gets his foot in the door and puts it all on blast. They can’t have the sheep knowing about the bots because the bots proves the “what” the “why” and the “how”. Which will ultimately lead us to the “who”, which is what they fear most. What: psychological manipulation Why: to control the public perception and groupthink to alter election outcomes and use the sheep to do their bidding How: bots, censorship, algorithm/hashtag manipulation, demonetization as punishment for wrong-speak, etc. As for the “who”, the public will be forced to ask themselves, “who benefits from censoring conservative voices, silencing damaging TRUE stories about the Biden family, and altering elections in favor of the globalist agenda? ”We all know who’s behind it, but for those still asleep, they will be forced to have an internal dialogue with the coming revelations as Elon revamps Twitter. The enemy will tell you everything with their actions. It would behoove all of us to watch Twitter closely. https://t.me/WeTheMedia/62324 |
fox files 
Recent Comments