Oh, brother, if there’s one thing that screams “we never learn” louder than a lab leak cover-up, it’s the mad scientists firing up AI to cook up brand-new viruses designed to hunt bacteria like microscopic terminators – phages so novel they’ve never existed in nature, promising to zap superbugs but risking a rogue evolution that could spell doom for humanity. We’re talking September 2025 breakthroughs where bioengineers used generative AI to dream up synthetic bacteriophage genomes, slapped them into bacteria, and watched the critters replicate and kill E. coli in lab dishes like it’s no big deal. This isn’t sci-fi; it’s happening now, with revelations warning of “extreme caution” as these AI-born killers could mutate beyond control, turning a “cure” into a curse. America First means slapping the brakes on this hubris before it bites us – because labs are “secure” until they’re not, and playing God with viruses is a gamble we can’t afford.
The AI Phage Revolution: From Code to Killer
It all kicked off with advancements in 2023-2024, but the real bombshell dropped in September 2025 when researchers announced the world’s first fully AI-designed bacteriophages – viruses that infect and destroy bacteria – capable of replicating and slaying resistant strains like E. coli in tests. These aren’t tweaks to existing phages; they’re entirely new creations, with AI proposing genetic codes that scientists synthesized and inserted into host cells, watching the viruses assemble, burst out, and infect targets.
How does it work? AI analyzes massive datasets of phage genomes – like the 10,000 sequenced by 2024 – to predict sequences that bind to specific bacteria, then generates novel ones that nature never made. Once designed, labs synthesize the DNA, insert it into bacteria, and let the phages self-assemble, replicating to form armies that latch onto targets, inject their code, and burst the cells open – a precision kill without antibiotics’ broad wipeout. Effectiveness? Lab tests from September 2025 showed these AI phages wiping out resistant E. coli strains in hours, with success rates over 90% in controlled settings.
The Dark Side: Evolution Risks and Unintended Mayhem
But here’s the nightmare fuel – these designer viruses are uncharted territory, and we have zero clue how they’ll evolve once unleashed. Revelations from genome pioneers in September 2025 warn of “extreme caution,” noting that AI phages could mutate in the wild, jumping hosts or turning virulent like a bad sci-fi plague. Unlike natural phages that co-evolved with bacteria over eons, these lab-born beasts lack those checks – a single tweak could let them infect humans or animals, sparking outbreaks we can’t predict. Think COVID’s origins: Man-made viruses don’t play by nature’s rules, and with phages replicating in minutes, evolution could spin out of control faster than you can say “gain-of-function.
“Worse, they’re being touted as “precision medicine” for superbugs, but revelations from a November 25, 2024, study show AI tools already predicting phage efficacy for E. coli with 85% accuracy, paving the way for widespread use. By May 22, 2025, startups were deploying AI-designed lysins – proteins from phages that punch holes in bacterial walls – to kill multidrug-resistant infections, but full phages amp the risk – they could spread unchecked, mutating to target beneficial bacteria or worse.
Lab Safety: “Secure” Until It’s Not
Sure, these labs are “as safe as possible” – BSL-3 or 4 levels with airlocks, suits, and protocols – but revelations from a January 6, 2025, real-world study on adverse events remind us accidents happen, like the 2023 Wuhan whispers or U.S. lab mishaps in 2022 that released engineered bugs. No containment is foolproof – human error, earthquakes, or sabotage could release these AI phages, and once out, they’re self-replicating time bombs. A 2020 commentary warned of “postantibiotic era” risks, but AI speeds it up, with no way to “recall” a rogue virus. The left’s “trust the science” mantra rings hollow here – we never learn from past lab leaks, and these viruses put all humanity on the line.
America First rejects this hubris – why risk humanity for “designer” fixes when natural phages already exist? Polls from August 2025 show 58% of Americans distrust AI in biotech, with 65% fearing lab leaks. We never learn – from COVID to this – and it’s time to pull the plug before the monsters escape.
The reverse transcription debate is a decoy, while the real risk is DNA fragments built to integrate into your genome.
At the recent ACIP meeting, Dr. Evelyn Griffin rightly raised the alarm about mRNA reverse transcription—pointing to published studies showing nucleic acids in Pfizer’s mRNA COVID-19 shot can be integrated into human DNA, namely human liver cells under lab settings.
But Pfizer’s Dr. Kayvon Modjarrad quickly dismissed the concern:
“RNA cannot reverse transcribe to DNA [because that] requires a set of molecules and enzymes that don’t exist in humans and are largely reserved for retroviruses.”
Moderna chimed in, citing FDA reviews of “hundreds of millions” of doses and claiming “no indication of genotoxicity.”
The public was left thinking: case closed.
But this article will show that the real risk isn’t rare reverse transcription at all—it’s the integration of plasmid DNA contaminants into the human genome, a pathway every cell in the body is equipped to carry out.
Pfizer and Moderna are technically wrong that reverse transcription “can’t happen,” but they also know it’s rare—so they lean on that half-truth to keep the spotlight off plasmid DNA integration, which is far more likely and far more dangerous.
It’s a sleight of hand—a bait-and-switch.
Emergency room director Dr. Richard Bartlett told this website that the real scandal isn’t reverse transcription at all, but the hidden plasmid DNA contamination that provides the mechanism for Pfizer’s genetic code to be incorporated into human DNA and causes disease.
“Pfizer and Moderna are distracting from the smoking gun of plasmid DNA contamination in their COVID-19 mRNA shots,” Dr. Bartlett said. “In 2022, investigators worked with the information they had, but that information was not complete. The fact that Pfizer’s genetic code was incorporated into human host DNA is irrefutable. And the most likely mechanism that it got there is plasmid DNA, not mRNA reverse transcription. Pfizer knows this. Moderna knows this. They hid the damning information from investigators and doctors in 2022. That is why investigators misinterpreted DNA integration as reverse transcription. I am convinced that Pfizer’s genetic code found in human cells did not come from the mRNA, but from plasmid DNA contamination. This is catastrophic.”
You can watch a clip of the exchange, posted by Dr. Mary Talley Bowden, below:
The Bait-and-Switch
This is the inside baseball play: Pfizer and Moderna want the debate stuck on reverse transcription.
Why?
Because they can plausibly argue it’s rare.
The enzyme required for reverse transcription—LINE-1—is typically absent from the vast majority of human cells, with only modest expression detected in specialized cell types like epithelial cells, and higher activity mainly in tumors and with aging.
That makes reverse transcription possible, but not systemic.
They know this, and they exploit it.
But focusing there keeps eyes off the much bigger danger.
The study Dr. Griffin cited made the best assumption it could with the cherry-picked information the manufacturers released—but what it could not account for, because Pfizer and Moderna hid the evidence and still refuse to admit it, is the smoking gun: plasmid DNA contamination, the very mechanism by which foreign DNA can be incorporated into the human genome after injection, kept from researchers and the public and denying true informed consent.
Plasmids are routinely used in the industry to incorporate foreign DNA into host DNA.
The Bigger Threat: Plasmid DNA Integration
The COVID-19 mRNA shots are manufactured using DNA plasmids—the very genetic engineering tools designed to insert code into genomes.
By definition, plasmids are integration-competent.
They can stitch themselves into human DNA.
Independent labs have confirmed that Pfizer’s vials contain toxic levels of plasmid DNA.
A French government-funded study led by Didier Raoult (Nov 2024) found 5,160 ng of plasmid DNA per dose—516 times higher than the FDA/EMA safety limit.
A December 2024 peer-reviewed paper in Science, Public Health Policy & the Law found 227–334% more DNA contamination than WHO limits, including the cancer-linked SV40 promoter/enhancer.
A September 2025 peer-reviewed study in Autoimmunityconfirmed both Pfizer and Moderna’s shots are contaminated with billions to hundreds of billions of DNA fragments per dose—up to 627 times higher than FDA/WHO limits—with Pfizer uniquely carrying the SV40 promoter-enhancer, a cancer-linked sequence designed to drive foreign DNA into human cell nuclei.
This isn’t speculation.
The contamination is proven.
What’s Inside Pfizer’s Plasmid
Pfizer’s plasmid doesn’t just contain bacterial DNA and the SV40 cancer-promoting gene sequence.
α-globin (blood/cardiovascular): regulates red blood cell gene expression.
AES/TLE5 (immune): regulates transcriptional control in immune pathways.
MT-RNR1 (neurological/mitochondrial): tied to mitochondrial function and neurological disorders.
An October 2023 Nature npj Vaccines paper confirmed these sequences are part of Pfizer’s design:
“Pfizer-BioNTech’s 5’ UTR sequence is derived from the human hemoglobin α-globin (HBA1) gene… For the 3’ UTR, the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine combines one segment from a human mRNA encoding amino-terminal enhancer of split (AES) and another from mitochondrial 12 S rRNA (mtRNR1).”
These are not inert.
They are regulatory DNA codes.
Alignment With the Injury Signal
Here’s where it gets damning.
Two independent safety reviews (2022, 2024) found that serious adverse events after Pfizer’s mRNA shot cluster into three categories:
Pfizer’s own 5.3.6 safety reportconfirms the same triad:
25,957 neurological events
1,050 immune/autoimmune cases
932 blood/hematological disorders
Now line it up:
Plasmid fragment: α-globin → blood
Plasmid fragment: AES/TLE5 → immune
Plasmid fragment: MT-RNR1 → neurological
The plasmid blueprint and the injury clusters align perfectly—making the case plain without muddying the waters with debates over mRNA reverse transcription.
In other words, the match between Pfizer’s plasmid design and the injury clusters is exact, and it stands on its own—no need to get lost in the reverse transcription smokescreen.
Every Cell Has the Machinery
Unlike reverse transcription, which relies on rare LINE-1 enzymes, plasmid DNA doesn’t need anything special.
Every human cell carriesDNA repair systems—like Non-Homologous End Joining (NHEJ)—that can integrate foreign DNA into chromosomes.
These pathways are active everywhere because they’re required for basic genome maintenance.
That means plasmid integration is not rare.
It’s possible in virtually every cell.
The Silence Is Deafening
Pfizer and Moderna keep ACIP fixated on reverse transcription—a long shot they can safely dismiss—while saying nothing about plasmid DNA contamination, which is systemic and inescapable.
And yet their own blueprint, their own fragments, and their own safety data all point to the same conclusion: integration risk matches the injury signal.
Bottom Line
Reverse transcription is real but rare.
Plasmid DNA integration is universal—all cells have the machinery.
Pfizer’s plasmid carries human DNA fragments regulating blood, immune, and neurological systems.
Those are the exact systems showing up in serious vaccine injuries, confirmed by independent reviews and Pfizer’s own report.
This is not coincidence—it’s alignment.
The unavoidable question is whether Pfizer’s plasmid design itself is driving the blood, immune, and neurological injuries dominating the safety signal.
Until regulators investigate, the only responsible course is to pull these shots from the market.
That’s why the focus must shift off the apparently rare possibility of mRNA reverse transcription and onto the far greater danger—plasmid DNA integration—a risk built into every cell and written into Pfizer’s own blueprint.
Pentagon-funded study confirms scientists deliberately created airborne hantavirus particles and carried out stabilization trials to prolong their survival.
The U.S. military has funded research, published in July in the journal Pathogens, in which scientists deliberately aerosolized Sin Nombre virus (SNV)—the hantavirus that kills roughly 30% of those infected—in order to study how long the virus can survive in the air and under what conditions it remains infectious.
Why is the Pentagon commissioning experiments that turn a rodent-borne virus with a 30% kill rate into an airborne particle?
Why are U.S. defense labs probing how to stabilize lethal aerosols?
The study would say it aerosolized hantavirus because “gaining insight into the SNV bioaerosol decay profile is fundamental to the prevention of SNV infections,” but the deeper concern is whether such work risks accidental release or could be harnessed intentionally for pandemic potential.
This new study fits the same disturbing pattern: taxpayer-funded projects that blur the line between “biodefense” and the step-by-step recipe for a future bioweapon.
Dr. Richard Bartlett didn’t mince words as he raised alarm over Pentagon-backed hantavirus aerosol experiments:
“How much longer will We the People tolerate our government using our tax dollars to do deadly experiments in our homeland? Has anyone heard that the COVID pandemic might have been caused by a lab leak? We have no guarantee that another lab leak might happen on our own soil. Remember: Dr. Anthony Fauci and a 2016 NIH-led biosecurity report identified insider leaks as the “most probable” risk in gain-of-function research.”
A Lethal Virus
The authors admit the severity of the pathogen upfront:
“Later symptoms involve respiratory distress that requires immediate medical attention and has a 30% fatality rate.”
In other words, this is not a mild virus.
If contracted, nearly one in three patients will die, and there is no approved treatment or vaccine.
The Pentagon’s Involvement
This wasn’t purely academic work.
The study declares its sponsor:
“This research was funded by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA), under grant number DTRA/CBS-NSRI CB1099.”
That means the Pentagon’s weapons division paid for scientists to aerosolize and study the airborne stability of a lethal hantavirus—a clear overlap with bioweapons research.
Aerosolizing a Killer
The researchers describe how they turned the virus into an aerosol:
“Suspensions were aerosolized via a 120 kHz ultrasonic nozzle… with 3 lpm of carrier air.”
Put plainly, they deliberately converted liquid hantavirus into airborne particles small enough to reach deep into human lungs.
This step—aerosolization—is the foundation of making a respiratory bioweapon.
Measuring Airborne Survival
They then tracked how long these particles remained infectious under different conditions:
“At 49.1 ± 0.8% RH, the addition of 1.0 ppm ozone caused a significant increase in the amount of SNV decay at 2.6 ± 0.1 log/min.”
In other words, in normal humidity, the virus survives in the air unless destroyed by ozone.
Sunlight weakened it but did not fully eliminate infectivity.
This proves SNV is stable enough to persist airborne indoors—such as in barns, sheds, or attics—precisely where human infections are known to occur.
Comparison to Other Pandemic Viruses
The researchers themselves compared SNV to avian influenza and Lassa virus:
“This transmission route is similar to other viruses that have an environmental transmission route, such as avian influenza (e.g., H5N1) and Lassa virus.”
This places hantavirus in the same category as pathogens with known pandemic potential.
The implication is clear: if SNV ever adapted to spread person-to-person, as Andes virus already does, the results would be catastrophic.
Particle Sizes Optimized for Lung Infection
The team also measured the size of the particles they created:
“The results indicated a bimodal distribution… with a peak at under a micron in size and a second peak under two microns.”
Translated, these are exactly the particle sizes most dangerous to humans, capable of bypassing upper airways and embedding deep inside the lungs.
This is a specialized flow-through system designed to expose bioaerosols to controlled conditions such as simulated sunlight, ozone, and humidity.
Institutional Affiliations
The authors are affiliated with the following institutions:
Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC), Omaha, NE
The Global Center for Health Security, University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC), Omaha, NE
National Strategic Research Institute (NSRI), Omaha, NE
Center for Global Health, Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM
Full List of Scientists
Elizabeth A. Klug
Danielle N. Rivera
Vicki L. Herrera
Ashley R. Ravnholdt
Daniel N. Ackerman
Yangsheng Yu
Chunyan Ye
Steven B. Bradfute
St. Patrick Reid
Joshua L. Santarpia
Bottom Line
The Pentagon has funded scientists to take a hantavirus with a 30% fatality rate, aerosolize it into tiny lung-penetrating particles, and measure how long it stays infectious in the air.
This kind of research, while framed as biodefense, is indistinguishable from steps needed to weaponize a virus.
With no vaccine or treatment available, the knowledge produced here doesn’t just help “protect”—it creates a blueprint for how to turn hantavirus into a bioweapon.
Federal advisory committee fails to inform public about the risks, despite new RFK Jr.-aligned members.
The newly reconstituted CDC Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) was supposed to be different.
With several new members aligned with Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s mandate for transparency and health freedom, expectations were high that the panel would finally call out the dangers hidden in vaccine development.
Instead, the new board folded.
TurniACIP’s Hollow Move
On Thursday, ACIP votedmerely to push back the MMRV shot recommendation to age 4 because of the increased risk of febrile seizures in toddlers.
But the CDC had already admitted back in 2008 that ProQuad (MMRV) increased the risk of febrile seizures in toddlers 12–23 months old, and by 2009 ACIP was discouraging its use as the first dose at 12–15 months.
CDC had already cited studies showing about 4.3 cases per 10,000 doses—roughly double the risk compared to separate MMR and Varivax shots.
Meaning this latest “new” move by ACIP isn’t reform at all, but a belated rehash of mainstream business-as-usual policy that does nothing to protect children, even with so-called health freedom members now on the panel.
The Real Elephant in the Room: Plasmids
Instead of going further—instead of confronting the core problem—the panel stopped short.
They left in place recommendations for children to continue receiving vaccines that could contain plasmid DNA contamination with human gene segments capable of integrating into the human genome, a fact admitted in patents, FDA inserts, and independent lab findings.
MMRV (ProQuad): Recombinant Human Albumin Risk
ProQuad (MMRV) contains recombinant human albumin (rHA), made with a plasmid carrying the human ALB gene that could integrate into the human genome and dysregulate blood and cardiovascular systems (here).
The shot has never been tested for carcinogenicity, mutagenesis, or fertility impairment.
If recombinant human albumin (rHA) gene segments integrated into the human genome—particularly the ALB gene involved in encoding albumin—this could potentially disrupt the regulation of albumin production and its widespread biological functions.
Albumin plays a critical role in multiple physiological systems, especially in blood and cardiovascular homeostasis.
Potential Systems Dysregulated by ALB Gene Integration
Blood and Vascular System: Albumin regulates osmotic pressure in the blood vessels, facilitates transport of hormones, fatty acids, and drugs, and has anticoagulant properties by binding antithrombin and inhibiting platelet aggregation. Disruption could cause blood clotting abnormalities, impaired transport functions, and fluid balance issues.
Cardiovascular System: Since albumin affects blood volume and pressure regulation, abnormal expression might lead to dysregulated blood pressure, edema, or vascular inflammation.
Immune System and Inflammation: Albumin helps regulate inflammatory responses; its disruption could contribute to immune dysregulation, such as vasculitis or hypersensitivity reactions.
Associated Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
The malfunction or dysregulation of albumin expression caused by integration could manifest as SAEs involving these systems, potentially including:
Edema (fluid retention and swelling)
Thrombocytopenia or other blood clotting disorders
Vasculitis (blood vessel inflammation)
Anaphylaxis or severe allergic reactions
Cardiovascular abnormalities like hypertension or vascular inflammation
Immune-mediated conditions affecting blood and vascular health
This aligns with reported SAEs listed in the FDA insert for ProQuad (MMRV), including thrombocytopenia, vasculitis, edema, anaphylaxis, and severe allergic reactions.
The underlying hypothesis is that integration of human ALB gene segments from recombinant albumin plasmids into the genome could disrupt this key protein’s regulation, leading to these blood and cardiovascular disorders.
Thus, the biological systems regulated by albumin—primarily blood volume/osmotic balance, coagulation, transport, and vascular integrity—are the most plausible targets for dysregulation if human albumin gene plasmid fragments integrate into the human genome, and these are reflected in the types of SAEs observed.
ACIP’s Failure
The new ACIP, with new health freedom-minded members recently appointed, was supposed to be a firewall.
Instead, they chose to deliberate over the timing of doses—not the DNA contamination, not the lack of long-term studies, not the risk of permanent genomic integration in children.
This is not reform, but surrender dressed up as oversight.
What the public got was a board that kept the program alive, keeping dangerous products in circulation under the federal Vaccines for Children program, and dodging the real questions.
Bottom Line
ACIP Chair Martin Kulldorff tried to frame the febrile seizure debate as a matter of “trust,” urging the public to listen to scientists who debate openly.
But the committee didn’t debate the elephant in the room: plasmids, human gene contamination, and the utter absence of mutagenesis and carcinogenicity testing.
Both the newly appointed “health freedom” members and the long-standing vaccine loyalists on ACIP now face a test of credibility.
The authority they’ve been given carries a duty to move beyond procedural adjustments and confront deeper safety questions head-on.
That requires openness, genuine debate, and a willingness to subject their recommendations to far greater public scrutiny.
The public did not support changes to ACIP membership simply to see more of the same.
Parents and citizens expected new voices to raise real concerns and to demand stronger safety standards for children.
That expectation remains unmet, and the responsibility for addressing it lies squarely with the current panel.
Pfizer’s plasmid carries human DNA fragments regulating blood, immune, and neurological functions—the very systems most often harmed after injection, suggesting the blueprint may cause the injuries.
The COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are built using DNA plasmids.
By definition, plasmids are integration-competent DNA molecules—they are the very tools genetic engineers use when they want to insert new code into a genome.
In other words, plasmids can integrate into human DNA.
Independent labs have confirmed that residual plasmid DNA fragments remain in Pfizer’s finished vaccine vials.
A French government-funded study led by Dr. Didier Raoult (Nov 2024) confirmed that Pfizer’s vaccine contains 5,160 ng of plasmid DNA per dose—516 times higher than the FDA and EMA’s safety limit of 10 ng.
The contamination included sequences from the vaccine’s manufacturing plasmid such as a bacterial origin of replication, a kanamycin resistance gene, and an SV40 initiation factor—a sequence historically linked to oncogenesis (the process of tumor formation or the induction of tumors).
A December 2024 peer-reviewed study in Science, Public Health Policy and the Lawfound that Pfizer’s COVID-19 shot contained 227–334% more DNA contamination than WHO limits, including the cancer-linked SV40 promoter/enhancer sequence, and urged an immediate moratorium on mRNA vaccines.
As the article reveals:
These residual plasmid DNA fragments carry three human genetic sequences.
And the systems those sequences regulate—blood/cardiovascular, immune, and neurological—are exactly the same systems most often injured after the shot.
Meaning the very blueprint Pfizer used to mass-produce its mRNA shot is built from human DNA control codes—and the same biological systems those codes regulate are the ones showing up again and again in the most serious vaccine injuries.
The unavoidable question is whether this overlap is accidental—or whether regulators have ignored the possibility that Pfizer’s plasmid design itself is contributing to the very injuries now dominating the safety signal.
Severe AEs were classified into five groups: cardiac, allergic/immune, neurological, pregnant, and immunocompromised.
Among these, the majority of serious AEs were cardiac, immune, and neurological.
The review concluded: “Most of the reported severe adverse events were related to cardiac events,” and emphasized that allergic/immune and neurological complications also dominated the literature.
The authors stressed these three categories as the primary clusters of serious outcomes in both clinical and post-marketing data.
What’s Inside Pfizer’s Plasmid
Pfizer’s vaccine is produced from a DNA plasmid template.
That plasmid doesn’t just contain bacterial sequences.
It carries human untranslated regions (UTRs) said to be chosen to stabilize the synthetic RNA and make it behave like a high-output human transcript.
These include:
α-globin 5′UTR (blood/cardiovascular): In native biology, the 3′UTR of α-globin is the canonical stabilizer of mRNA during red blood cell development. But researchers have shown that the α-globin 5′UTR can be repurposed in synthetic constructs to boost translation efficiency in mammalian cells. In either case, the sequence is drawn from human blood biology, tying the plasmid design to the cardiovascular system — the single strongest AE signal.
AES/TLE5 3′UTR fragment (immune system): The AES/TLE5 gene family encodes transcriptional co-repressors involved in various developmental and signaling pathways, including immune functions. Its 3′UTR fragment was selected in mRNA engineering screens for its ability to extend RNA half-life and increase protein yield. By making spike RNA persist longer and produce more antigen inside antigen-presenting cells, this sequence indirectly drives heightened immune activation. That aligns directly with the allergic/immune AE category flagged in safety reviews.
MT-RNR1 fragment (neurological): MT-RNR1 encodes the mitochondrial 12S rRNA, essential for mitochondrial protein synthesis. Variants in MT-RNR1 are linked to hearing loss, drug-induced ototoxicity, and neurological mitochondrial syndromes. While MT-RNR1 is not an mRNA and lacks a natural 3′UTR, researchers have repurposed fragments of it in synthetic mRNA technology as stabilizers to enhance RNA persistence and translation. Its inclusion in Pfizer’s plasmid therefore borrows from a gene with direct neurological relevance, aligning with the neurological AE category consistently documented after vaccination.
The presence of these three human genetic sequences is confirmed in an October 2023 Nature npj Vaccines publication:
“Pfizer-BioNTech’s 5′ UTR sequence is derived from the human hemoglobin α-globin (HBA1) gene, an efficient expressor… For the 3′ UTR, the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine combines one segment from a human mRNA encoding amino-terminal enhancer of split (AES) and another from mitochondrial 12 S rRNA (mtRNR1).”
This means it is not speculation—Pfizer’s own blueprint borrows directly from human blood, immune, and neurological genes.
And these happen to be the very systems most often injured in patients.
By their nature, these fragments are regulatory code.
If plasmid DNA fragments enter the nucleus of human cells, they are integration-competent and capable of altering gene regulation.
That means the very systems from which these sequences were borrowed—blood, immune, and neurological—could be dysregulated.
The Overlap No One Wants to Talk About
Adverse events: Independent reviews in 2022 and 2024 both concluded that the dominant serious side effects after Pfizer’s mRNA shot are cardiac, immune, and neurological.
Plasmid design: Pfizer’s plasmid carries human DNA fragments that regulate blood, immune, and neurological systems.
Plasmid nature: By definition, plasmids are capable of genomic integration.
This isn’t coincidence.
It’s alignment.
The design choices in Pfizer’s plasmid template mirror the very domains where the worst vaccine injuries concentrate.
Evidence of Plasmid DNA Integration
Independent researchers have already presented evidence that vaccine-derived plasmid DNA can integrate into human cells.
Nature Scientific Reports Study (2023): A peer-reviewed paper demonstrated that when linear DNA fragments were introduced into human cells, between 1–10% of the transiently transfected cells became stably transfected, and in some constructs integration reached 10–20%. Junction sequencing confirmed the foreign DNA had been incorporated into the host genome. The authors concluded: “All of the forms of linear DNA resulted in a high fraction of the cells being stably transfected—between 10 and 20% of the initially transfected cells”
Kevin McKernan’s Study (2024): In February 2024, McKernan and colleagues published a preprint showing that plasmid DNA from Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine (BNT162b2) integrated into the genome of human ovarian cancer cell lines (OVCAR3) in vitro. Using qPCR and DNA sequencing, they detected plasmid-specific sequences—including the spike gene and SV40 cancer promoter (yes, that’s in the plasmids, too)—persisting in the genomic DNA of exposed cells, indicating integration. Importantly, this was shown in a cancer cell line, not normal human cells, and there is no direct in vivo evidence in humans. The study demonstrates integration in this controlled lab model but does not prove it occurs in vaccinated people.
Phillip Buckhaults’ Findings (2024). McKernan’s warning was later echoed by Dr. Phillip Buckhaults, a cancer genomics expert at the University of South Carolina. In November 2024, Buckhaults presented results from normal human epithelial stem cells (colon organoids) exposed to mRNA vaccines. Using qPCR, his lab detected persistent plasmid DNA sequences—including the spike gene, SV40 promoter, and NeoKanR gene—in the genomic DNA of these cells one month later. This evidence of integration in non-cancerous cells addressed the main criticism of McKernan’s earlier study.
Intracellular Reverse Transcription Study (2022). A peer-reviewed paper in the Journal of Genetics and DNA Research found that Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine (BNT162b2) was reverse transcribed into DNA inside human liver cells (Huh7) within 6–48 hours of exposure. This study was said to deal with the vaccine’s mRNA component rather than plasmid contamination, but it reinforces the principle that nucleic acid from the shot can be copied into DNA inside human cells—complementing the plasmid integration evidence reported later.
Mechanistic Review on Genome Integration (2022). A review in the Journal of Neurological Disorders (Kyriakopoulos, McCullough, Nigh, Seneff) outlined plausible pathways for mRNA vaccine sequences to integrate into the human genome, citing LINE-1 retrotransposons and polymerase θ as mediators. The authors noted that spike-induced DNA damage and engineered mRNA stability (via methylpseudouridine and long poly(A) tails) may increase the likelihood of integration during DNA repair. While not experimental proof, the review concluded that genome interference by vaccine mRNA is “more than a theoretical possibility.”
Together, these findings underscore that integration is not just a hypothetical risk.
Published studies and independent genomic analyses now show plasmid DNA from COVID-19 mRNA vaccines can, under certain conditions, insert into human DNA.
Bottom Line
This is not claiming causation.
What it is showing is an investigative match:
Three human DNA sequences in the plasmid → blood, immune, neurological regulation.
Two independent peer-reviewed reviews (2022, 2024) → cardiac, immune, neurological injuries are the main serious AEs.
When the blueprint and the outcome line up this closely, the question is not whether the overlap exists.
It does.
The question is why no regulator has demanded a forensic accounting of whether integration of these human DNA fragments is occurring in patients—and whether this design is partly responsible for the most serious injuries tied to Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine.
And we don’t even know the full picture—because Pfizer has never publicly disclosed the complete plasmid sequence, leaving unanswered what other genetic elements may have been built into the blueprint.
Georgia State University is creating pandemic-capable mutant avian influenza pathogens with NIH funding.
This month, the journal Virology published a study confirming that U.S. researchers at Georgia State University and South Korean collaborators from Jeju National University and Sungshin Women’s University are using reverse genetics to create chimeric H5N1 “Frankenstein” bird flu viruses.
The study was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) grant AI154656.
Researchers combined purported highly pathogenic avian influenza genes with a laboratory H1N1 backbone.
This is not happening in isolation.
It’s unfolding amid international “pandemic preparedness” efforts, where the creation of dangerous bird flu pathogens goes hand-in-hand with the rollout of vaccines as the supposed solution, which no mainstream or non-mainstream sources are warning about—except this website.
It follows the same playbook as COVID-19, which multiple U.S. agencies have said most likely came from a lab incident.
The new bird flu pathogen creation comes as the United Nations has staged its first-ever global bird flu summit, mobilizing 500 officials and scientists to coordinate “control strategies,” surveillance, and vaccination campaigns—confirming that the very governments engineering these Frankenstein viruses are simultaneously organizing the policies and vaccines that will follow.Subscribe
Building Hybrid Pathogens
The paper openly admits to constructing synthetic flu viruses:
“Reverse genetically engineered reassortant H5N1 influenza viruses were generated using hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase genes derived from either A/Vietnam/1203/2004 (Vietnam rgH5N1) or A/Indonesia/05/2005 (Indonesia rgH5N1), with the remaining seven gene segments derived from A/PR/8/34 (H1N1).”
In plain terms: they spliced bird flu proteins from Asian outbreaks onto a lab H1N1 backbone.
That’s a lab-born hybrid that doesn’t exist in nature.
The very definition of engineered pathogen creation.
Inflammatory Collapse
The experiments revealed catastrophic immune reactions:
“Vaccinated AG129 mice demonstrated significantly higher levels of IL-6, IL-1β, the regulatory cytokine IL-10, and the neutrophil-attracting chemokine KC (CXCL-1) compared to vaccinated A129 mice.”
This translates to runaway lung inflammation—a cytokine storm–like collapse that mirrors the reportedly lethal immune overactivation seen in severe flu and COVID cases.
The Authors
Here are all of the authors, some also holding affiliations in South Korea:
Ki-Hye Kim
Hye Suk Hwang
Youri Lee
Yu-Jin Jung
Eun-Ju Ko
Jae Min Song
Sang-Moo Kang.
But all of them are affiliated with Georgia State University in Atlanta, which you can contact here.
Bottom Line
The paper proves two damning facts:
Engineered bird flu hybrids were built in a U.S. lab with help from South Korea, using reverse genetics.
These constructs triggered lethal inflammatory outcomes when combined with vaccination.
This is not preparation, but orchestration.
It’s the same pattern we saw before the COVID-19 pandemic, now being repeated with bird flu.
This isn’t isolated “basic science.”
It’s a pipeline: build dangerous pathogens, then promote vaccines as the “solution.”
The COVID-19 pandemic was said to have been caused by this very thing.
Prioritizing “control strategies” for backyard poultry systems, early warning systems, vaccination strategies, and biosecurity measures.
In another unprecedented instance of worldwide bird flu pandemic coordination, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) has mobilized “around 500 experts and decision-makers to galvanize multisectoral collaboration and investment” at a three-day meeting in Foz do Iguaçu, Brazil.
The FAO’s latest move comes as scientists in Brazil’s Butantan Institute recently engineered never-before-seen H5 bird flu pathogens using reverse genetics—chimeric lab-built viruses that never existed in nature, created under the banner of “pandemic vaccine preparedness.”
Led by Secretary-General António Guterres of Portugal, the United Nations is a highly influential body that can shape international laws, economies, and policies, as many critics view its push for centralized global governance as a dangerous step toward eroding national sovereignty.
The U.N. exploited its unprecedented power during the COVID-19 pandemic by endorsing harsh emergency measures that led to widespread human rights abuses, including repression, censorship, and excessive force against vulnerable populations under the guise of crisis control.
As this website has exclusively been reporting, Brazil, the United States, Japan, South Korea, Egypt, and several countries in Europe are all coordinating bird flu gain-of-function research, reverse-genetics experiments, and vaccine development.
Together, these developments show a coordinated global apparatus in which the same governments engineering new bird flu pathogens are simultaneously assembling under the U.N. to dictate the vaccines and policies that will follow.
Unprecedented International Bird Flu Mobilization
For the first time in history, the United Nations has staged a worldwide bird flu summit, bringing together hundreds of handpicked government officials, scientists, corporate executives, and bureaucrats in one room to coordinate pandemic policy.
Just like they did before the COVID-19 outbreak with the infamous “Event 201” exercise, conducted by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in partnership with the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
This is unprecedented.
The U.N. has never before convened this level of global multisectoral coordination on avian influenza.
But it confirms my warning that governments and global institutions aren’t just preparing for pandemics—they’re actively building the infrastructure for them.
While the U.S. is telling the public that it’s about “protecting food security” and “backyard poultry systems,” the deeper reality is clear: the very same governments funding bird flu gain-of-function, reverse genetics, and Frankenstein chimera experiments are now organizing the response framework—and pre-positioning vaccines as the solution.
‘Surveillance, Biosecurity, and Vaccination’
This is pandemic planning.
Beth Bechdol, FAO Deputy Director-General, declared: “Failure is not an option.”
What she did not say is that many of the “solutions” already on the table are vaccine campaigns waiting to be rolled out, designed in lockstep with the engineered crisis itself.
The official agenda is revealing:
Targeting backyard poultry systems in low-income countries
Building global early warning systems for outbreak detection
Expanding vaccination strategies as central to control
Hardening biosecurity measures across poultry operations
Integrating animal and human health policy under the U.N.’s “One Health” framework
Locking in surveillance tools for rapid outbreak response.
Brazil’s Agriculture Minister Carlos Favaro praised his country’s “swift and effective response” to bird flu detection earlier this year, framing it as proof of a “credible sanitary system.”
FAO’s Chief Veterinarian Thanawat Tiensin doubled down on the vaccine-surveillance model, saying: “Improved surveillance, biosecurity, and vaccination when appropriate… are keys to controlling this disease.”
Bottom Line
This was not just another conference.
The U.N. has openly staged a first-of-its-kind global command center for bird flu, aligning governments, corporations, and scientists under one pandemic framework.
While labs around the world continue to manufacture the threat through reckless genetic engineering, the U.N. is setting the stage for mass-coordinated countermeasures—vaccines and surveillance systems—before the next intentional or accidental outbreak even begins.
Shot hijacks human cells to churn out “heterotrimeric” hybrid spikes—Frankenstein chimeras made of Wuhan and Omicron parts never found in nature.
A new preprint published August 19, 2025, in bioRxiv reveals that a Gates Foundation–funded team at Caltech, Gladstone Institutes, and Acuitas Therapeutics has engineered a self-amplifying mRNA vaccine platform that doesn’t just code for spike protein—it forces human cells to self-replicate the RNA instructions and churn out entire enveloped coronavirus-like particles (eVLPs).
Who & Where
The study was conducted by Chengcheng Fan, Alexander A. Cohen, Kim-Marie A. Dam, Annie V. Rorick, Ange-Célia I. Priso Fils, Zhi Yang, Priyanthi N. P. Gnanapragasam, Luisa N. Segovia, Kathryn E. Huey-Tubman, Woohyun J. Moon, Paulo J.C. Lin, Pamela J. Bjorkman, and Magnus A. G. Hoffmann, with affiliations at Caltech, Gladstone Institutes (UCSF), University of Washington, UC Berkeley, and Acuitas Therapeutics in Vancouver.
Funding disclosures make it explicit:
“These studies were funded by … Gates Foundation INV-034638 (P.J.B.) and INV-056219 (M.A.G.H.).”
That means Bill Gates’ foundation bankrolled this self-amplifying virus-factory vaccine.
Self-Amplifying & Whole Virus Design
Unlike first-generation COVID shots, this platform is designed to keep copying itself inside the cell—leading to higher, longer-lasting output.
Self-amplifying vaccines not only instruct the body’s cells to make the coronavirus spike protein—like the original mRNA COVID vaccines do—but they also instruct cells to make an enzyme that makes “copies of the original strand of RNA.”
This process leads to the production of even more spike protein within the body than first-generation mRNA COVID jabs produce.
Purported “benefits” of samRNA include extended duration (time) and magnitude (amount) of spike protein creation, a “strong” immune response, and requiring a smaller dose than original mRNA jabs.
The new study comes on top of Yale University School of Medicine’s discovery that spike protein from the original jabs can linger in the body for 709 days—when, earlier in the COVID pandemic, health authorities told us the spike protein only stays in the body “up to a few weeks.”
The authors of the new Gates-funded preprint describe their work this way:
“We recently developed the ESCRT- and ALIX-binding region (EABR) mRNA vaccine platform, which encodes engineered immunogens that induce budding of enveloped virus-like particles (eVLPs) from the plasma membrane, thereby resulting in presentation of immunogens on cell surfaces and eVLPs.”
This means the injected RNA doesn’t just make spike once—it replicates, keeps instructing, and drives cells to bud off whole coronavirus-like shells.
Far more viral material is created inside the body compared to regular mRNA jabs.
The implication: If standard mRNA already triggered spike toxicity and DNA contamination concerns, self-copying versions exponentially magnify those risks.
Cells Turned Into Virus Factories
The experiments confirmed that mammalian cells, when hit with this design, shed whole synthetic viral particles:
“To verify that the designed constructs induce eVLP budding, HEK293T were transiently transfected … After 48 hours, transfected cell supernatants were harvested, and eVLPs were purified by ultracentrifugation.”
Translation: In the lab, the vaccine instructions reprogrammed cells to manufacture and release entire pseudo-coronaviruses.
Novel Hybrid Spikes Created
Even more alarming, when two versions of spike were included (Wuhan + Omicron), they fused into brand-new hybrid proteins:
“Co-expression of ancestral Wu1 and Omicron S in the same cell could result in the formation of S heterotrimers consisting of Wu1 and Omicron S protomers.”
That means the vaccine doesn’t just make past spikes—it fabricates chimeric coronavirus spikes never seen before in nature.
Confirmed by Cryo-EM
This wasn’t theoretical modeling.
Cryo-electron microscopy reportedly directly showed the new synthetic hybrids:
“Single-particle cryo-EM analysis confirmed … trimerized HT2 and HT3 S proteins … These data demonstrate heterotrimeric S formation for soluble forms of SARS-CoV-2 S proteins.”
In other words, scientists actually imaged the new hybrid coronavirus spikes generated by the vaccine platform.
The Bigger Picture
This Gates-funded research is not isolated.
As my previous investigations have shown, governments and global foundations are already bankrolling self-amplifying mRNA (sa-mRNA) platforms worldwide.
Japan has already approved one (ARCT-154), and the Biden administration handed Gritstone Bio a $433-million contract to advance its own self-copying jab.
These vaccines are said to be “more efficient.”
But the reality is they extend duration and magnitude of spike production inside the body.
Cambridge University scientists already warned that first-gen mRNA is misread 10% of the time, producing rogue proteins in one-third of recipients.
If self-amplifying vaccines magnify those errors, the risks grow exponentially.
Bottom Line
Gates Foundation money funded an mRNA vaccine that self-replicates and programs cells to manufacture entire coronavirus-like particles.
This goes far beyond spike: cells become virus factories, producing synthetic hybrid spikes never found in nature.
Combined with the self-amplifying mechanism, the body isn’t just briefly making spike—it’s pushed into prolonged production of whole pseudo-viruses.
Bill Gates’ fingerprints are now on a technology that forces the body to churn out entire synthetic coronaviruses, amplified from within.
A new peer-reviewed study published today in Autoimmunityhas confirmed that both Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna’s mRNA COVID-19 injections are contaminated with enormous quantities of DNA fragments—billions to hundreds of billions per dose—with Pfizer’s product uniquely containing the SV40 promoter-enhancer, a viral genetic element long associated with cancer concerns.
The study was authored by Dr. David J. Speicher, Dr. Jessica Rose, and Dr. Kevin McKernan.
The startling findings come as Pfizer’s own confidential safety data show serious injuries clustering in blood, immune, and neurological systems—the exact three human DNA fragments built into its vaccine plasmid, raising the possibility that plasmid integration is driving the very harms now dominating the safety signal.Subscribe
If you value this reporting, consider upgrading to a paid subscription.
Residual DNA Found in Every Vial Tested
The contamination was not limited to a few batches.
The authors make it plain:
“Residual DNA was detected in all 32 vaccine vials surveyed.”
Every single dose they tested had measurable DNA contamination.
Levels Exceed FDA & WHO Limits by Up to 627-Fold
The FDA and WHO set a maximum limit of 10 ng of DNA per dose.
These vaccines blew through that ceiling:
“Using fluorometry coupled with RNase A digestion, all products tested exceeded the guidelines for residual DNA set by the FDA and WHO of 10 ng/dose by 36–627-fold.”
Translation: These vaccines didn’t just skirt the limit—they shattered it, with up to 627 times more DNA than allowed.
Pfizer Contains SV40 Promoter—Linked to Gene Activation & Cancer
One of the most alarming discoveries: only Pfizer vials contained the SV40 promoter-enhancer, a sequence designed to push DNA into cell nuclei and drive gene expression.
“The SV40 promoter-enhancer-ori (0.25–23.72 ng/dose) was only detected in Pfizer vials.”
The SV40 promoter is not an inert bystander—it’s a nuclear targeting element used in gene therapy and flagged in past studies as tumorigenic.
This means Pfizer doses deliver cancer-linked viral DNA elements directly into patients’ cells, wrapped in lipid nanoparticles.
Billions to Hundreds of Billions of DNA Fragments Per Dose
This isn’t just a little DNA dust.
We’re talking staggering numbers:
“These data demonstrate the presence of 1.23 × 10^8 to 1.60 × 10^11 plasmid DNA fragments per dose encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles.”
That’s hundreds of billions of DNA molecules in each injection, not floating free but packaged in lipid nanoparticles designed to deliver genetic material into human cells.
Pfizer’s DNA Exceeds Limits in Multiple Lots
While Moderna’s DNA fragments stayed within FDA limits by qPCR, Pfizer repeatedly broke through:
“When tested by qPCR, all Moderna vials were within the regulatory limit, but 2/6 Pfizer lots (3 vials) exceeded the regulatory limit for the SV40 promoter-enhancer-ori by 2-fold.”
So Pfizer’s contamination isn’t hypothetical—it’s verified above-regulatory limits.
DNA Fragments Are Protected, Not Degradable
If these were just naked DNA fragments, they’d be destroyed quickly.
But because they’re wrapped inside lipid nanoparticles, they’re shielded from breakdown and can enter cells efficiently.
The authors stress:
“This study emphasizes the importance of methodological considerations when quantifying residual plasmid DNA in modRNA products, considering increased LNP transfection efficiency, and cumulative dosing presents significant and unquantified risks to human health.”
Layman’s terms: these DNA fragments are protected, designed to get into your cells, and regulators never accounted for that risk.
Authors’ Warning
In their conclusion, the authors reaffirm the data “demonstrate the presence of billions to hundreds of billions of DNA molecules per dose in the modRNA COVID-19 products tested.”
They warn that current safety guidelines are outdated and must be revised, urging replication of their findings under strict forensic conditions.
“Our findings extend existing concerns about vaccine safety and call into question the relevance of guidelines conceived before the introduction of efficient transfection using LNPs. With several obvious limitations, we urge that our work is replicated under forensic conditions and that guidelines be revised to account for highly efficient DNA transfection and cumulative dosing.”
The scientists stress that regulators must follow the precautionary principle, prove safety with transparency, and fully disclose how these products are made.
“This work highlights the need for regulators and industry to adhere to the precautionary principle and provide sufficient and transparent evidence that products are safe and effective, and disclose the details of their composition and method of manufacture.”
Bottom Line
Pfizer and Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccines were found to contain massive amounts of residual DNA—far above regulatory thresholds—with Pfizer uniquely contaminated by SV40 promoter-enhancer sequences.
These DNA molecules are packaged in lipid nanoparticles that maximize cell entry, raising the specter of genome integration, cancer risk, and long-term genetic damage.
The authors—Speicher, Rose, and McKernan—are clear: regulators need to reassess DNA safety limits in light of lipid nanoparticle delivery and cumulative dosing, something never done before these products were unleashed globally.
In a significant development within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (RFK Jr.) has dismissed two senior officials following the unauthorized approval of Moderna’s mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (Spikevax) for high-risk children aged 6 months to 11 years. The decision, made while RFK Jr. was on vacation, has sparked debate about internal oversight, vaccine policy reforms, and potential conflicts of interest. This report examines the timeline, key players, public reactions, and broader implications, drawing on recent news reports and social media discussions.
Background on the Vaccine Approval
On July 10, 2025, the FDA granted full approval for Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine for use in vulnerable children, a move that contrasted with RFK Jr.’s ongoing efforts to restrict mRNA vaccine recommendations for healthy youth and pregnant women.
RFK Jr., a vocal critic of certain vaccine practices, had previously removed COVID-19 vaccines from routine schedules for healthy children in May 2025 and dismissed the entire CDC Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) in June 2025. According to sources close to the matter, including vaccine researcher Dr. Robert Malone, the approval was expedited by HHS Chief of Staff Heather Flick Melanson and Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy Hannah Anderson without consulting RFK Jr. or his deputy.
This occurred during RFK Jr.’s absence on a working vacation, leading to accusations of bureaucratic overreach and possible influence from pharmaceutical lobbies. The move initially fueled public speculation that RFK Jr. had softened his stance, prompting backlash from supporters who viewed it as a betrayal of his “Make America Healthy Again” agenda.
The Firings and Immediate Aftermath
Upon returning, RFK Jr. acted swiftly, firing Melanson and Anderson on July 16, 2025, as part of a larger HHS leadership restructuring. Reports indicate the dismissals were directly linked to the unauthorized approval, with one deputy allegedly reacting dramatically by crashing into RFK Jr.’s vehicle in a fit of privileged rage.
RFK Jr. has also reportedly referred the officials for criminal investigation, citing potential misconduct. This action aligns with RFK Jr.’s pattern of overhauling public health institutions, including replacing fired ACIP members with allies and vaccine skeptics. About time! It’s past time to address perceived corruption in regulatory processes.
Public and Media Reactions
The incident has generated widespread discussion on social media and in the press. Supporters praised the firings as a step toward accountability, with calls for further investigations into pharmaceutical ties. Detractors, including public health groups, have expressed concerns over the politicization of health decisions and potential disruptions to vaccine policy.
Implications for Health Policy
This event starkly exposes the relentless undermining of RFK Jr.’s leadership at HHS, where he is besieged by aggressive legal assaults on his bold reforms, such as a federal judge’s outright blockade of critical workforce reductions. Pharmaceutical powerhouses like BIO are waging an all-out lobbying war against him, funneling millions in a blatant bid to derail his agenda and preserve the status quo. Though the approval narrowly survives, it glaringly illuminates the formidable barriers to enforcing genuine transparency and reform amid a bitterly fractured regulatory arena. As RFK Jr. battles on to overhaul vaccine oversight, entrenched stakeholders from every corner clamor for “caution,” ostensibly to safeguard innovation, safety, and public trust—but in reality, often to thwart meaningful change. This saga is far from over, poised for intensified scrutiny, deeper probes, and seismic policy upheavals.
I am expert in influenza, and have consulted with the WHO over the past two decades on the topic of flu vaccines. This is one subject matter I am extremely knowledgeable about. This goes back to my medical school days, when I worked with Robert Lamb, one of the top influenza virus specialists in the world. It extended through much of my career, including my serving as Director of Clinical Influenza Vaccine Research for Solvay Biologicals, in which I oversaw over $200 million in federal (BARDA) alternative (cell-based) influenza vaccine research funding.
What is happening now with “Bird flu” is another psyops campaign being conducted by the administrative/deep state, apparently in partnership with Pharma, against the American people. They know and we know that the “vaccines” being produced will be somewhat ineffective, as all flu “vaccines” are. The government is chasing a rapidly evolving RNA virus with a syringe, just like they did with HIV and Covid-19.
Generally, the currently circulating avian influenza strain in the US does not include any cases of human-to-human transmission. And the current mortality, with over 60 cases identified, is 0%. NOT 50%.
All the while they are getting prepared to roll out masks, lockdowns, quarantines, etc.
All the while getting ready to roll out mRNA vaccines for poultry and livestock, as well as for all of us.
The more they test, the more “Bird flu” (H5N1) they will find. This “pandemic” is nothing more than an artifact of their newly developed protocols to test cattle, poultry, pets, people, and wildlife on a massive scale for avian influenza. In years past, this was not even considered. In the past, the USG did fund a massive testing and surveillance program called “Biowatch.” That program was a colossal failure and a massive waste of money. Billions of dollars.
Of course, these facilities producing the tests have been repurposed from the Covid-19 testing facilities.
Key questions include:
Will we all comply?
Will we be forced to comply?
Will President Trump go along with the PsyWar/psyops campaign again?
We will know soon enough.
As the United States is testing everyone who has even the mildest symptoms for the H5N1 (avian) influenza, guess what – they are finding it! This is what we call in the lab, a “sampling bias.”
Globally, from 1997 until the present, there have been 907 reported cases of H5N1. And in fact, this particular outbreak was not the worst – and it is the only one where a massive testing campaign has occurred. It appears that this is partly due to the new diagnostic capabilities developed and deployed during Covid-19. The more you test, the more you find. But is it clinically significant?
The Case Study of Tetanus: Supply Chain Issues.
The CDC recommends a booster for the tetanus vaccine every 10 years for adults.
However, research published almost a decade ago suggests that the protection from tetanus and diphtheria vaccination lasts at least 30 years after completing the standard childhood vaccination series.
“We have always been told to get a tetanus shot every 10 years, but actually, there is very little data to prove or disprove that timeline. When we looked at the levels of immunity among 546 adults, we realized that antibody titers against tetanus and diphtheria lasted much longer then previously believed.”
-Mark K. Slifka, Ph.D, study author
This research, published in a highly reputable journal, suggests that a revised vaccination schedule with boosters occurring at ages 30 and 60 would be sufficient. As this was published in early 2016, the US government, at the very least, could have commissioned easily designed prospective and retrospective studies to confirm these results. And those results would have been published by now, with the tetanus adult schedule revised to reflect what is now known about the durable immunity of tetanus and diphtheria vaccines. Reducing the boosters to just two shots would save the government vast sums of money.
Not only that, but both the tetanus and diphtheria vaccines carry risks for adults. It is estimated that 50%–85% of patients experience injection site pain or tenderness, 25%–30% experience edema and erythema. Higher preexisting anti-tetanus antibody levels are also associated with a higher reactogenicity rate and greater severity (reference).
Anaphylaxis after tetanus vaccination represents a rare but potentially serious adverse event, with an incidence of 1.6 cases per million doses. That means if 100 million adults receive the booster every ten years, 320 cases of anaphylaxis will be avoided over the 30-year period – from those two boosters being eliminated. Tetanus has always been a “rare” disease, spread through a skin wound contaminated by Clostridium tetani bacteria, commonly found in soil, dust, and manure. Before vaccines were available, there were about 500 cases a year, with most resulting in death. Concerns about vaccine-associated adverse events when immunizations were performed at short intervals led to a revision of the tetanus/diphtheria vaccination schedule in 1966 to once every 10 years for patients >6 years of age.
It has recently come to my attention that the traditional stand-alone tetanus vaccine (TT) that one used to receive as an adult has been discontinued due to WHO recommendations. Their reasoning being:
Use of TTCV combinations with diphtheria toxoid are strongly encouraged and single-antigen vaccines should be discontinued whenever feasible to help maintain both high diphtheria and high tetanus immunity throughout the life course.
The CDC blames the shuttering of the only plant producing TT for the current lack of a stand-alone TT vaccine.
Now, in order to get a booster tetanus shot, an adult must take the following.
Td: Sanofi’s Tenivacprotects against tetanus and diphtheria. Given to people 7 years and older as a booster every 10 years. *A version also includes pertussis (eg DPT), but due to the risk of encephalitis, it is not recommended as a booster.
Why is the DPT combination vaccine discouraged in adults due to encephalitis risk, but is it recommended for children? Another one of those inconvenient issues that plague the CDC-recommended childhood vaccine schedule.
While supplies of diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis (Tdap) vaccines (Sanofi’s Adacel and GSK’s Boostrix) aren’t limited, they are more expensive, and a very small fraction of patients can develop encephalopathy (brain damage) from the pertussis component.
In the United States, diphtheria is virtually non-existent, with only 14 cases reported between 1996 and 2018. Of those cases reported, most were from international travelers or immigrants.
The market for a stand-alone TT vaccine vanished worldwide due to WHO recommendations to stop the sales of the TT vaccine. Which was due to the relatively few, economically stressed countries where diphtheria is still an issue. So, therefore, the only facility manufacturing the TT vaccine was shut down within the last year.
The blowback from the WHO recommendations is that now there is a shortage of tetanus and diphtheria (Td) vaccine in the United States, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website.
This all comes down to poor planning. And illustrates why supply chain issues and infectious disease countermeasure stockpiles are essential considerations for governments.
The good news is that unless one is immunosuppressed, most of us have almost lifelong immunity against tetanus and diphtheria.
My recommendation is that unless one gets a very deep and dirty puncture wound and has not had a tetanus shot in over ten years or longer, avoid that booster.
Here is the ugly secret about influenza vaccines. They are given to protect one group of vulnerable people. Those who are immunosuppressed, and that cohort includes the very elderly.
If those influenza vaccine manufacturing plants only make enough vaccines for those susceptible to a severe case of the flu, there would not be enough of a market to sustain their production costs. Furthermore, if there were a pandemic of some sort of highly pathogenic influenza, there would not be sufficient capacity to make enough vaccines to meet demand.
Egg-based influenza vaccine production requires super “clean” eggs; about 100 million “clean” fertilized eggs are needed annually for vaccine production in the US alone. Candidate vaccine viruses are injected into the eggs. If the process is shuttered, the whole production comes to a screeching halt. Many vaccines can be stored for long periods. Even as long as a decade. This stockpiling system works well for DNA viruses with a low mutation rate. Stockpiling is rarely a solution for vaccines developed for RNA viruses that mutate rapidly.
Therefore, the influenza vaccine is pushed on the American people year after year. As a way to maintain “warm base manufacturing” and ensure sufficient market size to support industrial operations.
I have spoken on this subject at the WHO and US government agencies, as well as many, many conferences. Unfortunately, because the mRNA and RNA vaccine platforms require a lot of freezer space (commonly -20°C) to stockpile for even short periods, this limits the ability to stockpile. Furthermore, the frozen storage requirements are only for up to 6 months. That means stockpiling for more extended storage is not currently done, and it is back to square one on the supply chain issue.
The issue with freezer space and mRNA vaccines is one that most likely won’t be solved. This benefits the manufacturers of this vaccine technology – the US government has an endless need for new vaccines as the old ones expire.
My small hope is that the mRNA platform will be too costly to justify its continued use, as appeals concerning safety (or lack of) seem to fall on deaf FDA ears.
In the meantime, don’t believe the hype generated by ex-officials from the Biden and Trump administrations.
Both Dr. Lena Wen, CNN correspondent, and Dr. Redfield, ex-director of the CDC, have gone on to mainstream media shows and promoted the narrative that the case fatality rate for avian influenza is over 50 percent. This, frankly, is a lie that the WHO is promoting. Bird flu generally is not tested for when someone has flu symptoms. When an outbreak of avian flu occurs on a poultry farm, testing of farm workers who are seriously ill will commence. This has led to the generation of the 890 case reports since 2003. Of those seriously ill patients reported to the WHO, over 50 percent died.
This is not an actual case fatality rate of avian flu around the world. It is, again, a sampling error due to a tiny data set derived from those who are at greatest risk due to general health. And just like the WHO reported on an exaggerated case fatality rate for mPOX, which was also based on a sampling error, or for Covid-19, again a sampling error, it is now used to justify psychological bioterrorism on the world population. Please don’t fall for it.
El Gato Malo on X succinctly points out that Dr. Leana Wen and her public health ilk are advancing:
1. Do more of the same lousy testing used in Covid-19 to overstate a disease and cause panic.
2. Develop another non-sterilizing non-vaccine that does not work to be pushed on “the vulnerable.”
3. Doing it “right now” under EUA, so whoever makes these tests and jabs can cash in and be shielded from liability.
4. Claiming that proxies like “triggers antibody production” demonstrate clinical clinical efficacy.
It’s just one last smash-and-grab for cash before the Brandon administration ends. Anyone who falls for this one will truly fall for anything.
Question: what are Leana’s conflicts of interest? Who is paying her or giving her grants?
For those that haven’t viewed Dr. Redfield speaking of the avian flu case fatality rate, have a watch below. It is genuinely shocking. This fear-mongering comes from an ex-director of the CDC. Shame on him.
Frankly, it reminds me of the 51 intelligence officials claiming that Hunter Biden’s laptop was fake.
One has to wonder what conflict of interest motivated him to say this on national TV?
Remember in the US, there have been 62 cases of avian influenza discovered, and all but one case were very mild.
This deep dive into the supply chain issues is meant to show that public health has put itself into a groupthink situation that it can’t escape.
Many solutions to this quandary do not involve an evermore expanding schedule of vaccinations, stockpiled for some future use. I have some general thoughts before I sign off.
The use of early treatments via safe, proven drugs is a good solution.
We now have many antibiotics to treat bacterial infections. Vaccines do not always need to be our first defense.
Our medical system is very good at treating infectious diseases. The risks from such diseases are much less than it once was. People do not have to live in fear of infectious disease. I like to ask people, how many people do you know have died of flu? If you know of any (I don’t), how old were they?
The need to scare people into more and more vaccines is a dangerous trend.
And yes, the more vaccinations one receives, the more likely an adverse event.
Vaccinating pregnant women and babies should always be a last resort.
It is time for Congress to rethink the vaccine liability laws.
The House Oversight Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic released a 520-page report yesterday, detailing the findings of the subcommittee’s investigation concluded after its two-year investigation into the COVID-19 pandemic. It is the most thorough review of the pandemic conducted to date. This report ensures COVID-19 accountability and serves as a roadmap for the U.S. to prepare for and respond to future pandemics.
It is beyond damning, names names and references criminal acts. People are calling for a Nuremberg-type trial to prosecute the main players for crimes against humanity.
The final report is titled, “After Action Review of the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Lessons Learned and a Path Forward.” (Below)
This final report will serve as a road map for Congress, the Executive Branch, and the private sector to prepare for and respond to future pandemics. Since February 2023, the Select Subcommittee has sent more than 100 investigative letters, conducted more than 30 transcribed interviews and depositions, held 25 hearings and meetings, and reviewed more than one million pages of documents. Members and staff have exposed high-level corruption in America’s public health system, confirmed the most likely origin of the pandemic, held COVID-19 bad actors publicly accountable, fostered bipartisan consensus on consequential pandemic-era issues, and more. This 520-page final report details all findings of the Select Subcommittee’s investigation.
“This work will help the United States, and the world, predict the next pandemic, prepare for the next pandemic, protect ourselves from the next pandemic, and hopefully prevent the next pandemic. Members of the 119th Congress should continue and build off this work, there is more information to find and honest actions to be taken,” wrote Chairman Wenstrup in a letter to Congress. “The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted a distrust in leadership. Trust is earned. Accountability, transparency, honesty, and integrity will regain this trust. A future pandemic requires a whole of America response managed by those without personal benefit or bias. We can always do better, and for the sake of future generations of Americans, we must. It can be done.”
On Wednesday, December 4, 2024, at 10:30am, the Select Subcommittee will hold a markup of the final report and officially submit the report to the Congressional record. Ahead of the markup, the Select Subcommittee will also release additional supporting materials and recommendations.
The full, 520-page final report can be found here and below. Here’s a summary of the staggering information contained within:
The Origins of the Coronavirus Pandemic, Including but Not Limited to the Federal Government’s Funding of Gain-of-Function Research
COVID-19 ORIGIN: COVID-19 most likely emerged from a laboratory in Wuhan, China. The FIVE strongest arguments in favor of the “lab leak” theory include:
The virus possesses a biological characteristic that is not found in nature.
Data shows that all COVID-19 cases stem from a single introduction into humans. This runs contrary to previous pandemics where there were multiple spillover events.
Wuhan is home to China’s foremost SARS research lab, which has a history of conducting gain-of-function research at inadequate biosafety levels.
Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) researchers were sick with a COVID-like virus in the fall of 2019, months before COVID-19 was discovered at the wet market.
By nearly all measures of science, if there was evidence of a natural origin it would have already surfaced.
PROXIMAL ORIGIN PUBLICATION: “The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2” publication — which was used repeatedly by public health officials and the media to discredit the lab leak theory — was prompted by Dr. Fauci to push the preferred narrative that COVID-19 originated in nature.
GAIN-OF-FUNCTION RESEARCH: A lab-related incident involving gain-of-function research is most likely the origin of COVID-19. Current government mechanisms for overseeing this dangerous gain-of-function research are incomplete, severely convoluted, and lack global applicability.
ECOHEALTH ALLIANCE INC. (ECOHEALTH): EcoHealth — under the leadership of Dr. Peter Daszak — used U.S. taxpayer dollars to facilitate dangerous gain-of-function research in Wuhan, China. After the Select Subcommittee released evidence of EcoHealth violating the terms of its National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) commenced official debarment proceedings and suspended all funding to EcoHealth.
New evidence also shows that the Department of Justice (DOJ) has opened an investigation into EcoHealth’s pandemic-era activities.
NIH FAILURES: NIH’s procedures for funding and overseeing potentially dangerous research are deficient, unreliable, and pose a serious threat to both public health and national security. Further, NIH fostered an environment that promoted evading federal record keeping laws — as seen through the actions of Dr. David Morens and “FOIA Lady” Marge Moore.
The Efficacy, Effectiveness, and Transparency of the Use of Taxpayer Funds and Relief Programs to Address the Coronavirus Pandemic, Including Any Reports of Waste, Fraud, or Abuse
COVID-19 RELIEF FUNDING: Federal and state governments had significant lapses in coordination, were unprepared to oversee the allocation of COVID-19 relief funds, and failed to sufficiently identify waste, fraud, and abuse of taxpayer dollars during the pandemic.
PAYCHECK PROTECTION PROGRAM: The Paycheck Protection Program — which offered essential relief to Americans in the form of loans that could be forgiven if the funds were used to offset pandemic-era hardships — was rife with fraudulent claims resulting in at least $64 billion of taxpayers’ dollars lost to fraudsters and criminals.
FRADULENT UNEMPLOYMENT CLAIMS: Fraudsters cost the American taxpayer more than $191 billion dollars by taking advantage of the federal government’s unemployment system and exploiting individuals’ personally identifiable information.
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION (SBA) FAILURES: $200 million of taxpayers’ dollars were lost as a result of the SBA’s inability to conduct proper oversight, implement internal controls, and ensure fraud protection measures were enacted.
TRANSNATIONAL FRAUD: At least half of the taxpayer dollars lost in COVID-19 relief programs were stolen by international fraudsters.
COVID-19 RELIEF FUNDING OVERSIGHT: Expanding relief programs that lacked proper oversight functions exposed severe vulnerabilities in the system and paved the way for fraudsters, international criminals, and foreign adversaries to take advantage of taxpayers.
The Implementation or Effectiveness of Any Federal Law or Regulation Applied, Enacted, or Under Consideration to Address the Coronavirus Pandemic and Prepare for Future Pandemics
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION (WHO): The WHO’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic was an abject failure because it caved to pressure from the Chinese Communist Party and placed China’s political interests ahead of its international duties. Further, the WHO’s newest effort to solve the problems exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic — via a “Pandemic Treaty” — may harm the United States.
SOCIAL DISTANCING: The “6 feet apart” social distancing recommendation — which shut down schools and small business across the country — was arbitrary and not based on science. During closed door testimony, Dr. Fauci testified that the guidance, “sort of just appeared.”
MASK MANDATES: There was no conclusive evidence that masks effectively protected Americans from COVID-19. Public health officials flipped-flopped on the efficacy of masks without providing Americans scientific data — causing a massive uptick in public distrust.
LOCKDOWNS: Prolonged lockdowns caused immeasurable harm to not only the American economy, but also to the mental and physical health of Americans, with a particularly negative effect on younger citizens. Rather than prioritizing the protection of the most vulnerable populations, federal and state government policies forced millions of Americans to forgo crucial elements of a healthy and financially sound life.
NEW YORK PANDEMIC FAILURES: Former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo’s March 25 Order — which forced nursing homes to accept COVID-19 positive patients — was medical malpractice. Evidence shows that Mr. Cuomo and his Administration worked to cover up the tragic aftermath of their policy decisions in an apparent effort to shield themselves from accountability.
Evidence suggests Mr. Cuomo knowingly and willfully made false statements to the Select Subcommittee on numerous occasions about material aspects of New York’s COVID-19 nursing home disaster and the ensuing cover-up. The Select Subcommittee referred Mr. Cuomo to the DOJ for criminal prosecution.
TRAVEL RESTRICTIONS: President Trump’s rapidly implemented travel restrictions saved lives. During Dr. Fauci’s transcribed interview, he unequivocally agreed with every travel restriction issued by the Trump Administration. This testimony runs counter to the public narrative that the Trump Administration’s travel restrictions were xenophobic.
COVID-19 MISINFORMATION: Public health officials often spread misinformation through conflicting messaging, kneejerk reactions, and a lack of transparency. In the most egregious examples of pervasive misinformation campaigns, off-label drug use and the lab leak theory were unjustly demonized by the federal government.
The Biden Administration even employed undemocratic and likely unconstitutional methods — including pressuring social media companies to censor certain COVID-19 content — to fight what it deemed misinformation.
The Development of Vaccines and Treatments, and the Development and Implementation of Vaccination Policies for Federal Employees and Members of the Armed Forces
OPERATION WARP SPEED: President-elect Trump’s Operation Warp Speed — which encouraged the rapid development and authorization of the COVID-19 vaccine — was highly successful and helped save millions of lives.
COVID-19 VACCINE: Contrary to what was promised, the COVID-19 vaccine did not stop the spread or transmission of the virus.
RUSHED COVID-19 VACCINE APPROVAL: The FDA rushed approval of the COVID-19 vaccine in order to meet the Biden Administration’s arbitrary mandate timeline. Two leading FDA scientists warned their colleagues about the dangers of rushing the vaccine approval process and the likelihood of adverse events. They were ignored, and days later, the Biden Administration mandated the vaccine.
VACCINE MANDATES: Vaccine mandates were not supported by science and caused more harm than good. The Biden Administration coerced healthy Americans into compliance with COVID-19 vaccine mandates that trampled individual freedoms, harmed military readiness, and disregarded medical freedom to force a novel vaccine on millions of Americans without sufficient evidence to support their policy decisions.
NATURAL IMMUNITY: Public health officials engaged in a coordinated effort to ignore natural immunity — which is acquired through previous COVID-19 infection — when developing vaccine guidance and mandates.
VACCINE INJURY REPORTING SYSTEM: Vaccine injury reporting systems created confusion, failed to properly inform the American public about vaccine injuries, and deteriorated public trust in vaccine safety during the COVID-19 pandemic.
VACCINE INJURY COMPENSATION: The government is failing to efficiently, fairly, and transparently adjudicate claims for the COVID-19 vaccine injured.
The Economic Impact of the Coronavirus Pandemic and Associated Government Response on Individuals, Communities, Small Businesses, Health Care Providers, States, and Local Government Entities
BUSINESS IMPACTS: Federal and state governments imposed mandatory lockdowns that were the primary cause of temporary and permanent business closures. More than 160,000 businesses closed due to the pandemic — with 60% of those closures classified as permanent. For the businesses that stayed or re-opened, the lack of supply chain diversity exacerbated pandemic-era challenges and deepened existing disparities.
HEALTHCARE IMPACTS: America’s healthcare system was severely damaged by the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients experienced a decreased quality-of-care, longer wait times, shorter medical appointments, and missed diagnoses.
WORKER IMPACTS: Unemployment rates surged to levels not seen since the Great Depression. Overly broad mitigation measures — including the now debunked “6 feet apart” guidance — disproportionately impacted sectors with low wage earners.
FEDERAL RESERVE: The Federal Reserve’s aggressive, early, and unprecedented response to the COVID-19 pandemic prevented a severe economic downturn. This continued approach also contributed to staggering inflation.
The Societal Impact of Decisions to Close Schools, How the Decisions Were Made and Whether There is Evidence of Widespread Learning Loss or Other Negative Effects as a Result of These Decisions
COVID-19 SCHOOL CLOSURES: The “science” never justified prolonged school closures. Children were unlikely to contribute to the spread of COVID-19 or suffer severe illness or mortality. Instead, as a result of school closures, children experienced historic learning loss, higher rates of psychological distress, and decreased physical well-being.
CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION (CDC) INFLUENCE: The Biden Administration’s CDC broke precedent and provided a political teachers organization with access to its scientific school reopening guidance. Former CDC Director Rochelle Walensky asked the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) to provide specific language for the guidance and even went so far as to accept numerous edits made by AFT.
AFT INFLUENCE: Schools remained closed longer than necessary because of AFT’s political interference in the CDC’s school reopening guidance. AFT is a political union, not a scientific organization, that advocated for mitigation efforts that prolonged school closures — including an automatic closure “trigger.”
Testimony revealed that AFT President Weingarten had a direct telephone line to contact former CDC Director Walensky.
LONGTERM IMPACTS: Standardized test scores show that children lost decades worth of academic progress as a result of COVID-19 school closures. Mental and physical health concerns also skyrocketed — with suicide attempts by 12-17 year-aged girls rising 51%.
Cooperation By the Executive Branch and Others with Congress, the Inspectors General, the Government Accountability Office, and Others in Connection with Oversight of the Preparedness for and Response to the Coronavirus Pandemic
HHS OBSTRUCTION: The Biden Administration’s HHS engaged in a multi-year campaign of delay, confusion, and non-responsiveness in an attempt to obstruct the Select Subcommittee’s investigation and hide evidence that could incriminate or embarrass senior public health officials. It appears that HHS even intentionally under-resourced its component that responds to legislative oversight requests.
ECOHEALTH OBSTRUCTION: EcoHealth President Dr. Peter Daszak obstructed the Select Subcommittee’s investigation by providing publicly available information, instructing his staff to reduce the scope and pace of productions, and doctoring documents before releasing them to the public. Further, Dr. Daszak provided false statements to Congress.
DR. DAVID MORENS: Dr. Fauci’s Senior Advisor, Dr. David Morens, deliberately obstructed the Select Subcommittee’s investigation, likely lied to Congress on multiple occasions, unlawfully deleted federal COVID-19 records, and shared nonpublic information about NIH grant processes with EcoHealth President Dr. Peter Daszak.
NEW YORK OBSTRUCTION: New York’s Executive Chamber — led presently by Governor Kathy Hochul — redacted documents, offered numerous illegitimate privilege claims, and withheld thousands of documents without an apparent legal basis to obstruct the Select Subcommittee’s investigation into former Governor Cuomo’s pandemic-era failures.
fox files 
Recent Comments